Oct 08, 2013 4:26 PM

Derek Moran did an excellent job!

that is so him

I can't fast forward it on my phone. I'll check it when I get home.

starts @ 176 min.

:-)

While Scott Duncan, as per RULE # 1 is ALWAYS RIGHT, and it is truly futile to appeal to your rapist; I must admit that I am always heartened to see any instance of truth being revealed, and the "lumber" required to serve us all so generously provided. Kudos to Derek for investing his time to learn, share, and instruct those who seek/strive to realize an empowered life. :)

This was a good opportunity for Derek to inform the masses that were in attendance, I doubt the city will care what he said, but what about the hundreds that were there to listen ;)

do you guys mean 216 instead of 176?

I wonder if he did this weird lady with a pink hat after, :D

I agree Gail Marie. While so many of us appear as "shaved monkeys", so completely vacuous as to possibly force the universe to collapse in upon itself, I see merit in Malcom Gladwell's "tipping point" argument, previously referred to as the "100th monkey syndrome".

OK, I am sorry, but that is the first thought that crossed my mind, AND IT'S NOT MY FUCKING FAULT :P

You mean that wasn't Rob Ford in drag as a lesbian granny cowboy?

Hey Pete, in answer to your question from Derek "Tell'im to ask me his fucking-self...no wonder he is dependent on GOVERNMENT"

You know what Chris Evan, Derek is a nice guy, he is a MELANCOLIC type, he focus on details.

I like Derek, but I am the opposite....but having a guy like him in my entourage, can HELP me a lot, for all these boring things I can't do myself....

Perhaps, I could never do what he did in this place, first, it STINKS in these place, second, I will fall asleep, third, I will fuck up this meeting big time, fourth, I might embarrass some enough that I will be kicked out of that place....

:D

Same with PROTESTS,,,,I just can't show up in PROTESTS,,,,it's NOT my place....I know it :D

I'm glad there's someone who will do the detail work...I find statutes a wonderful cure for insomnia & a lot of the time I don't know where to begin looking.

It's important to have someone who will dig through the clubhouse rules to show these fools that they may be able to fool most of the people most of the time, but they can't fool ALL of the people ALL of the time.

As for the chick in the hat, she reminded me of Ray Liotta in this clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx_hlStCL7g

Rob Ford in drag.... a spandex moo-moo perhaps? Derek spoke well to those useful idiots. That thing in the hat, was she not a survivor of BATSHIT CRAZY!!!

This guy ROCKS !!!!! :D

See what you've just said Aladdin Sane ???

Derek spoke WELL to those USEFUL idiots :D

What the fuck is worth to speak WELL to useful idiots ?

Speaking well to useful idiots is the SAME as speaking well to useful pluwoods :(

*plywoods :D

Composure: calm, cool and collective. I would have had some more dramatic moments when speaking to those idiots.

I wonder if he did do her?

To Gail Marie...

but what about the hundreds that were there to listen

What hundreds ? :/

Ha, you mean these hundreds MELANCOLICS ? :D

They won't change fuck all, too busy in details :P

What we need is a bunch of fucked-up coleric rebels, that will start a rebellion and do the RIGHT something to stop these fuckers from sucking our blood.

:D :D

people vary so techniques can be varied ;)

Techniques seems to be the same, I see different personalities doing different duties, in the same rebellion :D

Gotta have the guy that cook the fucking potatoes :D

Spoken like a master administrator!

In fact, I sign ....

BY:________________ Sole Authorized Administrator

But since you bring this in, I really think of changing this for:

BY:____________________ Sole Authorized MASTER Administrator

:D

Haha... Derek...

never been arrested

Pete Daoust I've thought of another possibility for your signing line Administrator Extraordinaire...it's even part french already!

Nah Gail Marie, check the legal definition of that word :(

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/extraordinary

Are you still USING words without checking it's definition Gail ?? :D

do you mean you aren't exceptional?

Exceptional or extraordinary ? :/......are you truing to fuck me ?

Gail and Pete fucking?

Well, you know what I mean :D....not fuck me in a sense fucking, but fucking up my brain.....ya knw !!!!

Resort must be made to the extraordinary when the ordinary does not succeed

the word exceptional was in the definition of extraordinary in that link

It DOES succed so far.....so no need of this extraordinary shit......I will use it IF they want to go on the ILLEGAL side of things :D

Derek Moran could you provide the case law for the claim you made that an Individual is a trust.

