Aug 22, 2013 4:26 PM

Is not wearing a helmet-while-bicycling a Provincial Offences Act offence, or a City of Toronto by-law violation?

section 104.(2.1) HWY Traffic act.

104. Bicyclists to wear helmet

(2.1) Subject to subsection 103.1 (2), no person shall ride on or operate a bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a bicycle helmet that complies with the regulations and the chin strap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin.

..interestingly enough- there is NO definition for PERSON in the Highway Traffic Act.....but there is in the Legislation Act, 2006 ;)

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm#BK167

In this reguard. It would be the interpretations act that would applh

Nope. Ontario Interpretation Act has been repealed.

ok, I thought it was a Federal enactment

Note: This Act was repealed on July 25, 2007. See: 2006, c. 21, Sched. F, ss. 134, 143 (1).

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/repealedstatutes/english/elaws_rep_statutes_90i11_e.htm

looking it up as we speak.

I am thoroughly sick of this shit. Who are these people?

Derek Moran the act you refer to only has 100 sections.

Chris Schulte tell me about it. I just went to 55 division to demand these two Clown entities produce a business card and bonding information. the duty and desk sargents both refused to provide these pigs information thus bringing themselves into the controversy via The Police Services Act section 81. 2 and ,3 Withholding services

(2) No member of a police force shall withhold his or her services. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.

Offence

(3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than one year, or to both. 2007, c. 5, s. 10.

Write to the Ombudsman of Toronto for the info, Fiona Crean: Ombuds <ombuds@toronto.ca>;

thank you my unseen friend. I will do that right now.

..better yet- something in the Police Services Act regarding CONCEALING INFORMATION, would be best

Whats an Ombudsman in the States?

from the ombudman page The Ombudsman cannot consider complaints about: Policing

State Representative?

No....seems like an Attorney General....

You're not COMPLAINING about anything...you are SEEKING information

thats what i told the police, i was not there to make a complaint, i was there to get services.

Derek Moran I just called and the police are not in the mandate, they cannot help me.

Definition of person in criminal code under interpretations. Referenced from Legalese for Idiots here. Best post ever.

Councillor Michael Thompson is the Vice-President i think of the Police Services Board...

OH...call 311, the City's information-service

I think Scott Duncan would agree- this is a textbook-example of ON/OFF...notice- no arguing, no escalation, no controversy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi6scLZLrMw&list=TLhNcotZREmrQ

Government enforcement CYCLE HELMETS? Seriously??? Psychopathy meets Monty Python.

I wish it was a python skit, they caused nerve damage to my wrist. I suffered greatly at work all week. IM now off as I cannot perform my duties

Not trying to trivialise your injury David, just seems so insane and macabre Sorry for your hurt mate.

Mik, I never took it that way. It's kinda funny really, these mental cases believe they are in the right. IM gaining the wherewithall to correct these crimes against humanity and my individual self

They've PRESUMED you, being an employee of that city where they've stopped you....Justa say, I DON'T WORK neither with, and/or for YOU.

I am NOT an employee of that corporation you work for Mister....

And keep repeating that shit until they beat you with a baton :D ....or teaser you, or shoot you... :D

Pete Daoust, That's coming, I've pissed off a lot of swine lately.

Good on ya. I'm noticing a trend, through the years, wereby the standards for accepting individuals into law enforcement have been tightened, and that to make it through the eye of the needle only the select few combining under-average IQ and a need-to-hurt. In the old days they would've been locked up. Now they're selected for police and security work. these characters are now out there thinking it's ok to asault people fr not wearing helmets. Show'em their place :)

breaking the law by not wearing a helmet....this LAW is a corporation rule....same as if you work for coke.....Are you working for coke David Smile ??

A bunch of sack of shit sat together in Toronto, and decided that they will charge their employees if they catch them on a bycicle with no helmet....that's all....

A sack of shit can be useful unlike the private bar. A sack of shit can be burnt on the doorstep of a lawyer and the door bell rung, a lawyer just needs his bell rung. I asked the justice department once who wrote the statutes and the reply was outside lawyers so there is no conflict of interest

Put all that in an affidavit requesting damages, send to head of police services (I think) then when no reply, lay charges Queens Bench.

Pete Daoust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZNAFuRV51s&feature=youtu.be

Sorry to say that but you look a bit belligerent :D

this is war

IT,s pretty calm on my side......for now :/

Wow useless is and understatement.

she knew where i was going, thats why she got off the phone so quick

i have a video from 55 division but my phone wont upload it to youtube

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE FINANCIAL CONTROL — 71-13. Deposits with Chief Financial Officer. [Amended 2005-04-14 by By-law No. 331-2005] Duly executed copies of all agreements, including all insurance and certificates thereof, all contracts, bonds, letters of credit and other security for the due performance thereof, and all other documents executed by or on behalf of the City shall be delivered to the Chief Financial Officer for safekeeping.

I like black girls- and YOU THINK WRONG, AND VALUE THE WRONG THINGS...not to mention, you just gave me an ORDER

Pierre- can i borrow your VOID-stamp...and your SHOWER *yeesh*

My VOID stamp is in French : ANNUL”

And my SHOWER ???....:/

Ombudsman: I can't answer that question Me: Can you put me through to someone who can?

no because our function is to find out what you're complaining about and to take your wind out of your sails

NOTICE TO COUNTY CLERK _____________________________________ The minute you receive any affidavit, it is recorded. Should you refuse to record My affidavits, once deposited with you, you are committing a crime against justice under Statutes at Large Sec. 5403 and it is punishable by up to a $2000 fine and 3 years imprisonment. If your county attorney told you not to file any documents like mine, you are still responsible, as I do not accept any third party interveners. Any attorney, district attorney, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have a license to make a legal determination in this matter as they do not represent Me and you, the county clerk, do not have the authority to represent Me. Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying, &c., public records.) SEC. 5403. Every person who willfully destroys or attempts to destroy, or, with intent to steal or destroy, takes and carries away any record, paper, or proceeding of a court of justice, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of such court, or any paper, or document, or record filed or deposited in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer, shall, without reference to the value of the record, paper, document, or proceeding so taken, pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment, at hard labor, not more than three years, or both: [See — — 5408,5411,5412.1] Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enforcement of the laws.) SEC. 5407. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws, each of such persons shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more thanfive thousand dollars, or by imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not less than six months normore than six years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. See — — 1977-1991, 20042010, 5506-5510.1 Title LXX.---CRIMES.--- CH. 4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Destroying record by officer in charge.) SEC. 5408.Every officer, having the custody of any record, document, paper, or proceeding specified in section fifty-four hundred and three,who fraudulently takes away, or withdraws, or destroys any such record, document, paper, or proceeding filed in his office or deposited with him or in his custody, shall pay a fine of not more than two thousand dollars, or suffer imprisonment at hard labor not more than three years, or both-, and shall, moreover, forfeit his office and be forever afterward disqualified from holding any office under the Government of the United States.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq14MM1t7f8&feature=youtu.be

"let me get a supervisor" to confer on how best to get rid of you probably... Any further outcome?

