The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Sep 09, 2013 7:36 PM

My understanding is that the UK is debating a private members bill "Provide a system of national service for young persons; and for connected purposes."

In the above description they use the word PERSONS, but in the description they use the words "participant" and "individual"

individual, adj. (I5c) 1. Existing as an indivisible entity. 2. Ofor relating to a single person or thing, as opposed to a group.

What is PARTICIPANT?

Any person who takes part in any activity, service or program.

So are they getting sly or are these other words used because it's a private members bill and not law yet? http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2013-2014/0032/cbill_2013-20140032_en_2.htm

My understanding is that the UK is debating a private members bill "Provide a system of national service for young persons; and for connected purposes." In the above description they use the word PERSONS, but in the description they use the words "participant" and "individual" individual, adj. (I5c) 1. Existing as an indivisible entity. 2. Ofor relating to a single person or thing, as opposed to a group. What is PARTICIPANT? Any person who takes part in any activity, service or program. So are they getting sly or are these other words used because it's a private members bill and not law yet? http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills /cbill/2013-2014/0032/cbill_2013-20140032_en_2.htm National Service Bill (HC Bill 32) Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PUBLICATIONS.PARLIAMENT.UK
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1245 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 14

Mick ParkerSúil Eile

the only thing the parliament can make policy for is that which they contract? if you are representing the person PERSON.... MAY BE CAPABLE OF RIGHTS BUT WITH DEFINITE DUTIES... it will probably be incumbent upon citizens... as persons?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1246
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1246 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

yes what I was looking at is that they appear to be changing things up a bit, adding in other words that, are used frequently in everyday life. Just seems like a trick as people begin to learn about what a PERSON is.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1246
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1246 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

scheme. (16c) 1. A systemic plan; a connected or orderly arrangement, esp. of related concepts <legislative scheme>. 2. An artful plot or plan, usu. to deceive others <a scheme to defraud creditors>.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1247
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1247 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Here: Blacks 9th: scheme. (16c) 1. A systemic plan; a connected or orderly arrangement, esp. of related concepts <legislative scheme>. 2. An artful plot or plan, usu. to deceive others <a scheme to defraud creditors>.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1247
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1247 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top