I am sure he can, but he is NOT here.....

if you're wondering why Derek Morans not part of the group well you just figured it out

Derek and Case law is like dog and bobsleigh......NATURAL FIT... :P

All this time I have been thinking my status as individual was a good thing. I should have known better. I guess any status granted by the court is to be rejected.

Fuck the court.....litteraly :D

My status is MAN......and the rest is history....I do administration shit :D

LOL. an I do it wifowt angskin fhor pearmission.

Tuttle the technician in the movie BRAZIL.

Jeff Roggers: if you're wondering why Derek Morans not part of the group well you just figured it out"

..just desserts

^^ (y)

At the end of the night, while he was outside walking to the parking-garage, i asked Deputy Chief Michael Frederico what he had thought of what i had to say. He pensively looked at the ground and told me- "What you had to say tonight.....it really got me thinking. In terms of the legal system, relative to the Constitution, in regards to the law, and the way things were MEANT to be"...then he didnt really encourage me, but more suggested to me i make a DEPUTATION to expand upon what i had said at the next upcoming Toronto Police Services Board meeting

Funny thing...there is NO definition for DEPUTATION in The Dictionary of Canadian Law OR Black's Law 9th! :/

deputation d?pj??te??(?)n/ noun 1. a group of people appointed to undertake a mission or take part in a formal process on behalf of a larger group. "he had been a member of a deputation to Napoleon III" synonyms: delegation, delegacy, legation, commission, committee, (diplomatic) mission; More http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/tmmis/have-your-say.htm

In hindsight- i kinda kicked myself, i shoulda got up there and made a DEPUTATION allright, and APPOINTED myself the common law-SHERIFF for Toronto...who would i have been arrested for PERSONATING- Mike Harris supposedly got rid of them during his reign, who would've OBJECTED?? :D

All of the drones(sheeple), would go to high alert... the programming would kick in... and you would be labeled one of them free dumpers.... gone for psychiatric assessment and had the little blue pills... :-D

I'd actually love to hear Scott's critique on what i said, good-or-bad..

Ambushing, and Picking fights! :D

I approve :D

You could get a Badge from Robert Menard...

Seriously. The fact this even exists means you succeeded! I'm going to re-watch :D

:D

Im at minute 176:00, towards the end...5-minute speech, PUBLIC RECORD too, right? :D

Public record, gotta love it. I love posting recordings then emailing the link back to them.

I really like when the clubhouse rules are thrown at them :D

..as in- how they're not even following their OWN Clubhouse Rules?

My goal was to bring some logical-saneness to a night where everybody was mostly speaking from pure EMOTION...my intent was to try and educate some people and make them think and question some things they had never occurred to them before, and people told me afterwards i had done just that

Oh- and David your question about the term INDIVIDUAL, Settled Estates v. Minister of National Revenue 1961 i think, on CanLII, towards the very bottom of the ruling is where they define it as 'trust/estate'

Did you like the part Scott, where i innocently called the Chair out for his use of the term- "...just step into the Well(-Deck)?" :D

Truth is i only made this speech to impress LaNi Black so i could have sex with her if im ever in New Jersey...

-_-

there he is!!!!

:D

This group is fun! Never a dull moment :D

To wit- LaNi, would you mind if Beverly 'joindered' us? (pun intended)

Ah Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma would just CHEW you up...

Police Officers are one thing Scott, but would EVERY City of Toronto-employee also have a Performance/Hazard/Surety/Risk Bond whatever they exactly call it, say for instance- even a Librarian?

Yes. ALL government employees do.

And when a government employee is lying to me, and I can prove it, does that put him/her in a HAZARDIOUS location ?

No. If you claim, and then lien their bond, they can't work for the government anymore.

Ho ! :-\

This could be disturbing :-(

I should add- while i 'was away for a bit,' i made a concerted-effort to track this stuff down...i asked the City-Clerk's office about these Bonds, they punted to the Ombudsman's office, they punted to '311' (the general answer-line, like THEY would know), 311 said they were told i have to send a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

RISK MANAGEMENT

More and more, municipalities are adopting risk management strategies to address public liability. Generally, risk management strategies seek to minimize the effects and costs of public liability suits against a municipality. This involves identifying potential hazards and implementing the appropriate measures to reduce or eliminate them in your community. You may find that the biggest areas for potential liability are public works or parks and recreational services. Risk management initiatives therefore tend to concentrate on these service areas.

http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4965

How do we claim their bond? Through default and estoppel by way of a NOTICE concerning an infraction of clubhouse rules, and/or damage/injury to us by attributing a PUBLIC name to ME?