Oh yes.....keep it up David Smile, you're DOING what you have to do.....this is something only a FEW are doing.....keep it up Man...!!! :D

The less people that have to do these things the better, isn't that the whole point Pete? :)

The WHOLE point to me, is REALITY, and here in reality, it's all fucked up :)

Cops seems to think that they are some sort of SUPREME humans that can beat the shit out of you, if they feel like it.....

All I can think of is Nazi Germany. IDENTIFY YOURSELF or we'll beat the living piss out of you.

Norah, will you be my Boat Bunny? :D

No Scott. No. I don't need any more creeper cred than what I have already. :)

http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/crmd/crmd.nsf/All/FDCE95D760B1426AC22578E30035D4F5?OpenDocument

There's a link to civil registry legislation there but it pops up in Cypriot I presume... You should be able to find the act relating to it there...

does anyone know the other benefits from the name change act waiver. and how it can be applied in other areas of life?

http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/aps/

PLEASE NOTE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT, THE ACCESS AND PRIVACY SECTION HAS 30 DAYS TO COMPLY UPON RECEIPT OF YOUR REQUEST.

Types of requests

The following is a list of the most common types of requests processed through the Toronto Police Services’ Access and Privacy Section:

— Records of Arrest — General Occurrences; Incident Reports — Memorandum Book Notes — Witness statements or contact information — Police related 9-1-1 Emergency calls Next step is HQ for arrest record, incident report, memorandum book notes, bonding info and business cards from PC Metzger, PC Vega and the two (duty officer in video and his sargent) who by choice entered the controversy by not providing the required service.

Do you think they will comply ? :D

PLEASE NOTE: We are TRAINED, since we are little kids, TO OBEY, BREAK and take our hole.....We are NOT suppose to disobey, unbreak and stay outside the hole.....So now, these cops will be ALL FUCKED UP with you David Smile :D .....we are presumed being UNDER their authority, we are presumed being an EMPLOYEE, and we have to stick with the EMPLOYEE's rules

Unless we DECIDE otherwise :D

Risk Management Unit phone #416-808-7731 let's all call and find out. Or fax 416-808-8024. Mandate: The purpose of the Professional Standards-Risk Management Unit is to contribute to the achievement of the Toronto Police Service's mandate and priorities by: providing an effective and efficient support service ensuring that the prescribed Service standards concerning the administration, promotion and support of professionalism, which includes the practices, conduct, appearance, ethics and integrity of its members, strengthens public confidence and co-operation within the community. Who's community?

:D

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/community

6. In another sense, community is the right which all men have, according to the laws of nature, to use all things. Wolff, Inst. Sec. 186.

MUNICIPALITY. The body of officers, taken collectively, belonging to a city, who are appointed to manage its affairs and defend its interests.

Hey OFFICER David Smile, put your fucking helmet on :D

And shut up, or I'll kick your ass... :D (sounds a bit Taliban :/ )

The ADVANTAGE I have over all of you English speaking dude, is I have to check ALL legal definitions of words... :D I have no choice :D

They must have respect for the pluralistic nature of Canadian society. Pluralistic!

This PLURALISTIC stuff sounds BELIEFS to me, ...... I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW :D

If he keeps talking you continue with.....

I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW

the "tout-de-fucking-suite" quote belongs to Kate Butler....just saying... :D

The pluralistic nature of society dispels beliefs. Look it up in blacks

plu·ral·ism (plr-lzm) n. 1. The condition of being multiple or plural. 2. a. A condition in which numerous distinct ethnic, religious, or cultural groups are present and tolerated within a society. b. The belief that such a condition is desirable or socially beneficial. 3. Ecclesiastical The holding by one person of two or more positions or offices, especially two or more ecclesiastical benefices, at the same time. 4. Philosophy a. The doctrine that reality is composed of many ultimate substances. b. The belief that no single explanatory system or view of reality can account for all the phenomena of life.

pluralism [?pl??r??l?z?m] n 1. (Christianity / Ecclesiastical Terms) the holding by a single person of more than one ecclesiastical benefice or office 2. (Sociology) Sociol a theory of society as several autonomous but interdependent groups which either share power or continuously compete for power 3. (Sociology) the existence in a society of groups having distinctive ethnic origin, cultural forms, religions, etc. 4. (Business / Industrial Relations & HR Terms) a theory that views the power of employers as being balanced by the power of trade unions in industrial relations such that the interests of both sides can be catered for 5. (Philosophy) Philosophy a. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of more than two basic types of substance Compare monism [1] dualism [2] b. the metaphysical doctrine that reality consists of independent entities rather than one unchanging whole Compare monism [1] absolutism [2b] pluralist n & adj pluralistic adj

To me.....

I AM NOT ONE OF THE EMPLOYEE OF THE CORPORATION YOU WORK FOR MISTER......leave me alone tout-de-fucking-suite with your helmet rules, IT DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.....prove it Mister, and I will obey RIGHT NOW

Is more simple, and really EASY to UNDERSTAND :D

...and the Tout-sier the Sweeter...

What ? :D

Say it out loud.

Fuck... It's " Lou Manottii" all over again...

I said it out loud....NOTHING :(

Hey, remember that whole, "I'm your superior" thing I mentioned a post or 2 back?

Let that sink in.

Are you telling me EVERYONE EXCEPT the Token French Guy, got that?

Tout-sier the Sweeter....what's that ?....what does that mean ? :D

*sigh*

Tout De fucking Sweet in action.... dumbass

Well, fuck off I just don't get it....dumbass

the quicker the better...

I do a french phonetic joke, and the french guy drops the ball.

...after declaring I'm NOT his superior in every measurable way.

I'll just leave it at that. It's a microcosm of who you ALL are.

Ho...that was a french phonetic joke ?... :D

superior in EVERY measurable way ? :D

I think you've driven my point home... with excessive force.

haha serious stuff and funny stuff all in one place, who could ask for anything more :)

Ok, I quit, you are my superior Scott Duncan 8-|

Yes..

Intellect... Check. Knowledge...Yup, beat you there too... Acquired skills... HELL yes...

Has line of women who want to have sex with him... Yup... (OOO there's Gail...) I win again.

Those factors give me a distinct advantage over...well.. everybody... especially you, Pierre :P

:D

It was so boring 5 minutes ago, now it's fucking fun :D

So hit those books, Tout Suite! And the Tout-sier, the sweeter!

Me and Books, are like Cameras and you :(

Fair enough...

