The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Dec 20, 2013 2:40 PM

Damon FlaxDubz HerrodDamon RealDha Herrod

Hey guys, this is my first post on this page, none of you know me but I have read most of your information :) just got a quick question for anyone with a spare second. I've just received my first two letters from HM Revenue & Customs (UK tax office), the first thing I notice is that my name on both letters is in full capital letters, kind of made me laugh. The question is, do I return them to sender (no contract) or write them a letter in response asking for proof of why I am obliged to pay tax? (El Spaniardo style) Decisions decisions, this could be fun. Any info would be very much appreciated, thank you :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 685 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 12

Damon FlaxDubz HerrodDamon RealDha Herrod

Is this the video? It's the only one that comes up when I search that... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWtbSOgta_8

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 685 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 685 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Harold Austerman

ALL TRUTH IS SPOKEN IN AFFIDAVIT FORM!!! ALSO FRAUD NULLIFIES THE CONTRACT, RESEARCH THE 4 REQUIREMENTS OF A LAWFUL CONTRACT!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Damon FlaxDubz HerrodDamon RealDha Herrod

Is consideration one of these 4 points? They want me to pay them tax but what do they give me in return? Nothing. Does this make the contact invalid? Sorry I'm learning :) haha, thanks for your help man, will watch the video and do some reading

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Damon FlaxDubz HerrodDamon RealDha Herrod

Well to my knowledge they are trying to attach a debt to the legal PERSON (who I may happen to have in my pocket?), I am also aware that tax is statutory which is only a corporate regulation, not law, and as the administrator of the ''person in my pocket'' I do not wish to, nor do I have to enter into any form of contract with HMRC. I have the right and the power to decline any contract I am confronted with, and to be coerced into signing said contracts would make it an unlawful contract. I hope that I am on the right path haha

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

They are not trying, they are sending a debt to the person you happen to have in your pocket........so ask them to disclose to you, all methods available for you to administrate that debt, and tell them that you are the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the person you happen to have in your pocket.....

You have 2 choices,

1). BUY this debt and pay for it

2). Find where is the surety of that person, and discharge that debt via that surety.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 686
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 686 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Man O'man ManWit Ness

Damon, I read your initial post carefully, thoroughly, repeatedly and quite literally. You have failed in communicating what the contents of the 2 letters from them contains. There is a rather large assumption being made between you "received 2 letters" and "have to pay." Perhaps sharing the wording would help.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 687 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Damon FlaxDubz HerrodDamon RealDha Herrod

If i'm honest, I haven't even opened the letters, I am aware that I am very close to paying tax, as I have earned near enough the minimum amount required in my place of work before having to pay tax. I didn't open the letters as I thought it may be a good idea to just return them to sender without even bothering to read it, as the name on the letter is for the person in my pocket and as the sole authorized administrator I do not wish to contract with the corporation in any way, which includes reading their junk mail. But you're right, I am just jumping to conclusions, I suppose it's just a good time to get some information on the worst case scenario of me having to pay any forms of tax :) sorry if it was misleading in any way

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 687
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 687 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top