Nov 07, 2013 12:28 AM

Hey, I can bring a bunch of those MAYORS to you....with their crime list....

Perfect analogy Tara!

I've said it before, I'll say it again: Fattest crackhead I've EVER seen! :p

Now that you mention it, I'm surprised he didn't use his obesity as a defense. As in, "Come on people, look at the size of me! Have you ever seen a really fat crackhead?" https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152019029164083&set=a.10150968527014083.479277.784724082&type=1&theater

"A Charter of Expectations promotes STANDARDS among PUBLIC SERVANTS and informs the public about what they can EXPECT from public employees...The MISSION of the Toronto Public Service...is to SERVE a great city and its PEOPLE. The Toronto Public SERVICE fosters a corporate culture that sets the HIGHEST STANDARD of INTEGRITY, PROFESSIONALISM, and ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR."

http://www.toronto.ca/employment/life_tps/values.htm

TRUE STORY: while the City of Toronto SERVES the PEOPLE (hmm- they kinda make it sound like WE'RE 'the Masters,' huh?)

..their BY-LAWS however, apply/are applicable to- a 'PERSON'

Oh, i forgot to point out...the City of Toronto just so happens to use THREE separate definitions that they have for the term PERSON! ;)

LOL - just noticed this! Here is the last post i put-up on Councillor Josh Matlow's page, i say LAST as in- before he BANNED ME at some point since yesterday-evening...so much for 'FREEDOM OF SPEECH! ;)

Josh Matlow Yesterday via Twitter (Tuesday, November 5, 2013 - i added this part)

Our focus must be on working to ensure our city is run well & we deliver on Toronto's priorities. Honesty & accountability will prevail.

Like · — @JoshMatlow on Twitter — Share

21 people like this. Derek Moran " Honesty & accountability will prevail".....and when it doesnt- see number TWELVE:

108. Trials without jury

(2) The issues of fact and the assessment of damages in an action shall be tried without a jury in respect of a claim for any of the following kinds of relief:

1. Injunction or mandatory order.

2. Partition or sale of real property.

3. Relief in proceedings referred to in the Schedule to section 21.8.

4. Dissolution of a partnership or taking of partnership or other accounts.

5. Foreclosure or redemption of a mortgage.

6. Sale and distribution of the proceeds of property subject to any lien or charge.

7. Execution of a trust.

8. Rectification, setting aside or cancellation of a deed or other written instrument.

9. Specific performance of a contract.

10. Declaratory relief.

11. Other equitable relief.

12. Relief against a MUNICIPALITY.

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90c43_e.htm#BK147

Yesterday at 7:11pm — Like

and it looks like he still has teeth... :-D

Yes, but you're missing one very simple factor...money. It's only the crackheads that actually have to pick between buying crack or buying oh, EVERYTHING ELSE.

Only RICH crackheads are fat and have great teeth.

Tara doesn't write nearly enough. She just covered everything there is to know about Toronto's mayor. I knew nothing of the guy, and now I think I can speak comfortably on the subject.

Both Scott and Tara should write books. I'd buy them all. :D

This forum is amazing. I have ventured onto other forums to learn more about Admiralty law, having done so, To me there is no better class room then here. I have applied what I have learned and bumbled my way to being what I am which is way better then what I was.

..yeah- thats a great idea Daniel, Scott mentioned about doing a children's book!

*Derek is going to run-out and Trademark 'Fucks the Puppy' bright-and-early tomorrow morning*

Do as you wish Derek, but be ready to receive visit of "Fuck the Puppy" is personal tax collectors ! :D ....gotta pay these taxes :D

Wasn't he a notorious Buffet Rapist also????

I want to write screenplays for Child porn, as well as Children's books...

...seriously, the target audience can barely read. How hard can it be to write porn for them? :|

I didn't even know children watched porn! The writing opportunities abound! :D

Man, she's got a way with words! Whenever I start reading anything Tara writes, I can't stop reading it until I finish. I would definitely buy a book by her.

