The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Jul 16, 2013 11:20 PM

Ashley Hamaluk

I'm working on discharging some debt. I was wondering if someone, who has been successful in doing so, would be willing to look over what I have completed to send to the bank and see if I'm on the right track. Also, if there is anyone who has been successful in discharging debt when there is a co-signer involved. I'm not to clear if the processes are the same - discharging debt vs. involvement of co-signer (hope that make sense)?

Any insight and direction would be much appreciated. Thank you.

Admin - Scott - hope this is alright if I post this.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 756
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 756 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 455

Ashley Hamaluk

Bah. Wouldn't expect anything else. Even though your hilarious commentary would be great, haha, if someone is willing to work one on one. That would be perfect. Instead of posting all the nitty gritty on here. No reason to bog down the page.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 756
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 756 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I WILL do "private work, but I demand value for my time...

If you are male, then you'd best negotiate a currency exchange, and I get paid UP FRONT. Alternate'y, you may offer up your wife/daughter/mother to work off on their backs.

If you are female, you may offer up yourself and/or wife/daughter/mother to work off the debt on your/their back.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 757
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 757 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

You had a contract with the BANK. They sold it. Not your business anymore. To put it in simple terms.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 757 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 757 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Todd Keller

I know, I got a call from one today. Love chatting with him. Finally he said, "this conversation is going nowhere", I said, "what are you talking about, its going perfect, exactly the way I want it to go"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 758
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 758 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ashley Hamaluk

If it hasn't to this point been sold to a third party, and one decide to send letters to discharge - which Im trying to work on. To whom would you send them? I asked the bank for contact info for the CFO - the guy actually laughed at me. And told me to contact the Ombudsman? Would this be correct.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 758
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 758 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ashley Hamaluk

Those are not my letters, which Im sure your boy-brain understands. Thats just the process Im looking at using. So basically, why even do that? Just walk away - wait for the bank to sell it to a third party - and it no longer even exists since I never contracted with the third party.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 758 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 758 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Pretty much. Yes.

Peter Mansfield is awesome at dealing with "collection agents". Pity he's never on.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 759 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 759 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Gail Marie

I contracted with the bank to clear some debt...they cashed my check confirming their agreement to my offer but haven't responded to any of my correspondence at all..nor called me when their monthly payment was returned because of a stop payment I put on my account.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 759
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 759 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

If the Collection Agency calls you tell them to send you a claim from to you signed. Add if they continue to harass you with out claim then you will bill them $1000.00 (insert currency here) per incident also inform them that if they affect your credit rating in anyway with out claim then they will incur a $1,000,000.00 (insert currency here) to be paid forth with to your currant address. Also tell them that this conversation is being recorded and will constitute your terms if they want to discuss any thing with you.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 759
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 759 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

I also have a contract opportunity for those who may want to hit my credit rating...on my credit report I have a note, stating that without having proof a lawful contract with me, they agree to pay me well for that opportunity to hit it

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 759
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 759 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Carl Dunne

Is that the same with any third party ie solicitor firm ?. I had one contact me today demanding payment on a parking ticket or go to court. As it will be me vs the county council I'm assuming there is a difference

Carl Dunne

Cool. I was going to contact the most senior member of the firm and ask him is he going to take responsibility for this notice and to provide full disclosure on how to discharge the debt as i know they won't but that is pointless too in this instance yes ?

Scott Duncan

Government workers are the best to do that with. :D

"Well, since you work for the government, I will concede that it is most reasonable to presume that YOU are more familiar with the rules, than I am... Except that you work for the government... You make a living being a lying parasite. It is reasonable to assume that you haven't STOPPED being a lying parasite just for me! I shall presume you are lying. Show me this law and how I am bound to it!"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 761
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 761 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ashley Hamaluk

Gail 'I also have a contract opportunity for those who may want to hit my credit rating...on my credit report I have a note, stating that without having proof a lawful contract with me, they agree to pay me well for that opportunity to hit it'.... How did you go about that, if you don't mind me asking?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 761
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 761 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

ChiefRock Sino General helped me with it....2 pieces of ID (1 with picture) and any bill with your name and address on it...send a copy of those along with your contract offer to the credit bureau with instructions to attach the contract offer to my account

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 761
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 761 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ashley Hamaluk

How would you go about wording something like that? That would be great to get more information on that. If Im understanding it correctly, if you send that to the credit bureau - your credit it protected. Unless you personally default on a payment of whatever, for example. But a third party can't touch it, since there is no contract. Correct? Or am I girl-braining it...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 761
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 761 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Ok, NONE of the shit you people are spewing is true. Seriously. Time to shut up now.

