The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 4

Oct 06, 2013 7:42 AM

Neda RealNeda W. Up

Hi. Does anyone know if there is anyway around a writ that the bank put on your mortgage? The lawyers say they can sell the house and take their money at anytime. It is over a $23,000 credit card.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 343
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 343 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 410

Scott Duncan

In MY case they INVENTED a mortgage. This is why I claim the right to kill everyone in that law firm...

There is nothing to be gained by appealing to your rapist. The only way to deal with a lawyer is to slit their throats. Every other "solution" means you are the victim.

The commonwealth is dead. I am just sitting around waiting for you idiots to wake up.

They don't even listen to their own rules, and nothing will change until there is a body count. It really is that simple.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 344 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 344 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Want to help your country and your fellow humans? Kill a lawyer. They don't actually DO anything, and harm strangers for a living. For every lawyer that dies, THOUSANDS of people will be spared victimization.

DEAD LAWYERS = FREEDOM. The more dead lawyers, the greater the freedom. Know WHO to kill when violence becomes the only option... and it will. I just have to wait.

Nobody cared about dead Gestapo Officers in 1944. Nobody will care about dead cops, in the same way... When you see that happening, start killing lawyers. You will be speeding up the war. The less blood the better. Just make sure the right people bleed.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 345
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 345 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

" I know there are some good lawyers" - No. It's all fraud. There is NO such thing as a "good lawyer". The ONLY "good lawyer" is one that ignores/refuses the call to the BAR.

You want to learn the hard way that they are all fraud? I will HAPPILY prepare a list of questions for you, and you can see for yourself, that the "good lawyer" is just a scumbag, exploiting tragedy. We call them "ambulance chasers".

They get paid either way. Remember that. You can hold on to your delusion, if it makes you feel better, but you are simply WRONG... And I have a law degree in Canada, and the U.S., and when called to the BAR, I responded "Why?". No thinking ethical man (or woman) EVER becomes a lawyer.

TL;DR - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD LAWYER! THERE ARE ONLY SCAM ARTISTS WHO CAN MAKE YOU FEEL GOOD.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 345
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 345 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You have expressed your naive view, and it is noted. Do not try to post anything further on the subject, as you are simply WRONG. WRONG answers have no place in this forum.

I'll thank you to remain silent about your mythical "good lawyers". They don't exist.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 346
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 346 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Yes they are, because it NOT a "fight". It's a scam. The only "winners" are the lawyers.

Tell me about their "successes"! :D

...and OF COURSE they did it Pro Bono! They're GOOD scam-artists! *ahem* I mean lawyers.

/sarcasm

I answered your question you stupid cunt! I'll say it again, without the fucking sugar-coat: YOU AGREED TO IT. YOUR "GOOD" FUCKING LAWYER SHOULD HAVE TOLD YOU THAT!

THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO BECAUSE YOU CONSENTED> THE END.

...why don't you go to a "Good" lawyer, instead of bothering me, if you don't like reality? ...and it IS reality, no matter WHAT you believe.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 346
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 346 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neda Real

FUCK YOU SCOTT! Go look in the mirror you dick head!!! YOUR FUCKING MOM IS A CUNT. And guess what else you came FROM A SLIMY CUNT YOU PIECE OF SHIT!! Your filthy ugly ass face rubbed against your mama's cunt when you came out... That sad day that a scum like you was born!!! I bet you swallowed a lot of that cum and bloody slim too... Did you enjoy it you bastard??

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 346 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 346 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Neda RealNeda W. Up

And no you didn't answer the fuckin question carpet muncher... I'm not bothering you, I didn't ask YOU SPECIFICALLY FOR ADVICE ASSHOLE!!!! Fuck off. You think you are tough shit come talk like this to my face you fuckin pussy!!!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 347
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 347 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You came here, I didn't invite you. I answered your question and you ignored it. You persisted in pushing a lie, an now you have a tantrum.

Then she calls me names.

Seriously. I'm seconds away from walking away from this whole thing. You are all SO FUCKING STUPID!

Please wake up, or just DIE. Pick on, people! I've had enough.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 347
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 347 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You all speak `tard. What is it with this "coward" designation? Exactly what is it I'm supposed to be afraid of?

That's the second time this week I've been called that, and it makes NO sense. What am I supposed to be "afraid" of?

Somebody explain this to me. WHY "Coward"?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 347 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 347 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Robert Cormier

I have absolutely no idea. I am at a loss. :( Considering what you are taking on, you strike me as extremely brave. :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 348 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 348 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Stuart Stone

It's the whole passive aggressive thing...

Ask a question, don't like the answer (eg: make changes in your life, take responsibility, learn something etc), become manipulative and/or aggressive & keep pushing emotional buttons until an assertive and/or emotional response (or what can be perceived as one) is received...

