Aug 27, 2013 10:13 PM

what I see is asking the rapist to put a condom on

the quote is "putting the condom on your rapist" even parrots do better than that. what if I put it in affiant form, duly notarized, sent registered mail. THE FORM IS THE LOGBOOK FOR THE VESSEL. I'm gathering public information so that I can send my private bill. The JUSTICE DEPARTMENT of CANADA and the FEDERAL JUDICIARY have recognized the TERMS and CONDITIONS of forced CONTRACT SERVITUDE UPON MY HUMAN CAPACITY TO DECLINE.

please stop spreading your b******* about human rights we have one right to contract not contract

whats in the ships log? affidavits? notice of mistake? opportunity to cure, default, proof of service? is the ships log not the soul/sole of the vessel? The Captain is not the ship

You are correct but, that right stems from the will.

no but I'm the captain of the vessel which carries the Soul which is the cargo= value

law= contract

ok ok, more reading. I have set my law down though. I'm looking for bonding/underwriter info so that I can lien #90170 and #5438 in official capacity. how else do I get the info I need for an affidavit?

Dallas Hills ^^ this may be of interest to you

This video is private?

I just made private while I edit out some personal info.

I am using the time stamp to show how the memorandum book notes conflict with the statements made in the video, The unit that provided the video also edited out the club house rules I used during detention. I have my notes from that night as well. It may be a while till its back up. I left a shit stain yesterday and am trying to grasp International Law and its application concerning posting it.

I am really trying to understand what is it that you are trying to do/accomplish, David. I am confused.

What were you forced to do? :/ All I see is someone acting as a witness against himself, and voluntarily answering questions. Something I don't get is: if you ended-up answering all the questions they asked you, and more, why not answer their questions from the beginning?

I know it's criminal for thugs with guns to detain you/us, but when you act like you know exactly what is happening, and you are "cooperating", you are telling them to "talk this out like adults", you even took a statutory ticket, then I don't see a victim, but a complying citizen. They had a statutory interaction with you, and you identified the person as you. They had your girlfriend as a witness to identify you, as well. And you took the ticket.

No one forced you to say anything. You answered all they asked. Where is the extortion part of this? :/

You should not be detained, and treated as a criminal until proven otherwise, but why call attention by not wearing the helmet? :/ Don't take me wrong, but I am really trying to understand what you are doing.

I wish you well, David!

ESC CTRL will be sending a bill . I'm setting up the evidence for the affidavit of obligation which will follow the invoice. After that comes the lien on the public bond. All the info I provided, the "surety" was provided while under force and duress, I was being tortured so they could identify the NAME, I'm still copy holder of the ticket . I provided the taken name not the the name they wanted (hence the confusion as to my identity), Karen never Identified ME, they did not point to ME and ask is this David Vilaca, she told the cop she was not involved and dident want to answer any questions, the cop asked her is his name david (pointing to his book notes), she said yes, then he asked about the last name and Karen said she did not want to answer so he asked if my last name started with a V and she said yes. thats all they could get out of her. That's how they ID'd the person, no corresponding address, no drivers licence # on the ticket. No one forced me to say anything by the barrel of a gun, they used the bindings as a torture device to gain compliance. The law is very clear about what a reasonable man or woman ought to do. YOU have made a lot of assumptions as to what happened that night. are you 1 of the 12 views on the video before I changed it to private? if so you you did not pat attention, there was no joinder to the info on the computer, they also edited out the part where no picture came up with the DL on file addressed at Hertle, why is that? why no picture on file, perhaps the Justice Department is involved, that question is one I can't answer

Mackximus Minimus, show me where joinder was created, show me how I willfully accepted surety? questions negate understanding, were any of my questions answered? Why did the investigations unit edit the video? Did you even notice the edits?

As copy holder I have the ticket before me, Metzger (total blonde bimbo) struck out the DL section even thought the # was on the CPIC, even the address is struck out twice before she got the spelling right (which I gave knowing it did not match the DL I had at home) there is nothing to prove joinder. When Metzger passed the ticket to me, I accepted on condition she admit she is a peace officer in the common law jurisdiction, she told me to take the ticket or go to jail that night. tell me how should I have acted with VEGA being a bull on parade?

According to the City of Toronto Act you are required to submit a claim letter or email to the City Clerk for property damage or injury. You are encouraged to submit your claim as soon as possible.

https://vimeo.com/93148009

PERSON INFORMATION No information for this event :) MTO INFORMATION, No information for this event. :) I dont get it, I have a person in my pocket and that licence is valid :). anyway, GRANITE CLAIMS SOLUTION will soon see a rather large bill.

For those of You in Toronto, GRANITE CLAIMS SOLUTIONS

excerpt from affidavit of truth. On August 16th 2013 approximately 8:38:00 pm, I was stopped at Queen St E and Greenwood Ave by Toronto Police Services Officers Vega #5438 and Metzger #90170 of Unit D55. At the time, I was riding an E-Bike in my private capacity. Officer Metzger asked where my helmet is and I responded with “I am an adult and do not need one”. Officer Metzger then asked if they could talk to me and I responded with “no thanks” negating consent to further intercourse. Officer Metzger then stepped out of car 5506 and told me I need to wear a helmet as per the Highway Traffic Act. I asked Metzger what the Highway Traffic Act means? Metzger, unwilling to provide service then asked for identification of which I did not have at the time and informed her of such. Metzger stated I needed to give my name and so I replied “by what authority do you ask me for my private name?” it was at this point Officer Vega exited the car with anger and malice and asked what my name was, it was then that I stated David. Both Officers then attempted to compel me to provide a name (SURNAME, D.O.B. and address) via threats of detention. Contrary to the Officers memorandum book notes, I was not waiving my hands around and spitting on them (why no charges if this is true), the claim that I was belligerent is fallacious and fraudulent, I had to raise my voice to assert my right to ask a question, I again stated “by what authority do you ask me for my private name? Officer Vega then violently forced me into submission and placed restraints upon my wrists with enough force to make me cry out in pain while publicly humiliating my dignity. Officer Vega began to twist back and forth the bindings and apply more force while asking me for my name, I again cried out in pain and asked the people at the bus stop to film my torture. Realizing my friend had left in fear and that I had no witness, I was compelled under duress, fear, coercion and torture to provide my private name. Under duress I gave my real name (first and family name) and invoked my right to remain silent. Officer Vega continued to torture me in his attempt to extort and coerce from me, my standing on my common law right to remain silent. While Vega is using force to compel information I’m now shouting at Officer Metzger if this is the behavior of common law peace officers and ask her to stop VEGA from torturing me. At this point the in-car camera is triggered (Timestamp 20:43:20) and VEGA is recorded still torturing me (2 mins duration?) while pretending to release the excessive bindings as Metzger is asking me to clam down. Officer Vega then further restricts the binding on my left wrist to the extent of creating hostility and ill will by pinching a nerve, I inform VEGA charges are to follow (my language is such that my suffering and duress is evident) VEGA places me in car 5506 with bindings still being used to remove my singularly human rights and compel information via the inhuman condition of torture, bondage and servitude to public servants of HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO. At no time was I informed of any of my rights before during or after detention and interrogation. No officer was concerned that torture was being used to produce information, in fact Office Metzger clearly states on video, “the cuffs are not meant to be comfortable” while I inform her of international law and the conditions I am being forced to endure. During my detention and interrogation no joinder was created between the public name and the private name provided, identification was provided by a private member of the public. C.P.I.C. had no information and no photographs available to identify me. All information provided by me was provided under duress, threat, intimidation, coercion and torture. As I was under physical restraint, pain and mental anguish I never willfully consented to any interaction, I continued to ask that I be freed so that we could converse as reasonable adults. Both officers were more concerned about the legal name and ensuing bill of exchange than my suffering and arbitrary detention.

