Oct 31, 2013 12:29 AM

Objected, and declared fraud.

Claiming that you made a "motion" is untrue.

You can't "deny" a fact from the bench, nor can the exhibits be ignored.

...and why were you there in the first place?

I was dragged in with cuffs on by the State Police.

Actually, my error....the post should have read Tuesday....Monday I was thre in cuffs

The full story...Monday I got a call from a "potential client" and scheduled an appointment, when I showed up , the "potential customer" identified himself as an agent of the State Police and said he was exercising a warrant. I went Tuesday to enforce what I noticed because I want to be left alone

Haven't you fallen for that already?

once. It took me a week and a half to ask this question

He said "I am treating it as a motion."

Chris: "Are you familiar with the Rules of Recusal?" ;)

I have good reasons to believe that this UNauthorized administrator was not very competent and fair with CHRIS SCHULTE :(

I mean Chris Evan :D

Maybe you should send that guy a TELEGRAM Chris, saying that you have good reasons to believe that he committed fraud that day, by treating the affidavit as motion,

That sounds like a good idea and something for me to make an ordre de jour for tomorrow.

I guess by doing so, you,at least, have something on the record concerning that fuck up......I wonder what Scott Duncan would think of this telegram idea ?

I have sent a telegram once to a justice, it's very fast and accurate, and easy, more costy than a registered mail, but VERY fast....

"potential client" ? what type of business where you doing? Scott Duncan can you tell us why its fraud?

I own a Landscaping service company. The State Police officer called me (got my number from my website) and said he just put his father in a nursing home and needs the place spruce up to get it ready for sale.

Why where you arrested what was you're charge?

The Officer was executing an Arrest Warrant for Failure to Appear in the matter in which I issued already issued an Affidavit with Exhibit A Notice of Mistake and Exhibit B, Birth Certificate.

Then subsequently, he charged me with Operating after Suspension

I didn't argue with the 4 idiots on the side of the road about the Appearance and NAME

I have a couple of questions. I may be in the same situation as Chris and I'd like some suggestions on how to respond. If the courts have received my NoM, affidavit and bc, but the warrant is still out their for my arrest, what should I do now? How should I respond if the police come after me again? How should I respond if I'm in public , at the airport, or on the side of the road and the police are attempting to handcuff me even though these documents have been submitted into the courts but the account has not been settled? Is there something else I should do to settle this matter without appearing in court?

Was there something Chris didn't do correctly that got him arrested and forced to appear in court?

Scott, can "friends of the court" submit affidavits into a "case" that they are not a party of? If so, is registered mail sufficient to get those affidavits filed?

Mackximus, I believe that "friends of the court" can submit anything as "advice" but none of it has to be used as evidence. We went through this in one thread before.

Thanks Beverly! I sure missed that particular subject. If there is a link, or notes, for that thread you want to share, I will appreciate it. Thanks!

I know "friends of the court" INFORM.

What if a "friend of the court" has seen PROOF, that a living man is been MISTAKEN for a NAME? I would think is a DUTY to INFORM the court, perhaps via SWORN NOTICE in form of an Affidavit, of such terrible MISTAKE.

Is this a real possibility, Scott Duncan, or should I put all that back into my ass?

I would say do it anyway... it can't hurt anything...

It can only be disregarded... as likely as the original post here...

IF law is about intent, then how can a third party determine the intent of your affidavit/motion Chris Evan?

As Dean C mentioned previously....repeatedly...the author is the sole authority able to determine intent.

With that in mind, is this a reasonable question to pose?

'Mr Supernumerary, by what authority do you presume to be able to read my mind & determine my intent when it states clearly at the top of the document the document's intent? Or are you volunteering to act as surety in this matter?'

Have you sent the telegram Chris Evan ? :/

Not yet....I am showing David Johanson around Salem....later Pete

No rush....takee your time :D

Lazy administrator :P

Me, I would drop this David Johansen on the side of the street, and run like a CRAZY weirdo to ma office, to ADMINISTRATE that shit :D

Hey, Justice so and so,

I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRIS SCHULTE on that "date", and I have good reasons to believe you've done it WITHOUT authorization, in FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRIS.....

That leads me to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY, I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

:P

Sent via telegram makes it extremely sexy :D

Also consider telling him criminal charges MAY be filed for fiduciary misconduct, dereliction of duty, partiality, abuse of authority and fraud with the police and relevant ombudsman. We do that over here in dk because of the liening barriers, not that the system does anything about it, however the person in question does not like having such reports officially filed in the system with the name attached and to avoid any possible repercussions of said report disappear the case ect...