TO REVIEW:

NO COLLECTION AGENCY DOES, and NOR CAN THEY DO, ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:

1: Report ANYTHING to a CREDIT REPORTING AGENCY - Anything they reported would be FRAUD, as there's NO FUCKING CONTRACT

2: FILE LEGAL CLAIMS - AGAIN, NO FUCKING CONTRACT. Did you receive a BENEFIT from them? Are they an INJURED PARTY?

Seriously. Stop making shit up. The REAL stuff is hard enough, with out having to clean up YOUR made-up shit!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 762
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 762 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Carl Dunne

The drawer is liable and the drawee only liable once the bill is presented for acceptance and he accepts the obligation by signing the bill forming contract otherwise the bill has no value until it is accepted

Carl Dunne

To sell a bill of goods today usually means 'to put something over on someone'. This usage appears to have arisen in the 1920s. No one knows exactly how it got started; but as long as there have been commercial transactions there has been fraud, so the association of the two in this phrase apparently struck a chord. Inducing people to order a bill of goods by exaggerating their quality, and even taking money for goods that never materialize at all, are familiar concepts, as centuries of court records attest. In a rather colorful example, a 1949 case in the North Carolina Supreme Court concerned a textile mill's complaint that it had been fraudulently induced to purchase a bill of goods including an item for 148,227 pounds of dyed cotton, only to find "that 100 bales of said merchandise . . . was not dyed cotton but was of a quality greatly inferior, which was known as dyed waste or 'frog hair', as the defendants then well knew."

Although bill of goods in the current sense of 'something fraudulent, deceptive, exaggerated' is usually associated with the verb sell, it is often used alone. A recent law review article about proposed "patient bill of rights" legislation contains this example, which manages to wrap together several meanings of bill: "The bill of rights formulation has also allowed for further permutations--with Democrats deriding Republican proposals as a bill of goods and a bill of wrongs, and Republicans arguing that the Democrats' approach creates a lawyer's right to bill."

Scott Duncan

The COLLECTION AGENCY BOUGHT the bill of goods (the debt) and now has TITLE to the account.

However JOINDER MUST BE RE-ESTABLISHED with all parties on the bill. You contracted with the ORIGINAL secured party, not the agency.

The bill is still VALID if the other party ACCEPTS it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 762
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 762 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

The collection agency KNOWINGLY bought a "Bill of goods" to victimize the gullible parties.

Giving your name and address is enough for them to PRESUME joinder. They THEORETICALLY could lay a claim based on this. If they send it by registered mail.

Sending it back registered mail (RETURN EVERYTHING THEY SENT WITH A NOTICE OF MISTAKE) will kill it dead right there.

Watch what you say on phone calls. Shit like "we just need to confirm your address... What is your address"?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 763
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 763 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

Heres another issue my friend just got hit with a lawsuit against him, for get this failure to pay. But they continue to take monthly paychecks.

He sent a letter asking questions and MAnuLife went apeshit.

Notice of mistake time for lawsuit?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 763
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 763 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

I have a friend who has a brief NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE he sends out:

"I conditionally-accept your demand for payment, on the condition upon presentment to me of the ORIGINAL INSTRUMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS in its ORIGINAL form."