She's currently writing the Rob Menard meets Aquilae Chronicle.

We won't be charging anything for that. :D

Whenever I start reading anything Tara writes, I get lost in some black holes ! :D

I know the Secret Handshake-So you Slaves shutup and Slave On!!!!

All Rob Ford has to do now is, get caught in a hotel with a prostitute and lot's of cocaine, go to jail for six month while persistent rumours lurk about him regularly getting bj's from a female prison staff member, and he just might end up as popular as Marion Barry. It would help put Canada on the map! :P There's still hope.

White Marion Barry, will do it! Have faith! :D

Here's an excerpt from the Waters 'Law of trusts in Canada' text:

" SPECIAL trusts can be further divided into those where the trustee duties are MINISTERIAL or administrative, and those where they are DISCRETIONARY or DISPOSITIVE. Ministerial or ADMINISTRATIVE duties are those involved in the RUNNING OF the trust, for example the keeping of accounts, hiring agents like SOLICITORS and VALUERS. Discretionary duties may be dispositive in the case of the POWER to maintain out of income, or to ENCROACH on capital, for a beneficiary with a FIXED CONTINGENT capital interest, or DISTRIBUTIVE, as with a POWER OF APPOINTMENT. Distributive powers given to trustees require them to ALLOCATE the trust property among class appointees of the power. The power may be a TRUST POWER, or, a MERE power."

If the above post sounds familiar, thats cuz its briefly touched on in the 'The Municipal Councillor's Guide' put out by the Province on pg.49:

Trust Funds

Trust funds are funds held in trust by municipalities. An example would be funds held on behalf of residents of homes for the aged. Trust funds are not generally accounted for as part of a municipality’s assets. A municipality acts as a trustee for such funds.

http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4965

..my hubris is 'breathtaking' ;)

A video has popped up that shows Ford, in a drunk rage, go on about wanting 15 minutes alone with someone to kill them. More videos are bound to turn up offering other drunk moments.

Is what we have right now Scott, the Government operating a DISCRETIONARY and/or SPRINKING TRUST with us, as they "SPRINKLE" trust property to us currently as they see fit?

Derek Moran... Look at yourself and where you are in life.

Got the image/feeling? GOOD! :D

Know that this is your fate. You will ALWAYS be in this state. ALWAYS. This is as sure as the sun rising in the East tomorrow.

Why? Because your love of bullshit will anchor you there.

These are strangers imposing their will on you. nothing else. You have NEVER examined that one fact. You just focus on the scribblings of strangers.

I WRITE LAW. I ADMINISTER law, and I OWN COMMERCIAL PERSONS... I have a need to know this stuff.

...you don't. You don't have a Navy, the last time I checked. I do.

...you do not have officers/trustees that you are LEGALLY and LAWFULLY responsible for. I do.

At this moment, here in reality, you are a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far. So am I.

What we have in common DIVIDES RIGHT THERE.

Thinking like ME is WRONG FOR YOU. You are NOT me. I am.

You are wasting the ONLY value you have... YOUR FUCKING TIME, on the scribblings of strangers.

Think about that.

"One... ahh, two... ahh, multiple suspects." - Rob Ford

The creator of Calvin & Hobbes also wants Scott Duncan to know something about Derek Moran...and that he stopped caring about what people thought of him a very, very, very, VERILY long time ago - oh, and thank you for all the valuable information you have shared with all of us since you started this page, Scott :)

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1325692/thumbs/o-WATTERSON-900.jpg?6

"Rob Ford has “lost the moral authority to lead,” says Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong"

Interesting, i didnt know Mister Denzil-Minnan Wong had the AUTHORITY to decide that...BY WHAT AUTHORITY Mister Wong, have you DARED to decide that "YOU" have ANY authority, to make ANY such decision on behalf of the PEOPLE that voted Mayor Ford IN?...just as the City of Toronto is as a whole usually, you too are- ULTRA VIRES! :D

http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2013/11/05/rob_ford_crack_scandal_councillors_to_strip_mayor_of_power.html

Oh- better question, HOW exactly did Mayor Ford GAIN this alleged "moral authority" TO BEGIN WITH again?

