Oct 13, 2013 6:58 AM

That's Leigh of the House of Collins. You banned her

Ya, I was told when I was stopped and did not give my name and stated, I do not consent, my language then associated me with the freedumb movement..( mistake, heat of moment, did manage to read public notice... write up invoice...) To Which he replied.... "It doesn't matter". So ya... VOID. No Name. No Court. Fucking she has Balls to go in, but is it worth it? Is it Prudent? For me, Fuck No.

And she DID use the Notice of Mistake!!!

Did she not use the NOM correctly or do the courts just not follow their own game... Hmmm :/

She doesn't consent, yet is STANDING in THEIR courtroom!!!!!

Looks like consent to me

True that Chris, what the fuck is she even doing there!

Its not as if they tied her up and dragged her in there! They invited her and she showed up!!!!

She could of at least set the court straight on her standing by letting them know she was there by special appearance since she went to all that hassle.

they knew she didn't know what she was talking about when she mentioned human rights

It is Kuntaroo court.... I am not a Kunt, I do not Know KuntHouse rules... I do not belong to The clubhouse of... They created it... I have no business there.

She made a claim.

Nice shit though "By what authority are you addressing me by that name?"

The questions will move the court to claim it lacks jurisdiction on its own accord. No statements are necessary.

I absolutely love it Scott when you bring it right back to the one simple fact we all need to comprehend. Who we are and what we are not :-)

... A man can not appear in a tribunal .... Only persons can appear in PERSON, and the State is the trustee for your true person.

this really pisses me off, after all that was said and repeated.... shame...

she should not be there

By showing up you're saying please prosecute me

Do not consent and waive the benefit the benefit is prosecution

She embarrassed the notice, reading it off a sheet of paper..

hi there all - I'd like to learn a lot more about all this - where shall I start?

Check the Files section for Notice of Mistake!

read through (almost) everything here... keep point on what Scott says and go through the suggested videos above

relax on the cheekey just go though the group first...

Roslyn Aubrey, focus on my posts, and you will find the gold nuggets faster ;-)

We have a guy in here who is real good at sifting the BS out. I dont recall seeing your posts in those documents

Who?

Max

Why must you cause controversy with everyone? He is a good man, learning like the rest of us.

were all in this togather!!!! Lets focus on Mentoring-Teaching!!!

Chris, for the record this Wummin (Leigh Collins) has a huge set of balls for even trying to STAND HER OWN GROUND. Have you tried this approach In court? ? Does this act make her a good person does it Chris? ? Or does deleting shit stains make ye a good person?? Or does helping people with real powerful Remedy make ye a good person? ? Because if so I AM not a good person.

Oh no...leigh embarrassed the Notice of Mistake by reading it off the page!! Get fucking real Bev....she was shit scared & did an amazing job of standing her fucking ground but let's attack her for reading off the page.....FUCK OFF

What ?? Hellooos?? I wish Leigh OftheHouseof Collins nothing but the very best o irish luck...go get em leigh. ....rip em a new one babe.....

Hmmm, this looks like another job for Tara's amazing new thread cleaning product. "Irrelevance-B-Gone" (TM).

All non-essential comments will now be purged...

And to Adam, you were not allowed back in because your "controversy" was missed, you were allowed back because it appeared you actually wanted to learn.

Picking fights with people is disruptive to the learning process. And you don't just post singular inflammatory comments, you post them in sporadic clusters that can drag an entire thread into mindless bickering.

You were booted once before. If you TRULY want to be here, how about you start acting like it? Work on that "listen-more-than-you-speak" thing. Start examining your comments before posting and assess whether or not this is RELEVANT information that you're sending out.

Have you said it before? Possibly numbering into the double-digits?? Does it contain no actual information, but something off-topic or directed at someone else personally and may incite conflict???

If the answer is yes, this makes it unnecessary to post!

:-D

I can't tell by the way they cut the news piece together. Did she do the point of order, reserve all rights and then Notice of mistake? Sounded like she did not till grabbed... reserve all rights.. that is. She used the nature and cause of the proceedings line and they just ignored her... She is small... tiny... brave. So if we go into court, we are automatically labeled Freeman... even if we are not? Registered Mail seems the smart option... by proxy. This also looks orchestrated somehow.... Since when has the press in Canada ever been allowed in Court with a fucking Camera? It is first time I have seen that... This is much bigger than one local news piece...

It appears as though she planned to just-walk-in and read that which should have already been attached to and received by the claimant[s].

I don't know the details, just an observation.

It appears that she is CONFUSED, like most of us :-(

Ok ... out of left field... What if one is compelled, by some misplaced values, to go to Court and does so Under a White Flag?

Surely the notice of mistake includes a white flag waving sort of action in its substance.

Ah... copy that.

^and the court must honour the message delivered under such white flag conditions to remain in honour. That's the whole idea.

I see the Notice of Mistake as a document that NOTIFY a mistake :/

And I see this document being sent via REGISTERED MAIL, while I stay confortably sit in my living room

I see that the ONLY way I can end up in one of this bunker, is to get dragged in there, with chains all around me :/

Of course that IF IT'S TRUE that I have GOD-LIKES power :)

And I have good reasons to BELIEVE that IT'S TRUE :D

I have it on good 'authority' the court must address the questions posed before it can proceed.

the main thing here is, when you ask a damn question in court (that is if your silly enough to go) and they do not answer or say anything other than an answer to your question. Answer the damn question for them. Is it that hard to provide an assumed answer seeing none was provided ? why do so many forget to do this in court. They really dont like you doing this, so giver a try sometime eh ! :P

If you would recall liegh was one of the individuals that tore her original order in front of the clerk thinking that she could do it without an affidavit. And registered mail. A few individuals may have gotten away with it but the courts learn quick the affidavit and registered mail of a new original void order Is the correct procedure

cheif rock - i've only recently joined the group so i am a novice - what if they hold the court and create a verdict in absentia

Absentia ??...where is this town ? :-\

Well, what is the thing they are prosecuting or processing for profit ? Its a piece of paper, might be bond paper but its paper. So, what is wrong with writing in a contract for the piece of paper your using, keeping in mind it does not belong to you, you didnt create it. So, if you wanna throw in the Notice of Mistake along with a performance contract by all means, dont sit on your ass while they do paperwork as well. Contract law is a fun game if you wanna learn it.

in abstentia meaning that they create a verdict when you're not there

latin - in abstinqance

abstinance

Oh....I think I'll start commenting in French in here :P

Well, are you sure your person is not there ? how would they be able to do anything unless it was ? The surety may not have shown up but damn im sure they will contract someone to be that thing.

I hate when you guys start using this fucking LATIN language that these fuckers use in their bunkers to look like they are some type of hyper-class or something....I just hate this, it makes me want to vomit.....yyyaaaarrrkkkk!!!!.