CLAIM NOTICE

You've harmed me. So let this NOTICE serve as INTENT, that i INTEND, to CLAIM your Bond, Lien your Bond, and Liquidate your Bond.....fuckers.

..i wonder how often someone from the City of Toronto opens up THAT envelope? ;)

ChiefRock Sino General asked me to get some advise here at TTFL on how to draft a NOTICE OF CLAIM against a person who is not a government employee. < At least not officially and on the record as having/occupying an OFFICE. He's helped me start the process, but says in order to perfect my lien against an "individual" I have to send a NOTICE OF CLAIM. Do I inform them that I will LIEN their PERSON, or their LEGAL NAME. or them, as in, I will lien you JOE BLOW?

^^ I'm thinking that I should post this question as a new thread as it doesn't directly relate to Derek's appearance. :(

You have to establish cause.

Otherwise its frivolous and vexatious.

I've established cause already.

have you sent them a bill?

yes

An INVOICE, not a bill :P

that was the next question...

an invoice=bill as well.... dumbass :-D

NO WAY....check the legal definition of these 2 words :P

ok , I get it, I stand corrected via legal definition... However in common everyday use sending an invoice is often referred to as "send me the bill" in english.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming... Robert did they respond?

Fuck the common everyday use, I can't AFFORD that anymore :P

You neither I THINK :P

No...and no....didn't respond to the Notice of Default either.

Ok.. So if that part of the Administrative process is done, Perfect with a lien and public notice.

I understand that. Thanks. What I need to know/establish is an answer to my last question. :(

which is?

Do I inform them that I will LIEN their PERSON, or their LEGAL NAME. or them, as in, I will lien you JOE BLOW?

You have established grounds for a claim. You PPSA their ass ( Name and all accounts associated with) and notify thru Public Notice once Lien is filed. The Public Notice is a Tender, they have violated that tender. It perfects the lien and then you will be contacted by the underwriter of the accounts. Send them Pubic Notice via registered Mail... put a Stamp on the top right hand corner...

Is an affidavit of obligation not necessary then?

First I have to give/serve a NOTICE of CLAIM. As I inferred, I am looking to triple check the wording of the claim before I send it.

I saw the affidavit of obligation as a way of notifying them of the lien...but a copy of the public notice i can do :)

Affidavits are simply recognized by court, from my understanding, I have seen these other so called long wordy affidavits and wonder what is the point? I mean... If The affidavit is recognized, if one attaches exhibits of already existing Notices and certified copies of every step of the administrative process it perfects the claim. So to me, It is just a simple statement, that the following is true to the best of my Knowledge.. and the see attached exhibits with a directory/appendix and short one liner of the content of each exhibit.. exhibits- including a statement and all relevant documentation.

Robert If you have done what you have said, your calim has grounds and after you complete the lien on the accounts/Name and You Have Given PUBLIC NOTICE That is the NOTICE OF THE CLIAM... Fuck. Out

Are you claiming you know more than the Chief? You are so funny sometimes. I seem to recall Scott saying the Chief is always right. I don't recall Scott saying that Jay is always right. Hmmm

I am not always right. I do understand the process. The Chief is very wise as is the Admiral. i am relaying what I have learned. If it is incorrect, I am sure I will know, right away. In the meantime, I really do not know how to assist you anymore.

Block that "VICTIMIZED FAGGOT" :D

If you are going to court to sue them then their civl process, yes .. You give Notice of Claim. If you have done a administrative process and established grounds for a claim, an alternative claim is a lien, without court. I never made any such claims to the following quote taken from your above post. "Are you claiming you know more than the Chief? " that being said. bye.