..but im guessin' NOTICE OF MISTAKE trumps that, obviously

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 763
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 763 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

Just in case you missed it:

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PUT A RETURN ADDRESS ON REGISTERED MAIL ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! I know you said this three times and I'm shaking in my boots because I don't want to feel a tingly sensation Scott. But I'm so curious I have to ask. Shaking in boots with bloody shins. Here it goes: ChiefRock recently told me to put my Address on registered mail, but, instead of adding the last line (postal code) he told me to write: Non Domestic without Canada. Here's my questions: Did Chief Rock make a mistake instructing me to do this? Is this a valid option? Have we been misinformed?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 764
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 764 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Mmm. So I gather that the POSTAL CODE *** IS *** the WARD (POLITICAL DISTRICT) there by use of the POSTAL CODE "DESIGNATES" you as a WARD of THEIR POLITICAL JURISDICTION.? ? Just thinking out loud.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 764
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 764 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

Chad. If you put in the postal code. You are admitting/creating joinder. Essentially you are saying I'm a government of Canada employee and I am here as an employee working hard protecting/serving at this Canadian post (think military post) identified by these numbers and letters. That is my understanding.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 764
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 764 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

I can't quite recall...perhaps two years ago, when I got into this, I seem to recall Winston Shrout saying AlLL postal codes throughout the world are registered with the IMF. Do I remember that accurately Scott? Or am I way off base?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 765
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 765 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Here in the States, using a postal code is acquiescence to the Federal Jurisdiction. It is prima facie evidence that YOU have claimed DOMICILE in DC and are RESIDING in another State. I have sent thousands of pieces exactly like this:

John Doe 123 Main Street Peabody, Massachusetts

Some guys use [ ] around the Zip Code or write "Near", but it is not necessary. They way I write it is de jure and compliant with current Postage Regulation. ALL MY MAIL GETS WHERE I WANT IT TO!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 765
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 765 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Yes , and part of dealing with debt is the paper work that does deal with it. This paper work requires entries and fields to be filled out. If I am out of line here on this then continue to Discuss law but never practice the actions of the law. I think Ashley would like to have the aspects, concepts AND the Practical information of dealing with her problem. Every Single Piece of it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 766
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 766 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

i just had a collection agency call me. NO idea why they were calling, they would say that its a business matter and they would not talk until they confirm name D.O.B and address.

How convienient.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 767
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 767 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ashley Hamaluk

The other information on this post, brought to light different aspects that I hadn't taken into account or really thought of. So Im happy it came up, even if it doesn't really deal with debt.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 767
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 767 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Tell them this is a recorded call and if they continue to call thus number without providing proof of claim the per each instance they will incur a fee to be paid forthwith in Canadian funds by certified check.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 768 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 768 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Let say I BUY toilet paper, and I CALL you to sell it to you, and I'm rude with you because I THINK (in my fucked-up trainless head) that you have NO CHOICE of buying MY toilet paper :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 768
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 768 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

Since you said that Ashley Hamaluk, I'll just do this one comment off topic. This goes under your city/state line and keeps them from adding a zip code without your permission. You are citing their own postal manual

Non-Domestic, w/o the US ZIP EXEMPT (DMM 602 1.3e (1)(2))

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 768
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 768 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Maximus Legis

A question on adresses. Say I intend to form a private trust, can I use my existing home address for the trust and have it Non Domestic Without The United Kingdom effectively making it offshore?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 769
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 769 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

You are happy to hear from me what you already knew in the first place ?......do you take pills ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 769 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 769 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Pete Daoust

Fuck that !!! :/ I hate when people ask me a question when they already know the answers....and if they let me explaine in details, and at the end they say: oh I knew that !.....I go nuts with that shit :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 770
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 770 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

We ALL have the "substantive right to set-off debt".

Cf. United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 239, 67 S.Ct. 1599, 1601, 91 L.Ed. 2022 (1947) ("government has the same right 'which belongs to every creditor, to apply the unappropriated moneys of his debtor, in his hands, in extinguishment of the debts due to him' " (quoting Gratiot v. United States, 40 U.S. (15 Pet.) 336, 370, 10 L.Ed. 759 (1841))); see also Tatelbaum v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 207, 210 (1986) (set-off right is inherent in the United States government and grounded on common law right of every creditor to set off debts)

Cf. De Magno v. United States, 636 F.2d 714, 727 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (district court had jurisdiction over claim involving VA’s “affirmative action against an individual whether by bringing an action to recover on an asserted claim or by proceeding on its common-law right of set-off”) (discussing similar language of predecessor statute, 38 U.S.C. — 211)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 770
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 770 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Step by Step for Ashley ( but I’m sure she already know that) :D