Hey Mackximus Minimus, did you see the photo I posted, still think joinder was created? The affidavit, invoice and letter of claim are complete and Copies WILL be sent to City of Toronto Clerks Office, the two pigs (for rebuttal) and Granite Claims Solution. The bill is not large but is accorded to my Claim of Right. 10,000 per day or any portion thereof, x2 for forcible confinement and servitude to Her Majesty in Right of Ontario. 5000 per hr or any portion thereof x2 while under arrest and or interrogation. 5000 pain and suffering x1 and 1000 per hour Administration fee.

David Vilaca, I said I was/am trying to understand what you were/are doing. By no means I claim expertise of some sort. If I have led to believe that, please forgive me. That does not mean I am either right, or wrong.

I have learned in TT4L that you never talk to cops, and that there is ways to create joinder and/or help in the presumption by giving a name, address, etc.

Also, I heard of not appealing to your rapist.

My assertion was based on watching the video. But I am not Scott Duncan, or someone that know that much.

But maybe you know something I don't (which is very likely), and I wanted to understand what was the base for doing all this.

I have been reading what you have kept posting to understand more. I am still not fully clear, but I think all you want is compensation for violation of your common law rights, it's what I get.

I wish you well, and I will keep reading what will come of all this David!

Scott Duncan, any idea why my criminal history has been wiped from CPIC, could it be that the Justice Department deleted that info after my claim of right was established. I have a lengthy record from my youth (assault police, assault, and many drug charges). When the persons Drivers Licence was brought up on the in car computer no picture was available, in fact no pictures of me are on their system even thought I have been finger printed and photographed many times, what gives? Also, is it best to send the invoice via the sole proprietorship, I have yet to charter ESC CRTL and created the deed for the living trust. From what I understand a private man can send a bill to anyone.

Thanks Mackximus Minimus for clearing up the intent of your post. From my understanding joinder can not be created by compelling one to give information via torture ( unless you live in Murcia) the photo I posted clearly shows no joinder was created. And Yes, my intent is to send an invoice as per my aggrement with the Justice Department.

Ok, because here in Murica, handing that DL and giving info i think is reason enough to presume you are fuck, right? But not in "Canada".

Is it different here Murica?

That's were maybe my confusion comes from.

Its the same here if you willingly give your DL and info, but here in the common law the piggies cannot use force to compel one to provide information. It is very clear from all the information I have gathered that I was arrested for contempt of cop simply because I asked a few questions.

No common law in Murica, because the cops don't take oaths to uphold common law, like in Canada, correct?

I'm not sure but I think the cops here take 2 oaths, 1 to the crown and 1 to the public which has a caveat of secrecy that if the come across certain information they are bound to not disclose it by oath. that is to say when they figure it out, we are all servants of the crown, have no proprerty rights and are to be held as surety for public debt, they cannot reveal the deception as they are under oath.

whats the question Kent Barrett? in the clubhouse rules, or who is the holder in due course? Who is Granite claims solutions?

then look to the club house rules, it's in e-laws

Incoming :)

Claim received by both the City and Granite. City has a file # that differs from the adjusters file #. My Claim, invoice and affidavit of obligation are registered via mail. How should I proceed? The cops will fault and default with non-response to the affidavit while Granite is investigating, do I send notice of fault to all 4 parties (2 cops,1 Clerk, 1 adjuster) or do I just default the cops and add it to the claim?

Make separate claims.

invoice to each and see who pays first?

No, separate claims rack up the numbers in a clear ACCOUNTABLE way.

so each of the 3 registered mailings IS the claim, Granite did not receive a registered claim the City forward my claim to them, now that I have the adjusters acceptance I add a new registered mail claim to bring them onboard?

Invite them to the party.

Party !!! :D

Where ? :/

What are the rolls being played here, City Clerk (Ulli S Watkiss )failed to reply with a signature while the adjuster sent wet ink with his reply. The City letter is mistakenly addressed to all caps while the adjusters is mistakenly addressed to the person in my pocket. None of the replies was by registered mail. The Clerk and the adjuster mistakenly addressed me, both were directed to address me as david vilaca (I know this is not possible) in private. Are the File #s separate Accounts (for the person addressed) Do I append the file# to the registered notice of fault mailing for each agent/agency. If the file is an account it must be settled via the invoice. I'm confused, they are using 3 different names for 1 claim.

OK, make each claim separate to each party. Cop 1/ Agent. Cop 2/Agent. City Clerk/Agency, Granite is Assurance Agency?

By what authority do you attach a name derived from a public document to me?

Hey Chris, Notice of Mistake will be sent to the City with my notice of fault plus an invoice for using the name as surety (I was very clear on how to respond to ME, in private by registered mail). The 2 pigs will receive a notice of non response with 5 days to reply, each will receive an invoice marked due and payable 5 days henceforth. The assurance company will receive copies of everything.

Hey John, this is the thread for my Arrest on Title/ Commercial Lien process.

