Jul 04, 2013 10:52 PM

You just flat-out come up with the best-shit, Scott Duncan...thanks for this

You sure you want these "Lies" I'm telling you?

A "Truth Minister" said I was a DEMON, spreading lies, and blocking "The Truth".

..oh wait a second - is that a CANLII -tab, i see opened-up on your screen?? Have you been looking-up 'CASE-LAW, Scott!?

Clubhouse-RULES...and you did say- "WHY?" to the BAR, Scott ;)

LOL

Legal Name: Government of the Northwest Territories Operating As: Justice, Dept. of

also part of that listing.

My god Scott is right.

SCOTT IS ALWAYS RIGHT

NUMBER ONE RULE IN THIS GROUP! Not in the pretend way the POPE is "always right". I REALLY AM.

I just assumed you idiots would actually THINK and CHECK FOR YOURSELVES. I should have known better. I mentioned a long time ago...as I recall I was discussing the difference between a JUDGE and a JUSTICE.

So much for- NONE OF THIS IS HIDDEN...in this case, at least ;)

most definately. im slapping myself when i didnt look up justice sooner and screenied it when scott first brought it up.

looked up my police dept in pennsylvania and my city came up. gotta love those alternative streams of revenue for failing corporations.... :/

If you are in the US, it's ALL "alternative" revenue streams.

They are cleaning the evidence up, the government of Ireland , the court service of Ireland are all listed on it better get screenshots before they vanish also

"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact your Justice, that the GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO is currently 'Operating AS' Justice?"

..how did you refer to that again as, Scott- the 'Conflict of OATHS Doctrine?'

http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ReportSelectionCmd?dunsNumber=0&busName=THE%20GOVERNMENT%20OF%20IRELAND&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&address=GOVERNMENT%20BLDGS%2C%20UPR%20MERRION%20ST&city=DUBLIN&state=&zip=2&country=IE

That's something that throws me a bit Scott... D&B have THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND listed yet as you said the Government is not a corporation and not recognised as a Person... If you could shed some light on my confusion regarding this it would be a great help...

so since they remove or omitted province of Ontario listing, what other way to get it shown that JUSTICE operating as the PROVINCE OF ONTARIO.

This just goes to show that ever case or proceeding is already stacked against you because the crown attorney AND the JUSTICE presiding over the case both have a vested interest to profit and therefor require you to give your time and labour to GET that money to PAY for the FINES that the COURT ORDERED YOU to PAY AND/OR imprison YOU because YOU APPEARED without REBUTTING the JURISDICTION of the COURT.

"Do you take Judicial Notice of the fact your Justice, of the OATH you took to Queen Elizabeth Windsor the Defender-of-the-Faith and the Keeper-of-the-Trust, in the performance of your duties and/or obligations on the Bench and/or presiding over the court here today?"

This is even more obvious that the COURTS do not care what you say most often. Why take the chance and HOPE you can win when you can kill it before it even starts.

That is why it is even more important that everyone understands the NOTICE OF MISTAKE. It always has been just about accounting. Therefor, you already lost(unless you have a fucking amazing clear cut case against the crown).

Don't waste your time dealing with clubhouse rules(with very few exceptions) as the reasons are:

1. You are not part of the club. 2. You are not qualified 3. You are not surety unless you consent and agree with FULL knowledge 4. You do not know or have understanding of ALL of THEIR LAWS. 5. Contract = Law. This is important. Notice of Mistake rebuts all presumptions that contracts has been made past present and future.

OK, I admit it. I didn't see this one coming... :D

Derek Hill, you are the LAST one I'd expect to truly demonstrate UNDERSTANDING of NOTICE OF MISTAKE.

...yet here you are.

Fuck, I was just about to write this myself :D

Scott Duncan, I used it so much that I beaten the thing into my head. 6 times I used it alone for "possession of marijuana" charges. ALL withdrawn(didn't bother liening).

I also used it for 2 charges of uttering a death threat to cops. 1 was flipping the bird. The other I told the cop to "die".

The last marijuana charge I didn't have time to get a notice of mistake but I had it drilled in my head, so I told them that I must make an affidavit orally. My affidavit was the same shit in the notice. Sufficient to say the charge was dropped.

Now I smoke weed around cops and I am left alone.

Point No.2 is the MOST important to me !! :D

DEREK- share these experiences with the rest of the group and you wont be getting chirped-at as much as you are, this shit is fucking GOLD!

share with who?

With US !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why there is nothing to say other than the notice of mistake works flawlesslty

for as long as you understand the meaning of those words.

Well, just maybe post a thread saying: NOTICE OF MISTAKE STRIKES AGAIN, or some stuff like that, :D

ill make one when i get back into Windsor.

which it will be late tonight 11pm. So after that ill work on it, e don't got much, like no transcripts or w/e. But i will do what i can

Pete Daoust, are you not working for the information? Expecting Derek Hill, to just dole it out? lol

No, I ask Derek Hill to SHARE his experience, if he want to, of course....if he DOSEN'T want to share it, it's ok as well.....that's it !!

I thought you had it conquered, Peirre?

Sorry Leigh OftheHouseof Collins, I don't get it :)

lets take it further. This notice of mistake applies to ALL COURTS. Including restraining orders, Child Support Payments and other similar things that you may encounter.

When I was talking to Scott Duncan, he said to lien the case file so you can claim all the equity(right term?) in that case file. I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now that I see that a court file number is just a business account number for the province of Ontario, it HAS YOUR NAME. CLAIM THE FILE NUMBER and EVERYTHING IN IT.

You can then direct it how you see fit.

Since you claimed all the value of the case file number, who is going to object to you putting your stuff in there?

This comment is speculative So maybe some direction from Scott Duncan would help.

You are correct again!

..im guessing THEIR corporation-number would be somewhere on this link? ;)

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000074615&owner=exclude&count=40&hidefilings=0

Clearfield Doctrine

"Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." -

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942) What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation.

As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder- in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom demands for specific performance are made.

And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.

This case is very important because it is a 1942 case after the Erie RR v. Tomkins 304 U.S. 64, (1938) case in which the Legislatures and Judiciary changed from legislating under "Public Law", which was in consonance with the CONstitution, to legislating under "Public Policy" according to the wishes of the "Creditors of the US Corporation".

that screenshot was for the Public Prosecution Service of Canada listed on Dun and Bradstreet, sorry quality poor will try to fix

This group is getting better and better... I'm gonna drop in more often, as much as I can't stand stand facebook

Steve Lemieux, you won't have to do it much longer.

I have to finish the OpenID parts (because fuck registrations) and http://thetenderforlaw.com is done.

Do I get a password? ;)

thetenderforlaw.com will be its OWN OpenID node too, in case you don't want to associate it with any account...plus you can CREATE Facebook and Google accounts BASED on your Tender for law ID.

Yes it will be that fucking cool. :D

i assume its not quite done yet?

Did they ever eventually put back-up on that page, Scott- GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO is currently 'Operating AS' Justice?