And ChiefRock Sino General, I have NOT received MY T-Shirts :P

In absentia = absent, done to the person, they have just created for this transaction, while you are not there. Since silence is acquiescence and consent... without the rebuttal of the presumptions they are contracting under. The legal person will be held accountable. Unless you have liened the NAME and protected yourself in Trust. Cutting them off from the revenue stream and being held to account for unauthorized use. After all you have been notified by an Invoice.

The LEGAL person will be held accountable ? :-D

And who the fuck will ADMINISTRATE that shit ?

:-D :-D

The trustee corp or in your case Stalin :-D no rebuttal.. them, it is their creation.

Oh Jay Le B, I have NO problem being the ADMINISTRATOR for anything that the person I have in my pocket could be could be held ACCOUNTABLE for :-D , are they going to like my administration method ? ....that's another story :-D

Sorry if it's NOT on topic, but I have a new hobby since a few months, I check legal definitions of words, and I am having fun doing it.... :D

Anyway, I was checking IMPACT, and it brought me to INFLUENCE, and I have found this....

Improper influence is that dominion acquired by any person over a mind of sanity for general purposes, and of sufficient soundness and discretion to regulate his affairs in general, which prevents the exercise of his discretion, and destroys his free will.

Now, I suspect some GOVERNMENT AGENTS having operate IMPROPER influence on "ME", through media, school, and all that bullshit they spread around...

:D ...

Roslyn, you must administrate (contract) on behalf of your person before any court session takes place. Rebut the claim on paper (create history/evidence) and if they do not counter-claim, you are done by default.

Sorry Beverly Braaksma, I administrate THE person, not MY person, and I am not doing it "on behalf of" ....I just "do administrate THE person", NOTHING else

"on behalf of" seems to imply much more.....that was the point....

HI Beverly - so if I'm sent a letter threatening to fine me, and I return the letter, 'no contract' then there can be no court case?

Under what authority do you address me as a "You"? I am appearing here today on behalf of CONTINUING MANDAMUS INC as per the PUBLIC NOTICE NOTARIZED on [retracted date] as served to you as a courtesy Mr. Justices fuckitall. Do you have your oath of office on your person?

I will bring witnesses in a case, while I wear my suit... http://www.purefit360.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/wizard-of-oz-original1.jpg

Who is paying my fee to be on this page today?? SCOTT?? I HAVE BEEN MAGICALLY SUMMONED TO FACE-BOOK. I AM APPEARING IN DIGITAL LEGAL LAND. Judgements in 30 minutes or it's free [like dominos and shit]. Or if your female Scott gets to knock u up & shit...

Sorry I have been away.. I have been having lots of fun with the senate and congress down here in the states... How is the air up there Canada???

AL-WAYS USE REG-IS-TERED MAIL WHEN POST-ING IN THE POST-AL SERV-ICE... It counts as a REG-IS-TERED signature [See the sneaky thread on what a Signature really means... fun stuff / sneaky French] hilarity ensues....

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/calgary/story/1.1991208

Hey Jason Moreland, do you work at MacDonald in the DRIVE-THRU ?

A la-rge bi-g m-ac and a sm-all Fre-ch fr-y plea-se

No but I have considered making a bluetooth app that allows the Text-ing of the Super-MC-FATASS order #3

Then pay with bitcoin... just automated McDonalds.. ; )

Guess what all the "money" is in one account or on one bond BTW....

Helloss!!!, Are yous ALLdressings mes ? :D

Humm, sorry, I just had an air-bulb crossing my brain....sorry :/

do you have a link kent on the paper?

thank you kent

Mr Supernumerary! HaHa

Ok, so if this girl doesnt go to court for her sentencing because you are never supposed to go to court, then what happens next- is a Warrant issued for 'her persons' arrest?...if so, what would be the right way of handling this, if this is indeed the situation she is facing now?

hmmm....IF this happened to me, I wouldn't go back and WHEN they issued an Arrest Warrant, I would notify of another mistake that was made. I may also ask some more questions like "Can you produce certified copies of EVERY document you have that has led you to believe that I am acting as SURETY in the matter."

Replace "the court" with Wal-Mart. What would you do if you were told that you must show up for an employee discipline meeting (even though you have NEVER contracted with, nor work for Wal-Mart) and will kidnap you if you don't?

How would you handle that?

Calling the cops is useless.

I would ADVISE them of the MISTAKE they are making, as I am NOT one of their employye :#

Through registered mail, never go to Walmart...

Of course....EVERYTHING via registered mail :D

Scott Duncan Thanks for the Phd Education we're getting on this game of Commerce!!!!

we're ? :D

Man....its gotta suck when the TOKEN is correcting everyones grammar

it's :D

Classic.

oh oh... :-D

You all look the same from this 2000 feet hole I am in :P

A bunch of FAGGOTS :P

"(even though you have NEVER contracted with, nor work for Wal-Mart)"

This might sound crazy...but i would then send 'WAL-MART' the Terms-and-Conditions of MY employment-contract then with WAL-MART: Id like to make $100, 000/year, an unlimited expense-account, my own parking-spot, a corner-office, have every Wednesday off to break-up the work-week, one week of vacation every month, a two-hour lunch-break, a company-car (Dodge Charger), and a hot secretary i can bang whenever i want without ever getting in trouble for breaking some corporation by-law

...do you think 'WAL-MART' would go for that?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YevJAazdUG4

"Replace "the court" with Wal-Mart."

So if WAL-MART = "THE COURT".....then what exactly does "THE COURT" equal Scott, technically speaking?

Private Bunker ? :D

The court= administrator of the surety created for that charge to that person they created for that circumstance. That until you state otherwise they attach to you by your consent of showing up for their private business meeting...

OK, so it's a PRIVATE BUNKER ? :/

Yes... by their rules....

Once authorities file a claim in the court is it the court service that creates an account? And seeks to discharge it?

@Chip Douglas: " So if WAL-MART = "THE COURT".....then what exactly does "THE COURT" equal Scott, technically speaking?"

--------------------

It makes them a bunch of strangers who aren't wanted/needed in commerce and can't get a job in the real world (That's why they work for the government) who've decided they have "authority" over you. That's what it makes them.

I thought all of you knew that.

Funny, it reminds me a BUNKER :D

That description you just gave Scott, could that be classified also as a Trustee de son tort?

No. It's classified as a bunch of strangers who aren't wanted/needed in commerce and can't get a job in the real world, who've decided they have "authority" over you.

