Sep 12, 2013 7:52 PM

Scott, why they don't just say: Hey, idiot, we don't accept this payment or remittance method....go fet some cash and pay, you fucking moron..

They can't answer that way, because that would be illegal...

...irony.

Fuck ...what do I do now :D

And it's not illegal to enter a non-guilty plea on the person ?

How can they do that ?

Who is the 'you' that you are referring to?

I did not enter a plea, did 'you'? If so, what evidence do you have that 'you' entered a plea?

It is my understanding that only a defendant can enter a plea. Are you claiming that 'you' are the defendant? :D

same here too Pete! They r pulling the same shit with me

Isnt that dishonor of a BoE?

they have just interpreted what they have seen as you wanting to plead not guilty?..... tell them they've made a mistake & that was not your intention.... is this the counter offer again??.... they're offering you a deluxe administration?

"If I have lead you to believe I have consented to you "pleading" and/or acting on my behalf in ANY way, then that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive me". ;)

i'm seeing a pattern emerging :p

I envy all of you... I must be so awesome to read...

LOL.. :D

How in the world could I had lead them to believe something like that ? :D

for those of us that see the value of truth/fact over social niceties,yep theres beauty in your words haha (Y) its just what they wanted to see Pete :D

Sometimes I picture these idiots like little kids that just got caught doing something wrong, and they just don't know what to do :D

it's Sui....it's, not its :D HAHAHA

YEP! insistant little spoiled bastards lol

One day Scott Duncan, I will write an article that will blow your mind....but not right now....not right now :D

Will it be in proper Frenglish?

It will be AWESOME :D

That doesn't really answer the question.

It will be PERFECT Frenglish and extremely INSPIRING.....like a $19.99 monthly subscription type of thing :D

This Book is Legal tender :p

I do not consent and wave all benefits

Jay Hank is JOHN WADE FRISBEY....hey Scott Duncan, this group has in fact, 28 members, ALL the rest are JOHN WADE FRISBEY :D

'is' or is a name used by?...just sayin' :D

Jeff Roggers http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/refln/U13L1a.cfm 19 août, — 02:01 — J’aime — 1 Jeff Roggers I said eyes are similar to that not the same as. 19 août, — 02:03 — Modifié — J’aime Jay Hank — Ami(e) avec Adam Thomas et 1 autre how's that block working for you??

You guys remember that movie ?? :D

Don't recall that movie Pete Daoust. Why do you ask?

Fuck I have a new NAME :/

ROBERT DAOUST, I received another communication from the city of Montreal.....

The letter inside the envelop is addressed to ROBERT DAOUST, with a different address than PIERRE DAOUST's address.... :/

But on the envelop, it's HAND written (weird) PIERRE DAOUST and the right PIERRE DAOUST's address

Why this letter is NOT address to PIERRE DAOUST, and has a similar address, but different than PIERRE DAOUST's address

Fuck is this thing is getting weird... :/

ROBERT DAOUST...lol :D

BOB....Bobby.....HAHAHAHA!!!!!

Fucks the Boobies :D

HAHA....yeah, it seems like they FISH! I got a letter that said I could not request a hearing because it was a criminal matter....threw that unsigned bill aside. Then I got one for the same "offence" that says I can request a hearing by a certain day!!!! WTF?

I NEVER REQUESTED A HEARING

They are fucked-up with this payment method, they just don't know what to do.......I don't care, if I have to go to court to say...Hey, it's paid, here is the proofs... :D, they will have to say they don't accept it ?....at one point :D

how could you even receive a speeding ticket if you dont have a license?

PIERRE DAOUST has one.....

It was a "allowing an unlic operator" ticket. Addressed to CHRIS SCHULTE, when the OWNER of the vehicle is SGMI. CHRIS SCHULTE had nothing to do with the vehicle in question.....they made it up on the side of the road!!!!!!

David Johansen, I think it was a MGL Ch 90 sec 12 violation. Yup...it happened and CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE had nothing to do with it....why they would issue that person a Citation is just FRAUD!!!!

And I have let them know that. :-)

YOU presented it to them which created surety between the parties thinking you could just discharge it. send their letter back stamped VOID, NO CONTRACT and see what they say to that.

me?

They sent the Citation, I wrote on it "VOID NO CONTRACT CS". All this has happened AFTER that. :-)

No "ME" I guess,....

They mailed it to me......Literally, they invented this joinder. :-)

David Johansen, I ask the cop if I was OBLIGE to give him PIERRE DAOUST's driver's license, he said YES. and he had a gun and a baton.....

CHRISTOPHER EVAN SCHULTE is not Schulte Grounds Management Inc. No way!!!!

But the point is, PIERRE DAOUST the person received a BoE.

And "ME", as the Sole Authorized Administrator of PIERRE DAOUST, I took care of business and discharged that debt through PIERRE DAOUST is surety.....so I did not CONTEST the ticket, it's PAID.