Oh Blake... what were you like two years ago? :D

Eating virtual steaks in the matrix along with the other batteries...

Good answer... Got any advice for Mackximus on the "friend of the court" question?

Is it in aid of settling the matter? Is there any lawful objection? Is it firsthand knowledge?

So the corruption involved in disappearing cases can work to our own advantage then...cool...I like your style Blake Gardner :D

I'm just not sure if it can be held as fact or evidence...

I dunno Chris, I think of Dean's videos and the fact that there is a TRUST relationship actually going on. I seem to be less disregarded when I reinforce the fact that I only understand that “not that I have much experience in a court. I would keep asking questions because the only thing you understand is that you are beneficiary in this matter... Just don't stop asking questions and DO NOT allow ANY of them be unanswered.

How are my exhibits considered "motions"? — Can you define "motion" so I might UNDERSTAND where you derived this from? — Is that YOUR determination of what I have put fourth?

ie. Any statement that pops up in your head, turn it into a question :D

It is a TRUST situation with a negotiable instrument at stake and they really, really want you to be trustee. Wear them out...

My question about "friend of the court" came as an idea (from deep within my rectum) to compliment the NoM, when "they" seem to ignore it.

I thought that if a "friend of the court" is WITNESS to "fraud upon the court", by letting the court know that he/she has PROOF (a certified copy of the previous documents filed on the record, Affidavit with NoM and BC as Exhibits) that surety, and the legal name derived from public documents are been MISTAKENLY applied to a MAN, perhaps Chris, or others in the same situation, could get more meat on their side to have "them" OBEY the RULE OF LAW.

But again, that is something I pulled out of my ass, I have no idea if it's possible, or even appropriate.

Pete....hows this?

NOTICE FOR CLARICICATION 11/1/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Certified Mail #

Hello Mister Brennan,

An Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case in which you were presiding over. You declared that the Affidavit was a Motion and treated it as such.

Definitions

Affidavit: A written or printed declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, taken before an officer having authority to administer such oath. (From: Law Dictionary: http://thelawdictionary.org/affidavit/#ixzz2jPWgzIoG)

Motion: In practice. An occasional application to a court by the parties or their counsel, in order to obtain some rule or order, which becomes necessary either in the progress of a cause, or summarily and wholly unconnected with plenary proceedings. (From: Law Dictionary: http://thelawdictionary.org/motion/#ixzz2jPX1HqfR

Need for further Clarification:

It seems that if a declaration of facts is submitted into the care of one who has been bestowed the high and honorable title of JUSTICE as well as being a DISINTERESTED third party mediator, then said person should exercise the utmost care and concern when FACTS are declared upon him. It seems that what you did was took a statement of FACTS and converted it into an APPLICATION.

1. Therefore, can you please clarify what your intentions were at the time you made this decision? 2. Can you please indicate how your decision conforms to Massachusetts Code of Judicial Conduct (which may be found here: http://www.mass.gov/cjc/code.pdf)? 3. Can you please explain why your behavior was appropriate and in the best interests of Justice? 4. All of your answers MUST be under your FULL commercial liability AND under the pains of penalty and perjury. Chris can only accept Registered Mail for this communication. All other forms of mail SHALL be disregarded.

Failure to respond shall not end the matter. The matter will be escalated until a FULL resolution and explanation has taken place. You have 10 days to answer these questions, or you will be in DEFAULT.

Thank you, Chris

What ? :/

You can't see the letter I just posted 1 up from your comment?

Yep.....I see that letter....He was NOT presiding fuck all, and he have not declared fuck all :(

He was ATTEMPTING to ADMINISTRATE without AUTHORIZATION, and he took a decision :P

Why in the fuck, everyone is trying to look SHARP in their stuff ? :D

I AM NOT SHARP.....I say it as it is, point final :D

huh? Is giving a man a chance to explain himself wrong?

What Man ? :/

The idiot I am writing to!!!

What EXPLANATIONS you think you will receive ?

You will be bombarded with bullshit (controversy and confusion) or you will be left alone.....nothing else :P

Come on Chris fuck.....let it rip buddy :D

Hey, Justice so and so,

I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRIS SCHULTE on that "date", and I have good reasons to believe you've done it WITHOUT authorization, in FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRIS.....