If I meant " Trustee de son tort", I would have SAID "Trustee de son tort". You do not use these terms, why do you suddenly use them regarding law? These are "Clubhouse rules" and you aren't part of the club.

ahhhhhh :-) I learn so much when he is angry!!!

http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2013-10-12/article-3427331/Member-of-Freeman-on-the-Land-movement-voices-objections/1

From the article:

"When Madden asked what was on her birth certificate, she spelled A-M-Y C-O-L-L-I-N-S, but insisted she be known as “woman.”"

If this is accurate reporting, the cheeky fuckers again achieved joinder by asking what was on 'her' birth certificate:

Is it 'her' birth certificate or the states? By responding and spelling out 'her' name, she just claimed the name and/or the birth certificate as her(s)...is this an accurate summation?

I'd ask them to DEFINE birth certificate.

Whatever they answer, you DENY such a thing is real. The Onus is on THEM to produce it.

She really should stop by the Admiral's quarters for nude courtroom lessons. :D

Oh yeah !!!....please DEFINE birth certificate, and please DEFINE citizen :D

:P :P

And in the mean time, please DEFINE this Black, whit and red outfit you have on you ? :P

Scott, is that a Tender for Law?

It was like an episode of cops... Joinder trickery and hey ... We will just ignore you and do as we wish in our court... We did create it after all.

Do NOT accept ANY notion/presumption they present.

"JUSTICE": You have a certificate that says your name and date if birth from the government!

ME: I do not have any knowledge of such a thing, nor do I believe such a thing exists.

I find it interesting that this Dean Otf Kory gets in shit for recording what happens when he goes into court. But its okay to let a TV-newscrew into the court and film what was going-on with her- wtf

It's because these places are BUNKERS Chip Douglas, THEY decide what's going on in THEIR bunkers .....

"How would you handle that?...Calling the cops is useless."

From my various reading Scott, is the answer to the previous scenario you presented, to simply submit your NOTICE OF MISTAKE, to the Court Clerk attached to an Affidavit as an exhibit, along with your Birth Certificate?

Think about that, when the day comes when you have to decide if you are going to kill one to save yourself or someone you love.

They think it's their right to do this. Remember that. They aren't going to be "enlightened" by anything you say. Just look at the theists (And oprah). They BELIEVE they are right. I KNOW and can support the position, that I'M RIGHT. Why would I give ANY credence to their "belief"?

Scott Duncan, I agree with your "theory". However, there is "in theory" and there is "in practice". That is where the problem lies because, in practice, if you don't attend at the Walmart hearing, notwithstanding having advised Walmart you are not one of their subjects, the Walmart goons will deem you to be a servant of Walmart and come and throw you in a cage. Unfortunately, "in practice" trumps "in theory" :(

I think though, this is a case of 'Best-Laid-Plans,' with All-things-being-equal, Scott is trying to get across to us

If you are there against your will, then there is a meter running. SOMEBODY has to pay for that.

...and if goons come to kidnap you... Kill them. It's fucking Wal-Mart.

James, when the time comes and you have 2 choices and only those 2 choices, what will you do? Are you going to go along with their tribunal involving YOUR value, or will you tell them of a Mistake?

Hey Scott, I receives lots of private messages from female strangers these days, is that mean they find me intellectual, and they want to have sex with me ? :/ , or is it me again that suffers from anxiety ?

Token is just trying to learn here.... :D

Sorry for being off topic :(

Yes I agree Scott, some other "man" engaging in a violation of my rights will be held liable for harming me, a man. Chris, perhaps there are more than two choices. Attending at a hearing under duress and fear while making it clear that you are standing on your rights to not to have to play in their pool is another option, is it not? Don't you think it could be a good opportunity to, inte alia, put those men and women coming against you, but who have a higher duty as trustees of your rights, on notice?

HAHAHA...James, I went there once by"special appearance to settle a matter". Ha, I even went through the Point of Order! If you want to make a plan to go that route, go for it, it's not my decision. After I REALIZED that there was NOTHING good that would come out of me "standing on my rights", I chose to Notify them of a Mistake. They chose to issue an Arrest Warrant for this person they have in their custody already (Still puzzling me really). So I issued ANOTHER Notice of Mistake to let them know EXACTLY what was going on and further, I demanded that they send CERTIFIED COPIES of EVERY document they have that makes them think that I am SURETY.

I made my choice and here I am typing away from the comfort of my home. All I can share is MY experience!

So, you can stand on "Theory" or "Practice"....your choice!

some other "man" engaging in a violation of my rights will be held liable for harming me, a man

How can a "Man" be liable ?

This WHOLE thing is about PERSONS.....no ?? :/

SURETY for the PERSON really!

James Allan, seriously? Do you REALLY think I haven't been doing that FOR 30 FUCKING YEARS?

To answer your idiotic questions:

NO

NO and No.

Nope, not me! I didn't create that document!

Pete Daoust is starting to think right.

It's about time :D

Pete, , only another man can cause me harm. Even if he and a few of his friends got together and wrote down that they had created magic unicorn offices with super duper human powers and rights allegedly more than equal to mine, it is still that other man in the real world (not the land of make you believe) that harmed me. :)

You don't even know what the word Liable means. Time to shut up, James.

... sort of related ... The trust needs to administrate a charge,to the legal person, received last week from 2009 ... The Attorney General's Agent... Ramon ( No Last Name) Stated in the text... " I could take care of the matter with the remittance attached below"... There is No remittance below :-D First action of the Trust coming up..

I don't know how is it where you live James, but here, it seems to be a LEGAL world.

And if a MAN, have intentions of HARMING "ME", and/or my family, I know EXACTLY what to do.......

And if this man wants to go after the person I happen to have in my pocket after having doing my DUTY as a MAN, well, I know EXACTLY what to do as well...

:)

Chris, why would you go to court to settle a matter that doesn't pertain to you. Why would you say anything concerning the subject matter of a trial for some entity you claim is not you and you have nothing to do with? Would you also try to settle a matter for a trial for Ronald McDonald or perhaps just let them know that nothing that happens at that trial better result in a violation of your rights? ;)

Seriously, if it contradicts anything I say here, IT'S WRONG. I'm FROM THE FUCKING PEOPLE WHO BUILT ALL OF THIS!

None of your "theories" are right, and NONE OF YOUR BELIEFS ARE CORRECT, BECAUSE I'M ONE OF THE FUCKING PEOPLE WHO GAVE YOU THOSE BELIEFS!

KING JAMES BIBLE <---IT FUCKING SAYS THE NAME OF THE GUY SCAMMING YOU, ON THE FUCKING COVER!

Stop posing "alternate theories". You aren't qualified.

I hate THEORIES :D

Theory works great in SCIENCE and Music.

Exactly! But now you are making circular arguments....what is your intent?

I hate circular arguments :P

Which 'me' are you referring to James Allan?

