The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Aug 16, 2013 12:20 AM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

If you say, wanted to get un-married... Could you just get a certified copy of the original application and VOID it as well?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 148
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 148 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 63

Stuart Stone

My understanding, is because a married couple is considered one 'person', then the other party is the state...either party can terminate the relationship/contract at any time (like any contract), BUT my biggest question is this:

How are the goods and chattels then divided up? (especially as any product of the union is considered chattel property- I'm thinking specifically about the issue of children being taken by the state)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 149
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 149 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Scenario: You & I engage in a business contract....we work together for say 7 years and then the contract is voided for whatever reason...

If we don't have an agreement in place as to how the chattel property is to be divided (prior to our terminating our agreement), then we either agree, negotiate or 'duke' it out as Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma suggested.

Does the state already have an exit clause in place, or do they just presume that they control and/or own the chattel property & it's up to us to negate these presumptions (as in Notice of Mistake re children/person/chattel property etc)?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 149
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 149 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

I'm guessing Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, the motivation for voiding the contract is to extract yourself & have the chattel property (children) removed from the jurisdiction of the state?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 149
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 149 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dean Clifford

" I wish to redact my marriage license application" "Oh, how so?" I wish to rescind my signature, I was not given full disclosure regarding this license, thank you."

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 149 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 149 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

No Stuart, a friend wants a divorce. He and his wife are ok on all aspects of the kids/assets, etc. Neither want to deal with a liar on the matter though and have to PAY.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 150
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 150 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Dear Government,

I've married Nadine because I wanted to be the only one to have sex with her, now today, 20 years later, I find out that YOU, the government, have some business issues in my UNION with Nadine, please forward me FULL DISCLOSURE of this business aspect of this UNION, my INTENTS was ONLY sexual, no commerce was expected, unfortunatly, YOU, the Government, don't teach these things in school, and I have good reasons to believe that YOU are using religions to fuck us up. Of course these reasons to believe are based on some recent information I've received from Scott Duncan and Dean Clifford......

You have 30 days to send to me FULL DISCLOSURE of this Marriage business deal.

If I don't receive an answer from YOU, me and Nadine will consider this MARRIAGE nul and void.

Thank You BY:________________ Master of PIERRE DAOUST 26X-XXX-XXX

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 150
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 150 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Man O'man ManWit Ness

What office of government do you write to in order to have the proper persons respond/react/direct/approve provide whatever next step is necessary? And further what if we cannot find the marriage certificate, how is it sourced, traced, addressed, verified etc?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 151 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 151 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Man O'man ManWit Ness

Cara, they must have their own rules, otherwise why are we notifying them, if we want them to acknowledge our VOID, ya? Or do we not need their acknowledgement, notice I did not say acceptance.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 152
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 152 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dwaine CarrilloSeiko Seven

And as Dean says, "I was not given full disclosure regarding the license" is kind of a big thing ;) ... You didn't know you were entering into a legal contract with the STATE, which would allow them to govern the affairs of your marriage - till death do you part :)

You just did it because you were 'coerced' by your pastor; by the STATE; by everyone you've ever known your entire life, and of course alcohol, into believing you MUST have a marriage license, when in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

You just wanted to have sex with the guy, but your pastor said you'd go to hell and burn-burn-burn for all eternity if you didn't get married first ;)

You are a victim :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 152
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 152 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Dept of Births Deaths & Marriages in Australia, vital statistics or similar elsewhere?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 152 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 152 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Derek Moran

Whadaya say Beverly, lets try this out- we'll go to Vegas, get hitched, ill be a real dick during the honeymoon, drive you MYSELF to the records office, but not before we stop off at Staples first to buy a red-ink stamp, ask to see the Marriage Licence we got, *STAMP*, and then live happily-ever-after..... :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 153
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 153 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top