That leads me to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY, I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

By transforming one of my CREATION into something else Mister justice :P

Fuck you and Fuck off tabarnac Mister Justice :P

If someone is in position of throwing you a right hook right in the face, will you give the MAN a chance and let him throw it ? :/

HHHEEEELLOOSSSSS !!!!! :D

I am NOT a fucking lawyer, I am a MAN and I have a PERSON.......and from what I get from your stuff so far Chris Evan, some dudes is trying to fuck around with CHRIS's surety :P

That would be a good thing to add to your letter Chris Evan

So dear JUSTICE, I suspect and have all the good reasons to believe, that you guys seems to want to fuck around the the person I happen to have in MY pocket is SURETY :P

And it SCARES ME to deaht Mister Justice :P

The TRUTH in your OWN words .....IT FUCKING SCARES ME TO DEATH what you are ATTEMPTING on "ME" and the person I happen to have in my pocket.......what's wrong with SAYING and WRITING it ?

I AM NOT A FUCKING SLAVE......what's wrong with saying it and WRITING it ?

Chris, you are "authorized representative" for Chris... In anything you write, be sure to differentiate that these two are different. I would bring up the TRUST and that you acknowledge his "oath of office" too... just for good measure.

I know that if I would be DOING this to people, and one of them would send doccument to me with these words on it SLAVE, SCARES, SURETY FUCKING AROUND etc....I would begin to think a little bit, and maybe feel some tingglings :D

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma in your opinion should I be the " authorized representative" or claim power of attorney for the Person? I'm concerned with using the word representative.

If I "represent" am I taking on surety?

Now, I will leave Scott clean the stain shit I may have left here.... 8-|

I think "athorized administrator". And I think you are right here Pete. I am pusstfooting around some idiot who works for me. Got it....I will post a revised one later

This letter should take you 3 minutes and 42 seconds to write.....if it gets longer than this, you are just fucking the dog :D

And these guys don't work for "you" ....they work AGAINST "you" and for THEM :P

Ask Dean Otf Kory :D

True story....I wrote a letter to an "unauthorzed administrator" on a wednesday for issuing an arrest warrant after I noticed her where to find the surety and was arrested the following Monday

well in his defense, he did drop me on the side of the street. thankfully it just happen to be where i was also parked! take that B1TcH! LOL

Chris Evan, maybe that LETTER you've wrote, on that wednesday, was too complicated and lead them to confusion and controversy !! :D

Modified:

NOTICE AND DEMAND 11/1/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Certified Mail #

Hello Mister Brennan,

On October 22, 2013, an Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case in involving CHRISTOHER EVAN SCHULTE. I would like to point out that YOU decided to administrate the person CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE by turning an Affidavit into a Motion, thereby took a statement of FACTS and converted it into an APPLICATION. I have good reasons to believe that you have done so WITHOUT authorization. In FACT, I am the Sole Authorized Administrator for CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE. I didn’t create it, I never asked for it, but somehow I became the lawful holder in due course of it, so I am doing my best.

IT SCARES ME TO DEATH to think that you have the power to change the INTENT of MY CREATION in an effort to corner ME into playing the role of SURETY! I, a living man, created a declaration of facts and you changed it! What is going on here? Am I some kind of a SLAVE? Why should I bother stepping into a courtroom ever again if you are going to FUCK around with my FREEDOMS? I can only presume that my SWORN TESTIMONY and intent are not valid in your courtroom, thereby, I, the man, MUST have no business there.

This has given ME good reasons to believe that you fully accepted SURETY in this matter, so as the BENEFICIARY (which is really the only role I can possibly be), I will wait for my check, and let you do the administration, until this matter is completed.

Oh, and for good measure, you can also find the Affidavit in this communication along with 2 EXHIBITS.

Chris can only accept Registered Mail for this communication.

Failure to respond within 5 days to the questions contained in this communication and rebut ANYTHING that isn’t a FACT shall indicate acquiescence of ALL the terms and conditions indicated within the communication.

Thank you,

Chris PS…..I, the living man, am not SURETY for this Account. Would you care to swear under the pains of penalty and perjury that I am???

What does one put in the Affidavit?

Your version of the truth (claims), with supporting evidence...if not rebutted in the designated period (varies eg: 14 days for UK, 30 days in New South Wales), your claims are then established as fact.

"ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" underneath the title. You may want to add NON-NEGOTIABLE, NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

Of course Max! I much prefer being wrong in here....at least you guys won't lock me in a cage!

Should I indicate "or pay with your....wife?"

This is probably known by most, but remember AFFIDAVITS may contain ONLY FACTS, no opinions, allegued violations, or bullshit. Just FACTS.