'it is still that other man in the real world (not the land of make you believe) that harmed me.'

If you are claiming the fictional name created by someone else as the 'me' that you are referring to, aren't you causing controversy by claiming that something not created by you is the 'me' that was harmed?

First, you say: "Chris, perhaps there are more than two choices. Attending at a hearing under duress and fear while making it clear that you are standing on your rights to not to have to play in their pool is another option, is it not? Don't you think it could be a good opportunity to, inte alia, put those men and women coming against you, but who have a higher duty as trustees of your rights, on notice?"

Now you say: " Chris, why would you go to court to settle a matter that doesn't pertain to you. "

I am also presuming that you have not followed along here, because if you did, you would KNOW why I went to court. I think you should heed Scott's advice lest you become tingly.

inter alia (in-tur eh-lee-ah) prep. Latin for "among other things." This phrase is often found in legal pleadings and writings to specify one example out of many possibilities. Example: "The judge said, inter alia, that the time to file the action had passed."

And for clarification, no!!! I shall not PLEAD with these criminals! Pleading indicates you are in ACQUIESCENCE to the PROCEEDINGS. The Notice of Mistake is issued BEFORE the PROCEEDINGS!!!!

Man, the more I dissect your paragraphs, the more FreeDUMB shit I am finding. :-)

This smells of "Christian Logic"...

James Allan, are you a Christian (because we made that up too!)?

Chris, did I ever say I go to court to settle the matter, or did I suggest I would go there for something otherwise? Only the person or someone having a representative capacity for the person whom the Crown is coming against has standing the settle the matter. How can one say there is a mistake but then proceed to settle a matter that doesn't pertain to him? Can I settle a matter for you without having some type of representative capacity or similar? They will know you by your fruits.

Nevermind. I will get no benefit from this conversation.....PEACE!

It's not a NAME, it's a PERSON :P

Pete Daoust continues to think right.

Pete Daoust is starting to feel a little tingly (positive one ) :D

Its really funny how this guy James seems to know everything about my case WITHOUT reading the discussion that happened on this forum. "They will know you by your fruits" Yeah, no shit! That is probably why the FBI (allegedly) called me the other day. Please read.....

James, what is your intent for being a part of this forum?

Peace always Chris :) Scott, you asked if I am a Christian. I have no idea as I dont know what your defintion of that word is. ;)

Oh, allow me to clarify, James.

My question shall be less ambiguous, so YES or NO are the only possible answer:

Do you believe Jesus Christ is your Lord?

That's a Yes or no.

*Jeopardy Music*

...finger poised on the button.

:D

Hellos !!! :D

Hurry up!!!! I have to go check CHRIS' mailbox!

*buzzer*

Need an answer!

*Jeopardy Music (Extended Sino General Mix)*

HAHAHA!!!!...I received a CD yesterday from ChiefRock Sino General.....ouffff !!!! :D :D

Pete, how bout dont give them the, NAME-of-the-PERSON...more concise?

ChiefRock Sino General hasn't don't the Jeopardy Theme, as far as I know.

If he did, that'd just make him more awesome.

You guys are awesome - jeopardy music - hahaha. Scott that is a leading question. By that, I mean it presupposes that I have formulated a yes or no position on the subject matter of your question. As you are well aware, lawyers and politicians are masters at this. In response I will tell you I have formed no opinion on the subject matter of your question. And not likely that I will before the music stops....hahaha

And by you not answering you will feel a tingling sensation, followed by...

BANNED!

No theists. Seriously, these scum are the Nobility's "enablers". These adults with imaginary friends (THAT THE FUCKING NOBILITY CREATED) are responsible for EVERYTHING you are fighting and suffering from today. They deserve NOTHING except ridicule and contempt.

You are welcome, but imaginary friends are not. If you have an imaginary friend, you are mentally ill. It doesn't matter that there are lots of you, you're still ADULTS WITH IMAGINARY FRIENDS and you are harming EVERYTHING.

Chip Douglas, it's up to you, but as far as I am concerned, I am a Man, and I TOOK the name Pierre to communicate with other Man, and I HAVE a person.

And when ANY of these suckers ask for MY NAME, well my name is Pierre......if, on the other end, they are looking for the person I happen to have in my pocket, they will have to be more specific with their questions, if they can't for some reasons, I will say:

Ho, you want the person I happen to have in my pocket its NAME mister ? or do you seek for the WHOLE person, so you can ADMINISTRATE it, without authorization ? :P

That's all there is for me.... :(

I am a MAN, and I have a PERSON, and it's NOT my fault :P

"...dont give them your name..."

Pete Daoust It's not a NAME, it's a PERSON

I think you directed that at me...just clarifying

Unfortunatly, James decided to chose Controversy and Confusion instead of TRUTH :(

Controversy, Confusion, and circular arguments with a topping of IGNORANCE. And there you have the FreeDUMB movement!

Or a CRA agent :D

You will notice the Christians infest the Free-Dumb movement. It's just another reason they should be avoided.

Or QRA, or a Hydro-Quebec Employee HAHAHAHA

Updated thanks to Pete's feedback; so just to encapsulate:

Scott Duncan: Replace "the court" with Wal-Mart. What would you do if you were told that you must show up for an employee discipline meeting (even though you have NEVER contracted with, nor work for Wal-Mart) and will kidnap you if you don't?

How would you handle that? Calling the cops is useless.

Scott Duncan: If you are there against your will, then there is a meter running. SOMEBODY has to pay for that.

...and if goons come to kidnap you... Kill them. It's fucking Wal-Mart.

Chip Douglas: "If you are there against your will, then there is a meter running. SOMEBODY has to pay for that."

YESSS, i remember reading somewhere where you said something to the effect that, at some point the Accountant will come down to find out whats going on because- SOMEBODY has to PAY for all this!...dont give them ID, dont give them the NAME-of-the-PERSON, its all about surety, and its all about Accounting - thank you Scott Duncan, oh yeah...and where there must be Accounting, there must be a contract

I hate encapsulations :D

Seriously, when I say "yes or no", you answer with a yes or no. If you "have not formed an opinion on the matter" the the answer is NO.

Is that really so hard?

Oh, that's freaking easy....for me anyway !!! :)

But when you are minority, no one seems to want to ask questions to you :(

And when they do, they run like hell before you give the answer, because they know you will tell the truth....and that can be scary shit for them ....

So it has for effect, the fucking PERSON's mailbox stays empty :(

I am putting a notice on my door "YOU WILL FEEL FEEL A TINGLY SENSATION FOLLOWED BY BANNED" those Mormons keep fucking knocking....

I have no doors :(

?

Well, I have NO doors !!...It's not MY door, it's someone else is door...I have NOTHING, but time, I mean nothing at all, except some time.....

