In that case, R. v. Jones was the APPLICANT, so he definitly admitted being a PERSON and/or a CITIZEN when he applied.....with or without knowing that a state has exclusive sovereignty over all persons, citizens or aliens, and all property, real or personal, within its own territory.”
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1154 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1154 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.