The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Oct 09, 2013 6:54 AM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So Scott, you said to set things up as these "countries" have set things up. Then I would understand that CANADA is the corporation that HOLDS ASSETS and does not operate in commerce? The gov't is a TRUST which handles commerce on behalf of CANADA?

Then all corporations / persons registered within that TRUST are PROPERTY of that TRUST and all commerce done therein are interest of this TRUST?

I am trying to figure out which entity acts in commerce on behalf of all. It is my understanding that an entity that HOLDS assets should not be involved in commerce at all.

My question being, do I have it all backwards? Would not the registered entity be the one involved in commerce and the TRUST does not?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 431
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 431 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_569400649762538
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.0151988293247E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 27

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

And another thought, if I decided to pursue "enjoying a living", why would I register this endeavor with a bunch of bankrupt bottom feeders? Just because I would be using their shitty money?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 432
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 432 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

What corporation does not act in commerce? Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma That is the whole purpose. Why cannot a holding corp or a corp that is trust property do business? It follows its bylaws... Canada's are ACTs and Statutes.. The corp is the Trusts Agent in commerce.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 432
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 432 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

A Trust is a legal entity that is structured in a way that it can legally take advantage of passthrough accounting. The proceeds pass through to its Beneficiaries. A Trust is the business of increasing assets. This is how the gov't doesn't pay taxes?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 432
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 432 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Beverly, in Canada do you have an option for a corporation that has "pass through" taxation? Here in the States, when a corp is registered, it defaults to a C-Corp (which gets taxed then distributes the profits to the shareholders who are taxed) or we can elect to be an S-corp (the profit is distributed to the shareholders then it is taxed). Its seems that S-corp status would be the way to go for us as any tax that is levied could be discharged through the Person in Trust. What do you think? Does this even exist in Canada?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 432 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 432 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

So...

EVERY corporation has limited liability. There are no exceptions.

EVERYBODY GET THAT?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 434 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 434 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.
Back to top