He provided NO proof of this, so they can presume! "PRIVATE CITIZEN" by the legal definition of the words on their own, would be the same as TREASON, in that jurisdiction.
A CITIZEN IS, in fact a Government Agent. It's THEIR WORD, under THEIR Charter. What is the idiot doing challenging it for?
Will he challenge Wal-Mart's CHARTER too? ...even though he has no standing in Wal-Mart?
This is what confuses me. Why do you care what a foreign corporation says about "citizens"? Why are you claiming "citizenship" in ANYTHING?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1242Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1242 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.