I always assumed he ate it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBMS2rr8pPw

owe the company boys www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKnm9SNosDU then maybe WE cn NETwork

This Denzil-Minnan Wong guy.....in the Navy, would this be the equivalent of a Captain trying to tell his Admiral what to do, Scott?

This court-case goes to show the potential of just how DUMB a City Councillor can be:

"Conclusion

[42] The City’s application to the court is premature. The City must first exhaust its appellate remedy under MFIPPA. This approach ensures the integrity of the scheme the legislation establishes to determine information access rights. It will also provide any future court reviewing the decision of the Commissioner with a full evidentiary record, including the Commissioner’s findings. This court will therefore not hear the application."

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2011/2011onsc1495/2011onsc1495.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAMImNvbW1vbiBsYXciAAAAAAE

Because you are 'all-things-Admiralty,' Scott- do these piss-ant City Councillors have the authority in ANY WAY to strip the CHIEF MAGISTRATE of the City of his powers to be the Mayor that he was voted to be by THE PEOPLE??

Non omne quod lied honestum est: Not everything that is lawful is honorable; not everything that is allowable is morally right

SPOILER ALERT - Useless info ---> SNL is doing a skit on Rob Ford tonight. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151969805374280&set=a.134804584279.105789.51570824279&type=1&theater

Buffet Rapist -opinion!!!!

SPOILER ALERT - Useless info ---> SNL's skit on Rob Ford. http://www.newstalk1010.com/news/2013/11/17/watch-snl-impersonates-mayor-rob-ford-in-opening-skit

Are you implying Harold Austerman, that Mayor Ford is in police custody?

Attempt at Humor!!!! Buffet Rapist???????

You IMPLIED that Mayor Ford has been taken into police custody. Thats not an attempt at humour, that is posting misleading information on this page. One thing ive learned about this page, is that the creator of it gets pretty pissed-off easily at ANY misleading information thats posted on it.

that's why he liked it!!!! CHILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you even FROM Toronto?

"in custody"...for raping buffets...

CLEARLY a humourous, tongue-in-cheek remark.

Harold, the editing was NOT necessary.

Well...hummm, ok, nevermind :D

I didn't want to Invoke the Wrath of the Admiral!!!! Then I remembered he Liked it!!! ;) Whewwww!

There's a distinct difference between lying, and being facetious.

The moment Mayor Ford was elected (by the people, and not appointed by the piss-ant City Councillors), former Councillor Howard Moscoe boasted openly about how the other Councillors will not let him be able to- "pass gas, without asking for the permission of the other Councillors first"...between the Mayor Miller-loyalist-holdovers and the Toronto Star, its been a fucking-witchunt the likes of which i dont think i will ever see in my lifetime again

Your TORONTO Mayor is a little pussy, compare to Quebec State's Mayors :P (well, maybe a medium pussy :D )

Smoking Crack VS stealing hundreds of millions ...HAHAHA!!!!...

Whats even more unbelievable Pierre, is just 2 hours away from us down the 401 in London, Ontario, the Mayor of that City is ACTUALLY up on criminal charges. He might be guilty, he might be innocent. But not a PEEP about him, and you dont hear about his Councillors running to the Premier to 'pass-a-law' that makes its more convenient for them not to have to FOLLOW the current so-called-laws they are BOUND by.

Look at the pic where he's smoking crack, several folks of Middle Eastern Dissent, could this be a Mossad Setup??? Or is my Tinfoil Hat to tight!!!

I didnt vote for George Smitherman because he admitted to doing illegal drugs in the past. I didnt vote for him because he was at the helm the majority of the time a BILLION $ were fucked-away with the E-HEALTH program.

