The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Aug 08, 2013 3:24 AM

Neil RowePaul Rowe

State courts, pursuant to federal law, have no jurisdiction to hear constitutional claims, or claims against state government or agents of state government, acting in their private capacity outside the requirements and restrictions of law, so if you file a counter claim, of any kind, they pretty much snicker at your ignorance. Trust me, this is first hand knowledge, trial by error and LEGAL practice. Your counter complaint, ideally, is for a federal deprivation of rights or violation of federal law by the state, or state officer, WITH, and this is important, stated up front, like in the Heading, a "Counter complaint with PETITION FOR REMOVAL to federal district court exercising original jurisdiction over such claims," as such claims cannot be heard by the state, against the state, or an agent thereof, and you waive the right youve claimed to access a higher authority by not stating the jurisdiction of your claim, as any claim is required to provide its basis in jurisdiction of law. Dont be a hypocrite yo! Got the devil by his the tail covered in scales, Bro. Im practicing, and giving legal advice, with no licence, foot loose and fancy free. "It all depends on what your definition of 'is,' Is." - Bill Clinton

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 455
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 455 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_546157925420144
Unique Facebook User ID:
853360158011508
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 5

Jessica BenderJessica N Clint Bender

Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That whenever it shall be made known to the President that any citizen of the United States has been unjustly deprived of his liberty by or under the authority of any foreign government, it shall be the duty of the President forthwith to demand of that government the reasons for such imprisonment, and if it appears to be wrongful and in violation of the rights of American citizenship, the Presi-dent shall forthwith demand the release of such citizen, and if the release so demanded is unreasonably delayed or refused, it shall be the duty of the President to use such means, not amounting to acts of war, as he may think necessary and proper to obtain or effectuate such release, and all the facts and proceedings relative thereto shall as soon as practicable be communicated by the President to Congress...........why not have a little fun with them :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 456
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 456 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

So ... You have a State district court, and a US district court, usually right next door to each other. You must think of them like this : One is the State Sheriff, and one is the U.S. Marshall. If the Sheriff (state Judge) is given just the subtlest of hints that you know you can call the Marshall (federal Judge) on him, he will tone it down a little in your favor and watch his step. Your civil claim for deprivation of civil or violation of constitutionally protected rights violated by the facts and circumstances arising from and surrounding the cause for the state case, is filed in federal court though, and is separate from the pending state case, in which your main concern should be to establish a record by affidavit(s) of fact (which they usually wont rebut if your right, an unrebutted affidavit standing as truth in commerce). Which in turn gives you basis to file a motion for default or declaratory judgement on the facts in evidence in your favor later. You have to keep these things separate for them to work as they should in law. You do not file anything concerning a potential federal constitutional or civil rights claim in state court, unless its a "Petition For Removal to Federal District Court" exercising original jurisdiction over such claims. A state court has no jurisdiction to hear a claim for deprivation of federal rights against themselves or one of their agents, although they are required to uphold constitutionally protected natural rights over commercial statues. There are other ways you fight and build a record in the state case, that can then be used as evidence in the federal case. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN32lLUOBzQ

Play video
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 456
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 456 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top