Aug 02, 2013 3:48 PM

They should have sent you a court date notice first???

Is there any name on the BoE?

Yes, PIERRE DAOUST :D

They've haven't sent a court date because I entered NO plea, so they've decided to enter a PLEA for PIERRE DAOUST. Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma

Would not a notice of mistake work? Also I meant was there anyone "else's" name on the BoE?

So my goal is: I want to have the NAME, address and inscription number of this STRANGER who entered a PLEA for PIERRE DAOUST, and the NAME, address and inscription number of the STRANGER who sentenced PIERRE DAOUST :D

Usually anyone I've heard of who has sent the ticket back with "no contract" gets a court date sent first before they get a "guilty charge"

The BoE dosen't bother me Cara Small Atherton, I KNOW what to do with that shit :D

Meh, send them a cheque for $5 to settle and close the account. Done.

No Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, I careless about the BoE, I careless about the MONEY....I want NAMES, ADDRESSES and INSCRIPTION NUMBERS of these strangers.....it's NOT about the MONEY

What should I do NOW, to achieve my GOAL ?

I am just thinking that if there is a name on the BoE may you not presume they are taking surety for the matter?

.I want NAMES, ADDRESSES and INSCRIPTION NUMBERS of these strangers

This is the ONLY thing I care about

File a claim?

Demand ADVICE on the matter?

Hire a private detective.... if it is that important to you Pete, or go to the court house and get the public record of the docket and see if you can find out the names of who was on duty that day...

Back in January.....were you aware of the NOTICE OF MISTAKE yet? ;)

Nope Derek Moran, I knew it existence, but could not get it at that time

But today, august 2nd 2013, .I want NAMES, ADDRESSES and INSCRIPTION NUMBERS of these strangers

So I am asking you, what would be the best next step.

I've thought about sending a 2nd Notice, Notifying them that I have not heard from them, and that the info I REQUEST is very important for "ME".

..maybe include that as an extra-question at the end of the NOTICE OF MISTAKE?

- WHO EXACTLY AGREED to ACCEPT SURETY in this matter when THEY entered a PLEA in MY ABSENCE, as this BILL then should be sent to THE SURETY WHO ENTERED THE PLEA, and is this not GROUNDS FOR PERSONATION and/or IDENTITY THEFT?

Oppsss...you are giving me ideas Derek Moran, I like that :D

and is this not GROUNDS FOR PERSONATION and/or IDENTITY THEFT?

MAKE them ANSWER the QUESTIONS ;)

Since I have good reasons to believe that some STRANGERS are fucking around with the surety of the person named PIERRE DAOUST, which I happen to have in my pocket, .I want NAMES, ADDRESSES and INSCRIPTION NUMBERS of these strangers

..dont forget Performance/Hazard/Surety Bonds ;)

Inscription number...

Know who your dealing with. Derek Moran are you thinking collecting all this into another detailed post such as you have done in the past? hint hint :)

SPOILER ALERT :D I just picked-up a RESPONSE from them in the mailbox :D

I am so fucking excited :D

The facts and the issues raised, requires further informations, to enable us to respond to you adequately, we invite you to call us.

If you decide not to call us, it will be impossible for us to follow up with your request.

I wish to have your input on this Scott Duncan :D

And the NAME of the agent is : Rachida Ait Allal :/

Maybe Dean Clifford could give his eleventy billion cents in this :D

They want me to CALL them, should I, and record the call and let them know up front that the call is recorded ?

of course... make a video...

LOL :D

content filled... like of the call, no weed eater

The question I have, DO I HAVE TO TELL PUBLIC SERVANTS that the call is recorded ?

It is the honourable thing to do.

Open the call and state it is bring recorded for your records.

Pete Daoust: I thought you did. Yet, after about ten minutes into a conversation with a public servant about 5 or six weeks back, when I told her that I was recording the conversation, she said that i was breaking the law by not informing her from the beginning of the conversation, and she hung up after telling me she was going to call the police on me. I immediately called the cops and informed them that I had recorded a public servant. The sergeant at the desk said that I did nothing illegal.

only one party needs to know, it is not illegal to record anything if you are a concerned party.

it becomes your creation, with rights, intellectual rights.

I should add that she claimed that her superiors had instructed her and her fellow public servants to immediately end any conversation upon learning they are being recorded. They want to record us, but, they don't like the thought of us recording them. Go figure. :)

One might deduce that they think we work for them. :)

a historical documented record, being avoided, evidence that can be used against them... hmm sounds a little sneaky.

its all accounting and they don't want to be held accountable

"This is being recorded for quality assurance."

short of Scott, kicking my ass for this. I apologise in advance. Their club house rules in the CCC under 183.1 defines the use of recording.

mmhhh....If I call a PUBLIC servant, because he ask me to call, it sure look to me as a PUBLIC converstion ?....

So if it's a PUBLIC conversation, it has to be PUBLIC ? :D

So recording this PUBLIC conversation is a good thing to do, to make sure it stays PUBLIC... ?

183.1 Where a private communication is originated by more than one person or is intended by the originator thereof to be received by more than one person, a consent to the interception thereof by any one of those persons is sufficient consent for the purposes of any provision of this Part.

To me...it dosen't make sense to ignitiate a call to a PUBLIC servant, and pretend this communication is a PRIVATE communication...I am just thinking outloud here :D

OK....called the city of Montreal today :D

The PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST has been declared GUILTY by a COMPUTER SYSTEM.

The PERSON named PIERRE DAOUST has been juged by a COMPUTER SYSTEM.

I have this on recording, in French :D

:-/

COMPUTER SYSTEM = court of COMPETENT JURISDICTION?

..maybe you should write back telling them that your 'toaster' has DECLARED that they are GUILTY for Breach-of-Procedural-Fairness ;)

That one is funny Derek Moran :D

What do I do with that...seriously :D

And that is why I can't understand why to use the PERSON. They are just gonna keep changing the rules and making up crap like this!

Unless I dig so deep that they will have to admit that this was a MISTAKE, and ask for forgiveness :D

:-) Nice!

I can't even watch the Soprano's anymore for fuck sakes, no baseball, no football...fuck me, I have to take care of "ME", they could have told me this before jesus christ !

:D :D

Dear City of Montreal's COMPUTER,

WHO ARE YOU? For greater certainty; BY WHAT AUTHORITY, have YOU COMPUTER, made a LAWFUL DETERMINATION, that I AM GUILTY of anything?

Signed, The Rules of Natural Justice

Signed, Due Process-of-Law and/or Duty-to-Act-Fairly and/or Procedural-Fairness and/or The Basic Principles of Fundamental Justice and/or The Rules of Natural Justice AND/OR a court of COMPETENT JURISDICTION.....i dont think Scott'll ever let me live that one down

You forgot to sign it "Toaster"

I can't wait to know by what authority a computer system can enter a guilty plea on the person I have in my pocket, and by what authority a computer system can sentenced the person....stay tune :D

If it was "computer" who found guilt, I would think you might ask them "Who is in charge of the operation(s) of computer? It seems this computer and/or its operator and/or the software guys have created a problem and I need to know, who the responsible parties."

I am glad that I know how to sign things void