Jul 12, 2013 3:34 PM

Pick your favourite strategy Gail:

Isn't it an offer to contract?

A BIG 'No contract, opened in error, return to sender' written diagonally across the envelope in RED.

Conditional Acceptance, with your terms (eg: $50.00 for every letter opened, $100.00 for each response, $150.00 for any cheques written & $400.00 per hour or part thereof...if I receive any further correspondence, then it is deemed tacit agreement between the parties that they accept the terms)

Notice of Mistake...the slam dunk

It probably all depends if you want to just make it go away, or for shits & giggles see what response a low key approach gets, then up the ante until you reach your outcome.

Thanks to you both.....would I write anything on the ticket or just send it to them with one of the above strategies?

That's a great question...check with the oracle Scott Duncan if their offer can be stamped 'VOID' and just returned to them

Is not voiding an OFFER to contract a DISTINCT "No Contract" ?

Send it back with NO CONTRACT mentionned on it, in red ink.......and wait :D

I'm ahead of you, I did that, and they've just sent me a BoE and telling me that a PERSON decided to enter a plea for me :D

Now, I am asking them, in writing, WHO entered a plea for my PERSON and what is his address and inscription number :D

Yes. Stop scheduling for MONEY.

And Gail, as you can see, Scott Duncan liked my posts here, and that gives me a tinggling sensation :D, I am the MINORITY for sure, because the MAJORITY don'T SEE THIS TINGGLING THING THE SAME AS i. :d

So fee schedules are no good then Scott? ?

I just had cyber sex...my key board on my phone is a fucking mess...lol..lol...lolllllllllLlll

They are good for rendering the security worthless to them.

If you tear a cheque in half, or you stamp VOID across it, then NOBODY can benefit.

Sorry was that a MISTAKE...lol... ;-D

All ORDERS, ENDORSEMENTS, CHARGES, MOTIONS, FORMS...these are all BILLS OF EXCHANGE that GROW AND GROW as they are PROCESSED. The winner gets to have a credit on an ACCOUNT.

How do they render the security to worthless Scott?

and if its voided, why would the lawyer be on the hook?

Fee schedules are LEGAL because they DESTROY the SECURITY INSTRUMENT.

Credit on an ACCOUNT?? What about credit OF acvount?? How do they differ ?

they don't

Any security that has been Voided , destroyed, ripped up just doesn't exist anymore AS A Financial INSTRUMENT. ????

That is correct.

So how do I get credit on an account then please Scott? ?

YOU DON'T

Only DISCHARGE? Re Adam Thomas question.

Ok they do then?..

No chad. Discharge is settlement.

Depends on WHY you are setting fees.

Setting fees to Rape the rapists back

THAT'S NEVER going to happen. THEY KNOW what money is. YOU don't.

Fee schedules are LEGAL because they DESTROY the Security instrument .......because unless a fee has BEEN paid then how could the security instrument exist????

No not fully yet I don't but I AM getting there thanks to you Scott :-D

Thanks Adam Thomas I realized I had typed to soon from the other thread. I knew it was wrong as I was posting :(

It's ALL ACCOUNTING AND SURETY!

Why has the learning/comprehension increased ten-fold in the last 2 weeks? Before it was in idle now it's at least going down the road.

I would have a Notice of Mistake on hand anyways, notarized... Everyone that I know that has sent back a ticket "no contract" or "void", they just send back a court date... Send the notice with it...

Scott Duncan, EVERYTIME you say that I want to transpose all this LEGAL stuff (words,definitions yadda yadda, procedures) into a standard double entry set of books.

I had not received ANY court date Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, so now you know someone who didn't :D

Someone will enter a PLEA on Gail Blackman at some point.....Then the fun begin...

That's actually a VERY effective way to think, Chad.

Thanks for that Scott Duncan. I have not done it yet because I am not sure of which angle to take. 1) The books of the Land. Or from 2) The books of the Government or 3) The books of Me. I get stumped on that part. I really think it should be The books of the land with the Government and people being the customers.

I think the Government are the customers... The other way around.

Want to add 4l Or from the TRUST.

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma it is tough call. I keep thinking one way then changing it. Just going in circles peeing in the center of the room.

I always tell my customers that if they wanna buy, buy, if they don't wanna buy, bye bye...!!!!

I admit this is my presumption, but let's say that the vehicle tagged had a sticker on its plate. Will the parking violation remain attached as a matter of record to the licence plate, and when the party attempts to apply for sticker renewal, will the parking violation amount be added to the sticker renewal fee even if one responded with NO CONTRACT, NoM etc?

Chad, id much prefer the book of ne.

IF that happens, go to court, and elect up to indictment. :D

Siegs....me...& lights off till morn. Gnight y'all. .