When Mayor Ford was a Councillor, he went on the John Oakley Show every Thursday morning and he spilled-his-guts about all the money, and all the various ways, Mayor Miller was PISSING-AWAY money down at City Hall. They've had the knives out for him ever since.

Kincardine Mayor Larry Kraemer is trying to destroy the Great Lakes with a nuclear waste burial site 1 km from them. People might want to jump on this one instead.... no crack head ever affected my future.... just sayin'... mayor@kincardine.net

I read ALL this, and it makes me think, all this shit must be in relations with SURETIES and ACCOUNTING :D

he from a rich home so he a fat crack head

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/rob-ford-says-he-s-quit-drinking-has-had-come-to-jesus-moment-1.2430801

I wrote to the City's Integrity Commissioner Janet Leiper who is a BENCHER of The Law Society here asking her- "Where exactly can i see the law that actually allows for these City Councillors to strip Mayor Ford of his powers?"

Derek, you may be the ONLY person asking that question. It really is funny to watch as everyone seems to ACT in an EMOTIONAL manner throwing law and rights out the window. Not just in this case, but in general. We need more people asking these questions, seriously!

http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0SO80ZZNIxSt1oAsnFXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzMW1uNmZwBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA2dxMQR2dGlkA1ZJUDMwNF8x/SIG=130jpj3a7/EXP=1384948953/**http%3a//www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/florida-congressman-arrested-cocaine

Chris- if it werent for Dean Clifford, i would've never have had MY "come-to-Jesus" moment- that being..."THATS a PRESUMPTION-of-LAW!...now SHOW me THE LAW"

AM640 here in Toronto has a feature every Wednesday called the 'Legal Panel,' where the two lawyers they have come on spoke solely about this situation and about how BADLY these City of Toronto Councillors have fucked-up in acting arbitrarily and tossing-away Mayor Ford's right-to-due process and bringing the administration of justice into disrepute. The PODCAST of their interview is on their website here if anyone is interested in listening, its about 28 minutes long:

http://www.640toronto.com/

Thanks Derek, but there are some stuff here in Quebec WAAAYYYYY better to watch these days :P

..let me now when they get interviewed by Matt Lauer then ;)

Only Benoit Dutrizac Paul Arcand, Guy Lepage, Guy Lafleur or Yvan Cournoyer and these types of NAMES in here.....nothing that resemble to Matt or Lauer, these names dosen't make sense for us :P

lets not 4get Wayne Gretzski!!!!

"right-to-due process" huh? :D

Derek Moran, you know how I say you waste the only time you get, of what can only generally described as your "life", circle-jerking to clubhouse rules?

Here's where it hits home:

Derek. Please tell us all what "Due Process" is. Be sure to cite your sources, because your ass doesn't count.

...just to "spice it up"; A pulled-out-of-your-ass answer will get you banned. :D

What is "Due Process"?

Whats the proper phrase then, Scott?

"Proper Phrase" for what, Derek?

ohhhhh boy....here we go

Scott Duncan "right-to-due process" huh?

..and im getting you an answer, im looking for it

YOU said that. Not me. I just laughed at it.

Look ALL you want. It doesn't exist.

Is THIS better? *sigh*

Audi alteram partem: Hear the other side . — No one should be condemned unheard.

Due Process doesn't exist?

"Due Process" is a legal WEASEL-WORD CATCH PHRASE. NOTHING ELSE.

You need to plea GUILTY or NOT-GUILTY to have that privillege of DUE PROCESS.... no ???

OH- and thats a MAXIM, of LAW, btw

citation = pg. 1846 of Black's Law Dictionary 9th-edition

Derek, why do you ALWAYS fall back to obscure maxims of a club you aren't part of?

No plea = No process :P

As opposed to WHAT, Scott?

