it's not this stuff that could be blamed or held at fault. it IS however the incorrect application by spoke and/or understanding which is liability. (and if i have made a mistake please forgive me) [hint: the 'court' has no mouth to spoke from, and can not object to a request, especially after having just been put on notice].
next mouth that opens is liable, except yours when you make a declaration that there has been no objection, so noted.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 1169Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 1169 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.