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tushy

*sigh*

Well well, the shit tard pigs never sent the info, a clear breach of the Police Services Act and the public trust. The info I requested is public, they think they can keep it private, we'll see about that.

they had 30 days to send the memorandum book notes, video, arrest record and bonding info.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bplx3Q5nWc4&feature=youtu.be

My intent is to lien the 2 peace officers. I would like keep this thread to the process of lienning public officers. I need to gather this public record so I have evidence of a breach of the trust. When I do collect this evidence, I'll file a lien and send copies w/affidavit to the underwriter. I will be claiming $6000.00 in damages from each officers bond as per my bill of exchange/fee schedule. Is this even possible ? I have no desire to make a claim in the court as there is no remedy or relief in that venue.

So, Scott Duncan, correct me if I am wrong.....

You will have to send each of these contractor, that forces you to do business with, an INVOICE, and then an ACCOUNT STATEMENT, and then, a NOTICE, and then, a FINAL NOTICE (because you are a nice guy) and then a DEFAULT NOTICE......and then LIEN them :D

Is that is ? :D

"Is that is????" Say it outloud :-)

Thank you Pete Daoust, this is the process I had in mind. Notice with bill/invoice attached. The bill is for using torture to extort the private name (I produced no slave id). Then the opportunity to cure with outstanding bill/account invoice, then notice of default. Place all evidence together and register the lien, send copies of everything to the underwriter.

I'm doing similar with a bank David Smile. I'm at the lien part and having a challenge as to where to find the Directors and Officers liability insurance information, they do give it up easily lol

Notice to agent is notice to principal... notice to principle is notice to agent...

your bill of exchange and your commercial liens on officers bond are two separate issues

Jeffsbee has a valid point. ;-)

what entity is going to run the lien on the two officers bonds?

if you don't win in court against officers bonds you may forfeit the whole of your assets because if you try suing the officers instead of your corporation doing it you are liable

good question Jeff Roggers, and part of the answers I seek. As I have been allocated Federal Court File (T-1395-12) the title of Private Individual, sui juris man, at no cost, it will be the private man who places the lien. correct me if I'm wrong

Gail Marie ? :/ .....do you guys ALL have an identity crises ? :D

why would i use the court for anything other than summery judgement?

How in the world a MAN can lien something ??

lol it's my version of putting the person in my pocket Pete Daoust ;)

so I need to get my ducks in a row by creating the trust, finding a trustee, creating the corp to protect the trust and send in the hound (trustee) to execute the lien?

:)

No David Smile, you need to STOP complicating shit :D

Pierre, I mean Pete, what do you mean?

All of you are changing TAKEN names :D

Why do you guys are talking about trust, trustee, trustette and all that shit.......that has nothing to do with David Smile is case here ? :/

Yeah, and I TOOK another one. Is there a law against that?

No....but you look like someone who have an identity crises :P

a forien summary judgment is given by a notary public which is not overturned by any judge

So do you!!!!

:-)

Oh yes, "ME" I went through a solid one.....as Scott :D

I have DEMOLISHED a whole thread during that crises :D

no Gail a trustee is someone you trust it will not be you you are the shareholder

I had to buy a new laptop when everything was over

my best friend is the trustee my wife is the secretary I'm acting president and my friend is also acting treasure

Are you refering to the "Fucks the Puppy" thread?

the corp created is Trustee corporation... holder of the Trust and administrator thereof... as proxy to me.. it handles all affairs of the legal person name lien by the trustee corp as a person... who is lawful holder in due course... I trust my corp....

Of course I am, what other threads you think I was talking about.......have you seen that thread Chris Evan ? :D

true Jason there's many way(s) that you can setup your corporation

I saw it briefly... then it was gone... Pete Daoust It was epic if I recall.

The way I did it was taught here.

No, everyone talks about it, but somehow I missed it.

I was just laid out of basic format for easy understanding

you missed it, it's "ME" who messed it :D

Now, just to clarify this Original thread....

David Smile encountered 2 clowns who FORCED David Smile's person he has in his pocket, to contract with them....is that was it is ?

So now, David Smile, as the best ADMINISTRATOR in town, has to ADMINISTRATE this fuck up...no ?

what I need really to help all you guys is a fully-equipped office and secretary and then I could show you exactly what I'm talking about

Pete Daoust, yes, my life is complicated and still full of the shit I thought was true.

right now I'm just a worthless eater

Because obviously, David Smile is the PERSON's Sole authorized administrator that was FORCED in some crazy business, right ?

Seemingly at the barrel of a gun....

So the Administator is the one who places the lien?

no gun was used to have capitulate my right not to contract, they used torture via handcuffs

The person you have in your pocket can't do fuckal, it has no hands

David I have a perfected lean process thread its all explained in there how it is done correctly

Did they people who tied you up have a gun on them that you thought could have been used against you??????

Jeff Roggers can you bring up the thread list with a comment so I can find it? also are you in the states and is the process the same

The person you have in your pocket will invoice, notice, final notice, default notice and lien....and you will be the one who will ADMINISTRATE all that shit....

David Smile you need someone you trust, perhaps your own creation by proxy which is what the corp does... your corp is accountable to you as sole share holder and the executives of the corp administers the trust established by the trust agreement you as grantor create to entrust the corp to administer your affaires... including but not limited to liens... The corp is seen as a person by the system...

OK...fuck it.....too many different subject in here....I quit...bye !! :(

pete can i pm you?

I do

have skype that is

Jason we should start a thread on the trust how to format etc cetera

so not qualified to, me.

well please do, i may be inept at this moment, but it sure would help

Chris Evan, yep the shit stains had guns but I gave then no excuse to use them so the cuffs were used to get me into a state of duress

read my above posts... its boiled down.. it is there... The corp is considered a person.. to detach from surety you have the corp handle the names affairs all of them... you.. you can do it with the name but joinder and surety become attached to that particular case... and the fresh entity created by the state each time you are charged with something... the lien process is best, to my knowledge, administered by the corp of which, in my instance. I am acting pres. and sole shareholder accountable to me..

1). Two clowns wants to do business with the person I have in my pocket.

2). I say NO.

3). They decide to FORCE that business on the person I have in my pocket.

4). I continu to say no, but these clowns have guns, and proceed with this business anyway.

5). When they FINALLY release me from kidnapping I go home, with the person I have in my pocket.

6). I sit at the fucking kitchen table and start the ADMINISTRATING process, for the person I have in my pocket, because I am the Sole fucking authorized administrator for this fucking person.

7). I make an invoice, of course the invoice will show the NAME of the person I have in my pocket, and send registered mail that fucking invoice to these two clowns.

8). The terms are PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT.

9). I wait 4 or 5 days, and then I send a fucking account statement.

10). I wait another 4 to 5 days and then I send a NOTICE, to notify these 2 clowns that I have NOT received the payment.