Next step is notice of Default any help would be great. Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent “He who does not deny, admits”

Reference: Affidavit of Truth # ________________ and #_______________

This Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure sent registered mail No: _______________ Date:

Affiant: David Vilaca Sole Authorized Administrator 95-260 Adelaide St E. Toronto, ON M5A1N1

Respondent: City Clerk's Office- Claims City Hall 100 Queen Street West 9th Floor, West Tower Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2N2 Granite Claims Solutions, David Raney Senior Adjuster Police Constable/Peace Officers doing business as VEGA # 5438 and Metzger # 90170.

Statement of facts

1. On or about May 7th 2014 Respondents received an Affidavit and Statement of Claim in good faith from affiant to Respondents Attention.

2. As of May 23 2014 respondent has not responded to the above stated Affidavit.

3. Respondents (Vega, Metzger, City Clerk and Granite Claims Solutions) are at fault in this matter.

4. As an operation of law the Respondents by dishonor of Affidavit has created a fault.

Opportunity to cure

In the event that Respondent’s failure to respond to the Affidavit # ___________, #____________ and #_______________was an oversight, mistake or otherwise unintentional, Affiant grants (Respondent) three (3) days, exclusive of the day of receipt, to cure the fault. Failure to cure will constitute, as an operation of law, Respondent’s final admission and agreement to all statements, Invoice/Bill and claims made by affiant through tacit procuration pertaining to Affidavit, #_____________, #_______________, #_____________ and #______________. Response by Respondents must be served on Affiant exactly as provided using registered mail service under full commercial liability, oath and penalty of perjury.

*blinks*

OK, Pete! I'm gonna need you on this. It hurts me.

I know not to sign a notice, how do I finish this off or make it perfect?

First: DEFAULT, not fault. You do not have the authority to declare fault. Only a third party or "Justice" can.

LEGAL NOTICE? USE LEGAL RULES.

ok, that is fixed. is the response time too short for the rules?

i really want to stick it to these assholes

What/who the fuck is this ? :/ Affiant: David Vilaca Sole Authorized Administrator 95-260 Adelaide St E. Toronto, ON M5A1N1

I see 3 parties there ^^^^ :D

the Claimant and injured party. I know my understanding is lacking, so dont add the admin part as I am making a claim not administrating a debt

David, the only way you can "stick it to them" is to follow them home, and if they have a child, kill it.

If they don't have a child, wait until they do...and kill it.

That's what AQUILAE policy is, regarding Policy Enforcer Remedy. It works nicely and makes for VERY frightened and confused cops :D

Claiming is ADMINISTRATING, David Vilaca, just saying :P

Montreal, may the 23rd 2014

Big Tits 123 dick roads Vagina (Quebec) H0H 0H0

Notice of DEFAULT.

Be advised, since you haven't paid the amount claimed, and haven't challenge this invoice, we have no other choice than to send you this notice of default.

We are nice folks, so we will give you an extra 3 days to pay the amount claimed.

If we do not receive payment, we will follow up with the LIEN process

With Love ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE

Authorized By: Sole Authorized Administrator for the Person named Jean-Louis, inscription number 1196604XXXXXX

I'm not willing (yet) to give what little freedom I have to kill a child for remedy. I just want some accounting to be done at the expense the individuals who like to hurt people.

Is my Notice of Default not too bad ? :)

Helloosss ? :(

Don't get caught!

Remember the Scott Duncan rules for a successful Homicide!

1: WAIT - Never kill in anger. WAIT A MINIMUM of 1900 DAYS! YES 1900. If you still think the cop/lawyer/justice and/or their offspring should die, after 1900 days, then they should probably be killed, because if YOU feel that way, the odds are 100% that a lot of others feel this way, too!

I call this "Padding the suspect list".

2: Use MODERN weapons. For 60 dollars you can build detonators triggered by your target's RFID badge. All government workers have them. USE THEM. RFID is VERY easy to clone/capture. Let them be the trigger, so you can be FAR AWAY.

3. Get 3rd parties to execute your tasks. :D Couriers are a good option, when a mailbox won't do. Unlike The Unibomber, your bombs can be hidden in fancy cases that look like an expensive electronic gift (See D-Link Boxee) that will deliver its explosive payload to its intended target and nobody else. Learn the art of "remote kills", ala "Law Abiding Citizen/Engineer".

http://youtu.be/HjGrHBpfqCo

:D

NOTICE TO THE INFILTRATORS: You of course can't take that "rules for homicide" seriously, because I'm just a "Mentally Ill Computer Operator" (Seriously! The Current Operations (C-OPS) networks says that about me. It also says I'm AKA "Dr Who", even though I am known by NOBODY as that... they just make shit up and leave it there)...so there's no way a "crazy" guy can do any of that! :D

Funny, my forklift just explode !! :-o

I was 100's of km away. It COULDN'T have been me! :D

Fuck !!! :(

The most awesome batshit crazy mentally ill computer operator!

These qualities are necessary for the ADMIRAL title. The Captains insist.

This fucking forklift really explode ffs !!! :(

Yes, we get that. It wasn't me. Honest.

Just returned from the Persons mail box, no response from respondents (surprise). Thanks Pete, in my affidavit I claimed my right to invoice, the invoice was omitted so as not to be vexatious, the invoice goes out with the Notice of Default. is this better? Notice of DEFAULT.

Be advised, since you haven't responded to my Affidavit, and haven't challenged my right to invoice, we have no other choice than to send you this notice of default.

We are nice folks, so we will give you an extra 3 days to pay the amount claimed.

If we do not receive payment, we will follow up with the LIEN process

Without ill will. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED / NO PREJUDICE

Authorized By:_________________ Sole Authorized Administrator for the Person named David Vilaca, inscription # XXX XXX XXX

Claiming the RIGHT to invoice ? :-o

Why would you do this ? :/

no invoice sent yet, invoice will go out with notice of default

WHY ?

Let them at least 3 days to pay the invoice ?

Send the invoice, with the account statement. Payment Terms: Due upon receipt

If they don't pay in 3 days Send a NOTICE, saying you haven't received payment.

If another 3 days passes without payment: A Notice of Default

If another 3 days passes without payment: LIEN

That way, you will cover all angles.....

as Administrator work had to be done for the matter to be expressed + damages

Between the NOTICE and the Notice of default, you can add a FINAL notice.....it's very "nice" to do it, and show lots of good faith :D

If they IGNORE all this, you will have everything you NEED to LIEN.

ok, I have missed a very important step. I'm jumping to default. Notice has not been sent yet, only affidavit and claim for injury. If Notice of fault can only be furnished by a 3rd party, what Notice would I send?