Oh, I forgot, AND IT'S NOT MY FAULT :D

And I have so much POWER, it's unbelievable :D

Oh yes I forgot almost....

The fun thing though James Baal, is I get to ADMINISTRATE that door, :D, and GOD knows that I am the best ADMINISTRATOR in town :D

(definitionof god = "me" ) :P

I am fucked with power series limits and sequences and exponential functions...:-( but hey who gives a shit....

Fun fact, two man just knocked on the door I happen to administrate, the one that knocked wanted to shake my hand when I answered the door, I did NOT put my hand in his, he is a stranger knocking on the door I happen to ADMINISTRATE, so I said: What can I do for you ?, he said he was a conseiller municipal (municipal elections related stuff), I said: I AM NOT INTERESTED and closed the door.

True story, it just happened 5 minutes ago, I have it on tape :D

I love these CCTV's hooked to that house I happen to administrate :D

Apologies for being off topic ...won't happen again ...I would love to see the tape only English though

This is a snapshot of me, I just made it.....If I want to show you those 2 guys, I have to access the server and make a copy of it.....which I don't want to take the time to do, it's not worthed....

I think the best thing to write on ANY door I get to administrate is:

NO COMMERCE IMPLIED/EXPECTED

Unless I want to do commerce from that specific door

:D

"Although the terms commerce and trade are often used interchangeably, commerce refers to large-scale business activity, while trade describes commercial traffic within a state or a community." from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/commerce

PAS DE COMMERCE IMPLIQUÉ / DÉSIRÉ

Very clear in French, it means I don't want to do ANY business inside that door.

...don't forget "Cash up front, or pay with your cunt". It's important.

Ok Sir !! ;-)

cunt (knt) n. Vulgar Slang 1. The female genital organs. 2. Sexual intercourse with a woman. 3. a. Offensive Used as a disparaging term for a woman. b. Used as a disparaging term for a person one dislikes or finds extremely disagreeable.

In French: Argent Comptant, ou paie avec ta plotte...

Muhahahaha !!! :-D

^^^^^^ New French Version! :D That has VALUE :D

http://www.vdaysouthbay.org/originsofcunt.htm

Another different approach cris

What's the origin of "Stupid Cunt"? There seems to be a lot of them, and if we can find/kill the source... Just sayin...

OK forget about it I think I fucked up here

Ha ha ha...

she just needs some more help and coaching.

atleast she thinks she's trying. more than most people are willing to do.

That much is certain.

Scott, will you help her?

If she asks.

It's not my right to interfere otherwise.

That's why the OPPT is such a fraud. They PRESUME to act on your behalf. I won't become what I behold.

I don't want to be off topic again but the word Cunt reminded me of great article somewhere on Ceit Butlers page serious well worth a search....sorry again..

The Honda Cunt :D

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/c_word

Love The Oatmeal!

Apparently I've just purchased a Honda :/

You aren't SURE?

Confused ? :-D

Well if I get there and it won't start... then I'm sure I don't want it...

Not Sure explained: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wM1P7GMnd38

NOT SURE! :D

CONTINUING MANDAMUS INC. incorporating higher authority inside lower authority is fun!!!!!

Me, I am the new administrator of a brand new LG 6 cubic feet washing machine, I am so impress with that thing that I've tried ALL the 14 cycles it has, and stood in the front windows to check that sucker doing its jib... :-D

*job

Is it a front loader?

Yes

My wife thinks I'm crazy :-\

Hmmmm. I may look into that. My machine is quite outdated and squealing like a pig.

She could do laundry by hand like I did for a couple of years and maybe then she would think differently.

What model #?

Your wife thinks your crazy for pushing buttons on an appliance?

She REALLY needs to spend more time with you. Her bar for "crazy" is WAY too low.

It's been a while she thinks that way Scott Duncan.....some 20 years now....

I won't EVER let my wife demolish her beautiful hands from washing some stupid clothes Cara Atherton......never

That's what concubines are for.

And this new toy has a HAND WASH cycle :-P

WTF is a "hand wash cycle"? You mean this machine has hands! Holy fuck!

Apparently, yes :/

I want the specs. What is the model #?

It's a LG, WM8000HVA, Steam (tm) Inverter Direct Drive, True Balance, Anti-vibration system......a fucking wild animal :D

Scott, Tom and I are looking for one of those. No luck so far.

That's the ANIMAL :D

http://www.uakc.com/Images/Uploads/400/WM8000HVA1.jpg

That's HIS job, not yours.

It's therefore HIS failing.

Thanks Pete Daoust. That was more than I asked for.

Hey Scott, would you mind if I start a thread on the new washing machine I get to administrate since yesterday ? :(

How do I benefit from this?

Well, maybe a lots of silent ladies will show up in the thread ?....we never know !! :/

There is 480 members in here, lots of silent ladies....with a thread on washing machine, they might ALL jump in it ?

I do not expend resources for the flawed and quite idiotic "you never know" position.

In other words, Scott Duncan, gets as much tail as he wants without Pete's help.

That too.

What tail ?.....why you ALWAYS jump in this subject Cara Small Atherton ?

I was talking about washing machines :D

"You never know" is about as close to intellectual bankruptcy as the English language can possibly produce.

And the "you never know" position, is, in fact, quite idiotic....I will NEVER use it again :)

In French it's "Tu sais JAMAIS, which dosen't even makes any senses :D

You know never

Nope, doesn't make senses.

I totally read that as Two Shitty Pajamas. I need to slow down my speed reading... :/

:D

Meanwhile in MERICA :D

Weapons in the war against democracy

The new arsenal of tyranny

http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/law-enforcement-corruption--abuse-1/weapons-in-the-war-against-democracy-.html

Meanwhile, in the laundry room, which I happen to administrate, today, and today ONLY, this freaking washing machine is spinning at 1300 rpm O.o

I am just in SHOCK !!!!!

Pete Daoust has now gone back to posts of no value.

And we know he isn't speaking in Metaphor because he HATES metaphors!

haa!!...sorry, I am sorry, :(

grounds for a suit? lible/slander?

...it was just too weird for me... Scott and Pierre conversing... about value... then I woke up... :-D

RE:"grounds for a suit"?

HELL YES! Let's litigate them into homelessness! I'm IN!

...remind me again where this "suit" is going to be heard?

So the Honda was running badly (because of old gas) and the seller was to put new gas in. Then he broke the seat latch when looking for the tools for the bike... so NOT SURE completely is how that went... :/

The washing machine is running like a duck :P

"running like a duck"?

is it quacking too?

Well, something like that :D

Hmm- poor Leigh...i guess they issued an Arrest Warrant out for her PERSON yesterday :(

http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2013-10-23/article-3436792/Arrest-warrant-issued-for-woman-who-caused-uproar-in-court/1

She didn't show up?