11). I wait another 4 to 5 days, and I send a FINAL NOTICE to these 2 clowns saying I have NOT received the payment, and it’s the FINAL chance they have to pay.

12). I wait 4 to 5 days and then I send a fucking DEFAULT NOTICE to these cocksuckers, saying that they are in default regarding that fucking invoice.

13). I wait 4 to 5 days, and then I LIEN THEIR FUCKING HOUSE, and their fucking BOND.

The End :D

Welcome in the wonderful world of BUSINESS... :D

There is no trustee, trust, trustette involved in that shit....it is PURE business, as day to day type of business... :D

Pete, when the NAME is liened and held in trust, the TRUSTEE is the corp. But what you and Jay are talking about are 2 different things. ;-)

In fact, you will act as a trustee for the person you have in your pocket during this ADMINISTRATION process......Am I correct here Scott Duncan ??....where is Scott for fuck sakes ? :(

BRB, multitasking

I am talking about this ORIGINAL thread, David Smile asked for help regarding the administrative process on liening these two idiots....that's ALL I am talking about....nothing else... :(

What is this BRB shit ? :/

be right back

It's NOT complicated, it's just very boring, I hate doing administration shit, but hy, gotta do what you gotta do !! :(

When the fuck did you become focused on a thread? WTF?

ALWAYS !!!!

We just using two different focus method :P

Here is my answer to this BRB, ....NRN :P

2 different things... yes. I am talking about a establishing a private trust and as part of that trusts business. Pete is talking about business.

Pete Daoust - You might want to be careful about providing only 4 or 5 days for the party to respond to you. While you may be right legally, it may be difficult to get a court to support such summary judgements as it may appear to them as being the workings of someone who isn't fair. I have had ChiefRock Sino General 's help with some of this stuff. I pushed for 4 to 5 day responses too and he suggested 30 days to show good will. For one of my NOTICES, he recommends giving 90 days to demonstrate that i'm an extremely accommodating person in law who is more than fair. In summary 4 to 5 days = unfair, mean spirited guy. 30 days = nice guy who puts some real effort to be fair and accommodating. 90 days= unarguably fair and just man bending backward to give every chance possible to a slime ball

Terms are DUE UPON RECEIPT, Invoice has been sent REGISTERED MAIL, they receive the invoice the day after I sent it....

I don't see ANY problems with a 4 or 5 days.....I am NOT asking for a RESPONSE, I am asking for a payment.....I am not ASKING questions, I send an invoice

I do this every day with the business I happen to be the CEO of....

Invoice are sent everyday here, and terms need to be respected...

This is BUSINESS Robert Cormier, nothing else...

Isn't a payment a response?

Payment seems to be more a payment than anything else :D

What if they don't agree and determine they now have a need to put together a counterclaim, or a written response. What if they left their papers at the cottage and have to wait till the weekend to return to the cottage to get them because they have to work for a living etc.:) I'm not trying to be belligerent Pete. Just passing on some words of advice given to me by a wise man. Apparently there is a fair bit of case law about this out there.

And what if I stuck my dick in my pant's zipper ? :D

Just passing on some words of advice given to me by a wise man....I DO THIS SHIT EVERY DAY :D

David Smile need the proofs that these two morons forces business on the person he happen to have on his pocket.....if he have that, the rest is ONLY administrative shit....

If you stuck your dick in your zipper you would have to go to the hospital and might have to stay a few days, giving you a valid reason not to respond to such a short window of opportunity. :) Claims made against you may be thrown out. :(

In "normal" business there is a PO or a signed invoice etc accepting all your terms of contract. This seems a little different in my mind. Did the cops sign something with David Smile that they agree to any and all terms that he might wish to impose upon him at a future date? Maybe I'm confused. Maybe I've missed something. I'm here to learn. I'm just thinking it may not be as simple as a typical business transaction with a signed invoice etc. :(

Did the cops sign something with David ?

No, he did not, but was that really a cop ?, what is a cop exactly ? :/

If you watch David's video, he is asking for a certain amount of info regarding the situation, when he will have these info, he will have his PO. :)

I know PEACE OFFICERS, and POLICE ENFORCERS...

These POLICE ENFORCERS, enforces what exactly ?

POLICY ENFORCERS. They ENFORCE POLICIES.

Oh, Thanks Norah Holloway :D

And these policies they enforce, can they be considered BUSINESS policies ? :D

Yes Pete, I think you're onto something! IT'S BUSINESS TIME! :D

Does the POLICY ENFORCER even have the authority to respond in 4 or 5 days?

So if these private contractors, enforce BUSINESS on the person I happen to have in my pocket, is it fair for "ME" to administrate this matter and produce an invoice ? :/

You see Robert Cormier, I really don't give a shit about what these thugs can or can not do, My RESPONSIBILITY, is to ADMINISTRATE the person I have in my pocket.....

If they DON'T like the administration process I use, it's NOT my fault...is it ? :/

They ONLY thing I have that has value is ?.... :D

TIME

I agree with Pete here! They forced the first contract, so he forces the second. Why? Because Fuck You thats why!!!!

I see your point. I truly do Pete Daoust. I'm just hesitant to outright dismiss what the Chief says. I know that I've read Scott Duncan claiming ChiefRock Sino General is absolutely right and knows his stuff, or something to that effect. Just me trying to be helpful here. :)

Robert, I come up to you and stick my dick in your mouth at the barrel of a gun, do you then give me 90 days to pay you for your services? 30? Or do you immediately file a charge against me?

It seems pretty cut and dry, they threw the first stone.....

I see your point. I truly do Pete Daoust....It's not MY point, it's this legal system's point....surety and accounting, that's all....

I am NOT trying to be right here Robert Cormier, I am not trying to WIN a point....I just apply what's logical regarding BUSINESS.....If I have NOT comitted ANY crimes, what's left ?....I can only see BUSINESS :/

While your time may be valuable to you...the courts don't give a rats ass about you, they only care about PETE DAOUST. As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat.

OK, but what court....there is NO court involved in here ?

You see, David Smile, will have EVERYTHING he needs to performe that lien, if he follows the steps.....do you see ANY court in these steps ?

I know that you are not trying to be right. I appreciate your input and the dialogue so that I can better understand. In my books, you are someone whom I have respect for here at TTFL. :)

I am gonna need WHOLE DISCLOSURE on your books Robert. :-D

It's the same in my book Robert Cormier, I have a lots of respect for Pete Daoust :D

Robert Cormier, As I understand it, the only thing you have of value is your signature, or your actions, which can turn the SURETY game tables against "you" in a heartbeat.

