The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Oct 24, 2013 3:43 PM

Pete Daoust

Sorry to bother”.

I think I understand this SUPRA PROTEST thing correctly :D ? HELLOOSSSS!!!!!

When the person I happen to have in my pocket, receives a Bill of Exchange, I, as a Man, can SUPRA PROTEST that bill of exchange correct ?

So now a MAN, which happen to be “ME”, is FULLY responsible for that debt :D ?

And as a MAN, I can use LAWFUL currency to clear that debt ?, since that these Note is LEGAL tender are for PERSONS :D

Now, LAWFUL currency, mmmhhhh, I have good reasons to believe that POSTAL STAMPS is LAWFUL currency, since that APPARENTLY, it is backed by gold, I goolged that for 2 weeks now, and CANÂT get a clear answer…..Help please ??

But if I am right, which bring this matter hypothetically, and I fucking hate that, but hey…..gotta start somewhere, I, as a man, can use this LAWFUL currency to clear that debt.

Now, what’s a $1 postal stamp can mean in LEGAL tender bank notes ? I guess I am the one who will make this decision :D correct ?

And why should I also use this stupid $0.05 postal stamp on this bill of exchange ?, would it be fair to say it’s to say THANKS to Elizabeth of the House of Windsor ?, because without her, I could not do that SUPRA PROTEST, as a MAN. ?

So, as a man, whatever the LEGAL amount should be, I can and have the right to MATCH it with this $1 LAWFUL currency postal stamps ? :D , unless there is a CONVERSION chart somewhere :D

Of course that bill will become NON-NEGOCIABLE, NON-TRANSFERRABLE, WITHOUT RECOURSE and RETURNED COMPLETED.

WHO could REFUSED that kind of debt discharge ?

Thanks Pete

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 89
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 89 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 57

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

$1.00 stamp = one canadian dollar, period... You are making a incomplete amenable charging instrument, complete and Unamendable. The DOLLAR is the amount the account is settled for... Stamping duty paid over a stamp ( which is the currency of the UPU -Universal Postal Union their jurisdiction) An international currency... not of the jurisdiction of Canada, it falls under international jurisdiction, The 5 cent stamp is duty paid on one dollar... 5% tax... duty. With the existing international agreements in place the postal union has a very powerful internationally recognized currency: the stamps it issues, INTERNATIONAL surety. The mail always runs...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 91
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 91 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

It is $1.00 written as one Canadian dollar it is the value of the stamp ( currency) exchanged for one Canadian dollar... Because it is a stamp and recognized by international treaties.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 91
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 91 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le Blanc

The post office is a currency exchange... It takes currency from one jurisdiction and converts it into another( when you purchase a stamp)... which has a superior claim.. taking you out and protecting you with international guidelines, the courts here are private... it takes their power away... they re bound by themselves

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 92 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 92 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

No you asked a bunch of questions... I attempted to answer... read your questions then look at the answers... it is a way to administrate the person, that removes their legal tender from the equation... I like boobies...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 92
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 92 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

I am approaching this from the Trusts viewpoint... however you are not claiming not to be something, you are not creating controversy, you are settling a debt with established and often forgotten or unlearned accounting practices, whether you are a person, corporation or a Trust, they all can use a process, this is just another process. The Canadian Dollar has been exchanged for a Dollar that is recognized and used globally in commerce ( stamp) is like cash without the surety. It effectively removes you from canadian legal tender ( Cash Dollars)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 93
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 93 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

of course there are repercussions to ones net worth... the value of the debt is reduced to one dollar... Since all money is debt.... no debt= no money... Then again you only need it when you spend it...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 94
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 94 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Derek Moran, "The 5 cent stamp is duty paid on one dollar... 5% tax... duty."

Is this goes to the Queen ?, so she can pay the POSTAL employee with it ?

Where this 5% tax, I guess LAWFUL tax ?....goes ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 94
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 94 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Its is duty paid to the creator of the currency... It goes to the jurisdiction which it was paid in.. To use the currency is to be bound by its laws. the queen doesn't sell stamps and has nothing to do with it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 94 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 94 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chris Evan

"Its is duty paid to the creator of the currency... It goes to the jurisdiction which it was paid in.. To use the currency is to be bound by its laws. the queen doesn't sell stamps and has nothing to do with it."

Duty implies a tax (fee) for crossing jurisdictional boundaries. I think the 5 cent stamp authorizes the "Supra Protest". Correct?

And......Its also my understanding that a Notary is the witness of crossing a jurisdictional boundary (de jure/de facto) in a similar manner.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 95 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 95 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

If you do it right you create your own jurisdiction... country.. fuck... .. straight out of my ass based on a vague recollection of the UPU union thing in the files.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 95
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 95 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Actually....now that I think about it, Jay is right too...the 5 cent stamp would make one party to the Treaty, thereby acting in the capacity of one who can Treatize. And, I am pretty sure that only a sovereign or one holding a position for a sovereign can be a party to a treaty.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 95
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 95 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Well with parliament, govt and the courts along with the church of rome are all intertwined there is no separation of church and state.... these are practices and process's of accounts for accountants by accountants... My sources related to me that this was taught to them by agents of this rome Vatican thing...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 95 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 95 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Blake Gardner

