I agree that's why it's implied. I think the government certainly have the right to assume that compliance and consent, particularly (BC aside) when we enter freely into agreements, eg for licences. I'm not saying this automatically obligates you to anything, but, of course the Gov have a right to assume you have consented when they have documents that you signed, you hold their licence and you have their reg plates which are there so they can identify their vehicles. The assumption of consent has to rebutted which I believe the Notice of Mistake is intended for?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1033 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1033 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.