Oct 07, 2013 6:42 PM

^^^^^^^ in the tabs are files... read them. Notice of mistake comprehend it by reading every word and looking said word up in a recent law dictionary.... That should keep you busy :-D

Well, judging by the posts on your page, you need to brush up on the basics (math + science) before you start exploring reality.

Then a little study of the ENGLISH LANGUAGE might be in order! For example: The U in UFO is for UNIDENTIFIED. Saying "it's aliens" actually identifies it. A stranger you will never meet profits off of your delusions. :P

:D

I would start by knowing WHO I AM.....but that's "ME"...

WHO ARE YOU Kevin Christie ?

Really Scott?

Yes, really.

I think a coffee pot is in order, BRFB (Be right fucking Back)

so-- Scott -- you really think I made these posts-- or did i just link them to my profile???

Well in my opinion your comment makes you look like an asshole.

rollin rollin rollin...

just asked a simple question people-- nevermind.

<popcorn> I think we may see a new record!

I feel ya Kevin, you certainly didn't deserve that comment.

Oh fuck, are you all a bunch of fucking FIFI ??....wow!!!....what the fuck is wrong with you guys ?

Whay are you here ? :/

Well... Your question is good, Kevin Christie. ..Scott is on a roll. so just read and learn for a bit... this other character will be a lesson in shitstain removal.. so read and watch..

Pat Ryan...WHY are you here ?

Hi-- everyone.... wanted to ask if anyone can direct me in the right direction

Fuck, HE FUCKING ASKED FOR IT ?? :/

To be insulted for my lack of knowledge I must assume. More importantly, why are you here?

Well, if you have so much knowledge, why the fuck asking to get in the right direction.....ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY ??? :(

nah....just your beliefs. Scott doesnt care about your lack of knowledge

What? Try again.

There is a hurt feelings report (NOT) in the tab section above... file it and someone will be right with you... :-D

Look very close at what Kevin asked...re-read that shit.....and tell me WHO is lacking knowledge ?

It's UNBELIEVABLE !!!!!!! :D :D

Your pseudo-knowledge does not equal my ACTUAL knowledge.

Lou Manotti has some new victims.

Bom Bom Bom....

you can't take any of this PERSONal Pat, there is no question that few of us were taught anything of value....accept that and appreciate the opportunity provided

oops lol

wow not a tingly nothing just gone... pffft ... puff of smoke... Lou is silent...

Lou Manotti is weird... :/ ,

Pete Daoust he is just very focused lol

:D

He works in mysterious ways. If you insist on the "tingly" schtick, I will let him know.

KIa ora Kevin Christie, when I began my learning naturally I started by studying the commercial law as applied in NEW ZEALAND cross referencing with Butterworths 6th law dictionary. As time went on I found it important to develop a comprehensive study simply because the subject and its principles are effectively imbedded both deeply in the mind and permeate society and every human interaction there.

Kevin Christie = Cop

Other material I have studied that was helpful; Holy Bible, Sun Tsu Art of War, Lords of Finance, Accounting Fundamentals, Zeit Geiste, World War II (Why we fight), various Acts of relevant legislation, movies and other entertainment multi media (modern programming can be very insightful when art reflects life), meeting, discussing, debating with other interested people re; related issues.

Lou should have his own schtick, your Creative...

How did the Holy Bible help you John?

Kia ora Chris Evan, the scriptures contain one of the oldest common law rendering and many of these principles reside within NEW ZEALANDs copious laws and regulations today (a part of the sources of law including among others, common law and equity, admiralty and maritime, precedent, convention, letters patent, NZ and UK statutes).

Oh, very interesting! Which version of the Scriptures do you find best?

That is soooo interesting!

Please tell me more about this correlation.......

John?

Kia ora Chris Evans, England, America, South Africa, Canada, Australia and NEW ZEALAND have the same law sources as colonies of Great Britain among others. Hence the UCC is able to be understood and applied here because scriptural truth is immutable.

mhmmmmm...cool!

