The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Nov 07, 2013 6:19 AM

Daniel J Wentz

I am in the PACIFIC FUCKING OCEAN, and I am spending a shit-load of money on my crappy data plan to read this fucking group.

Honestly, this is the only thing worth reading these days. Nothing else has any content. It's an expensive habit. I hope you all appreciate it. I have been experiencing withdrawal symptoms while I've been on the high seas. The bill will almost be worth it.

That is all. Carry on.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 950
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 950 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_584381008264502
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02021762657264E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 7

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

One does concur and recognizes the Sovereignty of Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Windsor and/or The Admiral (s). It has been thought provoking, even as an exercise in confirmation for ones own satisfaction, not that I doubt anything presented here, confirmation and the study of history and discussions with The Sovereignty of this Forum have given me much to think about. All due respect. It is still the main of my focus to deciding what truly the next step for one is. For now, I do not know enough.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 950
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 950 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Does one have the correct entity in The Queen presented in above post? One wishes to recognize the correct one, the One who admits to not being an administrator or law maker is the preferred. The New Westminster speech Queen... What is the correct protocol for such things? Naval Tradition stems from the Admiralty and the implementation of the first Admiral upon hiring privateers licensed by The Actual Queen of that era about 500 years ago... is this actual history? Is it relevant?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 951
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 951 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top