1). Call bank and give your address and EVERYTHING 2). Be honourable 3). You want to pay IF you owe, ALL THE TIME 4). You have your pockets and accounts EMPTY 5). But you REALLY want to pay. 6). Bank will ACTIVELY search for a sucker 7). Bank will FIND a sucker 8). Bank will make PROFIT from this sucker 9). Sucker will CALL you. 10). You tell the sucker to contact you via mail 11). You tell the sucker you want to pay IF you owe them. 12). But the sucker haven’t done and/or supply ANYTHING to you. 13). So you don’t owe NOTHING to that sucker. 14). So the sucker is the happy OWNER of of brand spanking OLD debt. 15). End of story.

:D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 771
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 771 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

T?lis B?aunsBrauns Orig Libau Tālis

Then collection agency sends you a claim stating: "Pursuant to the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, the Original Creditor assigned the liability, including interest, to the Plaintiff on (date)" Lawyer advises that the collections agency doesn't require further joinder.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 771
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 771 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Brauns Orig Libau T?lis, I would love to pay if they can substantiate their claim...after all I'm honourable and acting in good faith, so IF they 'claim' they were assigned the debt, THEN they must have the original document, in its' original form, signed by me.

I asked one of these collection companies for confirmation that if they had purchased the debt in question, they would have the original contract in their possession...otherwise that could be construed as fraud, coercion & harassment.

They said they were not proceeding with any claim until they investigated and could confirm that for me...that was more than two years ago, closer to 4, I stopped waiting for their confirmation.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 774
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 774 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Now you can do as I said before and LOOK UP THE WORD "REMITTANCE".

Remittance IS advice. It is ONLY found on a BILL or a SIGNED INVOICE.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 774 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 774 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

What is it you are saying Scott ? (I really don't get it )....and as you know, if I don't get it, no one will....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 775 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 775 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Chris Evan

What is ADVICE? View; opinion; the counsel given by lawyers to their clients; an opinion expressed as to wisdom of future conduct The instruction usually given by one merchant or banker to another by letter, informing him of shipments made to him, or of bills or drafts drawn on him, with particulars of date, or sight, the sum, and the payee. Bills presented for acceptance or payment are frequently dishonored for icant of advice.

What is REMITTANCE? Money sent by one person to another, either in specie, bill of ex- change, check, or otherwise.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 775
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 775 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

So, someone presents me with a BILL. I ask for advice (instruction on BILL) on the REMITTANCE. Without advice, I can dishonor the BILL. With advice?....They would instruct me on REMITTANCE? Which is money in specie, BoE, a check, or otherwise.

What is BILL OF EXCHANGE? A written order from A. to B., directing B. to pay to C. a certain sum of money therein named. Byles, Bills, 1. An open (that is, unsealed) letter addressed by one person to another directing him, in effect, to pay, absolutely and at all events, a certain sum of money therein named, to a third person, or to any other to whom that third person may order it to be paid, or it may be payable to bearer or to the drawer himself. 1 Daniel, Neg. Inst. 27. A bill of exchange is an instrument, negotiable in form, by which one, who is called the “drawer,” requests another, called the “drawee,” to pay a specified sum of money. Civil Code Cal.

What is DRAWER? The person making a bill of exchange and addressing it to the drawee.Stevenson v. Walton, 2 Smedes & M. (Miss.) 265; Winnebago County State Bank v.Hustel, 119 Iowa, 115, 93 N. W. 70.

So, I can make a Bill of Exchange to pay a BILL? or am I not following this?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 775
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 775 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

I've been asking ADVICES to Hydro-Quebec 4 times now, via registered mail on HOW to deal this BoE they keep sending me, I'm asking them to REVEAL to me EVERY method available to me ..... COMPLETE SILENCE from their part... :-\

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 776
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 776 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

ok.....so Hydro-Quebec sends you a Bill of Exchange. So, if they presented it to you, THEY are the Drawer, correct? They are thinking you are the Drawee, yes? Who then is the Payee? You as the Drawee say "Yes, it would be my pleasure to pay this third party (who is....?) on demand or at a future date, but how would you like me to do this?"

