The Tender For Law

Jul 13, 2013

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013

MARRIAGE LICENSE- Not sure if there is already a post for this but i was wondering about rescinding our signatures off of our Marriage License? We have our first child on the way and i want to get rid of the license before then. I have looked it up but all examples i found have some inclusion of religious shit in them. Does anyone have any experience doing this? Is it worthwhile? — Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 25

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 12:56 PM

Adam Hodge This would remove the STATES ability to claim jurisdiction over our child? Or at least give us a better chance of telling child services to fuck off if they ever come sticking their kiddy fiddling noses in our family? Is this a necessary step to take? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Jul 13, 2013 1:01 PM

Scott Duncan It REALLY depends on what your goal is. Look at TRUST law, and what provisions exitst to REMOVE THE TRUSTEE, because you do not TRUST them — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 1:17 PM

Adam Hodge Would removing them as TRUSTEE have a sweeping effect on ALL our licenses?? My question then would be- Would this process need to be done on an individual (License by license) basis or can 1 notice wipe the slate? TRUST law it is. Thanks Scott. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Jul 13, 2013 1:22 PM

Scott Duncan License by license, sadly. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 1:32 PM

Adam Hodge On that, say i need a license for work (my High Risk Crane and Riggers Tickets) or i maintain a drivers license and registration for ease of much mention of this in the threads i have read here yet. Sorry if this has been covered already. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1426 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Jul 13, 2013 1:52 PM

Maximus Legis Just a general comment re: licenses. Anything requiring a license must be fundamentally Lawful in the first place surely, so why should you need a fucking licence? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1427 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 1:59 PM

Adam Hodge I get that but no license, no chance of getting work in my industry over here. If i have to maintain that is there some kind of process i should carry out? More specifically, is there some process that this group recommends, because i know the Notification process recommended by the majority in the Free-dumb movement. Does Scott agree with the Affidavit/Notice of Understanding method? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1427 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Jul 13, 2013 2:06 PM

Maximus Legis By forcing you to take up their license, they are forcing you to do commerce under their conditions. What gives them that right? They are impeding your right to operate in commerce are they not. Should we not all be free to operate in commerce unencumbered other than by the conditions of a specific contract between parties. Can you not sue them for impeding your right to operate freely in commerce under your own full commercial liability? I may be talking shite but it's the first thing that springs to mind and feels instinctive to me. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1427 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 3:05 PM

Pete Daoust Who has the license ? me, or the person named PIERRE DAOUST ? Am I oblige to USE this PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST 24/7 ? What if I decide today to NOT use the PERSON ? If another PERSON is looking for PIERRE DAOUST today, can I tell this PERSON that PIERRE DAOUST is NOT available today and take the message ? Can PIERRE DAOUST take a 3 weeks vacation ? without ME going with it. Who is the MASTER of this PERSON ? Who makes business decision for this PERSON ? So many questions...lol.. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1427 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 3:44 PM

Adam Hodge This is my mindset too Pete, exactly my line of thought. No obligation to use the PERSON 24/7. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 3:47 PM

Pete Daoust And I do it litteraly, Yesterday, I have put the Birth Certificate in the car's trunk (serious), some laugh at me when I do that but I need to go that far to get it, I mean REALLY get it... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 3:47 PM

Pete Daoust PIERRE DAOUST is in the fucking trunk for the week-end — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 3:48 PM

Pete Daoust And Me, I am a KOOK — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 3:50 PM

Adam Hodge Do what you have to to deal mate. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 3:53 PM

Pete Daoust c#*t ?...what's that ? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 3:54 PM

Adam Hodge Cant? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 3:58 PM

Adam Hodge Have you used the Affidavit/Notice of Understanding process or will you just deal with issues as they come up? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 4:23 PM

Adam Hodge Notice of Understanding- I understand FUCK ALL apparently. Fuck this programming, i'm down for a mental clean slate. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 4:24 PM

Pete Daoust I will deal with what comes up.....I don't need to send Notice of Understanding — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 4:29 PM

Pete Daoust I'm reading the Notice of Mistake everyday, and the Notice of Waiver everyday....I had them translated in French by LEGAL translators, and I KNOW that EVERYTHING is in these two documents. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1428 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 4:31 PM

Pete Daoust I have it saved in pdf, but it's here somewhere.... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1429 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 4:33 PM

Adam Hodge Somewhere down there. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1429 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jul 13, 2013 4:35 PM

Pete Daoust I just uploaded it, you will find it in the files is group, as soon as Scott approves it.... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1429 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Adam Hodge

Jul 13, 2013 4:36 PM

Adam Hodge Legend, thanks. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1429 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Nov 13, 2013 8:45 PM

Derek Moran Scott Duncan: It REALLY depends on what your goal is. Look at TRUST law, and what provisions exitst to REMOVE THE TRUSTEE, because you do not TRUST them ..i dont TRUST my Councillor Karen Stintz anymore, can i have HER removed Scott? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1429 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.