Hey guys, this is my first post on this page, none of you know me but I have read most of your information :) just got a quick question for anyone with a spare second. I've just received my first two letters from HM Revenue & Customs (UK tax office), the first thing I notice is that my name on both letters is in full capital letters, kind of made me laugh. The question is, do I return them to sender (no contract) or write them a letter in response asking for proof of why I am obliged to pay tax? (El Spaniardo style) Decisions decisions, this could be fun. Any info would be very much appreciated, thank you :)
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 685 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.Filter by poster
Read Comments 12
Harold Austerman
you tube-the Power of an Affidavit,Billy Faust!!! also snoop around in here, goto File below the Header!!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 685 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Is this the video? It's the only one that comes up when I search that... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWtbSOgta_8
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 685 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.
Harold Austerman
ALL TRUTH IS SPOKEN IN AFFIDAVIT FORM!!! ALSO FRAUD NULLIFIES THE CONTRACT, RESEARCH THE 4 REQUIREMENTS OF A LAWFUL CONTRACT!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Is consideration one of these 4 points? They want me to pay them tax but what do they give me in return? Nothing. Does this make the contact invalid? Sorry I'm learning :) haha, thanks for your help man, will watch the video and do some reading
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Phillip Prater
who do they want to pay it? YOU? who is the YOU? maybe you should ask his administrator or talk to a great administrator named Pierre Eleveneightfivetwo.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
They want YOU to buy this debt, and act as surety for it....now, do you want to do this Damon RealDha Herrod ????
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
This debt has been sent to the person you happen to have in your pocket
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Well to my knowledge they are trying to attach a debt to the legal PERSON (who I may happen to have in my pocket?), I am also aware that tax is statutory which is only a corporate regulation, not law, and as the administrator of the ''person in my pocket'' I do not wish to, nor do I have to enter into any form of contract with HMRC. I have the right and the power to decline any contract I am confronted with, and to be coerced into signing said contracts would make it an unlawful contract. I hope that I am on the right path haha
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
They are not trying, they are sending a debt to the person you happen to have in your pocket........so ask them to disclose to you, all methods available for you to administrate that debt, and tell them that you are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the person you happen to have in your pocket.....
You have 2 choices,
1). BUY this debt and pay for it
2). Find where is the surety of that person, and discharge that debt via that surety.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Man O'man Man · Wit Ness
Damon, I read your initial post carefully, thoroughly, repeatedly and quite literally. You have failed in communicating what the contents of the 2 letters from them contains. There is a rather large assumption being made between you "received 2 letters" and "have to pay." Perhaps sharing the wording would help.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 687 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
If i'm honest, I haven't even opened the letters, I am aware that I am very close to paying tax, as I have earned near enough the minimum amount required in my place of work before having to pay tax. I didn't open the letters as I thought it may be a good idea to just return them to sender without even bothering to read it, as the name on the letter is for the person in my pocket and as the sole authorized administrator I do not wish to contract with the corporation in any way, which includes reading their junk mail. But you're right, I am just jumping to conclusions, I suppose it's just a good time to get some information on the worst case scenario of me having to pay any forms of tax :) sorry if it was misleading in any way
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 687 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Man O'man Man · Wit Ness
No worries mate.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 687 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 12
Harold Austerman
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685 · cut by a page break
Harold Austerman
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686 · cut by a page break
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Phillip Prater
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Man O'man Man · Wit Ness
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687
Damon FlaxDubz Herrod · Damon RealDha Herrod
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687
Man O'man Man · Wit Ness
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687