Are you claiming that you know more than the ChiefRock General....!!!...you see, that's why I blocked this idiot....he only want to waiste Scott and Chief's time.....not our's, so BLOCK him... :-D

Ya, "He Wasn't Right in the Head". :-D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs8QKXtCN9w

No harm no foul - Bobis Youruncle. :) It's obvious that I had falsely assumed you had read the entire thread and therefore my post about how I was under direct instruction (on this particular matter/point) by the Chief, and, that my statement about my need to establish a NOTICE OF CLAIM came directly from him. (If such a claim seems too ludicrous and just too plain dumb to accept, feel free to verify my assertions with him - if it pleases you.)

That's why I found it so funny when I got your numerous frustrated responses, one of which ended with FUCK and OUT, as if to indicate I (or in this case the Chief) am/is just plain thick and obviously can't, or, are unwilling to understand that a notice of claim is not required. Or perhaps, that I, which INCLUDES/MEANS the Chief in this case, doesn't have a clue what he's speaking about, and witness you sign off in frustration and hostility.

As I said, sometimes, it's almost too funny in here.

a notice is required... your warped peceptions aside... I never ever said or assumed or anything about the Chief your assumptions in that regard are simply wrong. Do what you want. I have the utmost respect for the gentlemen you continually try to pull in here. Fucktard.

public notice = notice of claim. period.

Block... :-D

I am having fun me, every minute I am spending here are funny..... :-D

Why would it be otherwise ? :-\

Oh. I had thought you were frustrated with my statements etc. (which was really me just repeating the Chief's statements etc) If I misunderstood...sorry. :(

You are right though. I have completed the lien through PPSA (with the Chief's help).

its not about being right for me, it is about the process to establish the claim. If you have done all of this... you would have better comprehension... the only conclusion I can draw is the Pete is right and you're a cop... which I don't care.. it just means you will be too stupid to figure this out... if not a cop, then a private security contractor perhaps... Do not Call me to any thread again...ever.

You're :-P

shit...

A private "victimized faggot" contractor :-D

Now I'm really laughing.

I can almost piss myself laughing when I entertain the "fact" that Pete is so very SURE that his SPIDY SENSE is always 100% accurate and yet doesn’t seem to realize the obvious: his statement is based ENTIRELY ON BELIEF.

FYI For those that give a hoot, my son and I have been fortunate enough to learn from and spend a number of hours in person with the Chief - not to mention time spent on the phone. I’ve even been fortunate enough to help him succeed with his legal pursuits on one occasion. I am confident that the Chief's "SPIDY SENSE" of us will reveal, should he be asked, that he doesn’t think my 10 year old and I are some kind of cop duo tag team. BELIEVE AS YOU WISH. I do find your and Pete's BELIEFS so very entertaining.

So are you intentionally being thick or what the fuck?

Seriously, what's the fucking deal?

It's like you do not even know what direction you are going in.

Robert is making sure he understands things correctly. After years of BELIEF...

Are not we all?

Robert is creating confusion and controversy

Thanks Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma. I used to think I knew it all because of my BELIEFS. Now I want to stick to facts, not speak about bullshit based on beliefs. :) Is that so bad? :(

When you get the the core of the deal with him, he literally DEVIATE the deal to some emotional bullshit....

Do you guys believe that this happy sid is his Son ? :D

SHILL...I SMELL SHILL!

Dean oft Kory, I smell BELIEF and it stinks like shit. :) lol

Which SHILL Dean Otf Kory ?

shill [shil] Show IPA Slang. noun 1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc. 2. a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty. verb (used without object) 3. to work as a shill: He shills for a large casino. verb (used with object) 4. to advertise or promote (a product) as or in the manner of a huckster; hustle: He was hired to shill a new TV show.

Do you guys believed the Derek Hill episode ? :D

No, it isn't but fuck, your being a fucktard. Pete has some valid points about you getting to heart of the matter then going off on some emotional bullshit... it does look like that from here. i do not care to invest anymore time in bullshit.. Blowing steam off, aside. I see provocation to get me to spar with you, you draw in Names of people who are busy, when your questions have been asked and answered> if you met the Admiral good for you, he probably doesn't care if your a cop, as long as it serves his agenda, and its not my business.. so what ever. Leave me alone and talk to Bev, she seems to get you.

Is his Son also met Scott ??

So he says..

Fuck, they hire cops at that young age now ?? :D

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

...and it looks like a few (very few here), based on their beliefs, want to burn another witch. Halloween is coming and tensions in Salem are rising. Let's find a witch! (Me, I'm going to study some more when I stop laughing).