I never said that ? :/.....I just wrote "TIME"

If you respect me so much, why do you say things I never said ? :(

I see two courts potentially involved. The first court i see is the one he creates when he asserts a summary judgement. That summary judgement of his can be challenged in one of their courts. If the determination of his court is challenged in their court, he may be asked to prove that his court was equitable.

I know you didn't say that. I did. :)

That summary judgement of his can be challenged in one of their courts: HOW ? :/

If the determination of his court is challenged in their court, he may be asked to prove that his court was equitable.: HE HAS ALL THE PROOFS :D

He may say to their court "I don't give a rat's ass about their policies, that's their business, I only am concerned with my business and my policies." The court might say "Good point! We'll apply that line of thinking right now. In the name of equity, logic and fairness, lets apply your argument to your business as well. Why should their business give a rat's ass about your business and it's policies?"

OK, we will have to go all over again Robert Cormier, WHO FORCED BUSINESS ON WHO ?

He may say to their court.......Why should he say ANYTHING in their court ??

You see Robert Cormier, you are stuck in the maybes....they might, he might, we might.....THERE is no might in this, it's STRICTLY business....

The whole point is SURETY and ACCOUNTING. Thats it!!!

starting an administrative process is equivalent to a contract offer. it's a 3 step process, each step of the process the other party is given time to counter offer the original offer...the public court isn't there to decide if the one party made a good contract or not...its there to enforce the summary judgement.

If the cops sue David, that is a whole different separate matter?

Sue David Smile for what ? :/

And the administrative process begun : A week ago Friday I was assaulted by two Clown

It's not David's fault if these clowns are NOT trained well enough to do business with respect, honor, dignity and integrity.....on the other end, David need to FOLLOW UP, with the administrative process, with RESPECT, HONOR, DIGNITY & INTEGRITY....if he do that, he will win........OR......he is DEFINITLY one of their slaves.....NO ?

While that may be true, EQUITY and EQUITABLE TREATMENT (or non-equitable treatment) may have something to do with the outcome here in reality. For example; even some of the "gurus' such as Dean who's been at this for 17 or so years for example, may be 100% right (although using different tactics). As much as Dean is "right" beyond a shadow of a doubt, so to speak, here in reality he has had two or three trucks taken from him, spent 20 something days in jail, doesn't get his 2 or 3 vehicles back and in the end considers it a BIG WIN when they drop the charges and don't compensate him. While he may secure summary judgements worth ELEVENTY BILLION dollars, in reality, according to Scott (if I understand correctly), he will never see a dime and will never get the justice he so very much is deserves.

Popcorn ready....I see a chess match coming. Now if only Scott and Dean would duke it out here for us all to see.......

:D

I'll make another pot of coffee :D

Oh fuck....last time you made coffee you went into this spastic posting mode. I am pretty sure some of it was en Francais....

I'm back, well on the road to slave land

Putting coffee on as well. :)

Charges have not been DROPPED on Dean Clifford if I remember correctly, they had been STAYED.....NO ?? :/

As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are. :)

So, one day, they will have to do something with these STAYED charges....either dropped them, or follow up with them.... NO ?

Both of you are right, I use a 30 day reply date, a 10 day opportunity to cure, 5 day notice of fault followed by notice of default. Its business, not my problem the shit stains have no understanding. Being a good administrator, I will give reasonable response time so as not to be a vexatious litigator

"you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy" I know a guy who doesn't seem to be so accomodating!

I stand corrected. Which further asserts my point. They didn't even drop the charges. They can still put him in jail again. That's reality here in the real world for you. :)

The end results will be the same....5 days or 30 days.....why would you give net-30-days to two clowns ? :/,

Robert, its all about SURETY. Why can the still put him in jail? Only if HE confesses to being SURETY otherwise, its an INTERNAL issue!!!!

David Smile, Any criminal charges implied in your story ?

If he trips up and grants them permisson to use the NAME, then yes!, he will go to jail. But until that happens, it doesn't concern him

They can still put him in jail again: Wanna bet they won't ? :D

Everyone have there coffee and popcorn.

Pete Daoust, no charges other than the ticket

You see Robert, no charges implied in David Smile's case.....ONLY FUCKING BUSINESS :D

So they can never say that they didn't have enough time to gather records, think about their choices, shop for a lawyer, hire one, give the lawyer time to consider the legal merits of a defense, study relevant case law , etc. I agree they won't put Dean in jail again for that confrontation, but, in reality, was it really a big win? Did he really get the upperhand?

Because I failed to produce state ID the got a little sentimental and loved me up with bondage

I will post all evidence of their forced intercourse

Intercourse is a financial term

Robert Cormier: but, in reality, was it really a big win?....depends on Dean Clifford's reality....I am NOT in his shoes... :/

Chris Evan. In reality, they might take another truck and put him in jail because they don't like his face. They might even shoot him. They are rapists. They simply don't have any respect for law. :(

Robert, I have managed NOT being surety for the person named PIERRE DAOUST, that I happen to have in my pocket, for 7 different matters so far, to me, that is a big fucking win, but maybe for others that is NOTHING.....but who cares, really ?

the plain and simply reality is I was forced into intercourse while being held in bondage. The language must express the reality. I will never use the terms handcuffed or forced into contact, not in my affidavit anyway

It's a big thing to me. I love success stories. :)

Well, they are NOT success stories, they are ADMINISTRATIVE boring fucking shit matters.... :D

And it seems that better I become to administrate, nothing comes in PIERRE DAOUST's fucking mailbox :(

Pete Daoust You see Robert, no charges implied in David Smile's case.....ONLY FUCKING BUSINESS. It's a really TOUGH BUSINESS to be in.

Ohh...business is not easy Robert, trust me on that one :D

Come Scott Duncan, please say something, I know you're out there :D

HELLOSSSSSS

Having property stolen is not a success story. Dean likes big trucks, that's 30, 000 a pop, much better that equity sits in trust than an auction block

Things are kind of cute, fuzzy and warm in business when doing BoE stuff if you know what you are doing. Start liening people posing as Judges (JUSTICES), or men posing as PEACE KEEPERS (POLICY ENFORCES) and things can escalate very quickly. In fact, just publicly asserting you have a right to travel down the road in a car can get you in a heap of stink.

Pete DaoustAdjust, we don't need Scott to repeat what we know, its all accounting and surety. He could making porn, yes

I was just thinking about one of those: "I hate you all", or "Why natural selection killing stuff"....nothing too technical you know ? :D

I'd really appreciate it, as I'm sure others would if you made a gold notes, or, document, explaining EVERYTHING you did in detail. I'm sure I could learn from it, and I'm guessing others would as well.

^^ Oops. That was meant for Pete.

I am more interested in slaps, if I spread bullshit....I want ABSOLUTLY to be slap in the face, if I spread bullshit.....that's ALL I want....