Do I have this correct? When you received the Bill of Exchange, how were you able to identify it as a BoE and not as a Bill for Account or Services (etc) or an Invoice?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 776
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 776 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Hydro-Quebec can ONLY invoice corporation, and they can only send BoE to the people and wish these people will BUY that debt and pay for it :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 777 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 777 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Chris Evan

Ok....I just read my Electricity Agreement. I signed this 7 years ago and haven't thought of it since. I identified myself with an SSN. This would mean I identified myself as a "corporate fiction". Thereby, I would be required to pay them. Looks like I need to change this contract and let them know I have no duty to provide them with this number pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974. More fun!!!!!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 779
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 779 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

This is where we get fucked big time.....people are AFFRAID to ask questions....this is where I focus on my children education, I reapet them EVERYDAY......ASK ANY FREAKING QUESTIONS THAT CROSS YOUR MIND.....Always and to ANYONE...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 779 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 779 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chris Evan

I am thinking that this is it....

http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/article3.htm#s3-101

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 780 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 780 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Chris Evan

endorse (indorse) v. 1) to sign one's name to the back of a check, bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument with the intention of making it cashable or transferable. 2) to pledge support to a program, proposal, or candidate. (See; endorsement)

TO INDORSE. To write on the back. Bills of exchange and promissory notes are indorsed by the party writing his name on the back; writing one's name on the back of a writ, is to indorse such writ. 7 Pick. 117. See 13 Mass. 396.

did i miss something?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 781
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 781 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Gail Blackman, 3 parties to BoE....what if ?

Me = Drawer Bank of Canada = Drawee The one who sent me the BoE = Third party or Me = Drawer Receveur General du Canada = Drawee The one who sent me the BoE = Third party

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 782
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 782 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

So the one who are sending me these BoE are just starting the BoE, for me to complete it, and send it to the Drawee, which is either the Bank of Canada or The Receveur General (I'm not sure of these 2) and then one of these 2 have to send it to the third party, which is the one who sent me that bill in the first place ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 782
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 782 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

that is pretty much how it's worked out for my dentist bill...so we'll see the outcome of that.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 783 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 783 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Gail Marie

If you send to the receiver general, the payment is taken from the consolidated revenue fund which is tax money... a little birdy told Derek Moran that there is only one institution in canada that can create money from our valuable consideration/signature...the Bank of Canada

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 783
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 783 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

I don't know if the receiver general has anything to do with the bank of canada...the deptuy minister of finance sits on the board of the bank of canada although doesnt have a vote...I think the receiver general is more tied to revenue canada?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 784
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 784 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Bill of Exchange

In Montreal, February 31st 2013

For this bill of exchange pay to the order of Fucks the Puppy the sum of $100 CDN

Drawee: Bank of Canada

Fucks the Dumpy SIN: XXX-XXX-XXX (signature of the DRAWER)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 784
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 784 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

The only problem with taking it out of the Public trust is that it harms others by increasing public (government) debt, which your fellow man pays for...even though this is the way we are instructed to do it via the B of E Act (at least in Australia, the instruction is to send it via the state treasury).

My understanding is that if it gets sent to the central bank (who creates the currency in the first place, they can discharge it at their end, or make the necessary deposit on our behalf...which is why people with a greater comprehension than me have done it this way.

Either way, more debt is created, which ultimately burdens and or enslaves us further, which leaves us in a Catch 22 because until we can get everyone out of this debt based system, ultimately someone 'innocent' ends up harmed by our actions.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 785 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 785 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chris Evan

Yes....that is exactly what I was discussing with Bildo Schmildo earlier. So, if we are beneficiaries of the Public Trust and we are sent a BoE, maybe we shouldn't be doing anything with it.....maybe there is something else all together we are missing.....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 786
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 786 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

