The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Nov 26, 2013 3:37 PM

Anibal Jose BaezMackximus Minimus

Besides THE BIG PICTURE here for me of WHY is it that Dean LIED, if we go to trivial-imaginary-world talk, Dean said many LIES.

He said you can use the name, and/or "a trust that has already been set-up for us ". That's is a LIE, and also FRAUD in the imaginary world of make believe, that has become REAL for many of us, who have helped maintain this shit.

At the same time he talks about the AUTHOR, having the authority. Of the creator, having control over it's creation. Those are some definitions, from some dictionary we did not created, yet if this is true, how can we have "control" over something WE did NOT created, and have AUTHORITY over something we did not AUTHORED?

He said that the "judges" where there just waiting for us to unchain the handcuffs from them.

???

If we knew the magic words, which meant "to give our terms-and-conditions" of something we did not created.

???

So, according to the same "maxims of law" Dean said exist, it would mean that those are Words THEY CREATED, and we EVIDENTLY have NO CONTROL over them.

He also said that no terms and conditions are attached to the use of legal tender.

???

Really? So you can now create your our terms and conditions, and attached it to something you did not create, therefore, do not control, therefore, is a fucking impossibility, given the "maxims of chimps".

Being nice, or having good intentions, is just part of the programming we have participated, and also been a victim of. But it is evident that in REALITY, that shit of nice and dandy don't fly.

If there were to exist animals that were "nice", and had "good intentions", they would get EATEN by other animals with more KNOWLEDGE in NO TIME. That is a FACT! Oh, wait, there is an ANIMAL that "believes" in things like being "nice", and having "good intentions... us chimps!

Dean (and many of us at some point) is both nice, and with good intentions. Because we have been programmed to think wrong, and to value the wrong things.

"Nice" people, and/or with "good intentions", will not understand me.

At the same time, I have not, nor do I encourage to wish harm upon Dean. I read some comments here that are just plain bullshit. That's the kind of shit people with knowledge, and mean us harm, use against us. We do it upon ourselves.

I wish Dean well.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 105
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 105 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.