Acts-and-statutes = CLUBHOUSE RULES

Case-Law = CLUBHOUSE RULES

MAXIMS-of-law = CLUBHOUSE RULES

Yes. you are obsessed with those too.

Yup.

So why the obsession? Why are you so fixated on the ways of your rapist?

Are we allowed to defend ourselves with ANYTHING?

I think I need to become the RAPER

"allowed"? You STILL seek "clubhouse benefits"?

Who is this authority you seek leave to be "allowed" to do anything?

I would rather be LEFT ALONE by the state. You of all people know that Scott, that sometimes, they dont let you.

ME...I am the authority!

You need to find who is "GOD" Derek for fuck sakes :D

Muhahahahaha!!!!!

(sorry guys, 20 coffees today, you better put your seatbelt for tonight, in here :( )

"ME...I am the authority!"

Yes Chris, in a perfect world. And if IF's and BUT's were candies-and-nuts, we'd also all have a Merry fuckin' Christmas.

I'll make it simple, Derek.

A government worker comes after you, hunt them down, kill one of their children.

Don't get caught.

Derek, I know it, but I am not good at enforcing it! It sucks really!

In my experience it takes 5 to "correct the system" locally.

Are you fighting something Derek, as we speak ??

What do these "5" do?

Just hold them accountable?

Scott, how about- if DUE PROCESS is the wrong phrase because its a WEASEL-WORD...whats the right wording/phrasing we should be using instead then?

Better question: Is there any issues in your life right now with the government, and/or the justice ??

Right phrasing FOR WHAT? DUE PROCESS? There IS NONE.

Ok.. this is as dumbed down as I can get. It hurts. Pay attention. READY?

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DUE PROCESS. THE CONCEPT. THE NAME. NO SUCH THING.

THERE

IS

NO

SUCH

THING

AS

DUE

PROCESS!

Pete- the CONTEXT, was in use of the phrase "DUE PROCESS" a caller used on a radio-show in Toronto this morning in relation to whats going-on with Rob Ford. Thats it. No intention to MISLEAD anyone here.

IS THAT clear enough? Or do you want another fucking name for this thing that doesn't exist?

OMG referring to the fucking rapist's puppet show is where you are grasping? REALLY?

The context is Rob Ford, Scott- and what City Council did stripping his powers. I AM NOT appealing to any "rapist."

Oh boy.....and it continues.... :-P

really what these lawyers are doing is further spreading deception and the illusion to the masses by sharing that terms "right to due process"...it sounds good, it feels good...people will never know it doesn't really exist...we'll tell them they got it or they didn't ...they won't know the difference...and they will thank me profusely and fill my bank account...signed 'John Doe, Lawyer

I wonder what they would say if questioned.....????

they would ignore and threaten and attack you, directing you elsewhere to try to trap you in controversy and arguing

However, Gail- Mayor Ford, City Council, the Province, etc., are working in a COMPLETELY different 'sphere-of-jurisdiction'...one actually made-up solely consisting of CLUBHOUSE RULES, that apply STRICTLY to THEM...this is not lost upon me

I see this as a D rated clubhouse production, designed to distract the audience from something that they should be watching

...which can all be ignored.

To be safe: If Derek Moran is focused on something, it can be ignored.

I haven't been watching the show, and I never considered the "due process" term, but having it brought to my attention, it does sound familiar, I'm grateful he brought it up, and that Scott responded...new comprehension and learning for me :D

trap you in controversy: I love that shit !!! :D

I personally do not care about what happens to that FAT CRACKHEAD... fuck him, fuck 99% of dolphins and fuck ALL SHITHAWKS!

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma is nearing completion. She will soon serve me. :D

Her programming is coming along nicely. :D

She left me on my own :(

once people recognize your guru status Pete Daoust you'll never be on your own :P

...and Gail still wants me in a naughty way.

all governments are corporations, all corporations have an evil agenda, greed.