Then justify your own shortcomings by projecting them onto the other party...rinse & repeat until they lose their rag & then end it with something profound like:

See? I told you he was a dick!... I used to be a bartender & saw that shit play out all the time...along with other assorted attention seeking behaviours

Maybe it should fall under a wikipedia topic such as 'tard logic' ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 348
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 348 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

In some ways I would agree LaNi Black, except for a couple of things:

'New' members or maybe just people used to having answers spoon fed are doing themselves no favours because they aren't doing the hard yards, reading, researching, studying etc to find the hard answers to difficult questions, to break down old programming etc etc

To come on here expecting a cookie cutter, '5 minutes of effort & all my problems will be solved' is not only irresponsible, but dangerous.

It's a house, not a parking fine...there's a lot more at stake...it's worth a lot of energy n study to gain some real comprehension of what's going on.

If this person was serious, they'd take the wake up call on the chin, suck it up & spend the next 10, 20, 30 hours reading, studying & catching up on the required viewing, then maybe come back & re-examine what was said & why instead of going with the obvious knee jerk response.

That kind of over emotional response gets cops with itchy trigger fingers VEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERY excited...and nothing good ever comes out of that situation...unless the national kick a cop in the face day gets put into play ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 349
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 349 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

Scott Duncan: Seriously. I'm seconds away from walking away from this whole thing. You are all SO FUCKING STUPID! Please don't walk away Scott Duncan. We (those who truly want to learn to end their ignorance) need you and appreciate you! :) :) :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 349 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 349 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

I was QUITE civil, until it was implied that I didn't answer her question. You people can't even see THAT without reading it 100 times...

I don't CARE if you don't like the answer. IT'S STILL RIGHT.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 350
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 350 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Mick ParkerSúil Eile

since coming onto this page i have gained discipline & respect for the facts, the way i used to come to conclusions can no longer be considered as thinking.... so why would you care what she thinks?..... Q trap-door.... gone. Rule1 of lifesaving.... never at the expense of your own!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 350
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 350 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

she sounded like a plant or a lawyer lol....her response, while if she was sincere, she may be in some fear, it was way over the top and coward doesn't fit this or the other situations...next time it happens, ask them to define their definition of coward...maybe its a code word.....strange

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 350
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 350 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Maddog WonfeyeveKing Matthew Benevolent

Coward is classic troll for I have no angle of attack that makes any logical sense... Just sayin... And fucking ban all the fucktard trolls that come here! I am tired of wading through their bullshit to get to the pertinent information! I am her for an education.Period. ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 350 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 350 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Maddog WonfeyeveKing Matthew Benevolent

This is trolling Pete Daoust; Neda W. Up FUCK YOU SCOTT! Go look in the mirror you dick head!!! YOUR FUCKING MOM IS A CUNT. And guess what else you came FROM A SLIMY CUNT YOU PIECE OF SHIT!! Your filthy ugly ass face rubbed against your mama's cunt when you came out... That sad day that a scum like you was born!!! I bet you swallowed a lot of that cum and bloody slim too... Did you enjoy it you bastard??

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 351
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 351 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Mick ParkerSúil Eile

its the difference between those adding to the value of the page & those only rearing their heads for the social commentary if at all. Eventually after reading a certain amount, the need for answers will inevitably lead to relevent questions. YOU CANNOT HIDE HERE :o

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 351
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 351 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Maddog WonfeyeveKing Matthew Benevolent

For one thing Pete Daoust, I have been reaffirmed in my understanding of the legal system scam; and the importance of knowing how their little game works. I read a large amount of books too; not just the posts here ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 351
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 351 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

This is Pierre, our Token French Guy.

He speaks Quebec Pseudo-French, so he gets confused easily. Somewhere in Quebec, there is a village missing their idiot... (Look up "Village Idiot" to get that joke, Pierre)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 352
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 352 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Humanity doesn't exist. The great "circle of birds" and the "collective of cows" doesn't exist either.

We are not "brothers", we are genetic variances. You are a semi-evolved chimp that made it this far, nothing more.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 352
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 352 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

I daresay the kunt above, just wanted to pick a fight... coward and her tirade attack were the digital equivalent of a semi evolved Chimp flinging shit your way, from the cage... speaking to the above post in request of translation of Tard... I used to speak it fluently...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 353
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 353 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

That was purposely done Scott, just to help you recover the smile after the fuck up up there, you see how we care for you ? :D

:P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 353 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 353 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Adam Thomas

Yup...so Scott, I missed another banning.....twas very funny me thought.....larfing out LOUDLY. .... "YOUR MOTHERS A KUNT!!"....... :-D She/he/it was talking TaRd language as its switch is on off mode or ticking but negative on the Tocking.......defending Lawyers. ...chop chop.... off with their heads!!