The way it is set up in America (although it got all fucked up with the 14th Amendment) is indirect and apportioned taxes to cover this stuff. For example...Gasoline Tax pays for Infrastructure. It would be perfect if we weren't bought by "benefits"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 786
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 786 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So Scott, I am understanding any BILL that you receive that has a REMITTANCE attached would show that it is a PUBLIC DEBT? Therefore can only be "paid" with MONEY OF ACCOUNT?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 787
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 787 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Andrew D'AragonAndrew Ofthe RoyalHouse Aragon

Not sure if I understand correctly but, the bill portion would be the part that gets discharged against the public debt, and the remittance is what is owed the beneficiary of the trust being manged as part of our birthright to the resources of the land, is this close Scott Duncan? Or am I way off base on this?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 787
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 787 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

My cable bill says "Make cheque Payable to Cogeco Canada." Right there on the face. It does not say make your cheque. Make cheque Payable. And bloody'ell it certainly looks like a cheque. So when we get our corrected bill back we are going to Accepted by signature on the back and put the B.C. number. Just to see what happens. We have switched to phone data and canceled the cable.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 788 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Chad Brodgesell, here is how I did it:

ACCEPTED BY:____________________

DATE:___________________

Account Number: (I put my SIN)

(signature)

Bill of exchange act L.R.C. (1985)

And I sent it back to the them, but I should have sent it to the Bank of Canada (original) and send them (which are the third party) a copy and a note saying that Bank of Canada will take care of this... :D

But so far, it looks like it worked anyway :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 788 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

I know for a fact that this is TRUE, because I ASKED four times Hydro-Quebec about it via refistered mail and they DON'T answer me, they just stay silent, and they don't come to my house to cut the service, They don't even call me :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 789 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Allan

Interest info Pete Daoust. But would the drawer not be the party sending the bill of exchange (unless it is incomplete) and the drawee be the Government as legal title holder of PETE DAOUST?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 789 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

The SIN is the account number of PIERRE DAOUST Chad Brodgesell, and PIERRE DAOUST is not me, if they want to presume it's one of there emplyee, it's their business, not mine.....I AM NOT one of their employee...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 789 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

James Allan, that's what I've thought 3 days ago, but I REALLY think that I AM the drawer, Hydro-Quebec just help me by starting the bill, because they have no other choices....Hydro-Quebec is the THIRD PARTY, and as far as the drawee, you can pick either the Bank of Canada or Receveur General du Canada, I pick the Bank of Canada because they will CREATE some money of account to discharge the bill, if I pick Receveur General of Canada, they will take some of my neighbor's taxes to pay the bill....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 789 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Hydro-Quebec is the THIRD PARTY, but they can't count on me to make the BoE because I'm suppose to be an IGNORANT, so they just started it, and send it to me, and because I'm suppose to be a stupid ignorant, they ASSUME that I will BUY BACK that debt :D

They have no CLUE that I can learn stuff :D

So now, I say: Hey, thanks HQ for starting that BoE for me, and now watch me ACCEPT, SIGN, DATE and complete that stupid BoE and send it REGISTERED MAIL to the Bank of Canada (Drawee) so they can send some Money of Account to HQ (Third Party)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 790
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 790 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Allan

Or perhaps most people simply claim, by their conduct, to be the legal title holder for the NAME and government, having best evidence of legal title to the NAME, simply take no issue with your claim and is more than happy to let you deal with the bills they are actually liable for?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 790
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 790 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Oh and Chad Brodgesell, I am NOT using the SIN in this operation, THEY are using it, not me.....me I'm just doing the RIGHT thing concerning the PERSON I have, that's all, I am doing NO wrong in all this, I just DECIDE to NOT buy debt.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 790
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 790 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

There is two choices with BoE.

1). You buy back the debt (I did that for the past 30 years)

2). You ACCEPT the BoE and send it to the Drawee so he can DISCHARGE it.