Belief doesn't even enter into the picture, No witches, One would have to care, one doesn't and good luck. You wont' be able to see me anymore this is the last post wasted on you.

Well, there are many factors which point towards your PERSON. We have, as of late, acknowledged that our BC is a security of the PERSON, you have a PERSON and are responsible for it (else you might land up like Leigh), the PERSON is an account and new PERSONs seem to get created often, ie., bank accounts, credit cards, traffic tickets, etc. The LEGAL TENDERization upon this PERSON (for commercial use only) keeps you running around trying desperately to stay out of some form of "troubles". The fact that your signature creates "money" for ME to benefit from as Authorized Rep for this PERSON (for accounting purposes only)...

You start thinking almost TOO MUCH to try to purify it all to only ONE entity regarding all this information in your head.

THE PERSON Bev, not YOUR person :D

Scott has even said, You HAVE a PERSON and you are responsible for it.

But he NEVER said to REPRESENT it, I think he've said the OPPOSITE so many times :/

but you have said over and over that you don't HAVE a PERSON

The fact that your signature creates "money" for ME ,....NO, for the PERSON.....this money is for the PERSON, not "ME"

but you have said over and over that you don't HAVE a PERSON: Fuck, you just don't read me I guess.........HOW many times I have wrote in here "The person I happen to HAVE in my pocket" ?

if that freaking piece of paper would need to freaking eat... i'm SURE it would be FOR that PERSON... but, with full knowledge that the piece of paper does NOT need to eat... I highly doubt it benefits that PERSON...

It's definitely MY PERSON to administrate for so I don't land up like Leigh

HAHAHA!!!....I see the FLAW here....These LEGAL tender NOTES are meant for PERSON, not Man and Woman, Man and Woman are NOT legal stuff :D

Its really not worth an argument... make another singing video Pete :D

Write a song about the PERSON IN YOUR POCKET :D

For me, it's THE person I happen to have in MY pocket, and I get to administrate that thing.....the same as I administrate a $20 bill :P

"I gots a person in my pocket and I dunno what to do with it... person in my pocket, person in my pocket..."

I REALLY don't want to argue with you Bev...

And I don't see this as an argument, but a great opportunity to learn

I am NOT smarter than you, I promise :D

and I hope you are NOT smarter than me :D

Oh, Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, TRUST me, I know EXACTLY what to do with it :D

Right now, it is sitting in the pick-up truck's box :D

Pete gets the simple rules... some of us understand the fuller aspect and some of us just over think it...

I know EXACTLY what to do with ANYTHING that could be HOOKED to that person, BELIEVE it or NOT :D

Only LAWYERS loves complicated stuff :D

The fuller aspect ??? ...here is the fuller aspect

I am a MAN, and I HAVE a person. period

Yes, and Robert is very clear on some aspects... and Lee Boobie is very clear on many aspects... Rome wasn't built in a day...

I did NOT ask for that person, I did NOT SIGNED as surety for it......

I see 3 options...

1). I will LEGALLY administrate that person the way I see fit. 2). Its creator will take it back from me legally, which is an impossibility. 3). Its creator will ADMIT that I am one of his SLAVEs and send the neck chains via registered mail

I can't see anything else :D

Do you see anything else ?

You just CAN'T represent that person Beverly Girl......You were doing EXACTLY that all these years.....think about it :(

And these NEW persons they are creating OVER and OVER, where do they PRESUMED having the RIGHT to create them ?

THE SURETY, it's all about SURETY and ACCOUNTING......well that SURETY is hooked to THAT person I happen to have in my pocket.....they are ASSUMING that they can fuck around with the SURETY, because I am suppose to be an IGNORANT fucker.....

Anyway, if I get this ALL wrong, I will know it very soon :D

See you in jail and/or in hell :D

Pete Daoust, I would rather see you on the bridge. I'm just waiting for a very special letter in my persons mail box so that I may administrate.

In THE person's mailbox

But, I am NOT wrong David Smile......so no worry for the jail and/or hell, for now :D

I know you are not wrong. I'm wrong for now but I study now before I open my jib. I know it's not my person, I just need some mail to administrate via your teaching. Should about a 4-500 in fines coming in soon plus the info I demanded from TPS.

Tell me when you open that person's mailbox and it's in it......I will go step by step with you if you want :)

Pete Daoust, you are top shelf.