Invoice has not been sent yet :/

I made the parties aware that failure to respond would be cause for a bill

as previously stated I would like to avoid the title of vexatious claimant. The city responded with a non-registered reply as did the Adjuster. I have ignored these as I only care about the affidavit and claim under the registered mailings and not the file #'s they have provided. So just send the invoice with statement of account?

In light of what David is trying to do here- and kudos to him; what does the phrase- "to sue in his own name" exactly mean, Scott?

I have no fucking clue. I was just going to let him prattle on and then ask questions.

Sue in his own name, huh? :D

...which name would that be, then? Did he make one up? Is THAT "his own name"? ...if so, he has no standing.

Is it the name on the Birth Certificate? If that's what he's referring to... then NO, it's not his.

I don't even KNOW what "suing in your own name" is supposed to MEAN.

I was going to write something funny !! :D

You still can, Pete! :D

Taking an ARAKIRI type of thing :D

http://frm001.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/.pond/arakiri.jpg.w300h254.jpg

Ok, time to eat, so lets eat in my own stomach :P

I don't see where "sue in his own name" came from. I don't sue anyone so wtf, why is that an issue here?

Scott Duncan can Aquilae reimburse me for the seminar that one of Dean put on?

Have CHRIS SCHULTE send a bill to Roguesupport Nx... :P

Because I am SURE it's Roguesupport Nx that takes care of the ADMINISTRATION :D

Oh fuck !!!! :-o

Notice of Non-Response

Greetings

On May 7th you received an Affidavit of Truth and Claim for Injury.

An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce. YOU have attempted to defraud me of my rights and failed to contest my claim in good faith and or otherwise.

YOU have accepted the charges of Criminal Assault, Forcible Confinement, Criminal Breach of the Trust, Arbitrary Detention/Interrogation and my Administration Fee's.

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT The charges are as follows.

Criminal Assault $15,000.00 each. Forcible Confinement, $5,000.00 per hour or any portion thereof. Criminal Breach of the Trust, $10,000.00 each. Arbitrary Detention/Interrogation, $5,000.00 per hour or any portion thereof. Administration Fee's, $1,000.00 per registered mailing.

If YOU fail to respond I will have good reason to believe YOU are, have been and intend on acting illegally. In good faith I offer YOU 5 days to rebut, point for point, my Affidavit of Truth, sworn under oath, penalty of perjury and full commercial liability. In the event YOU fail to respond as directed and/or fail to settle the claim within 5 days YOU accept the charges, tender for settlement and STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT via silent assent.

Without Prejudice By Sole Authorized Administrator and Beneficiary All Rights Reserved.

I would remove the "Greetings" part. It may just be me, but this is business. If I was to be totally honest with them in the communication, (remember, some shit head is/was interfering in my life) then the "Greatings" would read something more like this. Here's to hoping that your spouse is receiving aids right now from an affair they are in. And if you have daughters, that they are on the strip turning tricks for crack and your sons are turning tricks for free!

Thanks to all for the help, with all the shit going on in my life, looking for a new place to live, packing, work calls and the claims I have in motion it is hard for me to focus. If Karen had taken the time to understand how important it is to resign from the fraud then we would be stronger, instead she is choosing to vote and I just can't live in two parallel worlds, I can no longer support stupid cunt syndrome as it leaves me detached from the love we once had for each other. Karen is a great woman, I love her like no other, if I stand with her we will loose everything as she is the weak link and will turn on me through ignorance. She fears the system, that fear is stronger than love and in the end it will destroy us both.

I have not had the time to deal with this, as it stands I have sent the Affidavit to the parties, I have received reply from the city who then sent it to the cities claims adjuster, not a word from the two Agents on the undertaking. I would have sent the Notice of Non Responce had the ex not gone batshit crazy with fear of reprisal. Is this a dead claim? the adjuster made the claim that he was doing an investigation, this was months ago (May 6th). Here is where I fucked up, I sent an email to the adjuster.

From: David Vilaca [mailto:cycloped@me.com] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 1:57 PM To: David Raney Subject: Without Prejudice file DR104461010

Mr. Raney I have received a "without prejudice" correspondence dated May 12, 2014. Thank you for acknowledging my Affidavit of Truth and accepting my Claim registered under RW948016097CA, RW948016106CA and RW948016110CA.

In your correspondence you claimed to be doing an investigation. If I or anyone acting in my interest has lead you to believe that my private name is derived from a public document then that would be a mistake and please forgive me.

The parties (City Clerk, Vega, Metzger) had 10 days to rebut my affidavit. After receiving your letter, I waited, in good faith 20 days past due for your reply. YOU are now in dishonour.

Please take note that my affidavit and claim is via registered mail (proof of service) and that I seek a rebuttal and/or peaceful resolution and right of redress for the criminal assault, forcible confinement, arbitrary detainment and fraud perpetrated upon me on the evening of August 16 2013.

As you are aware, No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law. Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit and an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. Furthermore, slavery and servitude has been abolished in all its forms. I have no intent nor obligation to bring this matter before the Courts, The Police Services Board and/or the SIU, I have waived my right to be recognized and/or represented as a person before the law.

I expect your duty and wet ink signature to honour your statement to investigate this controversy. Please provide an offer to settle prior to a notice of fault/non-response under the terms and conditions set out in my registered mail affidavit and claim.

As principle investigator please be sure to have Her Majesties servants and trustee's respond to me in private, under oath and penalty of perjury with full commercial liability. The City Clerk (acting as Her Majesty in Right of Ontario) Police Constable's VEGA and METZGER have failed to respond and or rebut my affidavit and claim, under oath and penalty of perjury with full commercial liability. YOU, The City Clerk, Police Constable's VEGA and METZGER are in DISHONOR, all defaulted parties served Notice of Non-Response, Invoice and proof of service agree to be accountable as surety to the following charges.

Item a) Criminal Assault. Price $10000.00 ea, units x2. Item b) Arbitrary Arrest. Price $5000.00 ea, units x2. Item c) Detention/Interrogation. Price per hour or any portion thereof $1000.00 ea. units x2. Item d) Forcible Confinement. Price per day or any portion thereof $10000.00 ea. units x1. Item e) Subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Price $10000 ea. x2. Item f) Administration FEE. Price per mailing, $1000.00 ea. units x3.

