The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Aug 21, 2013 12:03 AM

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

If you ever go to call Equifax, know you will receive the Philippines and not a Canadian on Canadian soil. If you request to speak to a Canadian on Canadian soil they will not transfer you but give you another number 1-877-323-2598 to the QUE for the Quebec office.

Today, after being on the phone for over a half hour and several attempts to communicate with a human, I finally got through to the Customer Service Dept for correcting discrepancies. You see, I.C.B.C. applied a debt (not belonging to me) on my credit report and I have been trying to have removed for more than two years. Of course, this directly effects my rating and subsequently my credit.

I really don’t understand why it is me who has to work this out for them seeing it wasn’t me who created the debt, nor was I the one who is unable to correctly manage the account, nor was I the one who accept the file or attach it to my bureau report. It seems as though I am the only one with the desire to remove it. One would think they would want to track down the correct person to recoup their debt.

The Phlip I first spoke to spoke english barely and was either deliberately difficult or he was just stupid. Raymond-8991 told me he was in Canada though he was not a Canadian citizen. I requested to speak with a supervisor but he refused to escalate the call. He would not give me the name of the supervisor nor would he do anything to correct the reason for my call. He ended up hanging up on me because I asked him if he knew of a law which requires Canadian companies servicing Canadians to supply calls, if requested, to be directed to a Canadian on Canadian soil.

I called back (again) and spoke with a female who answered my questions to only inform me that they were a call center in the Philippines and they were not Canadian citizens. I tried to make a complaint about Raymond however she refused to take it and directed me to call this number, the one above. She would not release the name of the business she worked for. I asked to speak to a supervisor but again, she refused.

Sorry for the semantics but I am a little aggravated at the moment. I am so pissed and need this gone. Sure would be nice to recoup something for my time and inconvenience as well.

I am new to this and will take a wild stab and say I need 2 affidavits to inform them of the circumstances and a fee schedule to bill for future time and inconveniences if required. Send one to ICBC and another to Equifax. Of course, I have absolutely no idea how to do this and humbly request the wisdom of TENDER FOR LAW.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 161
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 161 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_551058164930120
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.01523100619462E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 24

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

I guess this is not a priority for anyone here but I am still searching for a remedy. Can anyone help or does this doctrine not work outside court rooms?

Scott Duncan, anything?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 162
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 162 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

"I am still searching for a remedy" = "Still invested in the past".

Sorry you were victimized by frauds. There's no "remedy". Anyone who says there is, is in fact LYING TO YOU.

They're FRAUDS. There is no remedy.

Personally, I target individuals who participate in it, against me. If you act against my interests, I'll wait a few years, and then cripple you (kneecaps drilled out, cut off foot, etc.) and then I slaughter your children. They work for the government. Their offspring lives off of YOUR victimization.

So if you are a Lawyer/Officer or any such agent who has wronged me personally... Don't get too attached to those children. ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 162
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 162 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

Amusing response however until this is off my bureau, I will still make every effort for them to retract it and then, and only then, will I allow it to be in the past.

That said, Equifax continues to allow what I deem slanderous being I am not involved with the ICBC claim. ICBC will not talk with me about it as they know it is not mine and say it is against their privacy policy. Equifax has held a dispute for over 2 years with nothing new since.

What about a "cease and desist"?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 162
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 162 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

As long as it is on my credit history, they inform others it is mine. This directly effects my credit ratings.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 162 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 162 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

Well....that is TRUE, the credit rating you're talking about is the PERSON's credit rating, the person you happen to have in your pocket, that same person that the government created, so therefor, it' THEIR'S.....they are surety for it, so by informing them, you may help the person.

Unless you THINK that you are the person, and you are the surety of THE person... ? :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 163
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 163 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

I will give this a try in the morning and see where it goes.

I have much to absorb and find this all very interesting although somewhat disorienting. I was never particularly good at english grammar etc. so this is a little overwhelming. The variables seem like endless riddles.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 163
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 163 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Well, in that case, this should be easy for you......think about it as math and science :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 164 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 164 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Dino DisenfranchisedDino Quiring

"SEIZE/LIEN it. Then make a new name."

I didn't want to bother anyone with something that must be a basic foundation to perform these things, so I looked in the documents to see if there was anything pertaining to it.

The frustrations of educating the bewildered must be annoying to say the least but we have to start somewhere.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 164
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 164 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top