Sep 06, 2013 10:04 AM

Obviously there is some misunderstanding about many of the elements involved here. 1.) "Documents of this kind are intended to impede the legitimate action of government, law enforcement, and court actors" The actions for which the fee schedule addresses are NOT legitimate actions. They are criminal acts. They are acts which have no authority when waged against a living man. 2.) " when a person advances a “fee schedule”," A PERSON is not advancing the fee schedule, a living man is.

Codes, Regulations, Statutes, and Ordinances, are tools used to govern FICTIONS, not living man, who is self-governing by rule of Natural Law.

Once you figure out who you really are, come back and make the proper argument.

I would like to see how a fiction, in this case the criminal code, could possibly be offended...ascribing emotions to words on paper is bordering on insanity :P

I promise that if NO ONE is FORCING "ME" and/or the PERSON I happen to have in my pocket, to do business, I won't charge.

So, TAKE NOTICE, that "ME" and/or the person named PIERRE DAOUST, is in NO BUSINESS expected/implied mode, under NO circumstances, until expressed otherwise by its Master.

BY:_____________________ Master of PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX

No they are not, they are a notice of my terms of service. They can carry on doing whatever the fuck they want, but if they want my participation....these are my terms and conditions, otherwise fuck off, go do your thing, and send me my royalty cheque when you're done.

:D .....mmmhhh...That seems a little beeligerent Mister Dean Clifford :D

Any man or woman who subsumes their own Free Will, their own Law, to limit their action and intent towards promoting and propagating the ideology encoded in the Justinian Codex from 534BC has agreed to act against The Law and that which is lawful. Intimidating a justice system participant is lawful. Only the timid can be intimidated.

subsume [s?b?sju?m] vb (tr) 1. to incorporate (an idea, proposition, case, etc.) under a comprehensive or inclusive classification or heading 2. to consider (an instance of something) as part of a general rule or principle [from New Latin subsumere, from Latin sub- + sumere to take] subsumable adj

http://orias.berkeley.edu/summer2004/summer2004JustinianCode.htm

Well, i dont like using fee schedule wording. I always love using it in a contractual way, like the obligations created would or or will be this, if by the acts/conduct of the parties. See, you can always determine how the other parties are able to demonstrate their agreements with you, if they do certain acts or certain signs, its an agreement/contract. isnt contract law a higher form of law than statue ? :D

In The Dictionary of Canadian Law, the very last line for the definition of CROWN CHARGES is: "...by virtue of any CONTRACT"

Umm, seems to me, if you've been CHARGED for something, of which there is NO contract that exists regarding you and the CROWN being parties to this IMAGINARY contract...wouldnt that make that contract FRAUD on their part? You're letting them know up-front, my fee-schedule for you wasting my time with this non-existent contract fraud-business with me is.....

Courtesy of Dean Clifford, and polished-up by Scott...

"I AM REQUIRED TO INFORM YOU THAT FORCED COMPLIANCE TO ORDERS BY YOURSELF, AND/OR YOUR AGENTS, IS IN FACT, ACCEPTANCE of my Terms and Conditions."

..whats your favourite line from the Financial Administration Act, Dean?!?

There is a contract, but you never negotiated any terms. So you're stuck working at Tim Horton's for minimum wage, being zero in this case, and liable for all violations of Tim Horton's policies. Ooops

Is the BC an EXECUTORY Contract?

Fuck off Tim, I don't WORK for NO ONE :P

Ooooppss :/

Work 1. To perform a task, especially in exchange for compensation or the potential for profit. Working is necessary for any economy to function.

in exchange for compensation or the potential for profit...And WHO gets to decide that part ??

compensation

(1) Payment for goods or services.(2) Damages necessary to restore an injured party to his or her position before the wrongdoing.(3) In eminent domain, payment to property owners for the value of the property taken and any damage caused to the value of the remaining property.

So lets call it "The COMPENSATION Schedule" :D

The BC is evidence of an INCHOATE contract.

INCHOATE: commenced, but not finished. Dictionary of Canadian Law.

Like an INCHOATE blowjob ? :D

Anyone ever remember Dean 'painting-around-the-edges' regarding this on one of his shows? Dean once said about the BC on Tony' s show- "the BC used to say on it- FOR TREASURY USE ONLY, so what is that telling you...is that maybe saying it is not for US to use?"...im paraphrasing there from what i recall

Scott Duncan: If the post office made an error and delivered a Nuke, destined for Area 51, but ended up in YOUR hands, because of a MISTAKE, then until the US Army is NOTIFIED, then YOU are liable for the well-being of that nuke.

Receiver General: a public official in charge of a government's receipts and treasury. Pl. receivers(?) general. (Scott clicked LIKE on this) Black's 9th

FOR TREASURY USE ONLY = FOR AREA 51 ONLY > then until the US Army/Receiver General MP Rona Ambrose in charge of the TREASURY of CANADA is NOTIFIED, then YOU are liable for the well-being of that nuke

Not Rona anymore, Derek

But aren't you looking for Provincial Treasury/Finance Minister?

my corporation acts for me as the legal person because I have a new identity and I don't use the old one that is not owned by me is claimed in a lien and placed in a trust holding company

Bev- the Feds make TRANSFER PAYMENTS to the Provinces from out of the Federal Consolidated Revenue Fund.....the Provinces, then put that money into their own CRF. More specifically though- the feds make TRANSFER PAYMENTS in accordance to this definition from Black's 9th...

RECEIVER'S CERTIFICATE: Bankruptcy. An instrument issued by a receiver as evidence that the HOLDER is ENTITLED to receive payment from funds controlled by the bankruptcy court.

Wise-man once conceded to me: the Registrar Generals of each Province are the HOLDERS of the Receiver's Certificate.....and if what looks like at least our name is on the BC, whose name do you think would be on the 'RC' that the RG is CONVIENENTLY the HOLDER of?

You're right Beverly, its Diane Finley now: http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/apropos-about/org-eng.html

"Is the BC an EXECUTORY Contract?" Dean Clifford clicked LIKE on this)

EXECUTORY CONTRACT: a contract between a buyer and seller in which full payment is not made at the time of the contract; a contract to buy on CREDIT

Fundamentals of Contract Law - Emond Montgomery Publications, Jean Fitzgerald & Laurence Olivo

I like to call it what it is a BC is a surety bond

Receiver's Certificate A short-term debt security issued by a receiver (or party appointed by secured creditors in a bankruptcy) to finance his activities during bankruptcy proceedings. Despite the fact that they involve bankruptcy, receiver's certificates are low risk because they are secured by the same assets to which the secured creditors hold liens. Farlex Financial Dictionary. — 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved