The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Oct 09, 2013 4:25 PM

Gail Marie

For those that may have missed it ;)

Scott Duncan THE Creator has the SUPREME law. YOU are THE creator. "God" is an invention by the nobility to FILL that "THE CREATOR" spot, so you will think you aren't entitled.

For those that may have missed it Scott Duncan THE Creator has the SUPREME law. YOU are THE creator. "God" is an invention by the nobility to FILL that "THE CREATOR" spot, so you will think you aren't entitled.
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 672 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_569568266412443
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 22

Pete Daoust

Since this fucking PIERRE DAOUST's mailbox is EMPTY.....I have to do something, I have wrote this and wanted to share it with you....

I am a Man, and I took the name Pierre to communicate with other Men, I happen to have a PERSON in my pocket, a person that was created by the government 1 month after my birth, it seems to be a result of a deal made between my parents and the government.

This person has been named PIERRE DAOUST, and has an inscription number attached to it, with a lots of other numbers”

Today, after receiving some informations, I have all the good reasons to believe that MY duty as a MAN, is to ADMINISTRATE that person named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 119XXXXXXXX.

In fact, I am the SOLE authorized administrator for this person, unless ANOTHER person can prove otherwise.

So, I am NOTIFYING this matter to YOU today, and ALL of your Agents, and/or Officers, and/or ANYONE in your CORPORATIONS and/or INSTITUTIONS.

In ALL matters that has SURETY issues, be advised that these issues will be directed to the person named PIERRE DAOUST inscription number 119XXXXXXXXX is surety. And, as a MAN, I am NOT surety for this person, and never been, if in the past, I acted in ways that lead you to believe otherwise, that was purely by MISTAKE, so please forgive me if I did.

If ANYONE, decide, without authorization, to conduct and/or, administrate PIERRE DAOUST's affairs, this PERSON will also act as surety.

I will conduct ALL PIERRE DAOUST’s affairs with Respect, Honor, Dignity & Integrity

You can OBJECT to all of this if you wish, if I don't receive anything from you in the next 30 days, this will STAND as FACT, Evidences and proofs in ALL PIERRE DAOUST's affairs.

BY:_______________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST Inscription No. 119XXXXXXXXXXX

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 672
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 672 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chip Douglas

I can CREATE a trust, as it is 'My Will'...though Kate Rene/Gaia has been goin' around saying that trusts are nothing but "LEGAL BULLSHIT"

Im interested in your opinion on that Scott...are Trusts "legal bullshit" as KATE has been saying, or, is it our way to be the CREATOR of our own SUPREME LAW...operative-word, 'LAW'

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 673
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 673 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

you aren't asking me Chip, but I'd like to contribute (hopefully not a shit stain :/) the corp/trust idea as I try to comprehend the big picture, is the best solution because there is no honour left in the system. So the corp/trust provides us with an opportunity to manouever though the system with a protection that we don't have as long as our legal name is fair game to use in the public. I see alot of things/letters/tools that have resulted from the recent Apostolic letter ..which may be all good IF the club house players cared and followed their own laws. If given the choice to be protected by a corporation vs a letter , the better choice seems to be a corporation/trust that is created for the purpose of my and other beneficiaries welfare. Scott Duncan if what I've shared is not accurate, please delete or let me know I will delete it

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 674
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chip Douglas

Has this group discussed at all her "I, who shall not be named" letter, referring to the LEGAL NAME?...its like, yeah, i get it Kate- buts thats only because the PROVINCE OF ONTARIO created it...like, whats stopping her or anyone else CREATING their own?...seems like alot of belly-aching/much ado about nothing

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 674
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top