Take his daughter, if he is a "believer". The Bible/Torah says you can PAY with your daughters. :D

ehhhh....I typically prefer woman older than me. I don't think his daughters would cover it, he looked young. In lieu of proper payment, I can use his wife!

I would retract this.... Why should I bother stepping into a courtroom ever again if you are going to FUCK around with my FREEDOMS?

I, the man, MUST have no business there. : Man don't do business idiot :D

Chris can only ADMINISTRATE Registered Mail for this communication.

PS…..I, the Sole authorized ADMINISTRATOR, am not SURETY for this Account

You talk like these stupid freeman on the land sometimes Chris :D

K thanks Pete

You are MORE than welcome 8-|

commerce is for persons...

Updated...Please offer feedback.

NOTICE 11/4/13 To: Presiding Justice, Honorable Robert A Brennan From: Chris

Registered Mail #7012 1640 0001 1491 8232

Docket # Nothing has been served as of November 4, 2013

Hello Mister Brennan,

Take NOTICE….On October 22, 2013, an Affidavit was submitted into a Court File for a Case involving CHRISTOHER EVAN SCHULTE. Take NOTICE that YOU administrated the person, CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE, by accepting an Affidavit as a Motion in open Court, and thereby took a statement of FACTS and used it as an APPLICATION. IT SCARES ME TO DEATH to think that you think you have the power to change the INTENT of MY CREATION (the BENEFICIARY) in a Public Venue with the apparent intent to corner ME into playing the role of SURETY! This gives ME good reasons to believe that you administrated this WITHOUT authorization. In FACT, I am the Sole BENEFICIARY for CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE and I have NOT given you any AUTHORIZATION. Witnessing that act gives me good reasons to believe that you are the SURETY and TRUSTEE in this matter.

Are you trying to commit FRAUD by cornering me into a fraudulent usufructory agreement under the threat of false arrest and false imprisonment under the Color of Law?

Thank you for acting as TRUSTEE, SURETY, and ADMINISTRATOR in this matter.

Chris BENEFICIARY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NON NEGOTIABLE

PS…..If ANYTHING stated is not true, you may send a sworn statement of FACTS under the pains of penalty and perjury via registered mail to Chris at 300 Andover Street, Suite 120, Peabody, Massachusetts within 5 days. All statements not rebutted shall be considered FACT.

:D

Thank you for acting as TRUSTEE, SURETY, and "UNAUTHORIZED" ADMINISTRATOR in this matter.

I am not even sure the word TRUSTEE should be there....not sure at all :/

If he is a UNAUTHORIZED administrator, he can NOT be trustee.....being trustee would mean he is authorized

I think :(

So I would either ask Scott, or NOT use the word trustee :(

Scott...what do you think?

You can't use the word trustee Chris Evan.....who appointed this no body as a trustee ?.....if there is a trustee in all this, it has to be these idiots that brought this matter in this place.....not this Unauthorized administrator.....it just dosen't make sense....

You MADE statements in court=YOU ARE A SLAVE arguing/in dishonor IN OPEN PUBLIC COURT

FOR FUCK SAKES — STOP MAKING STATEMENTS AND/OR ANSWERING QUESTIONS WHEN SPEAKING TO THE PUBLIC SCUMBAGS, reserve what you wanna assert for your affidavits/notices

As for your notice - you will get no response, for several reasons. You can send whatever you want - just be prepared to STAND behind what you choose to send.

STAND=ASKING FOR PROOF OF CLAIM THAT WHATEVER YOU ASSERT IS NOT SO - incidentally, while making NO statements, answering NO questions and ONLY ASKING questions.

Personally, I’d file the notice/affidavit and go about my life as usual. Fuck those clowns, these “public servants” are only there to fuck you in the ass and refuse to acknowledge anything that wasn’t written by “one of the club”. If they arrest you, just remember you’re the beneficiary of the trust/secured party creditor for the defendant, whatever.. Is the birth certificate NOT a security? Is it not MY security? Is the security/birth certificate not PROOF of the FACT that I AM the beneficiary? Are you not a public servant and thus a public TRUSTEE? What would the minister of justice think of your fraudulent actions? Anyway, you are NOT the trustee/defendant so they cannot hold you forever. Keep asking for proof of claim with questions. Are you suggesting that using a driver’s license turns ME into a fictional character? Is the juristic person NOT a fictional character created by the government? Can you please explain what the fuck, YOU, a PUBLIC TRUSTEE, is doing perpetrating fraud against an honest to goodness beneficiary like me?...

For those of you who insist on making statements in court/questioning/taking to cops/other agents — remember: Depose: The term is usually applied to the deprivation of ALL authority of a sovereign.

