The Tender For Law

Oct 06, 2013

Michael Of-House Gantzer

Oct 06, 2013

Am I reading this right? I am reading the Constitution for the State of Arizona and Article 2 Section 26 reads " The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men." Corporations are not authorized to employ "an armed body of men", but "City of" and the "State of" have both been incorporated...thus are Officers are unconstitutional... Any thoughts? — Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 635 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 7

Chip Douglas

Oct 07, 2013 4:19 AM

Chip Douglas Unlike police/peace officers, Municipal Policy/By-Law Officers do not take an oath to do their job. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael Of-House Gantzer

Oct 07, 2013 4:49 AM

Michael Of-House Gantzer Anyone that holds an office takes an oath, but not those working for the officers...is that what you mean?. All Police Officers are Municipal employee's. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

David Johansen

Oct 08, 2013 6:29 AM

David Johansen your mistaking the constitution for a constitution. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael Of-House Gantzer

Oct 08, 2013 6:58 AM

Michael Of-House Gantzer I overstand your statement only because I DO comprehend what your saying. I am only stating it this way to express it in their language (legalese). I am not a Constitutor...as I did not sign the "Constitution". AAAaaannd, according to the case cited below, the SCOTUS agrees with me. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael Of-House Gantzer

Oct 08, 2013 6:58 AM

Michael Of-House Gantzer http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j& q=&esrc=s&source=web... http://google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2& cad=rja&ved=0CDUQFjAB&url=http://www.scri www.google.com — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

David Johansen

Oct 09, 2013 4:37 AM

David Johansen i have been a firm promoter of that case for some years. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

David Johansen

Oct 09, 2013 4:49 AM

David Johansen not overstand, review. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 636 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.