MMUTABLE. What cannot be removed, what is unchangeable. The laws of God being perfect, are immutable, but no human law can be so considered.

So, can I bring the Bible up in a Court?

Kia ora Chris Evan, for instance UCC Article 9 on securitisation is imbedded in the Personal Properties Security Act 1999, s(16) and can be used as the UCC 1 Financial Statement.

Isn't the term "scriptural truth" kind of an oxymoron though? Wouldn't you say that it is a bogus idea to begin with?

Kia ora Chis Evan, precedent can hardly be described as bogus.

the only advice for newbies is stay stump & scroll to the bottom, John, this wont end well, if you want to lecture create a page if you want to learn.... scroll. UCC & precedent are well covered if you have a countering argument after reading we'd love to hear it.... until then .....

Kia ora Chris Evan, because the applied law can be extracted from scripture as a core truth the courts in this land can only accept this reality. The truth is capable of destroying completely any lie.

So, the courts in NZ recoginize Scriprure as a fact?

John Almond, the correct answer to any question for you at this poin, I would think, is let me get back to you on that when i have my facts straight. I may be mistaken and need to research that for clarification. Then read and re-read EVERY word in this group. EVERY word. If you are still unclear... Ask questions. This bible you speak of holds NO answers. It is there to distract you and mislead you.

Kia ora Chris Evan, for instance (and as obvious as this may seem) anyone born in this land is therefore not an immigrant and by implication can therefore claim to be not a citizen by direct non compliance according to the Contracts Enforcement Act 1956 s(2)2 (I did not sign the social contract that supposedly binds a citizen). I am an indigenous indian of Niu Tireni, Aotearoa, 1835, and are only bound by consent.

Face-table.... i think John Almond has found something in the clubhouse rules .... hurrahhhh... we're saved :p

indigenous people=NATIVES. All persons born within the jurisdiction of the United States, are considered as natives. 2. Natives will be classed into those born before the declaration of our independence, and those born since. 3.-1. All persons, without regard to the place of their birth, who were born before the declaration of independence, who were in the country at the time it was made, and who yielded a deliberate assent to it, either express or implied, as by remaining in the country, are considered as natives. Those persons who were born within the colonies, and before the declaration of independence, removed into another part of the British dominions, and did not return prior to the peace, would not probably be considered natives, but aliens. 4.-2. Persons born within the United States, since the Revolution, may be classed into those who are citizens, and those who are not. 5.-1st. Natives who are citizens are the children of citizens, and of aliens who at the time of their birth were residing within the United States. 6. The act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, approved April 14, 1802, Sec. 4, provides that the children of persons who now are, or have been citizens of the United States, shall, though born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, be considered as citizens of the United States" But, the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never resided in the United States. 7.-2d. Natives who are not citizens are, first, the children of ambassadors, or other foreign ministers, who, although born here, are subjects or citizens of the government of their respective fathers. Secondly, Indians, in general, are not citizens. Thirdly, negroes, or descendants of the African race, in general, have no power to vote, and are not eligible to office. 8. Native male citizens, who have not lost their political rights, after attaining the age required by law, may vote for all kinds of officers, and be elected to any office for which they are legally qualified. 9. The constitution of the United States declares that no person, except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president or vice-president of the United States. Vide, generally, 2 Cranch, 280; 4 Cranch, 209; 1 Dall. 53; 20 John. 213; 2 Mass. 236, 244, note; 2 Pick. 394, n.; 2 Kent, 35.

"All persons born within the jurisdiction of...."

Kia ora to you all and thanks for the blurb, I'm off to get an exhaust for my truck, face you later.

Both your scripture and the UCC make for the best toilet paper :P

He DOES have a Cop-is stench, doesn't he?

Pat Ryan

Have I been kicked out of the TTFL group?

PM to ME...

He just seen FIRE !!!!!!!!!!!!....... :D

burning bush with voices?

seasonal weeding.