I have some more questions. No doubt that the "Am I being detained? Am I free to go?" mantra has seem to work in many occasions, apparently.
But, 1- does not the questions "Am I being detained? Am I free to go?" already imply/presumes authority, master/servant?
2- If "they" really don't have ANY authority, why ask those questions?
3- Does my freedom depends on the arbitrary decision of a stranger, low ranking fictitious character, impersonator of a public official, that can act as accuser and judge at the same time?
4- Why would a REAL free man beg/ask for permission, to another man, to be "free to go"?
5- Can any other man really hold that much power over another man, without consent?
6- Wouldn't it be DELUSIONAL to ask a complete stranger if one is "free to go"?
7- If there is such thing as IMMUNITY, would that have to be GRANTED by an AUTHORITY, or is something you just proclaim in some paper, saying you just have it, "because I say so"?
What the heck do I know?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 117Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 117 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.