Jul 16, 2013 1:35 AM

your not locked up... that is good.

Critique you? Sht no. What Jason F. LeBlanc said.

You did it. The amount of intimidation applied did not work.

When the guy on the bench asks "how do you wish to proceed" he is handing the court over to you and recognizing you as the sole authority with standing. at this point you can state you wish for all charges to be dropped and the record expunged with or without prejudice your call. and he will follow your instructions. Am I correct for the most part Scott Duncan?

""How do you wish to proceed?."" Says it all right there.

Well its not your name to claim ownership of and if you do... you accept SURETY for it. I don't think this will be the end...

Close Andrew, more precisely it would be the tennis equivalent of "Your turn", Ball is in your court to return. Judge in his proper role is referee making sure everything is in bounds and the ball was hit over the net in accordance with the rules. Actually, Dodgeball might be more correct, you have the ball now, kill the fucker.

thanks Dean Clifford

Dean Clifford you should read the "Stump Judge Scott Duncan" thread. They TRY to stump me by playing "justice". ChiefRock Sino General simply cheated...and he was the best contender :D

We are in a nation of future victims. I see that now.

cheated... ha

You think they'll send you a letter with another court date?

did he by claiming ownership of the name claim it as a form of title, and as such without objection from the court they can not then attach it to the person?

I think it is very simple. We are (well, I am at least) seeing to much into it. We keep talking / worrying about what to do in court but we really just simple shouldn't be there. So if we have a date to appear we know we should deal with it before that by some means. If we are dragged in then we should be dealing with , They shouldn't be dragging us in to begin with. Forest for the trees so to speak.

Not much to critique, It seems you followed procedure....

yah, i was going to say [before i saw scott's...] i was waiting for what was presumed to occur next, BUT i was also querious because you said "bla bla bla how do you wish to proceed?", which you could have replied "well seeing as YOU made a MISTAKE... I would expect to receive from you the value in the adjustment to be offset by a check to cover my loss" thankyouverymuch haveaniceday

Security for costs....

EXCELLENT!!!!!! But you didn't get your cheque for the false claims. lol I think I heard this strategy before somewhere.....now where was that......OH YEAH! From ME! :P

and you have 9 witnesses ... :)

"Stump Judge Scott Duncan" thread....send me a link.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/permalink/534408763261727/

Lien the court file, claim all equity in it, demand to be paid the sum certain value of the false claim, close the account and PAY ME!

That's and Order, I'm Tony Fucking Montana!

I'm Tony motherfucking Montana you mother fucking cock roaches. lol

Oh Dean Clifford! You naughty boy.

You always bring me the best violence :D

I heard somewhere that we place a promissory note so that we can siez it when they lose and get our pay?

I was just happy to get out of there unscathed .I totally agree Andrew it was in my mind to say dismiss this right now ,I knew it was the proper thing to say but I couldn't get my words out.I have no knowledge of the lien process,I understand the concept just not how to implement it. Beverly I think you are correct I have not heard the last of this.regarding claiming the name my thinking is this,it is my property it was given to me by my parents,I am surety for the name but I choose where and when to act as surety.I never really felt comfortable with my tactics ,I was double minded in my approach, a hack, but I have learned soooo much and really appreciate this group.

How do you plead?

sorry meant that for stump the judge

I do not consent, and waive the benefit.

:D

isn't it funny how we are sucked into something first because we attach to a legal fiction, and second how it is considered/portrayed as a benefit to be told how and what to do and have to pay for not obeying

I was reading the act related to the waiver in lieu of identification..and I'm still looking for the actual 'benefit' in it lol

You read those Gail Blackman ?.....:D

I did, yes, I don't want to ask uninformed questions ;) but honestly as I'm reading, I'm asking myself...what exactly is the benefit of this act?