I think it got back to her Scott's comments about- 'this is why you never show up to court'...so no, she never went back

If they come to pick-her-up, and she holds firm and doesnt give them her PERSON-NAME- hopefully the Accountant will come downstairs at some point and say- "Hey...SOMEBODY, has to PAY, for ALL THIS," like Scott has pointed-out before

I messaged with her on Sunday, she sounded like she was going to go... Your link didn't work for me...?

Yeah, said the site is down for maintenance...the article says she didnt show-up yesterday

Here's the text from the article... She's around. It Starts like this:

She caused quite a commotion the last time she was in court. But on Tuesday, the day Amy Collins was supposed to be sentenced at provincial court in St. John’s, all was quiet.

Amy Collins, shown during her sentencing hearing Oct. 11 at provincial court in St. John’s, had a warrant issued for her arrest Tuesday after she failed to show up for her sentencing. — Telegram file photo

That’s because she didn’t show.

As a result, a warrant was issued for her arrest.

The 36-year-old — who had been released on conditions after she was arrested in September — was convicted of obstructing justice and breaching probation Oct. 11 following her trial, in which she refused to take part.

Collins refers to herself as a human rights advocate and while she denies being a member of the Freeman on the Land movement, her beliefs are similar in that she refuses to heed government rules.

During proceedings in her trial, Collins continuously shouted objections and insisted that the judge call her “My Lady.”

“I do not have a name,” she told Judge Mike Madden. “I have a calling.”

She constantly interrupted the judge, prompting him to find her in contempt of court. Sheriff’s officers were called and Collins was led to the holding cells.

When she returned, she still refused to go on with the trial.

“Crown! I revoked your rights, as I am the only person standing in this matter,” Collins said.

Despite her objections, the trial continued and Collins was found guilty of the charges.

Madden issued the warrant Tuesday at the request of Crown prosecutor Mike Murray after a half-hour wait.

As of court closing time Tuesday, she still was not located.

rgillingham@thetelegram.com

Twitter: @TelyCourt

It blows me away that there was even a fucking news-crew IN the court filming her?.....i guess its okay to bring my digital-audio-recorder in now to DOCUMENT audibly what happened for myself in the future??

New Brunswick has had cameras in court for years.

..and then there's that :/

well fuck... how progressive of them :-D

Is her best-shot Scott, to just not give them the NAME of her PERSON when they pick her up, and hope the Accountant like you say says let her go, cuz SOMEONE has to PAY for ALL THIS? :/

Like Ms. Collins, I am a member if the "warrant for their arrest" club.

Maybe it's because I'm such a bad-ass Admiral, but this whole "fugitive" thing?

...it's kind of a breeze.

I may pick a fight on its issuance anniversary, just to keep them on their toes :D

I think I'll see how many I can get! :D

My RECORD was in 1996. I had 5 of them.

Me as well... I wouldn't call it a breeze, it is a bit of a trip to drive away free having not given out any info on me. I think but not sure, I have 3 right now.... 2 for sure. It is kinda fun...

The proxy of the trust is most potent. :-D Admiral, thanks.

do these warrants last forever or after a time they just go away?

Me? I woulda showed-up, just behaved, wait til the end for the ALLOCUTION, and tell the Justice- "With all due respect your Justice, i do not agree with the court's sentence. I do not AGREE, i do not ACCEDE, i do not ATTORN, and i do not CONSENT, to the court's sentence it's made against the PERSON the Province of Ontario is SURETY for to begin with"

Depends on the "offense". Most need to be renewed. All warrants expire though.

They are currently attaching the outstanding balances of old traffic stuff to the CRA account associated with the NAME for collection as a debt owed... Because I ignored it all... prior to landing here... So now... they are technically in unauthorized use land... It is a matter that will require some attention eventually from the Trust or something like that. The one warrant is for a peace bond... which apparently technically Makes the NAME a peace officer... :-P which could be profitable... And the Trust has a lien on the NAME for all debts previous and current. Safe at third :-D

a warrant only has a 30 day shelf life. (or somthing like that, dont quote me, i am not in there club). oh sorry, thats a warrant to stormtroop for evidence. maybe there are other types of warrants.

I do not know about that... stole my own car out of impound once... 8 months later... I was charged with stealing my own car.. from the warrant that was still on the system... (long time ago ... used to drink a little...)

I was gonna say... 30 days is nothing for you to go hang out on someone's boat... :D

Na.. not just yet.... I do not give out my name to people I do not want to contract with... The boat in due course... :-D

I was kinda speaking for "the many" whom might be in that club... 30 days would be too easy...

I was thrown by the YOU... 30 days isn't even a cup of coffee... that being said I have no Idea what the term is... I know they are trying to come after the name through the CRA but I have it liened so... they can get stuffed..

warrants once issued do no expire...

EVERY Warrant has an expiry date. There are no exceptions. "Issued' or otherwise.

It it DIDN'T have an expiry date, then it wouldn't be a warrant. It would be a LAW.

Sorry Rick Carne, but I have to call you out here; WHY do you think the steaming pile of crap you dumped here is true?

Yes do tell us Rick Carne :D

ever heard of an outstanding warrant?...:-)

Nope, just an outstanding lady :P

Please provide the law/statute code that supports your claim Scott and i will show you mine...hehe

type of warrant?

http://thelawdictionary.org/article/will-my-bench-warrant-expire/

if one is arrested on a warrant issued many years ago, the arrested person can ask the judge to dismiss the case based on Right to a speedy trial. The motion is commonly called a “Serna Motion” (People v. Serna (1985) 40 Cal.3d 239).

http://www.governmentregistry.org/?hop=sgmhoward&xsite=governmentregistry&xtarget=2&xpath=lp_warrantfiles&conversion_id=1069591026&gc_source=g&gclid=code1-cs544cfqwsoaodebfeeq

all of this is for the Person/surety

Wow. I apologize. I had NO idea they lied like that. Looks like it's time for an article. :D

A "Bench Warrant" (There's no such thing. This is slang) like EVERY warrant, has an EXPIRY DATE. No matter what lie is told here. Warrants MUST BE RENEWED BEFORE EXPIRY, or they expire (DuuuH!).

If the warrant is issued by 32 Division in Toronto, and it's "Canada Wide" the warrant has accrued costs. RCMP charge for the "service" of reporting on warrants. If the warrant expires, then the Police Division who requested the warrant, has to foot the bill.

They can keep renewing, but the bill grows. If it gets TOO big, it gets the wrong kind of attention. If the RCMP decide they need to EXECUTE the warrant themselves, they can take over. Now even MORE costs are attached to it, and they want YOU (The Person) to pay the bill.