Ok, I’m done now· ;)

Thanks!!!! Thats good info!

What if one goes to court as Beneficiary because one wants to find out who is fucking with their SURETY?

What if I go in a bikini to my rapist, and see if I can convince him not to rape me? :D

Really, I just don't want to be cornered on the side of the road again by these idiot....

see chris...i told you what the fuck are you talking to them for?

the road side is not where you deal with this shit..they are MORONS

Here's a question Scott- because we've ALL been in Chris' position and pulled-over by the police at one-point-or-another while TRAVELLING in a car we just happened to have-our-hands-on-the-steering-wheel-of.....where does it even SAY that we have to pull-over for these guys just because they are following BEHIND us with their EMERGENCY-LIGHTS on? :/

The bullets flying over your head will let you know, Derek.

*police officer-to-Derek* "Do you know why i pulled-you-over?"

*Derek-to-police officer* "Hello peace officer- how are you? Actually- i noticed you were tail-gating me and pulled-over on my own, for the sake of BOTH of our SAFETY. But now that you bring-it-up, where EXACTLY as Scott Duncan would say in your "Clubhouse Rules" DOES it say, that i have to pull-over for you because you were following way too closely behind me with your Emergency-Lights on by the way?" :D

What do you mean Rick? I sent Affidavit/Notice of Mistake/Birth Certificate. They issued an Arrest warrant. I issued another Notice of Mistake in response to the Arrest Warrant. They executed the Arrest Warrant. I went to court in cuffs that afternoon and started asking who the Surety was. They locked me up, stifled me, proceeded, etc. What did I do wrong? Why wouldn't they just do this all over again if I, the man, don't go?

I am thinking going there as BENEFICIARY and standing up to them is the best idea, but please.....offer a better idea. I NEVER tried to deal with these idiots on the side of the road, I NEVER answered to the NAME!

Have you sent this telegram to that unauthirized administrator Chris ?

Yes

what did you sign when you were in jail??

you mentioned you sign something....cause you wanted to get out..right?

Recog, Property return form. That is correct!

so they released property to the NAME and you were the authorized signer??

yup....signed V.C. then autograph

Listen....I was in a cage and I didn't want to be there. I figured I could swear out the facts that I was under duress and threatened with unlawful imprisonment to nullify the signatures. Is that correct?

” 3-402. SIGNATURE BY REPRESENTATIVE.

(a) If a person acting, or purporting to act, as a representative signs an instrument by signing either the name of the represented person or the name of the signer, the represented person is bound by the signature to the same extent the represented person would be bound if the signature were on a simple contract. If the represented person is bound, the signature of the representative is the "authorized signature of the represented person" and the represented person is liable on the instrument, whether or not identified in the instrument.

I don't want to be here either... but I am... and I ain't signing anything... because I'm not a pussy.

You "affirmed" that you were a "Person" so they would "allow" you to leave...

...do you see a coward when you look in the mirror? I know I would.

Fuck!

What would have been a better choice?

i told you so.....

they played your ass!!

Thanks Rick!

I know. But I don't even know what game they are playing! It seems like the game is rigged

Silence is Golden.

Do not answer to the name.

You are a kidnap victim. Act like one. Don't co-operate. say nothing. If you are in a bullpen, and they call your name, DON'T ANSWER.

The only thing you say is "I am here against my will, and I wish to leave", not "Ok, I'll be your bitch and assume surety if you let me go".

I kept on getting asked for the NAME on one occasion last year, albeit by a government-security-guard, and every time he did, i would just keep repeating this: "Ummm...are you asking me for the name of the MAN, or, are you asking me for the name of the PERSON?".....he didnt know what the hell i was talking about, but the receptionist at the desk couldnt help but start laughing, cuz she conceded that she knew what i was talking about when i asked her and half-winked at me ;)

Don't play THE game unless you've already won:-)...the rest is just a test of honor, competency and resolve.

Road side cop talk is a waste of time. The last time I was pulled over, I asked 3 or 4 questions only to have the pig reply "Sounds like you wanna argue" I just replied "I'm not gonna argue with some guy packin' a 9mm strapped to his fuckin' hip, do whatcha gotta do" then I shut the fuck up and jumped in the tow truck towing my car away. Point of the story is, pick your battles wisely. These fucking programmed clowns think they have all kinds of authority and it's a waste of time even trying to communicate with them. Save that shit for your paperwork.

...but if you think you can kill one and get away with it, DO IT!

...and post pictures :D

Bump