Scott Duncan is reading this thread. He is weighing in. I just got a like on: Robert Cormier As I understand it, for the reasons mentioned in my previous post, as per ChiefRock Sino General, you always want to be seen as being the most accommodating guy, always bending over backwards (not forwards) to prove what a super nice guy you really are.

If Scott Duncan would have been a soft gentil no hurt feelings $19.95 per month type of guy, I would not be here......I have NO time, I am 47, and need to learn quick (I know this sounds funny :D) and harder I get hit, quicker I learn, that is "ME"....so if I spread bullshit...please hit, and hit hard, I can take it....no big deal :)

well, not too hard :D

Hey, those who take care of sending FINAL NOTICE, are freaking nice guys :D

I'm 50 and he called me KID more than once. I like that. :)

I remember the first time in my life I received a final notice, I was maybe 19, my reaction was....YESSSSSS.....it's finished !!!! :D

You are 50 Robert Cormier..?...Are you in the photoshp type business ? :/

On second thought it's sad (at least to me) that I've wasted so much of my life thinking wrong and valuing the wrong things. :(

I am not even sure I was thinking, so... ? :(

Big deal :/

I like that Pete Daoust plays for keeps in the business sense. I also think being the one who gives proper notice is the most effective way of doing business

I have really really good genes. My pic isn't Photoshopped. While it was taken a few years ago, I look pretty much the same. That's where my luck ends!

a few years ago ?....like 20 ?

Me, David Smile, I like being the one who gives proper INVOICE first :D

Pete Daoust Well, they are NOT success stories, they are ADMINISTRATIVE boring fucking shit matters.... Not BORING to me. I can read and learn about this all day and night. Sometimes I miss taking a shower and consider pissing in a jar just to stay focused and not miss anything.

The pic was from about 4 or 5 years ago.

Pete Daoust, you say send the invoice first, on what grounds. Should I not send the invoice with the notice. Sending an invoice without notice as to the cause, could that not see me charged with threatening a justice system participants

Just DESCRIBE what's on the invoice :/

what is it you want to charge David Smile ?

NRN :P

I have a fee schedule in place with the justice department and the attorney general, so the bill is 1000.00 per hr or any portion thereof for intercourse and and 5000.00 per hr to be held in bondage. That's 6000.00 from each shit stain

12.000.00 is the total for two separate invoices

Et voila !!!...describe this on the invoice ? :/

How many days to pay do you suggest before I send notice

You have to send the statement before you send the NOTICE

what are YOUR payment terms ?

look... INVOICE STATEMENT NOTICE FINAL NOTICE (because you're a nice guy :D ) DEFAULT NOTICE LIEN

Brb, nrn, must set the scene for tonight's performance. Les Miserables is about slavery, I'm the slave on the fly floor. Pulling rope for the capt'n

30 days...and do not use a fee schedule or the term fee schedule....x is what you charge for this...y is what you charge for that. :)

First you send a PROPER NOTICE. When they indicate that they want to do business with you (accept your contract) by agreeing to your terms, then you can send an invoice and you're off to the races a la Pete Daoust. You can't send an invoice to someone who refuses to contract with you. < As far as I understand.

Ok...and send a roll of toilet paper while you are here

Pete Daoust, says send invoice first, Robert Cormier says send proper notice first then invoice. I think I will send proper notice w/invoice and affidavit. That leaves the final two steps and the understanding that I am operating at my full and proper capacity.

"The sow then asked for my name"..... Classic. :D

"I think I will send proper notice w/invoice and affidavit.", Yes, and don't forget the smile, David Smile, service with a smile. :D

I'm guessing Pete Daoust is thinking in the context of his business where he has a PO, and, or, a signed Invoice. Also, I am guessing he can prove he provided a service or product.

Dean Clifford - I stand corrected I guess, but don't understand. What contract did they agree to which justifies an invoice? Where is the contract they agreed to?

Always service with a smile which in fact is a smirk. Not that the shit stains know the difference between the law of the land and forced intercourse.

Provide them with the COURTESY of a smile. :)

Robert Cormier I will refrain from calling it a fee schedule, all thought I could point to the TPS website where the shit stains claim to have a fee schedule

Who's getting fucked, the public courtesan, who's doing the fucking, well a very courteous man that's who

Toronto police services

to bad the courtesans have no idea I'm an ass pirate, yarr!

Thanks to all for chiming in, you have been a great help. As I have said I am determined to correct the wrongs in my regard. I will keep you all updated on what transpires

Pete Daoust would send an Invoice, because there is ALREADY a contract, a contract that has been FORCED on the PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST, there are EXISTING proofs of that EXISTING contract.......

That is an interesting position Pete Daoust I see your point.

And the first item on this invoice would be: FORCED INTO CONTRAT $50,000.00

But hey.....if you feel sending a 52 pages doccument to them, feel FREE to do it :-D

Hmmm. I always thought a contract requires at least two parties who are in agreement on the terms, conditions and services/products provided. I can see legal joinder/obligation, but I don't see a contract. :(

Fuck....He has been FORCED !!!!.....they forced him to contract....HELLOSS... :-D

Pete Daoust If i get mad at you and knife your tire, causing it to go flat, what was the amount I agreed to be liable for Pete? $15.00 because it's an old tire? $5,000.00 because it's your favourite tire. Or, maybe I contracted to owe you $5,000,000.00 because I am now bound to pay you any price you ARBITRARILY decide to put on it? :(

I certainly owe you something, but, the amount has to be agreed upon as far as I understand.

No, I'll just rip one of your eyes....no $$ involve...

You would owe me one eye ball

They did indeed use force as I asked many times, am I free to go. The shit stains infact used extortion. By threatening me with more force to acquire my finger prints if I failed to comply with their order to produce a name. I did produce the name in viva voce, not by state ID. By who's authority do you demand private information was the question before being forced into bondage. I don't mind fuzzy cuffs if I'm feeling kinky, cold steel just don't cut it for me

cold steel bondage comes with a bill

Scott Duncan We need your input here should you have the time and it suits you to provide some.

I don't :-P

Input about what?

I tried to inform our friends here that your input would consist of a Scottism, it's all accounting and surety, I'm the accountant and the pigs are surety via public hazard bonding, police services act and a bill.

Clearly you failed. :D

No, they are surety and very accountable... :-D

My statement 9 and 11 posts up and Pete's statement 15 posts up.

I say a PROPER NOTICE first, then if the other party defaults, then the invoice. Pete and Dean say send an invoice right away for any ARBITRARY amount without consent through agreement/default.

When I say I'm the accountant I mean to say I am sole beneficiary of the person and the only one who can hold them to account. Ok so I am inept, more input please. How have I failed in my understanding. Pete Daoust says the man cannot lien the pig, my corporation can, is this the only way to succeed?