That's why warrants "appear" to be "forever".

Read ANY legal paper on warrants. They MUST have an expiry date. they are the same as a TREASURY BOND.

These sources are all US Jurisdiction. They lie about everything. Their population is too stupid to even knowingly question the issues.

I take Umbrage at this!!! ;)

yes,they can be discharged same as a bill, using their GSA forms...here in the U.S.

I just looked up GSA forms. This is the first I have heard of them. What is the significance and can you offer a good link as to how to properly use them?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yfal3d5fa8U

Wonder if she's single...just sayin'

She's Freeeeeeeeee-dumb.

*Sigh*

How long, Kent?

Until she figures out who she is, I imagine.

Last nite we were texting. She told to tell Kent if I didnt hear from her. I am pretty sure they were watching her

She posted that " to the car out front watching me I am watching you..." or something to that effect.. I think it was the night before last.

Martians ? :/

That's simple enough to get around. From my experience, those quacks are usually sitting at a computer during "therapy time" so you simply say:

"Okay then, just do me a favour here and humour me. Google these three simple things. First: "Maxim of Law, The inclusion of one..." Next: "The Criminal Code of Canada, Interpretations section, definition of every one", And lastly: "section 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms".

Anything that she tries to say personally is just going to make her appear crazier and crazier. Calmly sitting back and saying "Please, don't take MY word for it", and directing them to the actual government website will lend credibility to anything that she says.

Mmmmmm. Do you have a claim against me?

I would LOVE to pass a week in a mental healt hospital :-D

I would help ALL of them....doctors too :-D

Oh fuck wait !!!....I've been there done that :O

hospitals can be revenue... if held against ones will.

Oh yes you can smoke, unless you have no imaginations :-D

You can even make a fortune selling cigarettes....

For any unauthorized use of the NAME/PERSON a charge of $500,000 BOB Bucks /per day or any portion thereof will be issued. Conversion: Two BOB Bucks = One Canadian Dollar... The Trust is a currency exchange so you It may assist you to exchange your dollars for Bob Bucks at a very reasonable rate. For the unauthorized use and all... and then the medication kicked in...

These patients are so fucking crazy....

Hey Jason, you suppose to be crazy when you arrive there, and less crazy when you get out, not the opposite :-P

what... it doesn't look crazy from here :-D

that's the crazy part.

Canadian Tire does it... oh and something else... hmmm what could it be...

Hey Doctor why is it this person was created 6 weeks after I was born and you want me to be it ?

ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY ? :-D

Now, you can force me to be here ALL you want, you can even KILL me in here if you want, but I can't be something that was created 6 weeks after I was born.....and I charge $6000 per hour for MY time.....and these pills, you can shovel them up your ass.....bye

hehehe shovel.

Oh, and I suggest you and ALL your employee, to not touch me, because you will certainly change your definition of the word crazy :-D

I HIGHLY recommend St. Joe's, in London! The people were nice, food was good...

:D

Beds comfy? I put myself in for a month one time... was getting away from some things. Checked out against medical advice... the second time... It just wasn't the same :-D

I thought I was the ONLY cracked head in here.....seems you guys recovered well !!!.....good for you !:-D

that was the first time.... :-D

Saneness in an insane world is deemed insane... There are a few whack jobs out there...

On THAT scale, I must seem nuttier every day! :D

You're a fucking loon... :-D

You're.

shit

Leigh's supposed to be crazy- but, enforcing on Dry-Land the 'law-of-the-seas' is normal...ok, got it

She's not crazy. Just "out there" too soon.

Wether one goes to court in the capacity of accommodation party to administer the account (rebuttal and/or setoff) or NOM's and stays home and dodges warrants the result in most cases is the same...a lien on any assets attached to the person. Sure it's generally a joke going to court as is also not going and dodging warrants, both end the same...lien on person and person assets. I personally go watch the show, then come home and paper their paper with paper...as long as the collateral they want to lien including your body is a security interest held outside of the person there's not much for a hungry tiger too do.

*shrugs* "Thats fine your Justice, you guys can do whatever you want, but i will have you know...before i came here, i placed a LIEN on the PERSON the CROWN created for me soon after i was BIRTHED, on ppsa.ca - so good luck with that...and can i have official-copies of the warrant AND case-file-numbers, TOO?"

..betcha they've never heard that question/statement put before them before

Kent- ill call, but just so im clear...what exactly is the NAME they have for her on the BC, cuz, it seems 'Leigh' has actually used/gone through a number of names on here, i dont actually know who she really is

Or just, OK, OK, OK your justice, You seems to want to ADMINISTRATE the person I happen to have in my pocket, so let the record shows that YOU are surety from now on, and I will go sit there, as the beneficiary, and wait for my check.....(and you go sit and shut it up)

Oh, the person is in custody ???, and you accuse it of something ???, so I guess you have an injured party, show me the charges, and please be so kind to pint at me, where is the surety of the person, because we need it now.... :)

I need mmmhhh, let me think......oh, $350k to administrate correctly, competently and with fairness this matter :D

So where is the surety, for the 350k ? :/

What hospital ??? :D :D :D HAHAHAHA!!!!!

Just spoke to the Nurse where Leigh is being held. Basically, she's steadfast that the common law/Acts-and-Statutes are 6-one-half-dozen-or-the-other...she was awright (the Nurse) to talk to, but clueless

Awright but clueless !!!!....been there done that too :-D

eastern standard time? thats probably a waste of good film, you should go digital.

the poor girl. no one deserves to be brainwashed and then called crazy. her ignorance should not be an excuse to be tormented.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/amy-collins-sentenced-to-house-arrest-probation-1.2325800

Im curious Kent, does Newfoundland have an equivalent to this page that Ontario has regarding all of their Acts and statutes?

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/navigation?file=browseStatutes&reset=yes&menu=browse&lang=en

Moral of this story: Obey the law, because EVERYONE is to obey the law, and NO ONE is above the law :-P

Recognition of common law

98. Subject to sections 91 to 97 and other provisions of existing law

(a) all legal claims and demands; and

(b) all estates, titles, rights, duties, obligations and liabilities existing by the common law or custom, or created by statute,

http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/statutes/j04.htm#98_

Equity prevails

107. In all matters that are not particularly set out in this Part in which there is a conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of common law, the rules of equity prevail.

http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/statutes/j04.htm#107_

Kent Barrett please, where is this human rights defender title comes from ?

Ha...ok

So Amy has the RIGHT to the person she have in her pocket its SURETY ?