Total payable for services and injury, $65000.00 in lawful money of Canada. Note, further charges and penalties may be incurred upon Notice of fault/non-response and proof of service.

Kindly note, as of May 20 2014 my affidavit stands as truth in commerce and may result in further penalties and private commercial liens upon all parties.

I have presented my claim and affidavit in good faith, without ill will, vexation or frivolity. Failure to settle will incur Public Notice, automatic Default Judgement and liens upon the parties.

As YOU are aware, MY time is very valuable and none of this is my fault, my only obligation is to stand on my rights and serve the truth.

Furthermore You have 3 days to settle this account or provide rebuttal under oath, penalty of perjury and full commercial liability.

My word is my bond. david vilaca, Sole Authorized Administrator and Beneficiary. All Rights Reserved.

Raney's reply Hello Mr. Vilaca,

Thank you for your email.

Please note that I am investigating this matter on behalf of the City of Toronto / Toronto Police Services. I do not represent any other party such as Her Majesty the Queen.

My investigation is continuing at the present time.

However, I would recommend that you retain counsel in order to protect any limitation periods under the Limitations Act.

Regards,

David Raney, CIP, CRM

Senior Adjuster

Granite Claims Solutions

*F.S.C.O. Lic # 1001356-R

The real question being, once I establish a trust and LIEN the person, can ESC CTRL continue as trustee to settle this matter?

Scott N Tara (Roguesupport), Ceit Butler, Mackximus Minimus?

I do not see why not. But please do not count my answer as "the answer."

I presume there is a PROPER NOTICE process that needs to happen, notifying this particular parties about the new trustee/administrator. But I have NO clue about Trust Law, or how to go about this.

You, as the sole authorized administrator for DAVID VILACA, decided on this date, to give ESC CTRL full power of attorney to take care of DAVID VILIACA's business....

And if someone ask WHY, it's because FUCK OFF, that's why :D

Ok, so I will inform the parties that power of attorney for the person is now with ESC CTRL. I guess its time to get the trust in order so ESC CTRL can perform its duty to the beneficiary. I will post the trust txt and charter here so I can have feed back.

The trust only need to be expressed.....don't go all fucktard with it :-D

FTP trust is one 8 x 14 page, and has four witnesses's signatures.....now the TRUST is expressed, and the basics (intent) is clear, I will add to it as it goes......

Declaration of Express Trust. This private trust is to be known as Far Arden Trust. I, david vilaca the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, grant all assets and every thing that DAVID FERNANDES VILACA has an interest in to Far Arden Trust. ESC CTRL HOLDINGS shall administrate Far Arden Trust as trustee for the sole benefit of the beneficiary. The beneficiary of Far Arden Trust is the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA and may be changed by the SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR only. The beneficiary shall live free and clear of all financial obligations. Far Arden Trust shall provide all necessities so that the Beneficiary lives with integrity, security and the continual improvement of living conditions. Power of Attorney for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA is granted to ESC CTRL HOLDINGS. Signed on this day ____________, 2014 BY:_______________________ SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR of DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, registration number XXXXXXXX, SIN number XXX-XXX-XXX

Agreed

Kent, when the trust is signed by the Grantor and 4 witnesses will the Corporate Seal for ESC CTRL not do in place of the signature?

David, you need evidence of the corpus being accepted.

Power of Attorney for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA is granted to ESC CTRL HOLDINGS. Signed on this day ____________, 2014 BY GRANTOR:_______________________ ESC CTRL __________________________SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, registration number XXXXXXXX, SIN number XXX-XXX-XXX

They need to accept that

That would be in the Charter for ESC CTRL

Just a squiggle, no name :)

By:_____SEAL___________(I did not signed here) Sole Authorized Administrator for PIERRE DAOUST

TRUSTEE 9111-1111 Quebec Inc adress Tel:

____Signature here____________ Authorized AGENT.

FFS I gotta kill this apple product too

The Sole Authorized Administrator has a few stamps too...

I have been SO temped to make a FUCK OFF stamp. I am NOT kidding. In RED. Account that shit.

I certainly have a few stamps, I need the seal and void and ESC CTRL specific stamps to be made still

I may make another seal with the SSN.

YOU'RE ALL A BUNCH OF "PAPERWORK TERRORISTS". :D

That is the idea, when I Lien the person i will have effectively removed it from commerce leaving only the man as beneficiary

Scott Duncan, once this is done and properly noticed, does 12 USC 95a(2) come into play? As in...I only used that drivers license pursuant and reliant on 12 USC 95a(2).

If I inform Wal-Mart that I am not one of their employees, does rule #37 of the Wal-Mart Employee's handbook come into play?

:D

Chris Evan, please come meet us in the FUTURE, which is NOW! Haha! Leave those freedumb groups/friends, that shit is poisonous.

Max...not sure if you noticed, but NOTHING is working for me

You're in Massachusetts. You are at "ground zero". New "Policy" has ALWAYS been deployed there.

It's "working for you" and "not working for you". It's TRUE vs UNTRUE. They don't CARE what's true anymore.

Its because of the amount of lawyers per capita I think...

It's because they've realized that the American Men and Women are HAPPY being a slave.....

Actually, Scott, I have to Skype you later to tell you something very interesting that happened yesterday in Kourt! Will you be available at 5ish?

Tell it here, fuck !! :(

Don't play the Derek Hill shit, please :(

OK...later. I'm on my phone and its too long for this

It has nothing to do with getting my legs punched

I know about your situation, Chris. How can I put myself in your shoes? I cannot. I have never been in such situation. It must suck, to put it in lame words.

What I meant with my comment is that anything from the past, is wrong thinking. Our thinking, even in terms of LAW, must be in the FUTURE, and that "future" in here NOW. Unfolding.

Decentralized technologies, smart contracts, coding, Namecoin, 3D printing technologies, computer science, new services for a new era, etc. Even if one is in prison, that is the stuff that can actually help to "better ourselves."

We are better investing our time acquiring knowledge about the future, instead of 12 USC 95a(2) (which is some Clubhouse rule that will probably be gone in 10 years or less), we come better off.

I am empathetic to your situation, Chris. Just think about what I just said.

There are no witches, but the people of Salem had plenty of them to burn. Remember that.

Chris, you've mentioned that you did everything that I did, yet our results vary greatly. The biggest difference that I see is the Drivers License. I've never had one, so that makes it MUCH harder to pin the SURETY on me. You not only have a license, but are dealing with driving-related offenses.