Postal Power

The UPU (Universal Postal Union) in Berne, Switzerland, is an extremely significant organization in today’s world. It is formulated by treaty. No nation can be recognized as a nation without being in international admiralty in order to have a forum common to all nations for engaging in commerce and resolving disputes. That is why the USA under the Articles of Confederation could not be recognized as a country. Every state (colony) was sovereign, with its own common law, which foreclosed other countries from interacting with the USA as a nation in international commerce. Today, international admiralty is the private jurisdiction of the IMF, et al., the creditor in the bankruptcy of essentially every government on Earth. The UPU operates under the authority of treaties with every country in the world. It is, as it were, the overlord or overseer over the common interaction of all countries in international commerce. Every nation has a postal system, and also has reciprocal banking and commercial relationships, whereby all are within and under the UPU. The UPU is the number one military (international admiralty is also military) contract mover on the planet. For this reason one should send all important legal and commercial documents through the post office rather than private carriers, which are firewalls. We want direct access to the authority—and corresponding availability of remedy and recourse—of the UPU. For instance, if you post through the US Post Office and the US Postmaster does not provide you with the remedy you request within twenty-one (21) days, you can take the matter to the UPU.

Blake Gardner

Involving the authority of the UPU is automatically invoked by the use of postage stamps. Utilization of stamps includes putting stamps on any documents (for clout purposes, not mailing) we wish to introduce into the system. As long as you use a stamp (of any kind) you are in the game. If you have time, resources, and the luxury of dealing with something well before expiration of a given time frame, you can use stamps that you consider ideal. The most preferable stamps are ones that are both large and contain the most colors. In an emergency situation, or simply if economy is a consideration, any stamp will do. Using a postage stamp and autograph on it makes you the postmaster for that contract. Whenever you put a stamp on a document, inscribe your full name over the stamp at an angle. The color ink you use for this is a function of what color will show up best against the colors in the stamp. Ideal colors for doing this are purple (royalty), blue (origin of the bond / commercial), and gold (king’s edict). Avoid red [I believe this incorrect, that it should say "black", red is the color of blood and since time immemorial a covenant signed in blood is the highest form of Contract known to men. - Rick] at all costs. Obviously, if you have a dark, multi-colored stamp you do not want to use purple or blue ink, since your autograph on it would not stand out as well if you used lighter color ink. Ideally one could decide on the best color for his autograph and then obtain stamps that best suit one’s criteria and taste. Although a ["Red Fox"] dollar stamp is best, it is a luxury unless one is well off financially. Otherwise, reserve the use of ["Red Fox"] dollar stamps for crucial instruments, such as travel documents. The rationale for using two-cent stamps is that in the 19th Century the official postage rate for the de jure Post Office of the United States of America was fixed at two (2) cents. For stamps to carry on one’s person for any kind of unexpected encounter or emergency use, this denomination might be ideal.

Blake Gardner

Just some Stuff i found - you decide.

Stamps are gold backed by Swiss franks if I remember correctly.

Adz buck o five is simply another constructive contractual setoff remedy. I personally prefer the simplicity of the signature indorsement and addition of the persons estate account number though its more or less the same. A tender for setoff of the account as opposed to controversy...

Rick Carne

to un-create/invalidate another's creation you must have a superior claim/creation much like a superior lien.. evidence..think, what creation is superior in this case....example..to invalidate/uncreate an IRS lien one would use a superior claim, in their IR manual 21.7.13.3.2.2 relating to the "infant is a decedent/ estate" to show superior claim to their lien all one has to do it show that their is no decedent as the alleged decedent has a SS# thereby invalidating their maritime lien, the Name and Number vests in the LIVING not a decedent, thereby meaning you have come to LIFE,[remember cesti que trust] then you are operating under equity everything the living does is in equity all the rest is for the dead....SO THEY HAVE NO CLAIM because you have a superior claim and also under EQUITY...once this is done THEY BECOME THE TRUSTEE'S( also killing their claim again in other area's) the dead HAVE no power over the living, unless you consent to them.....you need to find the record that shows the infant as a decedent and correct it.(hint hint) THEN YOU HAVE THE SUPERIOR CLAIM...remember you can operate as the living and the legal entity but you have to know the roles/players to use, when you are operating as an accommodation party,appropriate person[like when You issue securities] then that has a specific role as does using your proxies to effect your desired outcome for other forms of commerce....own nothing control everything..ALL the BC is ,is a Book entry asset number,there is a entry asset number and a file number YOU ARE NOT THE BC it is theirs..the rest is to get you to argue over the Name...the BC my parents was given is not in all caps POOF! the BC is title to show the asset number and file number a RECEIPT for indemnity..Derka Derka..unless you rebut their presumption(by operation) that we are not considered dead you will be liable for ALL securities they have issued on the account/asset/file numbers/Name.. WHEE!!!the switch came at the time the hospital sent the COLB to the State and the State shanghai'd the infant into their jurisdiction[by force] and made you a dead thing an trick you to accept it.. and become the surety for it..they forcefully conscripted you into their jurisdiction[dead zone] denying you original juridiction land of the living..original usufruct has been denied...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 96
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 96 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Rick Carne

you need the issuance of the SS# only to validate life [in the land of the dead]..do not use it for commerce/work..once issued it attaches to the name/asset number /file number...do not use it for conversion of your energies/work..unless you wanna be the surety..this is why cops ask for the number to pay the securities/bonds issued on the name and all that attaches to the name..different game

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 97
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 97 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top