At least in the Ontario Human Rights Code, as Scott would say- "FUN-FACT": there is NO DEFINITION, of what a HUMAN is, in the Ontario Human Rights CODE.....they DO however give a definition for PERSON, none of which is ME ;)

“person” in addition to the extended meaning given it by Part VI (Interpretation) of the Legislation Act, 2006, includes an employment agency, an employers’ organization, an unincorporated association, a trade or occupational association, a trade union, a partnership, a municipality, a board of police commissioners established under the Police Act, being chapter 381 of the Revised Statutes of Ontario, 1980, and a police services board established under the Police Services Act;

Ontario Human Rights CODE Criminal CODE Municipal CODE DaVinci CODE

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h19_e.htm

But what about the person she HAVE Kent Barrett ?

I think the bogus is that Man and Weman have NO IDEA who they are and WHAT they HAVE :)

I refer to the Universal Declaration of HUMAN Rights, as just the, 'Universal Declaration of Rights'....the 'Human' part is to ensnare you BACK into their jurisdiction

PERSON: 1. a HUMAN BEING

Black's Law Dictionary 9th-edition

The PERSON we are talking about here, is that person that was created a few weeks after our birth, that person that has an INSCRIPTION number, and a CERTIFICATE.......I can't BE that person, I just can't be something that was created AFTER me, I can only HAVE that person......plus, that person have a SURETY hooked to it, there is a SIGNATURE on its certificate that proves it, and that surety seems to be its CREATOR, which is the GOVERNMENT......and apparently, Mister Justice, well, according to all these charters and declaration, I have the RIGHT to access that SURETY.....unless these documents are FALSE......so, I think we NEED that surety today Mister JUSTICE, can you tell me where it is PLEASE, Mister Justice ?

If AMY would have known WHO she is, that's what she would have done......now, tell me how the fuck they gonna deal with this ? :)

"PERSON: 1. a HUMAN BEING

Black's Law Dictionary 9th-edition"

wouldnt that contradict a person being anything else?

So we need a CRIME An INJURED party Some CHARGES And the SURETY

With all this, we are st up and ready for the show :D

No David Johansen, it depends where you are and what you do......in Amy specific case, the person was that thing she have in her pocket

But at the restaurent, you can be seen as a person by the cook, that person in this black laws 9th edition

HEEELLLOOOSSSSS !!!!!!!! :D

Lots of words have a complete different meaning depending on where you are........CURVE is an example that comes to mind........are you on the baseball field or on the highway ? , or in a laboratory, or in a architect office ?

You just don't get it Kent Barrett ?? :D

Don't you think this bartender has right too ??, if he DECIDE to see YOU as a person, but he has NO IDEA about ALL a person could be ??

Ayoye !!!! :D

Why is it so hard to get ?

I am a Man, and I HAVE a person. (Legal)

I am a Man, and some may see me as a PERSON (common)

I can be a PERSON, but the one in Black LAw's 9th (Human Being)

I am Pierre, and the person I happen to have in my pocket is named PIERRE DAOUST, that way, it was easier for some dudes to make me BELIEVE that I was this thing.....

It's seems to be all about, WHO accounts for SURETY in these courts......it seems to be a LEGAL world we live in......so the best thing to do, is to FIND where is SURETY, and go from there....no ? :/

I see.....you are not here to learn what is true or not......you are here to do the newspaper job on Amy's case......is that is ? :/

But just so you know, most of us KNOWS the Amy's case......she ran that case with freeman on the land bullshit, so she ended up in a hospital to make sure she is ok, and she LOST the case.....simple as it is......no big deal, and no DRAMA......just BUSINESS as usual...

If you want to be ONLY a human being, WITHOUT a person.......go to the government and REDEEM that thing, buy a guitar, find a nice place deep in the woods, and go play guitar......no one will ever SEE you as a person again :D

? :/

jeepers, jeepers creepers [?d?i?p?z ?kri?p?z] interj US and Canadian slang a mild exclamation of surprise

You are mildly surprised ? :/

Sorry, could not resist :D :D :D

I don't know WHO published all this information, so some fucktards could do stupid shit like that ? :(

At what point did I state such things are a good idea?

What the fuck is in your empty heads that you'd do this?

Kent, I'm sorry your publicity attempts resulted in "`Tard blowback".

To the idiots threatening... If you are going to harm someone, HARM them, don't threaten...

...these are people you mean harm. Why would you want to have a chat with them?

:D

Who do you talk to Scott Scott Duncan?

The guy who phoned and threatened... YOU KNOW he/she/it is in this group. They just HAVE to be.

I was thinkin Frizbee...

Unless this has been published on Dean's wall.....ahve you published this on some other groups Kent Barrett ?

That's like saying someone's a criminal just because they're black.

Just because Mr Frisbee is `tarded, doesn't mean he did this.

LOL....

When Dean Kory was in the bin, I think Frizbee called there, he mentioned it here I think...

*sigh*

Stereotypes exist because they tend to be true :(

double *sigh*

Yep....Freezebbe must have took 6 or 7 king cans, and decide to become her lawyer :D

Been there done that HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

the JOP yelled "Leave!" to me!

JOP ? :/

and kent knows all this stuff firsthand? got someone on the inside kent?

Frisbey posted the number there on his wall a few days ago as well! I really don't think it was idiots from this group, I think it was Frisbey!

Or maybe it was Jay Roggers or Jeff Hank, who knows? But I saw it!

justice of the peace - he was actually a retired vice-principal.... wtf? Ontario Court of justice

:P

Pete...that should read "HEY F***"

John JeffJay LLB at your service...I'm also a yoga instructor in my spare time!! :P

You forgot about "Bob Week"...

House arrest has HUGE holes in it. I spent three months on house arrest years ago. The conditions were that I couldn't leave the house, except for shopping on Fridays and work, and absolutely could not attend any establishment that served alcohol.

Except for the bar that I worked in, EVERY day, for 11 hours.

maybe 'Bob' is the yoga instructor...or former Olympic diver...that's a beautiful pike position he's holding!

Yup... there goes the thread. :P

These threads have such painful deaths...

The "restrictions" also, curiously enough, only applied to the FIRST two months of the three month sentence. The third, I could do anything. The entire incident would have gone quite differently if I were to encounter it now. I didn't have a clue back then!

hmmm, I guess the 'PERSON' is the one that needs to stay at home while the man/woman can get on with their life

Exactly! So as long as she leaves her wallet at home... :p

It would net even go that far Stuart Stone :D

*not

awww Pete Daoust, I'm sure you have a whole heap of pics you are just aching to put up using this theme...and now that the thread has officially been declared dead (at least civilly), it possibly deserves a few more of your inspired images to give it a proper send off...or should that be a TOKEN send off? :D

Anyway, there is a thread in here, which I CAN'T write fuckall on it, where a crazy guy just thrown himself out the window, and brought his bed sheet with him......29 fucking stories building :/ ......some crazy stuff is happening in here :-o

:/