I said it before, I'll say it again. There is NO fraud occurring here. Until you RESIGN, they have EVERY RIGHT to proceed. The birth certificate is the date that the CROWN ORGANIZATION was created. There is no connection to you at that point other than the shared name. You did not apply, you did not sign, you did not consent.

Enter the DRIVERS LICENSE. You DID apply, you DID sign and consent, and you gave YOUR photo and YOUR home address as the official address for the CROWN ORGANIZATION. You even presented them with the birth certificate to PROVE that's who you are. See the problem there?

Yes Ceit Butler, unknowingly and without full disclosure. Now that I am aware, I can effect a change

Yes, you can RESIGN. Scott has been talking about it forever, yet you have yet to complete this simple step... and are frustrated and wondering why nothing is working for you.

Don't you think that maybe this is a key piece of the puzzle that you've been missing?

OK...a.) I did not become aware that Scott was saying this until 2 months ago. B.) I could have sworn that some document I submitted asked for proof of this....

Maybe they didn't hear the question asked over the clanking of the chains they kept putting on me

Asked for proof of what? You just have to RESIGN! Why are you making this complicated? Also, two months is a long time... You've been stressing over this, why have you not done this simple thing yet?

So, you still have not done everything. You still needed to resign.

RE:" I could have sworn that some document I submitted asked for proof of this....".

Chris, what do you think I would do if you asked me for PROOF that you are NOTan AQUILAE trustee?

As per your statement that it was "unwillingly and without full disclosure"... Are you claiming, then, that you read your state's Motor Vehicle Act from beginning to end before signing? Because that right there was your "full disclosure". The fact that YOU did not read before you signed is no ones fault but your own.

"Why won't it read?!?!"

http://vimeo.com/24782590

This has some of the most profound wisdom in it.

...and how do you get "asking for proof' out of "YOU NEED TO RESIGN"?

If you think something like "notice of understanding and claim of right" is RESIGNING, go back and read my articles again. Search for "eat a dick" to speed it up. :D

Oh...great...perfect. Well fuck, there is the screw up then. Now we know why I have been arrested 4 times, locked in acage for 3 weeks and had $5000 stolen.

For the record, not everyone who hasn't resigned dealt with anything close to this

Eamonn, Aladdin, Michael, Ceit, just to name a few

Again, *I* have NEVER held, or even applied for, a DRIVERS LICENSE.

Ceit, I went back and read through the application and the RMV-1 (the form we need to get plates). NO WHERE did I sign and agree to be bound by MGL ch 90 (Motor Vehicle Act). I couldn't find where I signed!

I actually don't even think the Act was ever passed... :-/

You MAY have heard me say this before. Pay attention this time:

NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN. There is ALWAYS DISCLOSURE, and you are simply a "WHY WON'T IT READ", Human CentIPad.

You have a DRIVER'S LICENCE. This means you have CONSENTED to the RULES. YOU SIGNED. Ceit Butler has no licence to beat the crap out of people in the streets and therefore does not have to resign from the AGENCY licensing the practice. You used a PUBLIC DOCUMENT to get it too. The only "fraud" and non disclosure is coming FROM YOU.

You have NOT resigned.

Right...nor am I going to until these matters are behind me. I have had enough trouble so far that I am just lying down.

Okay, I give up. That just might be the most retarded thing that you have ever said.

ok....so Ceit, you go to battle, you have Scott, and Lou. You have no presumed Joinder, and you are in a small city. I have 2 articles written in the paper, the closest support i have is that idiot Johanson 45 mins away, and the internet. Yes...I give up on this!

:D

CHRIS SCHULTE has been liened, Chris Evan ?

So the only thing left to do is, send a RESIGNATION letter ? :/

Go give up on your own thread Chris, this is for those who want to learn how to resign. They will have to kill me before I "give up". I too am plagued by a bad program and trust issues but I have to look beyond what I will suffer to move us all forward. No one wants to make mistakes but for some that is how to learn trial and error. I have been to jail more times than I can recall, I totally get it, it sucks but cowboy the fuck up ffs.

And what about me, you guys think it's fun to do everything at candle light ? :D ....I am fucking suffering like hell here.... :D

hahahahahahahaha!!!!!

...you won't resign.

...Until all the the shit from NOT resigning, passes? REALLY?

You REALLY think that's rational?

"cowboy the fuck up" ?

Is this has something to do with brokeback moontain ? :-o

Chris: I had a recent encounter in the courts where they took my persons drivers licence. when I was stupid enough to go into the courts to have a motion heard to try and "beg" or reason for it back the justice gave me a motion denied paper stating once drivers licence is suspended, the courts don't have jurisdiction to deal with me. I then was asked how I wished to proceed and I closed a four year ongoing bullshit case in a matter of minutes. I will post it all when I have a chance to type it all out ,but let me tell the world that the notice of mistake saved me from a lot of bs. ill get to what happened in court asap. PS ...giving up is what they want you to do. they will test you until you either push through or give up. I would never go into battle with anyone that would just put down their sword and die so sharpen that fucker up and get in the fight!

John Gessas, please start a thread of your own, this thread is for those who WILL RESIGN. Resignation requires "EXTREME DETACHMENT" There is a specific process to follow and most every thread goes to shit before it gets anywhere. How am I (and all the other hamster brains) going to get this right? I'm not a woman, I cant think of nine things at once, LINEAR PROGRESSION PLEASE :P

David , from what I have been reading with respect to the commentary on this post, I deemed my 2 cents an appropriate statement for chris to ponder. If it helps turn on a light for him then what does it matter where I post it? I will start a thread on my case and pending Scotts approval ,you can read about it also...free of charge!

No problem, just tell your story on another thread, I said please, not FFS.

Fuck, resign....that's all !!!

How in the fuck is this suppose to be complicated.....You send a resignation letter to the local fucktard (MP, or Member of parliament) .....or to Rob Ford :D ....you attach a copy of the PPSA lien that ESC CTRL registered over the person....

:D

The TRUST has been BREACHED, dear MP, so I resign and I have found a TRUSTABLE TRUSTEE :D ...thanks and good luck....

It's really that simple. Everything is right there in what Pete said.

Admiral Scott, one may resign, without placing a lien on the name, yet?