It's PAID, and if they don't ACCEPT this payment method, THEY HAVE TO TELL ME :D

They just AVOID this .....they don't even want to talk about it :D

I did the same with PIERRE DAOUST is HYDRO BoE.....it's been 14 months and NOTHING....none a sound from them :D

It is illegal for them to not accept BOE.... so when you send them a remittance and they call and say we can't take it...I should just say, please put that in writing to me? I've heard of people having their service cut off for trying to use a BOE, in a case like that would you take them to court or an administrative process and lien them?

and they call and say we can't take it....fuck, I wish they would call !!!

a friend was called and told that, she said ok I'll see you in court...her service is still on last I heard..but others have been threatened with service denial, i guess they didn't call their bluff

If they can't take it, and it's legal to resuse it, no big deal ???....If all this is wrong and NOT true, I will ACCEPT it.....I DON'T look for a free ride.....I want the truth....that's all...

If at least I would receive threats from them....or something :D

"Pete Daoust David Johansen, I ask the cop if I was OBLIGE to give him PIERRE DAOUST's driver's license, he said YES. and he had a gun and a baton....."

why ask him that question rather than rebutting his presumption?

because he has a gun & a baton...and is obviously mistaking me (Pete in this case) for someone else, so he's either confused or mentally deficient...why argue, just take the crazy person's bit of paper, clean up the shitstain later....much better than getting hit with the gun and/or shot with the baton :D

Pete Daoust, UCC says that if you offer any form of security instrument to discharge a debt, and it is refused by the issuer of the Bill of Exchange, it will be considered as discharged.

A Promissory Note is the best way to discharge debt. Just make the redemption date more than the number of years you expect to be alive...

Pete Daoust - you are being offered a controversy, plain and simple. If it were I, I may consider completing the administrative process with a counter offer to their controversy.

Like; Your offer of adjudication is conditionally accepted upon proof of claim that, 1) the account is not already discharged by your acceptance of my tender, 2) did bank of Canada officially dishonor my instrument, 3) did bank of Canada officially deny discharge and 3) is there a notice of defect in the instrument?

Please provide either one or all of the appropriate evidences in affidavit form under penalty of perjury within 10 days so other arrangements can be made or it will be agreed between the parties that the matter is hereby setoff, settled and closed.

Then a notice of default / foreign summary judgement.

Just an option, at least then when your taken to court you have a record of a complete process of discharge, offer to cure and default to hang onto in aid of denying any judge the right to subject matter jurisdiction - while they verbally push and pull at you to take their offer and reality.

I myself am facing the exact same situation on behalf of someone else I'm helping at the moment.

I did a proof of claim request instead of a discharge this time, asking for the speed camera model and make, the calibration reports, the officers operation certificate and affidavit, affidavit of injured party and or witnesses, evidence of damages, ect...they of course defaulted and my friend got summoned. So I will do a show cause order, including an affidavit of negative averment from the defendant, and then tell the court; i will be simply conditionally attending the hearing for the exclusive purpose of being showed cause why the hearing should not be dismissed in accordance with the private agreement of discharge via default between the parties evidence by an administrative process via third party presenter registered post?

Then I will attempt to hold that claim calmly amidst their verbal court room assaults:-) Peace.

Awesome Blake! Can you post a copy of a negative averment?

Blake, I ask because the last one you posted got deleted, as did the copy I save....and no one else that I've asked here has it either. And it was FREAKING PERFECT!

Chris Schulte Jeff Roggers Pete Daoust

Not the same one as last time but same model...hang on to it:/)

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Affiant, John Henry Doe, hereinafter “Affiant”, does solemnly swear, declare and state as follows: 1.Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein. 2.Affiant has knowledge of the facts stated herein. 3.All the facts herein are true, correct and complete, admissible as evidence and if called upon as a witness, Affiant will testify to their veracity. Plain Statement of Facts 4.There is no evidence that JOHN H DOE, hereinafter “Taxpayer”, has taken a position identified as frivolous under I.R.C. §6702(c) and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 5.There is no evidence that the Taxpayer’s 2008 IRS Form 1040 reflects a desire to delay or impede the administration of federal tax laws and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 6.There is no evidence of a defect in the 2008 IRS Form 1040 submitted to the Internal Revenue Service on or about March 18, 2009 for the Taxpayer and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. 7.There is no evidence of a defect in the 2008 IRS Forms 1099-OID submitted to the Internal Revenue Service on or about March 18, 2009 for the Taxpayer and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand and seal on this 29th day of June, 2009 and hereby certify all the statements made above are true, correct and complete. Date: __________________ Signed: _______________________________ John Henry Doe

Thanks :-D

Thank you Blake! Officially saved!

Thanks Blake Gardner, always good to get something from the trenches so to speak :D

That should be it....in French :D

Mirabel, le 15 Septembre 2013.