Place Surety upon you from the person conjoining the names

Is there ANY benefits in ANY acts ? :/

Waving the benefit un conjoined

Well the bills of exchange act appears to have benefits...but the light went on for me related to the "benefits" in reading this particular act...I can't say I've read all the acts that exist though

The benefit Scott Duncan is talking about should be the benefit of giving the PERSON another NAME than the one the on the BC if you want. Not sure tho.. :/

you can use and gain benefits anytime you want our waive them anytime you want

Waiving that benefit tells them that I don't give shit what PUBLIC NAME they want to use for that PERSON.....as long as they don't attach it to MY TAKEN name....

The BoE act has stuff in it that we were not aware of.....

"respectfully GIVE NOTICE that I, in fact, waive ALL benefits of the ONTARIO CHANGE OF NAME ACT [R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.7], and as such I MUST DECLINE any such benefits."

so I took that to suggest that being able to change your name etc was all a benefit through that act

the act was giving you permission

Some may see it as a benefit

at a cost of course lol

sure it would be, if you didn't know any different

But who cares on HOW they name the PERSON ?, they can call it ROGER GENDRON and I care less... :D

Or Fucks the Puppy :D

And/or use the ability to discharge debt through the bills of exchange

actually if they did n ame it something other then the same name given by our parents...the jig would be up! because people would understand so much clearer what is going on

Mmmhhh, Are you suggesting a conspirency ? :D

no it's not a conspiracy lol

we even took stole that name. Through the belief of ownership

conspiracy ...ok, I've beated up that word big time....sorry

it's right there in plain sight it's not hidden

you ever hear the line " call me what you want just don't call me late to dinner"...it has new meaning now ha!

thanks to Scott Duncan for showing of all this stuff I thought he was some kind of scammer. NOT

Nope, never heard that line :D

Yes I'm grateful to Scott Duncan

maybe if I translate it or do it in Scott's french accent? :P

The group is gone so much more productive since it's closed.

Scott Duncan is Throwing curve balls every day

yep it's great...as I've said before, if you can make it here, you can make it anywhere ;)

The Tingle sensation is felt every where so yes Gail Blackman you are absolutely right. If tingle here though we lose so much more.

Just got back from the beach and had a nice conversation with somebody that's going to accounting school

OK if you're not going to enter a plea then I will enter a NOT GUILTY PLEA for you

Well, WHO ARE YOU ?....what is your NAME and address ?....WHO ARE YOU ?

A Guilty or a Not Guilty Plea is still in their jurisdiction. Remember. You are NOT supposed to be there in the first place. By accepting them to enter in a NOT GUILTY PLEA you are consenting to their Acts/Statutes as an OFFICER/TRUSTEE of their organization.

You just don't consent to plea ANYTHING, and get your RED VOID STAMP ready, :D

Jump on the beanch and VOID this nobody's forehead :D

Yes Mr.Pete Daoust, you are right..:) Always KNOW WHO you are dealing with.

I'm so electrified this morning it's amazing....maybe I should see the doctor so he can give me some pills :D

OFFICER DAOUST! You missed it. Have more coffee.

by what authority are you entering a plea

when were you granted power of attorney to act on my behalf

Let the record show that Justice XXXXX has offered up a chose in action on behalf of the defendant thereby converting on ALL liability as successor surety. And I hope that he has brought his check book here today so that he can post bond

Mmmm still accepting the Defendant role would place you in their jurisdiction would it not? Is the point being skipped that you just shouldn't be there in their Administrative hearing to begin with.?

Even if you don't attend they issue a bench warrant and drag you in

WHO ARE YOU and by what athority you enter a plea for THE PERSON ?

YES!

"Mr. Justice, are you attempting to practice LAW from behind the bench?"

HAHA!!!

Dean Clifford: EXCELLENT!!!!!! But you didn't get your cheque for the false claims. lol I think I heard this strategy before somewhere.....now where was that......OH YEAH! From ME! July 16 at 12:13am — Like · 8

Dean Clifford Lien the court file, claim all equity in it, demand to be paid the sum certain value of the false claim, close the account and PAY ME!

Dean Clifford That's an Order, I'm Tony Fucking Montana!