No, I am in a fucking bad mood over these cocksuckers :D

Helping YOU, will help "ME" a lot, some in here seems to have very specific AGENDA on that subject :D

Jeez Pete it's a compliment.

But I certainly understand how these cocksuckers can ruin a good day

I know, thaks for it, but I am telling you the TRUTH :D

I expect nothing less for an honourable family man such as yourself. Ok done ass kissing let kill all the cocksuckers

Well not all of them ;p

The first step is to OPEN the envelop, and then you call me in here....if you go further and jump on step 2 without me, you'll be on your own.....

Copy that, count on me sir

reason is, it might get to COMPLICATED, and I hate COMPLICATED shit :D

I'm get ink stamps made this week so I can do it right

What will be written on these stamps ?

And who told you you would need stamps ? :D

You won't need them before at least 60 days after opening this envelop :D

HAHAHAHA!!!! :D

What's so funny?

I like Lee Boobies... :-D

HELLOOOOOOOS

David Smile, What will be written on these stamps ? :)

This is EXACTLY how we will do it...... :D

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151917810013418&set=vb.564433417&type=2&theater

No fucking around the fucking up :D

Sorry Pete Daoust, last show que then home to check that link. Thank you.

No hellos, brb

Red ink stamp of my signature. Black ink stamp with sole authorized administrator (all Caps name) sin # and address

NO...don't do that please :D

Ok I'll just contact you when the persons mail arrives

We gonna go by the BACK door, because it's NOT against the LAW :D

Like that guy :D

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151917810013418&set=vb.564433417&type=2&theater

shit damn, the back door it is! That's top self.

And LEGAL :D

Back door Pirates... :-D

that cat is like in his domain, operates on both land and sea, full and proper capacity + killer instinct.

And LEGAL :D :D

weeee

We may encounter these kind of creature on the way, but they are so easy to DEAL with :D

MAY?

WILL!

MAY

but very little chances :D , and if it's happening, it will be fun :D

do you like to record them

I love it :D

And I always find a way to email them the audio :P

I was just going to say that.

too late :P

I sent this one to Blondie and the suit, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLYE7jo6PdE

i WAS an activist, the foodies fail me. and out the door I went

I am NOT an activist, I am a MAN and I have a person, very simple basic shit :D

I been on many ships, I've always been a man.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pifn4GImAu0/T3oaA6Z83bI/AAAAAAAAANM/TAPSZJi0YI4/s1600/Aging_Activist_1.jpg

David Smile, I just watched a few of your video's on youtube. I particularly liked your comment on the one where you served noticed to the police, where you commented: "Shine the light of truth, cockroach scatter". So true and funny! Many hate the truth. But that is to be expected as anger is one of the stages of the ego dying and trying to protect itself in defense of it's bullshit and "non truthing" ways. BTW Great Park performance. Did you put that together?

Robert Cormier, yes wrote the notice up in 10 mins. I was doing a free school seminar in the park when I saw several cops waiting to try to stop me from teaching people how to deal with the cops. They don't like me much ( 52 division) I will look for the notice and share it with you.

So Councillor Karen Stintz says the officer who gave her a ticket admitted there was actually NO Stop-sign for the ticket he initially gave her- so what does she do after he admits to fabricating/falsifying a ticket, she CAVES IN?.....am i reading this right, Scott?.....and SHE is running for MAYOR next year? - LOL

“The officer admitted in a written statement that there was no stop sign at the intersection where he gave me the ticket but he claimed that he had evidence that showed me going through two additional stop signs,” Stintz told the Sun on Tuesday.

“The prosecutor that they hired from Vaughan — they brought in an outside prosecutor — threatened to withdraw the ticket that they issued (for) Duplex and Berwick and issue me two new tickets that I would then have had to get a new (court) date, hire a lawyer, defend myself and again taxpayers” money would have had the outside prosecutor come back from Vaughan to fight it."