Kudos Derek Moran; Keep us posted; I'm curious. Scott has mentioned the social programming/experiment/effort more than once as you know. And although I can't prove it, I suspect that Chris's sentiment that you are one of the few left that has the audacity to ask such questions is correct. My hypothesis is that "they" are curious to discover the limits of just how many of our "powers" we are willing to give up without question.

Thanks Robert. Whether its part of the CLUBHOUSE RULES or not, Godbout v. The City of Longeuil was ruled on by the Supreme Court where they said, not once, not twice, but THREE times, that municipalties enact COERCIVE laws upon the people. If more people knew that, the more confident they'd probably feel with overcoming their fear at pushing-back.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hrSNMx3K00

A metaphor for the club teaching us through their good buddy, the media... Think freedumb movement... and the path it leads too. Being dragged away for protesting, in their play ground... common law isn;'t recognized in their club... So we are taught the four food groups... by seemingly nice people... that mean us HARM.. Strangers... Valuing wrong is demonstrated here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1hEKqZz-OY

Laval, Quebec Mayor....VAILLANCOURT ^^

Here is the MONTREAL ex-Mayor :D

Jane Cellars has taken a break from like-raping my posts, to ask a question! :D

Okey Dokeie! Let's just see what we have here...

"Could you file a complaint against the public servants' bond?"

Er... What?

Complaint? Who am I "complaining" to?

She gets the courage to ask a question, and it's an unintelligible one :(

Those are always disappointing... Like when you're watching Howard Stern, and a girl lifts her skirt (after much coaxing) and it turns out "she" has a penis.

...that's SORT of the feeling I have right now :(

Invoice.. :P

Punitive damages... or would that be penitive?

You're going to complain to them? Do you have a contract with them? Are they causing you harm? Dunn and Bradstreet is a RATING agency (inter allia) and nothing else. they are brokers of data... why would you complain to them?

...if you are blowing a D&B executive, you could theoretically cause a business listing a world of hurt, but that is the only value I see.

Lien it. Claim value from it. (You have to bill them first)

With a tank ? :-\

No tank... With a detailed bill and historical record established by invoicing and accounting by the creation of the fee for service bill, payable/ due upon receipt. You establish a claim to the title of the property in question. If it is done through a trustee administrator ( Much like we are assigned the duty of trustee to a Birth Certificate early in life). Surety resides with the creator, 100%. All the value goes to the surety though the accounting of it. Starting with the implementation of proper notice by invoice.

And of course if you have any other proper notices created, it would be advisable to send them with the bill.

Terms and Conditions in Private = Law. ( Public Notice = Tender for Law) Bill = Joinder Knowledge of meanings and definitions essential.

I guaranty you Bobis, I can remove a public servants' bond with a tank, and it will work :P

I'm pretty sure the Tank method would be effective.

See ? ....fuck, I am not CRAZY !!

Jane Cellars Could you file a complaint against the public servants' bond?

Scott Duncan Could you file a complaint against the public servants' bond?"

Er... What? Complaint? Who am I "complaining" to?

Scott Duncan You're going to complain to them? Do you have a contract with them? Are they causing you harm? Dunn and Bradstreet is a RATING agency (inter allia) and nothing else. they are brokers of data... why would you complain to them?

Jane Cellars How would you remove a public servants' bond?

Scott Duncan Lien it. Claim value from it. (You have to bill them first)

Bobis Youruncle: With a detailed bill and historical record established by invoicing and accounting by the creation of the fee for service bill, payable/ due upon receipt. You establish a claim to the title of the property in question. If it is done through a trustee administrator ( Much like we are assigned the duty of trustee to a Birth Certificate early in life). Surety resides with the creator, 100%. All the value goes to the surety though the accounting of it. Starting with the implementation of proper notice by invoice.

And of course if you have any other proper notices created, it would be advisable to send them with the bill.

Terms and Conditions in Private = Law. ( Public Notice = Tender for Law) Bill = Joinder Knowledge of meanings and definitions essential.