QUESTION: Civil Code of Quebec ( I know it's boring to discuss this but I'm IN Quebec)
Article 397. A spouse who enters into a contract for the current needs of the family also binds the other spouse for the whole, if they are not separated from bed and board.
However, the non-contracting spouse is not liable for the debt if he or she had previously informed the other contracting party of his or her unwillingness to be bound.
QUESTION:So if my WIFE publish a Notarized LEGAL NOTICE in the newspaper saying that she has NOTHING TO DO with ANY of commercial stuff I'm contracting in, that should be enough for her to NOT suffer from my DECISIONS for my PERSON ?
Thanks
Pierre
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 44Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 44 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.Filter by poster
Read Comments 5
Scott N Tara · Roguesupport Nx
That would put the removal of presumption on the Public Record. You can then correct any presumption, by giving notice.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 45 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Cara Small
Excellent question Pete! VERY useful.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 45 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
OK, Roguesupport Nx, in that Notice, would it be ok and correct to SPECIFY: any PAST, present and future contract that MY husband is engaged in ?
Thanks
Pierre
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 45 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Stuart Stone
'nunc pro tunc' would probably be the phrase you're looking for Pierre
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 45 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
A judgment nunc pro tunc is an action by a trial court correcting a clerical (rather than judicial) error in a prior judgment. A nunc pro tunc may be signed even after the trial court loses its plenary power. For appellate purposes, a nunc pro tunc judgment correctly taken ordinarily does not extend appellate deadlines.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 45 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 5
Scott N Tara · Roguesupport Nx
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45
Cara Small
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45
Stuart Stone
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 45