Cour Municipale de la Ville de Montreal Case Postale 11045 Succursale Centre Ville Montreal (Québec) H3C 4Y1 cc : Banque du Canada

Objet : numéro de dossier 803 926 141 Lettre de Change

TOUS DROITS RÉSERVÉS / SANS PRÉJUDICE

Monsieur / Madame,

1). Entendu et nous convenons que, Je suis le seule administrateur autorisé pour la personne nommée PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX. A moins que vous puissiez produire une évidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

2). Entendu et nous convenons que, j’ai complété la lettre de change que VOUS avez fait parvenir à la personne nommé PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX, et l’ai envoyée à la Banque du Canada pour paiement. A moins que vous puissiez produire une évidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit que la Banque du Canada a officiellement déshonorée cette lettre de change complétée, ou qu’un avis de défectuosité concernant cette lettre de change existe.

3). Entendu et nous convenons que, la preuve du paiement est jointe a cette communication.

4). Entendu et nous convenons que, je n’ai donné aucune explications pour aucune défense dans aucun dossier portant le numéro 803 926 141. A moins que vous puissiez produire une évidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

5). Entendu et nous convenons que, je n’ai PAS plaidé non-coupable et/ou coupable, pour la personne nommé PIERRE DAOUST ayant le numéro d’inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX dans un dossier portant le numéro 803 926 141. A moins que vous puissiez produire une évidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

6). Entendu et nous convenons que, VOUS avez plaidé non-coupable pour VOTRE dossier, et que VOUS avez donné ces explications, donc, J’ai toutes les raisons de croire que VOUS êtes la partie défenderesse dans VOTRE dossier, et vous souhaite bonne chance.

7). Entendu et nous convenons que, pour toutes autres minutes de ma vie consacrées a cette affaire, la personne nommée PIERRE DAOUST, facturera à la Ville de Montréal, $50.00 CDN la minute.

8). Entendu et nous convenons que vous avez été payé, et que VOTRE dossier est clos. A moins que vous puissiez produire une évidence ou preuve quelconque qui dit le contraire

Vous avez dix (10) jours pour me faire parvenir un affidavit, sous peine de parjure, démontrant une ou plusieurs évidences demandées ci-haut, si je n’ai pas de réponse de vous dans les délais prescrit, il sera convenu entre les parties que l'affaire est réglé et fermé.

Par :__________________________ Seul Administrateur Autorisé pour PIERRE DAOUST numéro d’inscription 119XXXXXXXXXX

:D

What do you think Andrew Lawrence ??....Lawrence ??, what happened ?.....don't tell me you have an identity crises Andrew ? .... :D

Je comprende Francais. Je parle Francais un peu! :-)

Ok Chris Schulte, but I speak Quebecois, not French :-D

J'ai appris Fracais en l'ecole pour cinq ans.

am I completely butchering it?

Me too :D

I mean me too I am completely butchering it HAHAHA!!!!, unless I am writing to a public servant, then, I become one heck of a good French bastatrd :D

What about notarial protest via a JP. Go to the JPs office and explain a peace officer threatened you to accept the ticket. Tell the JP you accepted the ticket under duress for fear of violence when exercising your right not to contract. Tell the JP the the officer in question was belligerent and had no concept of your right not to accept his offer. I've been meaning to do this but I never get tickets. Is this a valid process?

We are NOT in the same line of thinking David Smile :D

I understand that Pete Daoust, but if the bank and the admins in court won't accept the set off then why not try notorial protest

If THEY don't accept the set off, I will have lots of fun.... :D

WOW!!!!....just got a call from Hydro Quebec :D

But it was a machine speaking :( Telling that it's important to pay bills on time to avoid additional charges :/

It took them 14 months to do this :D

And this past august the 6th, I ADMINISTRATE the Bill of Exchange received from them, the right way, I haven't bought back the debt, I let PIERRE DAOUST is surety took care of it :D

maybe remove their implied right to ring you, explain that their behaviour has been so unprofesional to date you prefer to keep a written record, that you dont talk to or take legal advice from machines .... well hardly ever :p

I don't even care....the debt has been take care of, I have proof, the ball is in their side, they just have to notify me that they do not ACCEPT this...that's all

no fear (Y)

As Scott Duncan says, they can not tell me that they don't accept, it's illegal, so if they can't refuse, well they have to accept ? :/

Unless there is another word that I never heard of, that would fit in between ACCEPT and REFUSE ?

Does that makes sense what I've just wrote ? :/

yep perfect sense. the only word that could possibly fit in the middle of those 2 is "CONFUSE" and you're not about to let that happen :D

I have found love and seen the light at the end of the tunnel.....I am NOT confused :D

Well, sometimes when Scott's around but that's another story :/

i'm trying my best not to misinterpret that me aul mate :p

I gotta go make the person named PIERRE DAOUST give me a lift home, I hope this fucking person won't get another ticket :D

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

damn driving contract :p

who is "you" in your question ?

thats their error then, Pete has his facts.

Facts, evidences and proofs :D

law is very clear & precise, only legal eagles deal in "what if's"

Stuart Stone "why argue" practice my boy, practice.

i had to stop going into the police station to talk to them because they stopped listening to me tell them the truth they can not accept.