So basically, the "CROWN/STATE" has to to provide PROOF that the MAN was operating under the TITLE/LEGAL NAME as trustee/agent for the government at the moment of the alleged offense.
If the presumption that one, at the moment of the offense, was operating as a trustee/agent for the government is rebutted by affidavit, (and also, perhaps throwing in a certified/notarized copy of the Life Birth Registration as an Exhibit, as well) their statutory world will crumble down.
Dean Clifford, and/or Scott Duncan, kick my in the nuts if I am wrong!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 1176Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 1176 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.