"this bill of exchange has been commenced by the City of Montreal for PIERRE DAOUST, because they ASSUME that PIERRE DAOUST is too ignorant to do it, so they commenced it…they are the BENEFICIARY party to this bill of exchange, and PIERRE DAOUST is the DRAWER party to this bill of exchange."
That section confuses me...Is the second PIERRE DAOUST meant to be you Pete?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 7, page 788 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 7, page 788 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.