The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Dec 02, 2013 11:43 PM

Gail Marie

I'd like to start a discussion on the effect of a lien on the legal name has on things like mortgages, cars etc. I'm feeling a bit cloudy in my comprehension of a few things still....If there is a mortgage in the persons name for example, bringing the house into the trust would be opening up the private trust to the public so we don't want that. Say there is a willingness on the part of the corporation to continue to pay the mortgage....

Does the corporation send notice the bank that it will be paying that debt monthly and that will take care of it? Is there anything needed to be known when it comes time to renew the mortgage (the corporation will be the customer of the bank this time)

I'd like to start a discussion on the effect of a lien on the legal name has on things like mortgages, cars etc. I'm feeling a bit cloudy in my comprehension of a few things still....If there is a mortgage in the persons name for example, bringing the house into the trust would be opening up the private trust to the public so we don't want that. Say there is a willingness on the part of the corporation to continue to pay the mortgage.... Does the corporation send notice the bank that it will be paying that debt monthly and that will take care of it? Is there anything needed to be known when it comes time to renew the mortgage (the corporation will be the customer of the bank this time)
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 897 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 54

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I think you can have your bank take the payments out of any account you WISH... YOUR PERSON is responsible for it. Same with insurance. I told my ins co I wanted the payments taken out of a different account and they said they didn't care which account, as long as they could sell me some debt :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 897
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 897 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

once you lien the legal name the credit for the person is trashed, I'm not sure if banks do a credit check to renew or not, but if they did, then I guess the corp would have to buy the house and get their own mortgage for it?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 898
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 898 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Newp... as long as the payments are made. Beverly's credit is COMPLETELY FUCKED... and the mortgage was up in sept but they called me in april to renew... cause they wanted a signature...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 898
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 898 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

None of these entities care which account and/or who is buying, as long as someone buys their debt...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 898 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 898 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Gail Marie

my understanding shaun (and am testing myself and hope to be corrected if I'm wrong)....is the legal name is a construct of the legal system (they have legal title)...not the lien...we are equitable title holders providing the equity to the legal name and the govt is a trust not a person...which means there is nothing they can do?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 899
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 899 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

The person will RENT the house, and pay the corp., so yes, utility bills is for the person :D .....and since the person is liened, the corp. gets to ADMINISTRATE for it, and charges a FEE to the beneficiary :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 899
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 899 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shaun Hamer

Jurisdiction again, I guess, I suppose the lien is a tool that can be used in admiralty and in common law.

Im of the understanding a private prosecution is brought under common law jurisdiction, as it is not brought by the Crown. Perhaps a double barrel approach with the P.P. in place to ensure common law jurisdiction and commanding they do their fucking job as public trustees

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 899
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 899 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Wal-Mart is a person, and its name is Wal-Mart, so therefor WAL-MART is the LEGAL NAME....

PIERRE DAOUST is a person, its name is PIERRE DAOUST, so therefor the LEGAL name of the person I happen to have in my pocket is PIERRE DAOUST

So now, what's the difference between PIERRE DAOUST and the person ???

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 900
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 900 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

hmm I need to look at my notes, maybe I misunderstood at some point but thought I remembered seeing something about which was appropriate to use for the lien...'legal name' or 'person' maybe i misunderstood something

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 900
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 900 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Thinking out loud here......(watch out). GAIL MARIE B******* is a Person being administrated by YOU. But, GAIL MARIE B******* can be administrated by CORP 123456789 with the director of that corp being CORP 987654321 which is directed by YOU. or maybe there is one too many "liability limitations" in there....but you get the point

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 901
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 901 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

It would be a conflict of interest one thinks for gail Blackman lien to herself... A trusted third party is the solution. Plus the lien gives you equitable title. Equity rules. So the lien transfers equitable title into the Asset ledger of the corporations books, until such time as satisfaction is achieved, legally as directed by corporate charter. It becomes corporate property until the matter is settled as DIRECTED... Not theirs yours ... get it? :-D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 901
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 901 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Hold on.....I just got another thought. "Thinking out loud here......(watch out). GAIL MARIE B******* is a Person being administrated by YOU. But, GAIL MARIE B******* can be administrated by CORP 123456789 with the director of that corp being CORP 987654321 which is directed by YOU. or maybe there is one too many "liability limitations" in there....but you get the point"

Can CORP 123456789 be the director of CORP 987654321 and in turn, the director of CORP 987654321 be CORP 123456789?

Or maybe just enlarge that sphere too.....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 902
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 902 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top