What the fuck is an ARBITRARY amount ?:-\

David Smile, you are confused :-P

A random amount pulled out of someones ass without justification or any basis in reality. :P

Before you all look like TOTAL idiots...

What's the LEGAL definition of "ARBITRARY"?

Oh....you mean I have to ask PERMISSION to decide on an amount about PIERRE DAOUST and/or me, as far as my TIME's value ?

Yes, you do.

As far as "ME" looking like a total idiots, been there done that..... :-D

arbitrary, adj. (I5c) 1. Depending on individual discretion; speci”., determined by a judge rather than by fixed rules, procedures, or law. 2. (Of a judicial decision) founded on prejudice or preference rather than on reason or fact. _ This type of decision is often termed arbitrary and capricious. Cf. CAPRICIOUS. Black's Law 9th edition

Would you ever go to a restaurant, eat a meal, and then say it's OK, when they present you with an "eleventy billion dollar bill"?

No?

Then why do you think it's OK to do it to others?

And to who I have to ask ? :-\

You don't. you must give PROPER NOTICE ( I SWEAR I covered this).

When you eat at a restaurant, you will notice that you are ALWAYS informed how much each item costs.

No, but if I pull out a gun, and handcuffed the cook, it might cost me more than $8.95 for that speghatti :D

I'm smiling ear to ear. Not out of pride (well maybe a bit) but, more so because it's STARTING to sink in. :)

Thank's for clearing that up Scott.

Note to Self: Still so far to go. Baby steps Robert...Baby steps.

The pigs have arbitrary authority, they could have chose to let me go rather than force me into contract. I am free from arbitrary interference in my home and correspondence. I stated several times that I am free from arbitrary interference, am I free to go. The pigs chose to arbitrarally detain me to extort a name, they witnessed no crime, no breach of the peace, a polite peace officer would inform that I could get injured by not wearing a helmet and send on my way. But we are not dealing with peace officers, we are dealing with her Majesties arms, whom each hold arbitrary power.

So before I send an invoice, after being FORCED to contract, I have to send a proper notice on the cost of doing business with PIERRE DAOUST and/or ME, and then I can send the invoice ? :/

Her Majesty (the lady with the ugly hats) has nothing to do with it David Smile.

TPS is a corporation.

No, give notice that HENCEFORTH the rates are as follows for your time:

Insert HOURLY rate here. ONLY HOURLY.

You weren't forced to contract Pete.

Pete Daoust, that's the way I see it otherwise I to would be an extortionist arbitrarally imposing commerce on a justice system participant.

Is that a question Robert Cormier ???

They must default or agree before you send a bill/invoice.

You send the invoice WITH the notice ?

did I shit the bed/thread. Am I so off course I should just walk the plank?

Not with the PROPER NOTICE. In the notice you set your hourly rate for dealing with this business stuff. When they default, or agree, then you can send your invoice.

Sure. Notice + invoice will at least cover proper notice in the future.

OOPS Shit! I thought I had that. :(

Does the other party not have/need/require an opportunity to to haggle your terms or respond to the hourly rate Scott?

No

McDonalds doesn't "have to allow haggling"... seriously, where do you come up with this shit?

:D

Does it not bother you people, that you just make shit up, and you think it's real, and/or WORSE, something I said?

To be accurate, I meant an opportunity to accept or deny the hourly rate.

It's too late to accept or deny Robert Cormier.....

You mentioned McDonalds just can't charge eleventy billion dollars, the customer must agree. :(

*sigh*

In the metaphors I just posted...

YOU ARE THE FUCKING RESTAURANT! Where are these bullshit ideas COMING from?

Robert....think penis in mouth! Isn't that a little late to be negotiating how much?

OMG I can't compensate for this level of dumb...

HAHAHA!!!!!

How does this much stupid exist in one place, without it collapsing into a singularity?

Did I said something stupid ? :/

Robert Cormier, her majesty has everything to do with it, her servants are in breach of the trust of which her majesty is the keeper. Coffee break then act II

If a COP DOESN'T WANT A BIG MAC (Follow so far?), HE DOESN'T go to MCDONALDS!

No haggling. no stupid-pulled-out-of-your-ass-acceptance-of-terms!

I CAN'T DUMB IT DOWN ANY FURTHER. you are ON YOUR OWN!

So in this scenario David Smile is treated badly, he sends proper notice which includes his hourly rate of eleventy billion dollars per hour along with an invoice for eleventy billion. Because they recieved his notice and hourly rate, the TPS have to pay him eleventy billion? Sorry Scott...i don't mean to be thick. I've been thinking of David Smile's situation.

David Smile was talking about $6000.00 per cops, he never mentionned eleventy billion dollars :D

I imagine this just happened on the bridge

So David Smile, you send your invoice and your price list with it, in a nice envelop, registered mail :D

How did the cops accept that damaging David Smile would cost eleventy billion? Or $6,000.00 or $6.95?. When did David tell them his fee schedule before they wronged him? As far as I know, he never gave them a price to which they could choose to proceed, and wrong him, or not proceed and drive away. They wronged him (stole his Big Mac). So now the people who injured him (stole his big mac) get an invoice claiming the big mac is worth eleventy billion, or $6000.00, or any other price they choose, even though David's Burger Shack never posted any prices on their board so that the cops could know the value of what they were stealing? Fuck I'm confused.

Ask Scott Duncan Robert Cormier :D

I did, and Scott Duncan said said you were VERY wrong (you can't just send an invoice), and I was VERY wrong (they don't get to haggle the price). I still don't get how I was wrong (FEELING LIKE A DUMBO) and how the restaurant just gets to put any price on their burger if it wasn't advertized. :(

Scott said I was VERY wrong ? (you can't just send an invoice) .....you wanna bet I can ? :D

You never inform them of your rates, the arbitrary power invested in the individual public officer means he has to use his head at all times or be held to account by those who know how purposefully they have been kept ignorant. Eleventy billion would be frivolous and vexatious. My time is precious not frivolous. Time is money. Scott Duncan, I totally understand the McDonalds metaphor, it a choice they made to eat the shit I'm serving, ignorance of the law is no excuse, statutory, commerce or any other law for that matter.

Chris Evan best meme ever, for this thread and Scott Duncans position the we are inept and incompetent.

Scott Duncan No, give notice that HENCEFORTH the rates are as follows for your time... and... Scott Duncan Sure. Notice + invoice will at least cover proper notice in the FUTURE (my all caps). I understand that to mean that you can send them an invoice/bill if they do it again in the FUTURE because once you serve them a proper notice with your hourly rates included, HENCEFORTH (not back dating for stuff that happened in the PAST) but HENCEFORTH (from that point forward), IF they cause harm again you can send them an invoice/bill for your previously stated/advertised hourly rate.

Yep....