And for the record , I don't take kindly to people swearing at me so for anyone that has a temporary swelling and happen to mistake that for a set of real balls keep in mind that I am not the kind that gives a shit and I would eat my breakfast out of your hollowed out skull! Can every day be kick a cop in the face day Scott?

the lien is the resignation, it is also a valuable instrument :)

That wasn't directed at anyone , just an FYI

No Mackximus Minimus, the LIEN is proof of resignation... :P

The SURETY, seems to be accessible ONLY through a TRUSTABLE trustee :D ....maybe... :/

Why does Pete get this, and everyone else doesn't. It CAN'T be difficult! A Quebecois gets it, people! HOW HARD COULD IT BE?

DITCH YOUR PROGRAMMING!

:D HAHAHAHA !!! :D

Can married persons resign/lien (for the newbies, for we have talked about this), or would they have to transfer the agreement to another trust before doing that?

damn, stuff to do elsewhere :( I'll post the charter and by-laws when I return

Well, I am in the process of doing it, so yes Mackximus Minimus.....

No...no fucking transfer.. :(

Thanks for the answers.

If you don't have intent to divorce soon, forget about this marriage thing.....

Articles of Incorporation

1. This HOLDING COMPANY shall be known as ESC CTRL (Ontario #240330043)

2. ESC CTRL is located at 95-260 Adelaide St E Toronto, M5A-1N1

3. ESC CTRL is incorporated as a Holding Company, not for profit and as TRUSTEE for FAR ARDEN TRUST.

4. Henceforth, ESC CTRL is the Sole Authorized Administrator with POWER OF ATTORNEY for DAVID FERNANDES VILACA and any and all interests therein.

5. ESC CTRL is established in Perpetuity.

OBJECTS

ESC CTRL is dedicated to the principles long established in Trust Organizations and is obligated to act for the good of the beneficiary/s. I. To ensure the health and well being of the beneficiary/s. II To secure the rights, privacy and security of the person for the benefit of the Beneficiary/s. III To protect the Beneficiary by what ever means necessary. IV To publish, impart or disseminate to others, information, knowledge and technology.

BY-LAWS

a. The Director, Trustees, Agents and employees of ESC CTRL are mandated to protect the rights, privacy and integrity of FAR ARDEN TRUST, its BENEFICIARY(S) and interests.

b. The rights, privacy and integrity of the Beneficiary, security of the person and all other interests in, for or on behalf of, DAVID FERNANDES VILACA and/or FAR ARDEN TRUST shall be administered by, ESC CTRL.

c. ESC CTRL shall adopt the following early measures to ensure the survival of FAR ARDEN TRUST, its BENEFICIARY(S) and interests; i) Purchase and Implement all available technologies to ensure the value vested by the grantor in FAR ARDEN grows exponentially. ii) Purchase and Implement all available books/tools/vehicles/vessels and other necessities as required to ensure the rights, privacy and integrity of FAR ARDEN TRUST remain intact in perpetuity. iii) *CRYPTO CURRENCY shall be the preferred medium of exchange for ESC CTRL.

d. ESC CTRL adopts the following International Standards; i) Slavery and servitude has been abolished in all its forms. ii) The right to form, join and participate in non-governmental organizations, associations or groups; iii) The right to communicate with non-governmental or intergovernmental organizations. iv) The right to freely publish, impart or disseminate to others, information, knowledge and technology.

e. International Law, the Articles of Incorporation and BY-LAWS shall be the SUPREME LAW of ESC CTRL.

any ideas to add? does the seal get added to complete the construct? I know I'm missing some key stuff, directors, officers...

Come on, I can't be the only one who is listening/paying attention. Has no one else been working on the Trust Deed and Corporate Charter? How else would you RESIGN without these elements in place.

The oath of office....

I, the undersigned, do solemnly pledge myself to accept and abide by the Articles of Incorporation, objects and by-laws of ESC CTRL

_________________________ { STAMP SQUIGGLE HERE}{ SEAL} Director ESC CTRL Inc.

Who would be the OBJECT of this Trust, Scott?

DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, David Vilaca, or david vilaca...?

What?

Who technically would be listed as the beneficiary for David's Trust?

DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, or, David Vilaca, or, david vilaca...?

NOBODY.

When you TRUST ME, who's the "beneficiary"?

Your question is nonsense

But i've read that an express trust requires the certainties of intention, subject-matter, and objects to be established...?

All true.

...your question is still nonsense.

Well, has he covered the certainty of intention sufficiently enough in what he has wrote so far for his trust?

Chip as far as ESC CTRL is concerned, it's none of your fucking business :P

Yet David, you DID check the "like" button when i asked-

"Who would be the OBJECT of this Trust, Scott?

DAVID FERNANDES VILACA, David Vilaca, or david vilaca...?" ;)

at least you're asking questions

You talk from out of both-sides of your mouth:

David Vilaca any ideas to add? does the seal get added to complete the construct? I know I'm missing some key stuff, directors, officers... 12 hrs · Like David Vilaca Come on, I can't be the only one who is listening/paying attention. Has no one else been working on the Trust Deed and Corporate Charter? How else would you RESIGN without these elements in place. 3 hrs · Like

oh FFS, get your head out of your ass, the comment, "its none of your fucking business" is for the 3rd party who asks, not directed at you specific, the Beneficiary is PRIVATE.

Listen to David Vilaca.

In 1982 Antonella Kirov, wife of Erich Kirov swore fealty to the AQUILAE TRUST.

Why? None of your fucking business.

What is AQUILAE? None of your fucking business.

Who's the "beneficiary"? The question is nonsense, and even if it wasn't, it's NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS.

The purpose of establishing a TRUST is so that NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS, is TRUTH, not DISHONOUR.

OK Chip, when the trust is constructed the beneficiary remains the same as if you were admin for the person you happen to have without the trust, (the reason for the TRUST is the on going criminal breach of the trust on the public side). THE SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR for the name IS the BENEFICIARY. Then (timeline) the BENEFICIARY turns power of attorney over to ESC CTRL (HOLDING COMPANY/TRUSTEE) for the BENEFIT OF THE BENEFICIARY, from there forward FAR ARDEN and the Beneficiary is NUNYA FUCKING BUSINESS :)

Me as the SOLE authorized Administrator, and/or PIERRE DAOUST, and/or Pierre Daoust, has nothing to do with any benefits that could come from the FTP Trust. :P

Thanks Scott, Pete, Kent, next up Notice of Resignation.

I have created my notice and resignation, I attach the lien ESC CTRL now holds to the notice and resignation and mail via registered mail to whom, Speaker of the House (Queens Park), and Local MP?