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/22/ttc-chair-karen-stintz-pleads-guilty-to-cycling-traffic-ticket

Hehe !!!.....shoveling some bullshit Derek Moran ??... :-D

To put this into perspective, Pierre- if I WERE the Councillor for this area, and i found out from a Constituent that the City was depriving someone of their right to 'Due Process'/Fair-and-Impartial hearing, id march into Mayor Ford's office and start breakin' shit til someone told me they'd make sure it got rectified

That's why you'll never be a Councillor, :-(

Yeah- THAT, and the fact that i dont feel serving an organization that operates TRYING to keep the people under Admiralty-Maritime Law!.....id actually try to explain to as many as would listen how By-Laws are a scam, the other Councillors would all gang-up on me, id become miserable - NO THANKS, ill just wait with 'eager anticipation' on Scott's TRUST POWER article :D :D :D

Oh yesss... :-D

Ta-DA!

§71-13. Deposits with Chief Financial Officer. [Amended 2005-04-14 by By-law No. 331-2005]

Duly executed copies of all agreements, including all insurance and certificates thereof, all contracts, BONDS, letters of credit and other SECURITY for the DUE PERFORMANCE thereof, and all other documents executed by or on behalf of the City shall be delivered to the Chief Financial Officer for safekeeping.

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/municode/1184_071.pdf

Derek: Police Officers are one thing Scott, but would EVERY City of Toronto-employee also have a Performance/Hazard/Surety/Risk Bond whatever they exactly call it, say for instance- even a Librarian?

Scott Duncan: Yes. ALL government employees do.

Pete Daoust: And when a government employee is lying to me, and I can prove it, does that put him/her in a HAZARDIOUS location ?

Scott Duncan: No. If you claim (their bond), and then lien their bond, they can't work for the government anymore.

Derek Moran: RISK MANAGEMENT

More and more, municipalities are adopting risk management strategies to address public liability. Generally, risk management strategies seek to minimize the effects and costs of public liability suits against a municipality. This involves identifying potential hazards and implementing the appropriate measures to reduce or eliminate them in your community. You may find that the biggest areas for potential liability are public works or parks and recreational services. Risk management initiatives therefore tend to concentrate on these service areas.

http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=4965

Robert Cormier: How do we claim their bond? Through default and estoppel by way of a NOTICE concerning an infraction of clubhouse rules, and/or damage/injury to us by attributing a PUBLIC name to ME? (SCOTT CLICKED LIKE on this)

Derek Moran: CLAIM NOTICE

You've harmed me. So let this NOTICE serve as INTENT, that i INTEND, to CLAIM your Bond, Lien your Bond, and Liquidate your Bond.....fuckers.

..i wonder how often someone from the City of Toronto opens up THAT envelope?

Scott, as you've probably heard, there is another 'Town Hall-meeting' coming up at City Hall. This time about 'carding'/street-checks by the police, making these 'contact-forms' with people they do ID checks with out of the blue. Something tells me that somehow-someway, they are able to turn-a-buck out of this for themself. Are the police able to somehow generate revenue for themselves by conducting these 'carding' practices?

OK, I just read a bunch of buzzwords. WTF are you talking about?

I think it would give them a reason to "find something" and create revenue.

What is this "carding" you speak of?

Ill find the link...

"The police internal review delayed an independent assessment of carding by the city’s AUDITOR GENERAL, which many advocates felt would give weight to the Star’s findings and create a benchmark going forward."

The MOMENT i saw them mention the AUDITOR GENERAL, i automatically thought- "It's ALL about SURETY, and ACCOUNTING," and that somehow-someway, they are generating REVENUE from off these ID-street checks/'carding' as they call it...i just dont know what their angle is

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2013/10/07/toronto_police_board_asks_for_public_input_on_carding.html

"The force also proposes to get rid of the contact card — called a FORM 306 — which is used to record personal details during a street check. Instead, officers would make notations in their memo books."

they do that shit out there?

Isn't the angle stealing our brains, bodies and labour, or, should I saty out of this?

Yeah, they got the idea from New York- but...per capita, apparently they are doing it even more HERE now, than in New York

Not yet they don't. If I am asked for ID, I ask them for theirs first, and it must have theirr full name address and date of birth on it.

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma - All the time. <--- well at least so often there is no longer a surprise when asked. :(

I BELIEVE by your uniform that you work for me. BUT, I can't be sure. There are so many "crazies" out there. Can I see your ID?

How many pieces of ID does a police officer have to carry with them, Scott?

I don't know/care. How many pieces do YOU have to carry?

zero

If they demand Name, address, and Date of birth, demand the same from them first.

I only carry in Lieu of Identification. Does that make me a drone?

My uncle was a police officer. He admitted to me that they were required to carry "business cards" with them, though he said he was never really sure why.

With Derek Moran's statement about Common law on the back (@ 181:17) which I will read after they have given me 4 pieces of ID, including their business card. <---wait I might REQUIRE 19 pieces of ID. Hmmm

Yes Robert, i have heard the same thing, 4 pieces of ID: Badge/#, Business Card, ID card, Warrant card

We probably have the RIGHT to ask for 19 pieces of ID. Isn't it all about accounting and surety anyways. I can give my own tenders just as you mentioned at 181:17. :) Learning is a unique process for all of us. Some ideas seem so clear for me, while other concepts are relentlessly vague. It's a strange thing, this learning process. My learning curve has always been riddled with peaks and valleys. It's so obviously a unique experience for us all.

If they don't have 19, they can SUBMIT an APPLICATION to us. Fuck. I'm getting mad AND having fun. :)

"Approximately 1.5 million Ontarians aged 16 years and over do not have a valid driver's licence." <--I wonder what their angle is here? I'm off to study more. Happyface Sid and I have some homework to do.

WOW- shit really hit-the-fan with Mayor Ford today here in Toronto....what's your take on all of this, Scott?

Hmmm... wonder who's pissed with that guy?

When he was a Councillor, he would go on the John Oakley Show on AM640 every Thursday morning here in Toronto, and basically spill-his-guts to the people about EVERY example of ridiculous wasteful-spending that he found out was going on at City Hall under Mayor David Miller......they've had the knives out for him ever since

Yah, cause I'd call that a SET-UP... I'm sure they ALL have their secrets and pay well to hide them...

http://makeameme.org/media/created/12-billion-on.jpg

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/28/to-film-or-not-to-film

Hey Derek Moran, you should forget about memes, and write a book :-P

Hey Pete Daoust, YOU should forget about memes and write a book- about ADMINISTRATING DEBT! :P

;)

Funny you mention it, I was thinking about it.....very hard....

"Municipal bonding is intended for accidental misuse of power: bonding is not intended to protect officials in the deliberate misuse of power, that is, the commission of criminal acts."

http://www.civilrightsfreedom.com/node/19

Scott Duncan: Toronto was dissolved in 1997 and replaced with administrative zones as defined in the CITY OF TORONTO ACT. It is no longer a municipality nor is it a city, legally. It is a commercial administrative zone. You have NO rights there, and nobody even noticed.

Gayle, I take it back. I didn't know you were studying to harm strangers for a living through fraud.

For the record, I was called to the bar and responded "Why"?

You are entering a life of fraud and are beneath contempt. Derek can't construct a coherent sentence, but he can look at himself in the mirror.

How do you do it?

Same in Mass with the County of Essex. Gone...just a corporate subdivision managed under the Secretary of State

Scott Duncan Seriously. The fact this even exists means you succeeded! I'm going to re-watch

Bobis: i just re-read this thread and it turned out to be a pretty good LIEN thread in the end with the info you shared...any updates on how to do/perfect a LIEN since October?

This perfects it:

PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC/Jason Fredrick Le Blanc is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of the CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC And Jason Fredrick Le Blanc MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC/ Jason Fredrick Le Blanc FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF TWO HUNDRED And FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($250,000.00 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE. ALL properties, titles and Cargo derived from said names are forfeit to the Duly Authorized Trustee Corporation

Let it be Known: That the vessel with one sole on board known as: Jason Fredrick Le Blanc has relinquished that Title to be held in Trust.

The vessel has Taken the name BoB Uncle and waives all benefits under the Alberta, Change of Name Act.

All matters are PRIVATE.

All property and titles may be used at the discretion of the Board of directors as set out in PRIVATE Charter as per the PRIVATE Trust Covenant.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION, [ 1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] at and by the following method only:

We Reserve All Rights for all transactions unless otherwise expressly presented in writing.

All Correspondence must be received through registered mail addressed exactly as follows:

BOB UNCLE LTD. Attention: Accounting Dept. PMB 206 204-1440-52 ST, NE Calgary, Alberta T2A-4T8

Authorized By: Bob Uncle, President, Duly Authorized Trustee Corporate Seal. [1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] All RIGHTS RESERVED BOB UNCLE LTD

Proper public notice perfects the process.

some one has a value and has generated credit.

The rest is none of your business :-)