I think I will make a public proper notice in the newspaper :D

About the cost of doing forced business with PIERRE DAOUST :D

HAHAHAHA!!!!!|

If I understand, Scott is saying that if we have enough smarts, we can send a PROPER NOTICE and an invoice to the police with our hourly rates. If we are smart we do this BEFORE we are injured. Once they receive this notice complete with our rates, if they damage us from that point in time forward, not the past, but HENCEFORTH, any time in the FUTURE (after that) that they hurt us we can send them a bill.

or just public notice ... with a historical record like um... registered mail.... newspaper...

Scott instructs us to use registered mail via the post office because that is how to PROPERLY POST such NOTICES.

re read what he told you...

I have...several times. Am I missing something and if so what...don't be so cryptic. :(

cryptic scypthic... i do not think I am... unauthorized use stated in a public notice does not need the other parties consent if they engage without permission in the case of a lien being put on a name.. or a boe sent in the mail.. after one has been engaged against their will..

you walk into the macdonalds you chose to eat... public notice is the fucking macdonalds menu.. drive thru menu.. if they do not know of the public notice.. ignorance is no excuse.. historical record and all that.

I think I get it now. The cops walk up to David Smile and cause him damage. They think they can because David hasn't given them PROPER NOTICE with HOURLY RATES for Dealing with such matters. David just can't send them a bill for what happened in the past and declare an ARBITRARY rate for what has happened to him in the PAST. If he wants to send them a bill for doing such things in the FUTURE, he needs to send them a PROPER NOTICE through the POST with his HOURLY RATES. Once there is PROOF (RECEIPT confirmation from the POST), from that point in time (HENCEFORTH) and from that point in time forward (FUTURE) he can now bill for his stated HOURLY RATES. :)

nope... a notice is sent with the invoice... sufficient. Like Scott said....

His rates are in effect whether they like it or not.

Pete Daoust - I'm glad I asked Scott Duncan. If I didn't we might both still be here spreading huge shit stains.

too late... ;-)

I have in fact given proper notice, to the justice department and the attorn/y general. That is why no criminal record shows up in cpic and no photo shows up when they punch in my drivers licence. The general did his duty to protect the trust.

lol...now you tell us. :)

HAHA !!

shit piss fuck

Too funny!

Im off the Bovine Sex Club to raise a toast to the Capt'n of this thread, master of the house.

SO SEND A FUCKING INVOICE !!! :D

Bovine sex club ? :/ ....fuck, like bestial sex ?

don't forget to tip the bovine ;-)

Rock and roll bar. I tip the cow on my way out the door, if I'm not thrown out first.

https://www.gcsurplus.ca/mn-fra.cfm?snc=wfsav&sc=enc-bid&scn=140253&lcn=285401&lct=L&srchtype=&lci=&str=81&ltnf=1&frmsr=1&sf=ferm-clos

Nice boat for sale, $80k :D

They tried selling it at $140k, then 100k, then 90k, and now it's at $80k.....

I know it is not really ON TOPIC, but this thread became a bit complete so... :/

Could you name that thing SERENITY Jay Le B ? :D

Make an offer of 40k then setoff the bill

It's an AUCTION, the starting price is $80k

yep i could..

a little much in the consumption of fuel...

Depends on where you go ?

or contracts you have to keep it afloat... maintenance and upkeep on that puppy is a full time job, crew, range, fuel..

You manage to get a few bunnies :D

And I have IDEAS on some kind of contracts using that thing :D

yes.. many bunnies so little time... :-D

Well, it's more exciting than this :/

frog leg importing?

ouch... my eye

According to a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in a case called R. v. Mann, the police have no right or power to stop you unless they have reasonable grounds to believe you may have been involved in a criminal offence. So, The shit stains had zero right to stop me and force me to accept their contract. List of charges 1. Forceable Confinement 2. Battery and aggravated assault 3. Criminal Breach of the Trust 4. Extortion. The bill will be larger that the 6000.00 closer to 30.000.

keep that case to quote in the ledgering part of your notice of obligation/lien

A good sleep on it is ALWAYS beneficial :D

I came home drunk, not to drunk, drunk non the less. Man I love a good tequila

Breach of the peace

Oh, "ME", I can't drink alcohol :(

I have more charges to add, just a little fuzzy from last night. Anyone know the CCC charge for forced contract, would that fraud?

I think it's near the 332 or 335 article....not sure :D

It's in the 300's.....maybe 200's HAHAHA!!!

Don't lie to me Pete Daoust, batman will be there shortly

Haha:-D

You can bring two if these batman :-D

Criminal code offences, Fraud section 380, kidnapping 279(a) assault 265.1(a) criminal breach of trust 336. And other charges

I told you !!!....200 and 300 :D

I repealed batman

Good decision :D

Fatman in the boat, he's your problem.

Trying to find the D&B listing for TPS HQ seven pages of listings. I know their doing business as, just got to find it.

Government of Ontario Also Traded as Ontario Court of Justice Old City Hall 60 Queen St W Suite 156, Toronto, ON, CA

Government of Ontario Also Traded as Ontario Court Of Justice, Criminal - Toronto 60 Queen St W Suite 16, Toronto, ON, CA

getting closer http://www.oacp.on.ca/corporate-profile

Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police Corporate Office 40 College Street, Suite 605 Toronto, Ontario M5G 2J3

Phone: (416) 926-0424 Toll Free: 1 (800) 816-1767 Fax: (416) 926-0436 E-Mail: oacpadmin@oacp.ca

Question, the Offence Notice, the business in hand, is my evidence of forced contract (along with memorandum book notes, arrest record and video if I ever get them), what should I do with it? include copy, void it and return with invoice? or notice of mistake + henceforth any future intercourse is payable on demand upon presentment + list of Hourly rate for forcible confinement, et al

It's empirical proof of a false security being generated. Contact the SEC and formally protest and register complaint of securities fraud. "No such security agreement exists."

Brilliant.

...except the SEC lost all enforcement powers in 1997. Hmmm. That year keeps coming up ;)

Maybe we should just IGNORE that 1997 year ? :/

IGNOR-ance is no excuse :-D

The year Scott Duncan was asked to retire mmm.

point of order, matter at hand please. Not interested in dishonour only correcting this mistake via proper notice

Point of Order, reserve all rights and ask yourself, What the fuck are you doing in court....

not taking it to court

sending a bill/invoice. no need to go to court.

cool.

just looking to whom I send the bill. I can find the courts and chiefs of police on Dun & Bradstreet, I cant find divisions or police HQ

Clerk of the Court... should be on the back of ticket send it there...

137 Edward St, Ontario Court of Justice

There you go...

Follow up, the meat starts at 1:26. Still trying to find individual listing on D&B for TPS divisions, If I'm doing business with, I want to be thorough=extremely attentive to accuracy and detail=executed without negligence or omissions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phVELPI6OqY