No other options available, unless there is another one hidden somewhere :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 791
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 791 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Allan

Who took the original signed copy of the Statement of Birth and who is presently the holder of same? Is that not the best evidence of title to the NAME? HAve you ever tried to get that document from the Government?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 791
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 791 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

By doing a perfected lien on your property removing it from the control of the Government of Canada are any other country you then place it into your corporation which you then have sole control over

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 792
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 792 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

I just don't get it! Period. I HAVE WAAAAAY more questions than answers. The more answers I get seem to lead to more fucking questions. I am EXTREMELY frustrated and about 34 seconds from having a French Canadian style meltdown!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 792
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 792 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Can we just have one fucking discussion without INSANE ramblings so I can fucking learn something here? And can I get a FULL DISCLOSURE on anything?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 793 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 793 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Living on a lighted stage Approaches the unreal For those who think and feel In touch with some reality Beyond the gilded cage.

Cast in this unlikely role, Ill-equipped to act, With insufficient tact, One must put up barriers To keep oneself intact.

Living in the Limelight, The universal dream For those who wish to seem. Those who wish to be Must put aside the alienation, Get on with the fascination, The real relation, The underlying theme.

Living in a fisheye lens, Caught in the camera eye. I have no heart to lie, I can't pretend a stranger Is a long-awaited friend.

All the world's indeed a stage, And we are merely players, Performers and portrayers, Each another's audience Outside the gilded cage.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 793
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 793 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

This is what is confusing the fuck out of me. If I ask for ADVICE on the REMITTANCE. then comply, why the fuck would I issue a Notice of that?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 795 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 795 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Chris Evan

ADVICE, com. law. A letter containing information of any circumstances unknown to the person to whom it is written; when goods are forwarded by sea or land, the letter transmitted to inform the consignee of the fact, is termed advice of goods, or letter of advice. When one merchant draws upon another, he generally advises him of the fact. These letters are intended to give notice of the facts they contain.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 795
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 795 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

You can ask for ADVICES from the PERSON, COMPANY or ANYONE that will send you a bill of exchange on HOW to proceed with the fucking thing, ask them what are your OPTIONS with this thing, they HAVE to answer you.....tell them the call is recorded for training purpose, or send them your questions via registered mail...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 795 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 795 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Eamonn O Brien

So remittance is the sum of money sent between parties and advice is the notice sent to confirm the money being exchanged...?

Sorry if I'm confusing you more Chris. I've just jumped in on this thread and am only putting it together myself...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 796 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 796 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Chad Brodgesell

My advice to ...well.. any one who wants to hear it is, Read Black's Law 4th or 5th edition. Just skim it. Some words will jump out, focus on those and each word in the definition. Then go on to the next. Over and over again. Make the one dictionary (which ever you pick) the only book you read for 2 months at least. Spend every waking moment not involved with the life and family reading that one book. After that you will naturally gravitate to other documents yadda yadda.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 796
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 796 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

If you receive a bill of exchange for instance from the government, regarding income taxes let say, you can send a letter to the government asking them WHAT ARE the options for me to DEAL with this thing, other than FIDUCIARY money, or bank notes.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 796
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 796 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Scott - I'm NOT one of you idiots who don't read their contracts. I'm NOT one of you freeloaders-on-the-land who don't want to pay their bills.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 796 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 796 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chad Brodgesell

That is the POINT. what specifically is the MATTER at hand? General question receive general responses there by confusing the matter even worse.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 797 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 797 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10200333134517972&set=gm.543250709044199&type=1&theater

Read that !!!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 798 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 798 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

“negotiable instrument” includes any cheque, draft, traveller’s cheque, bill of exchange, postal note, money order, postal remittance and any other similar instrument;

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 799
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 799 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Rule H6 (s) "Remittance" means the portion of an Invoice that conforms to Part II of this Rule, or the electronic data, that is submitted to the Payor's FI by the Payor along with payment, and which itself becomes a credit item representing value when subsequently Exchanged by the Payor's FI;

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 799 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 799 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

you can either pay with that instrument which is Federal Reserve's which is a legal and constitutional law are you can discharge debt with lawful tender are lawful money which is a postage stamp of $1 this is lawful currency and valuable consideration

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 800
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 800 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Black`s 9th coupon (koo-pon). An interest or dividend certificate that is attached to another instrument, such as a bond, and that may be detached and separately presented for payment of a definite sum at a specified time.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 801
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 801 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade Firsbey

I'm going to take a before and after picture of my remittance which I turn into a bill of exchange

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 801 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 801 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.
Back to top