Nov 15, 2013 11:07 PM

Besides the default response of: We recommend that you consult with a lawyer of your own choosing in order to be informed of your legal rights regarding this matter,

I liked the hidden nugget in Q51:

Q51. I have a birth certificate issued by a Canadian province; can I request that the Government of Canada pay my debts?

A. The birth certificate is not a property of the Government of Canada and it is not an instrument to request payment by the Government of Canada of any Debt incurred under your name. It is an official document issued by a Provincial Government giving details of a person's birth. For any information or to voice any concerns regarding a birth certificate, please consult the Provincial Government where the birth certificate was issued.

Feel free to remove the shitstain if one is created, but here's my logic:

The birth certificate is not (a) property of the Government of Canada...but it appears that they acknowledge it is a form of property.

It is an official document issued by a Provincial Government...so they are the creator and signatory/surety.

So in that instance, the Government of Canada is not surety (they didn't create and/or sign the thing, the province did), so send the BofEs to the provincial treasury cos they deal with the BofEs associated with the person...or am I reading too much into that answer? ;-)

I wonder what the response would be if Qs 45 to 55 were addressed to the Provincial Department responsible for issuing the BC and/or the treasury of the province.

I received a similar response from the Reserve Bank of Australia (equivalent to Bank of Canada), but the NSW Treasury have not responded to similar questions, even though most of those questions are in accordance with the Public Trustees Act of NSW (the NSW Dept of Births Deaths and Marriages issue the BC in NSW)...still more learning to do.

Hi Pete Daoust where can I get that info. Q44 to Q54?

Well, you click on the link Rita Real :-\

oh yes..thank you Pete Daoust

Q46: Can I declare being two people for tax purposes ?

You got to be kidding me !, They really put this on their website, :-o

And here is their answer : You are not two people for tax purposes. For more information, see Canada Revenue Agency warns Canadians about tax protester schemes.

Oh, thanks, I am not two people for tax purposes......what a great information that is, two people ? what the fuck is that mean ?

People definition is a bunch of PERSONS, so who the fuck could even think of being two persons ?....Man if what I have posted here, dosen't PROVE to you that these fucking PUBLIC SERVANT goals is only to create confusion/controversy...!!!....well, I don't know what will :/

Seriously, read them Q44 to Q54, and think about it.....it's fucking hilarious :D

Are you REALLY a PEOPLE ?......calisse :(

people. (usu. cap.) (180i) The citizens of a state as represented by the prosecution in a criminal case

I am a Man with a penis, and I am alive, and will be dead one day. NOTHING ELSE.........hellossss.. !!! :D, I am NOT a fucking Individual, or citizen, or aggregate :D , or voter, or PEOPLE.......the person I happen to have in MY pocket is all that shit, not me :P

Use Man and/or Woman to define you and others......do NOT use ANYTHING else.....seriously !

People Legal Definition.

The aggregate of the individuals who comprise a state or a nation.

In a more restricted sense, as generally used in Constitutional Law, the entire body of those citizens of a state or a nation who are invested with political power for political purposes (the qualified voters).

Doing some research... I came across the word: Civilian. ci·vil·ian (s-vlyn) n. 1. A person following the pursuits of civil life, especially one who is not an active member of the military, the police, or a belligerent group. 2. A person who does not belong to a particular group or engage in a particular activity. 3. A specialist in Roman or civil law. adj. Of or relating to civilians or civil life; nonmilitary: civilian clothes; a civilian career.

Interesting food for thought...