The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Aug 14, 2013 4:49 PM

Lei GhLeigh OftheHouseof Collins

I am not wanting to steal Súil Eile's spotlight. I have my own questions to post. I am super overwhelmed, for us all! And for educational purposes...

I came at this from a Human Rights perspective and can not see much difference...it is accounting and surety.

Admiral Duncan has been aware of my status, as a human being, from God. I have not opened my Bible this year. :)

I will post regardless. I know I must recollect my thoughts and re-read Suil's thread. :)

Does the response and signature from my Lieutenant Governor mean the same thing; when he responded to my declaration of private law?

I also have one from the Director of Civil Division, Dept. of Justice, on behalf of Senior Administration, Department of Justice, Minister and Attorney General of the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Lieutenant Governor.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=326852784095512&set=pb.100003123781499.-2207520000.1376496568.&type=3&theater

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 351
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 351 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 48

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

So we create our own, thru creating and granting a trust to our corporation to insulate and protect our humaness thru the person and proxy of someone we can trust: ourselves by proxy...

Take what we require, share the rest and find like minded individuals to get thru it...

We have to create our own privileges.... :-)

And be people of our word, with integrity and cover and watch each others backs...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 352 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 352 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Persons have rights and privileges delivered via Acts and statutes ... legal, original, natural and other by treaty, agreement and contract... humans are not recognized...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 353
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 353 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Captain Kirk, Mister Spock, and Dr. McCoy don't have rights either. They are PRETEND. Somebody INVENTED them. Why would they have rights?

...and you KNOW these things, Derek Moran. Why is it even a question?

...or do you feel you have to meet some daily shit-stain quota?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 353
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 353 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Lei GhLeigh OftheHouseof Collins

If so, Jason F. LeBlanc, I have waived article 6 of the UDHR and have notified the government of same. Well, how fucked am I? :( I am a human being and I am TOLD I have rights. But not by Scott Duncan. ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 353 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 353 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

no... not nothing. It is a fine example of valuing the wrong things. I do not know all the particulars, and as a PRIVATE trust, I am not accountable to another organization unless an agreement is in place, As director of your own affairs, it is a valuable lesson... so my point learn and move on... Your law has been recognized... that is not a bad thing.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 354
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 354 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

From appearances, one would say, it is what isn't said... not so much as a WHO... ( noble Lie) only recognition of persons is in all the dictionaries and laws from what I can see, as the term human is not used in any acts, statutes, etc it is always some kind of person...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 354
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 354 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

"... of free MEN and free institutions; Affirming also that MEN and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;"

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/FullText.html

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 354
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 354 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

It is hereby recognized and declared ...WHO recognized and WHO declared all that shit......

declaration n. 1) any statement made, particularly in writing. 2) a written statement made "under penalty of perjury" and signed by the declarant, which is the modern substitute for the more cumbersome affidavit which requires swearing to its truth before a Notary Public recognize (Acknowledge) recognize (Acknowledge), verb accept, admit, allow, appreciate, avow, cite, commemorate, concede, confess, consent, defer to, dignify, exalt, give the floor to, give the nod to, grant, greet, honor, noscere, own, permit, realize, salute, suffer, tolerate, yield to

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 355
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 355 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Derek Moran, nobody determines rights. Animals don't have rights, because they don't respect MY rights.

"Justice Low" and "Justice Stinson" don't have rights for the same reason, and both will deal with me personally for that...

...but "Rights" are CONTRACT. Nothing else.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 355
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 355 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Kelleran Holman a LONG time ago wondered about one making/drafting a CLAIM OF RIGHT, for themselves...

Is sending one's CLAIM OF RIGHT they've drafted to a Government-Trustee-public servant then, an OFFER to CONTRACT?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 355
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 355 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Lei GhLeigh OftheHouseof Collins

My letters are only 2 of 14, optional, responses. And I know of some who have not read my Claim of Right. Police refuse to handle my Claim of Right...only one set of prints in 10 months on it, by accident.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 356
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 356 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

These cops ALWAYS refuse to handle stuff....I decided, one day, to pee on a police car hood, and asked one of the cops inside the car if he would like to HANDLE my dick.....that was a mistake :(

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 356
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 356 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Lei GhLeigh OftheHouseof Collins

Well, let me tell you that I gave a 'ride' to a bunch of idiots to a crack dealers house. (I did not know of my predicament) We pulled up and a tinted car got in front of my vehicle. ( the same vehicle that was snooping around Family Court and CYF$ last year, taking pictures of us raising awareness ;) and wanting to know who our new friends were...Protecting Canadian Children) So, the boy got out and tried to secure the deal. We waited and he chatted to fellow crack heads. Knocked again. No go. After 20 minutes, we leave and I am not around two corners and we have all kinds of cruisers, officers, both uniformed and not, and wagons. They know who we ALL are in the car. I tell the boys to shut up and roll up. The cops harass me and my passengers and ask me for a license. Here is my Declaration, officers. :) I do not have a license. You will have to issue me a ticket. They threaten me with arrest. I say I left my purse at home and YOU are wasting MY time. Give me your badge numbers. :P They then got mad at me and stated I was wasting their time. :) And I drove off... after they did. :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 356
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 356 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Interesting... last-time i spoke with Scott, he mentioned any time you make a DECLARATION, you are DECLARING your intent to engage in COMMERCE.....not sure how that works out but, interesting nonetheless

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 357
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 357 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Derek Moran: Scott Duncan, does THIS Bill of Rights carry/have any weight/force/effect here in Canada?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction

Grants of Forfeitures. That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void. Bill of Rights [1688] www.legislation.gov.uk An Act declareing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Setleing the Succession of the Crowne.

Scott Duncan: No.

Scott Duncan: The 1960 Bill of rights is the ONLY LAWFUL bill regarding rights in Canada.

Derek Moran: Crap. I liked the 'GRANTS AND FORFEITURES" part they had in there

Derek Moran: ..i guess ill just have to put it in my OWN CLAIM OF RIGHT/'Contract' then

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 357
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 357 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Lei GhLeigh OftheHouseof Collins

No, Chris Schulte, "So, they were aware you were engaging in a drug deal" How did the police have knowledge of the boy's INTENT? The boy was there for teabags...wtf?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 358
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 358 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top