Scott Duncan

They petitioned the court for their costs. The then slipped it in as a "balance owing" on a "mortgage". I notified the courts and al parties (Notice of FRAUD). They ignored it.

There is no functioning rul of law anymore. Stop trying to appeal to your rapists.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 355
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 355 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

The 96 exchange code is for CANADIAN banking networks. It identifies consumable goods/services. Nothing more.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 356 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 356 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Remember, Robert Menard does NOT LIE about the law. It's what he DOESN'T tell you that is the lie. He spotted a mechanism that allows you to lie through omission, in the entire "LEGAL" framework. Then he realized how lawyers pull THEIR scam off. He does the same as ANY lawyer. Lies through omission.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 356
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 356 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Ooooo... those are pretty terrorizing, if you put that on paper, yer a terrorist, for sure!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 358 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 358 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Gail Marie

actually, I have a question related to God and law. I've noticed a real surge in people talking about God's law etc...what is up with that, it makes me think its a trap for people? I know the idea of GOD is in itself, but it's being used more lately as a way to "free" yourself

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 359
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 359 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I say it too. I'm a decedent of the guys who WROTE that bullshit. I consider it a personal attack when you try to legitimize that crap. It's like telling Parker Brothers that the Ouija board is REAL! They made it, and know it ISN'T.

Same thing with me. You have no "bible secrets" to tell. We made it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 360
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 360 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Yes, what is with this mass `tardishness? What's with all these defective people who "love God/Jesus"?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 363 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 363 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Andrew D'AragonAndrew Ofthe RoyalHouse Aragon

Whenever a person asks a question and Scott Duncan answers, they must have the courage to do or endure dangerous or unpleasant thoughts that may conflict with their own beliefs. When the OP does not like and or agree with the answer which conflicts with their beliefs, they become fearful. When their belief is challenged and they lack a proper argument to counter the point presented by Scott, they call him a coward, shall we take look at the definition of COWARD?

coward /?kou?rd/ Noun A person who lacks the courage to do or endure dangerous or unpleasant things. Adjective Excessively afraid of danger or pain. Synonyms noun. dastard - recreant - funk - poltroon - craven adjective. craven - cowardly - recreant - chicken-hearted - timid

Clearly by calling Scott out as a coward, they are exposing themselves as the coward, as Scott has exposed them to a part of themselves harbored in ego which is too hard to look at and accept being a well and long standing belief held deep within in arrogance.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 364
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 364 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Tara Duncan

Come back Darren. We haven't even gotten started. Come back you coward - it's just a flesh wound.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 368 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 368 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Tara Duncan

I thought this was the "John the Baptist" vs. "Sid the Dentist" thread. Have I wandered into the wrong forum?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 370 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 370 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Lou Manotti

Welcome. You are unauthorized. Your death will now be implemented. Welcome. You will experience a tingling sensation and then death. Remain calm while your life is extracted...

...BANNED!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 371
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 371 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Sell the shit to McDonalds. ..paint it Yellow...the same colour as food parcels & cluster bombs....& the little innocents know no better. ..then it's lucky dip time for the kiddies....maiming for life or death or a very nasty rash that never disappears & leaves all Dr's on earth gob smacked as to its cause & nature....

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So for all 96 Remittances, would you send them to Eric Wolfe, Deputy Chief - Funds Management and Banking. Also Deputy Chair of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Payments Association?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 373
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 373 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma 1. Notice to Bank Governor Stephen S. Poloz

Inform him that when I receive a REMITTANCE that I am going to be acting as a teller for the BANK OF CANADA

2. Notice to MINISTER OF FINANCE Explaining that you are expanding his Mandate to deal with your Remittance. 3. CLAIM OF RIGHT to access the CONSOLIDATED REVENUE FUND 4. Mark REMITTANCE properly

$1.00 Stamp — Signature across the stamp Teller stamp Circle the 96 Put your BC Wharehouse receipt # under $1.00 stamp Write Diagonally across the remittance: Consumer Purchase

5. COURTESY letter providing directions instructing the above persons to use the remittance provided to draw funds from the CONSOLIDATED REVENUE FUND 6. Send all by Registered mail ^^ my notes from Robert Menard - 96 is your fix

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 373
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 373 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

I don't know, but Robert Menard says it is his understanding that the Bank of Canada creates money to cover the cost of all remittances in circulation and puts into the consolidated fund. I know of no other method. Pete, apparently can add a lot of his ideas on this.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 374
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 374 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Bill of Exchange. Here’s HOW I do it, and WHY…..

