The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Aug 26, 2013 1:41 PM

David Vilaca

Clown Entities, errm CROWN AGENTS.

Just Me gathering more evidence.

they disagree with Me, having rights. I have no oath of office. I have no duty to "HER MAJESTY"

youtube.com

Inside the Security Office of the Legislative Assembly of ONTARIO. Freedom of expression, self determination, equality before the law, NOT in THEIR backyard....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1401
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1401 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 42

David Vilaca

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASHQ6emofL8&feature=c4-overview&list=UULtvN9egUN8kps_2ELw1x5g

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1401 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1401 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Vilaca

Ha ha, no such thing eh, there are many ways to beat the court, one of them is to force them to obey the obligation of international law, such as UCC or Human rights law. Which Canada has a binding obligation to. You won't be using human rights law to place a lien but you can kill many state obligation by knowing how to apply the ICCPR, ICESCR. It's your toss frisbee.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1402
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1402 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Vilaca

The only reason I post this here is to show everyone I have the balls to stand up to these douche bags. No fucks were given other than my courtesy to the courtesans of public service. Sadly the people's peas garden fucked themselves by not following through with the 3 step process. I no longer assist activists, for the most part they live in fear and will not truly challenge de facto authority. Activists want to do the right thing, they just don't want to do the process. I have only a small piece of the puzzle, I'm here because the principles of correspondence and mentalism lead me here. I do my home work, I see the value of Scott Duncan and his gift to us to share so that we may correct the wrongs by courtesy of lien. I've a long way to go in understanding trust law and commerce. What I do know is that I will not stop, I will exercise my will and find the proper way to have my equity flow into the trust. I have made many mistakes but I stand before you all with the intent to follow through and share every mistake and success.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1402
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1402 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Jeff Roggers

what they fail to tell you is that the human being means person and person has surety attached to it

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1402 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1402 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Vilaca

Read as a whole, it appears that s. 7 was intended to confer protection on a singularly human level. A plain, common sense reading of the phrase "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person" serves to underline the human element involved; only human beings can enjoy these rights. "Everyone" then, must be read in light of the rest of the section and defined to exclude corporations and other artificial entities incapable of enjoying life, liberty or security of the person, and include only human beings. In this regard, the case of R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 is of no application. There are no penal proceedings pending in this case, so the principle articulated in Big M Drug Mart is not involved: Irwin Toy Ltd. v. A. G. Que., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927; Dywidag Systems v. Zutphen Brothers Construction Ltd., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 705; Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425; British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1403 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1403 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

So the person I have in my pocket can live, have liberty and have a security/surety....great.!!...Thanks :D

What about "ME" ?

Oh, I see that I am the sole beneficiary of that person that has the right to live, the right to liberty and the right to security/surety... :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1403
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1403 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Vilaca

According to the bank act, It's a security instrument. Created for this express reason, All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1403
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1403 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Vilaca

Bank Act article 86 (1) A security certificate shall be signed by or bear the printed or otherwise mechanically reproduced signature of at least one of the following: (a) a director or officer of the bank; (b) a registrar or transfer agent of the bank or a branch transfer agent or a natural person on their behalf; or (c) a trustee who certifies it in accordance with a trust indenture.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1404
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1404 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Vilaca

“bank” means a bank listed in Schedule I or II Toronto-Dominion Bank Bank of Montreal

Permissible registered holder If a person {which in the bank Act also means NATURAL PERSON} on whom the ownership of a security of a bank devolves by operation of law,{To pass on or delegate to another, To be passed on or transferred to another} other than a person described in subsection (2), provides proof of that person’s authority to exercise rights or privileges in respect of a security of the bank that is not registered in the person’s name, the bank shall, subject to this Act, treat that person as entitled to exercise those rights or privileges.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1404
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1404 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Vilaca

the birth certificate is not held by the registrar. The birth certificate is the negotiable security interest. The statement of live birth is your security

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1404 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1404 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

“person”

— personne —

“person” means a natural person, an entity or a personal representative;

So there is 3 choices, not one AND/OR the other.....but 1 OR the other.....check carefully where they use NATURAL PERSON, it define someone that WORKS for the government......nothing more....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1405
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1405 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

“director” means a natural person occupying the position of director, by whatever name called, of a body corporate, and “board of directors” or “directors” refers to the directors of a body corporate as a body;

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1406
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1406 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

“resident Canadian”

— résident canadien —

“resident Canadian” means a natural person who is

(a) a Canadian citizen ordinarily resident in Canada,

(b) a Canadian citizen not ordinarily resident in Canada who is a member of a prescribed class of persons, or

(c) a permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and ordinarily resident in Canada, except a permanent resident who has been ordinarily resident in Canada for more than one year after the time at which the individual first became eligible to apply for Canadian citizenship;

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1406
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1406 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

“delegate”

— délégué —

“delegate” means a natural person appointed or elected to represent a member of a federal credit union at a meeting of members;

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1406 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1406 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Vilaca

You like that eh. Just made it up. Gonna poster the city with it, just to be belligerent

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1407 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1407 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

I am the LAWFUL holder in due course of that person named PIERRE DAOUST, and that person has the right to life, liberty and security/surety.

And I am the MASTER of that person.

ANY OBJECTIONS anyone ? :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1407
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1407 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top