The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Jul 16, 2013 8:07 PM

Gail Marie

I think this is morally deficient/deviant and identifies many concerns. From a TFL perspective, however, maybe this can help us to see that there is detachment between the flesh man/woman/child and their PERSON.

As Pierre says, they own the PERSON. They obviously feel righteous in using it in any way they see fit. To be emotionally attached or otherwise to our PERSON can be traumatizing.

The identity they used was the name of the child's PERSON which they own via the birth certificate. Using the PERSON's BC, they were able to obtain a passport in the PERSON's name.

I think this is morally deficient/deviant and identifies many concerns. From a TFL perspective, however, maybe this can help us to see that there is detachment between the flesh man/woman/child and their PERSON. As Pierre says, they own the PERSON. They obviously feel righteous in The identity they used was the name of the child's PERSON which they own via the birth certificate. Using the PERSON's BC, they were able to obtain a passport in the PERSON's name. 42 police officers stole the identities of dead babies and refuse to apologise to the families... The ‘Day of the Jackal’ deception was branded ‘morally repugnant’ by one chief... MAIL ONLINE
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1386 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_537683496267587
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 17

Gail Marie

well from a law perspective Breach of trust...from a flesh man/woman both are equally dispicable

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1388 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1388 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Gail Marie

He said: “I believe the public do understand the necessity for police and others to do things like this to protect against a much greater harm.

“It was never intended or foreseen that any of the identities used would become public, or that any family would suffer hurt as a result.”

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1388
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1388 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

“It was never intended or foreseen that any of the identities used would become public, or that any family would suffer hurt as a result.” <---You need to prove THAT is untrue, and you can't.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1388
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1388 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

maybe in the sense that what they did is not illegal because they were given the name by the owners of the PERSON...and the law is not about right and wrong, but about legal and illegal?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1388
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1388 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

It does. It has NOTHING TO DO with the parents or anyone else for that matter. It's THEIR PERSON... No different from a police car, or a snow-plow. It's Government property.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1388 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1388 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: It does. It has NOTHING TO DO with the parents or anyone else for that matter. It's THEIR PERSON... No different from a police car, or a snow-plow. It's Government property.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1389
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1389 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top