The first step is definitely to open the mailbox, now, that mailbox is not even MY mailbox if I really THINK about it, it’s the person named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX is mailbox, I just happen to be the SOLE authorized ADMINISTRATOR for this person right ?

So, as a good administrator, I have the key for this mailbox, and I go there EVERYDAY, and I am so excited to do this now, , a year ago this stupid mailbox scared me so much, that my heart beat use to accelerate when I finally had the guts to go in there.

Anyway, I open the mailbox, and HA HA”!!!!.....a bill of exchange is in it

Now, this Bill of Exchange is addressed to the person I happen to be the SOLE authorized administrator….it is addressed to PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, so, as the SOLE authorized administrator, I have to open that envelop and TAKE CARE of that matter.

So let say the City of Montreal sent to PIERRE DAOUST this bill of exchange, and it says on it $295.00, now, WHO owe $295 to the City of Montreal ?, yes, it’s PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX.

Now, what do I do with this, mmhhh, —..I see 2 choices.

1). I can, yes “ME”, I can buy back this debt, and use some Bank Notes and go to the post office to buy a money-order and send it to the City of Montreal, and they will balance their book with this. I can NOT send the Bank Notes (cash) to them, they won’t ACCEPT it, I wonder WHY ?

2). I can DISCHARGE this debt for PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, because the truth is that this bill of exchange has been commenced by the City of Montreal for PIERRE DAOUST, because they ASSUME that PIERRE DAOUST is too ignorant to do it, so they commenced it…they are the BENEFICIARY party to this bill of exchange, and PIERRE DAOUST is the DRAWER party to this bill of exchange.

Now, we are missing one party, because a bill of exchange has 3 parties, the BENEFICIARY, the DRAWER and the DRAWEE.

WHO is the drawee for this bill of exchange ?.....I need to find where is the SURETY of this PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, and when I’ll find that, I will be able to KNOW who is the drawee.

Drawee: The party on which an order for the payment of money is drawn. Drawer: One that draws, especially one that draws an order for the payment of money.

I will NOT explaine this one in details, but I have very good reasons to believe that the drawee has to be The Bank of Canada, because the SURETY for PIERRE DAOUST is definitely the Government, since they have created PIERRE DAOUST, and on the CERTIFICATE that prove it creation, the signature is the government signature, so therefor, the SURETY, and since the Bank of Canada is the government’s bank, I am sure that the ORIGINAL certificate of PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX, is sitting in their building. So the DRAWEE is the Bank of Canada.

So, as one of the BEST sole authorized administrator in town, Here is HOW I do it.

I turn this Bill of Exchange on the Private side (Back), and I take out my STAMPS

The first stamp says:

ACCEPTED BY:______________ (I sign there)

The 2nd stamps say: DATE

The third says: ACCOUNT NO. 26X-XXX-XXX or 119XXXXXXXXXXX

And the fourth says: Bill of Exchange ACT (1985)

I have good reasons to believe that this COMPLETE that bill of exchange and discharge the debt.

I include a small one page letter with it giving EXPLAINATION on what I’m doing.

I send the Bill of exchange COMPLETE to the bank of Canada registered mail, and one copy to the benefiary, in this case, City of Montreal, to make sure they KNOW I have done my duty

I have discharged 5 bill of exchange so far for PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX

And guess what ? :D

THEY ARE FUCKING FUCKED UP WITH THIS.... :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 375
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 375 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

They will try to create CONTROVERSY and CONFUSION, they did it with me, it did not worked, I have BANG them with a killer notice

They have 2 choices now

1). Accept this payment method 2). Refuse this payment method

They had 10 days to refused.......they HAVE NOT refused, so, as the Sole authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST, I have no other choice to, IN FACT, consider these business affairs sttled and close. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 377
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 377 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Adam Thomas's method is a more killer one, he SUPRA PROTEST these bill of exchange, meaning he takes them on HIM, the Man, and then he use LAWFUL currency (postal stamp, which are backed by gold) to literally KILL these debts sent to the person he happen to have in his pocket......I will definitely continu studying his methodm until I grasp it completely :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 378
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 378 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

In fact, they've made a special postal stamp to honor Adam Thomas... :D

http://i.cbc.ca/1.1706528.1379089646!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_620/hi-bc-130910-superman-stamps-8col.jpg

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 378
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 378 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cara Small

I totally missed this thread until today. I think she was quite spunky, but I understand Scott's motion.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 378 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 378 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Adam Thomas

The fapfapfap is just me being a spazstick about people that bury their noses in their Law books.....that to me is a no no. WHY?? Because the first thing a judge &/or prosecutor asks for is if you've read the Law or have ye RECEIVED this notice or whatever fapfapfapfap......DO YOU UNDERSTAND ??

Back to top