Fuckin poms are killing us in the Ashes....

where do I go to learn what "elect up to indictment" means?

It won't happen. It will likely go to collections.

what are the implications or expected interactions if it goes to collections?

in other words, what does one do then? As the violation fee reamins attached to the sticker/plate during the passage of time....and if that renewal comes up....well, it's not gonna happen unless the full amount+ violation fee is settled, no?

I only think of what Scott Duncan SCREAMS ..ALL...the time. (Is the Man trying to tell us something?) He has that phrase permanently copied on the clipboard ready for immediate deployment with a 2lb. trigger pull. So thinking about that the conclusion I came to is that I hear *law, writs, orders, summons yaddayadda* when I should be thinking, Law equates to what in Accounting? Writs equate to what in Accounting and so on. Thought it would be a good idea to start thinking in Accounting terms when I hear Legal words.

in an effort to settle this in the private, before court, could you do the free man Menard and send them a letter like the one on page 25 here.. http://thewaterengine.com/law/Letters_to_Authorities.pdf and change the questions to suit your situation? As questions negate understanding and also shows an attempt to take care of this honorably? Please let me have no tingling sensation.

if using a freetard method is wrong, forgive me.

How can freetard could be right ? :/ ... freetard = being retard for free ? :D

Robert Menard taught me to OPEN my eyes and realize that we do not live in the world we think we live in. Right OR wrong I am grateful to him for that.

Everything Robert Menard says about the law is true. He lies through omission... because he likes Money of exchange.

This is fabulous...thank you all!

I refuse for cause unless they can clarify the conditions they are offering , I also tell them that since they epect me to work for this I charge them 50 bucks an hour for my time in processing . So " refused for cause and clariication " across the face and on the back I bill them for time .

I also like to put a little red star at the top right hand corner just to make them wonder :)

The RIGHT ANSWER is the RIGHT ANSWER. It doesn't matter WHO says it. :D

Bonus points for the "Red Star (tm)" Uber hysterical! :D

Fuck...bonus time already..? Red Star...hmmm....that sounds RACIST...... :-)"

Are you picking on us Jew Kunts again Scott ??.

Red Kneck.....K....

Ch” Geuvera. ..Red Star mofo....

I don't get the red star thing :(

Is the Red CZstAR.a lil spolier for us jew kunts being kunts ??

Pete Daoust, the red star is a brain fuck for them as they all stand around the water cooler trying to figure out what it means, which is nothing , to them, just us.

Red Lighting us jew/jesuit kunts....

Ha, that's why I could not get it :D Thanks Chad Brodgesell

Troll...troll...lol...lol...lolllllll....uber piss funny :-D

Instead of the redstar I was thinking of sending in a Polaroid shot of a Kraft Caramel

funny, that star thing gave me a few ideas :D

I haven't seen a troll this good since National Geographic's Evolution Issue.

You're forgetting the Preening North American Cam Slut. *sheesh*

Huh...Tara. ..who's the Nth american cam slut ......hahagahahahHahHahaha

Got me....

Sheesh....oh thats hilarious....full points for the red star. ..that is awesomely hilarious in its entirity.....Reich-Roll'd

Evolution....Aaaaaarrrrrggggghhhhh. .. Aaaaaarrrrrggggghhhhh Screaming OUT LOUD..

It was Tara's response to someone who had mistakenly tried to form hostile intent against her. She did a Mock-Up of National Geographic, and wrote a FEATURE ARTICLE on the "Preening North American Cam Slut" (Duplicitus Sluttus). That's because National Geographic has a sense of humour. The Canadian Wildlife Fund threatened to sue us for the "Hinterland Who's Who" spot we were making...

Parties quickly resolved all disputes, lest Tara put REAL effort into the blow-back. :D Good Times. :D

Noooo...this is so funny..has anyone seen or heard from crazy man Dean Kory?? Just wondering what he's abouts are?? Strange how he's been slammed up gor talkin n walkin it.... same thing happened here to me. Strange goings on there...very strange indeed....

Oh wow...that sounds like a great read. Have ye a link I can read about it please Scott.

It might be in the internet archive. Tara has it on a backup somewhere. It's not published anymore.

We were doing the whole "blog" thing back in 1997. When Livejournal opened, we closed.

parking ticket. they are attempting to enjoin your auto in a contract, they placed a copy of it on it. I told them they can not charge me a fee to use land that I OWN, and they voided the ticket. (more to it than that but that is basically it in a nutchel.

Gail Blackman, just saw this one re Parking Fines in the UK... Probably applies equally where you are :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psuVLph2Y8Q

Scott Duncan: Fee schedules are LEGAL because they DESTROY the SECURITY INSTRUMENT.

"Accepting a fee or being paid back in return for acting as a surety is against the law." from derek's post containing http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/sureties.asp