Who gave you ID?

...them.

Should have read the thread again, sorry Cap't. I would very much like to send it to the Cunt at queens park, via the unelected speaker. I'm certain he won't read it before the house but he does control the Sergeant at Arms and security as I understand it.

So send that too? I have put the motorcycle up for sale, I won't need the licence any more.

DL, PASSPORT, BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Return it all?

Ok, DL to the Ministry of Transport? SIN Card to CRA, and so forth, all with notice and proof of resignation via registered mail?

This will be mailed registered to the Senior Investigator with Global Claims Solutions. Mr Raney

It would seem you have no intent to investigate and/or settle this matter honourably. Why would you recommend that I retain counsel? YOU seem intent to prejudice my standing and influence the outcome of my claim. I have no faith nor trust in YOUR Organization, its integrity, intent and claims to date. I have no obligation to attorn my rights to anyone nor do I intend on being represented as a ward and/or person before the law. I have already informed YOU, I am a man and I seek a peaceful resolution AND settlement of this matter. A matter must be expressed to be resolved. This matter has been clearly expressed in an affidavit which now stands as truth in commerce due to non-response.

Perhaps the nature of the claim is not accounted for in your Organization and its policies. I do not require an admission of guilt. Guilt has already been established. I understand the rights of men have been removed from YOUR SOCIETY but that does not negate the fact that other rights exist.

Your claim to not represent Her Majesty is fraud and a Breach of the Trust. As you are aware, "every one" "person" "owner" and similar expressions include [Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius] Her Majesty and an Organization. This includes YOU and your Organization. Ignorance of the law, is no excuse.

I am entitled to my life, my liberty, my integrity and the security of the person, anything less is slavery.

I fully intend to remedy this situation. If you continue to deceive and mislead me and you fail to recognize the importance of this undertaking I will have no other options other than to turn Power of Attorney for this matter over to a Duly Authorized TRUSTEE, without further notice to YOU.

Without ill-will, vexation or frivolity David. SOLE AUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATOR AND BENEFICIARY FOR DAVID F. VILACA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Thanks for this David Vilaca.

lots to filter, pay attention, don't thank me, yet, I'm still learning.

the aim here is to transfer the claim to ESC CTRL (the trustee) in order for IT to act legally in their jurisdiction under its own LAW (Articles of Incorporation, Objects By-Laws). "It's not my fault", this position is held both by the Trustee (ESC CTRL) and Beneficiary :)

"In 1982 Antonella Kirov, wife of Erich Kirov swore fealty to the AQUILAE TRUST."

David, did you swear fealty to ESC CTRL?

I have an oath of office, over 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, I am fucked, I can't even violate ANYONE'S rights :(

If a fucktard calls 9111-1111 Quebec Inc, and ask some PERSONAL information on ANY "PERSONS", I just can't answer, I can't because of this fucking oath of office :(

In Quebec, "persons" has the RIGHT to "PRIVATE" life.... I am cooked if I give answers :(

And I can't fuck around with ANYONE'S rights to the surety of HIS person :D

Assurance of Codified Slavery. This is what I have been waiting for, this is key to my formal resignation.

"requiring persons...to identify themselves" :D Will you ask them for clarification regarding the definition of persons? Please, for me :)

Where is the law that says I have to identify "me", as a LEGAL person ? :/

I remember an episode of MASH, where they bring this Korean civilian in for treatment. They were trying to find out who he was. They asked him if he could identify himself. He said,"I'm me".How can you argue with that?

As i will NOTE, Mister Raney doesnt even provide for that sectio- err, 'revision,' where it even says that..

A wise noble Admiral has said there is no legal definition for the word "ME". :D

You bring up a good point, Mackximus. Just what exactly are the 'safe-words' so to speak we can use to describe ourselves with without having to worry about creating JOINDER, Scott?

1 - ME 2 - ? 3 - ? 4 - ?

Administrator

Fuck :-(

Sir :D

You may/must address me as SIR, ADMIRAL or YOUR GRACE.

GRACE. That which a person is not entitled to by law, but which is extended to him as a favor; a pardon, for example, is an act of grace. There are- certain days allowed to a payer of a promissory note or bill of exchange, beyond the time which appears on its face, which are called days of grace.

Translation: I CAN MAKE MONEY OUT OF DEBT, FOREVER... except my title's prorogued.

yes.

To this day the government doesn't know what my position is, "OFFICIALLY".

Yes David-Paul Sip, I will indeed ask that very question and a few others as well. Once the formal resignation is in place. It's kinda laughable when you look at all that is wrong with the reply. It starts with a YOU FFS and omits the affirmation (sent registered mail ) and how the identity was ascertained, torture is routine in roadside intercourse, there is no other way to compel information when one chooses to remain silent. My very first question "by who's authority? on August 16th 2013 set the stage for the actors and the breach of trust. ESC CTRL has damaged the BC and SIN #'s, I need only send the formal resignation, return ALL of zepapers, (PASSPORT, LICENSE ect) to complete my private standing. Thereafter, some one I trust will correct this, The intent is to DAMAGE reputations on the blockchain and see this never happens again.

Seeking clarification Admiral Scott...what is meant by YOUR GRACE? Does this mean/imply YOUR FAVOUR as IN your favour?

There are no synomyms in law, David. That should give you the answer.

Nope! Nothing yet brother :/ "There are no synomyms in law" I've read this many times in TTFL...Fuck me!

GRACE. That which a person is not entitled to by law, but which is extended to him as a favor; a pardon, for example, is an act of grace. There are- certain days allowed to a payer of a promissory note or bill of exchange, beyond the time which appears on its face, which are called days of grace.

Its a courtesy.....

who's getting fucked?

The Debtor.

ahhhhh :-D

Hellos?? If it's LEGAL, it's about MONEY! :P

Notice of mistake is a courtesy, it's not grace, it's notice to the debtor.

:)

And the PUBLIC is ALWAYS the DEBTOR....profound! Ha ha ha...YOUR GRACE means it is the ADMIRAL's GRACE/COURTESY to give to any PERSON he wishes to fuck. Seriously, wow! Much like :D

there will be no synonyms on the blockchain :) David Raney "Senior Claims Adjustor" will equal-zero integrity, do not trust!!! there will be 100,000's of thousands of confirmations on the blockchain that he was not willing to swear an oath to the truth.

WHERE IS THE FUCKING SURETY ?