The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Dec 24, 2013 3:32 PM

Derek Moran

Dino Quiring What happened in 1982 that altered history for the Nobility?

Scott Duncan Dissolution. The UK CANADA ACT, inter alia.

Scott Duncan Right under your noses too!

They sold it as "rights".

Scott Duncan Lets look at some "word games" since you love that shit so much...

FIRST go HERE and read up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Bill_of_Rights

NOTE THE PREAMBLE: "The Canadian Bill of Rights remains in effect, but its widely acknowledged ineffectiveness[3] was the main reason that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in 1982."

What is not immediately obvious (until I point it out) is that they don't say WHO it was "ineffective" FOR! It was INEFFECTIVE FOR THE GOVERNMENT!

Scott Duncan THIS was the last of the RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT PROTECTIONS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_government

Scott Duncan THIS IS ALL THE SHIT THAT IT IS YOUR DUTY TO KNOW if you want to do anything about the current state.

Scott Duncan IT IS YOUR FAULT THAT YOU DO NOT KNOW THIS.

IT IS YOUR FAULT THAT YOU GET DECIEVED

Scott Duncan Let me drive that point home again...

NOTE THE PREAMBLE: "The Canadian Bill of Rights remains in effect, but its widely acknowledged ineffectiveness[3] was the main reason that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in 1982."

What is not immediately obvious (until I point it out) is that they don't say WHO it was "ineffective" FOR!

A LIE OF OMISSION that would make Menard proud!

Scott Duncan ALL of this shit is worthless if you DON'T KNOW WHO YOU ARE.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 8, page 522 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 8, page 522 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.