The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 3

Jul 03, 2013 12:58 PM

Gail Marie

I posted this on Trent's page, if you don't think it's accurate Scott Duncan, you can remove from the TFL.

I'm grateful to Scott for various reasons...he may be alot of things but one thing I trust in him is that he is not a liar....if you reread the convo...you will notice that the suggestion was made that he lied. That is an ad hominen attack..

Ad hominem attacks during discussions = loss of credibility + no increased awareness/learning

An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance

The piece of information he was explaining is a KEY to freedom. I always say, if you can make it in that group you can make it anywhere...I'm forced to critically think everything before I post a question even. That in itself goes against our programming which is what makes the group so valuable.

The other thing is, none of it is personal, even the law is not personal, it's our own ignorance that gives us that impression. We all comprehend that our person is different then us the living being. In the group, think as a living being (critically), but recognize that the 'person' is our programming. When Scott responds, it's the 'person' thinking/programming that he is responding to, not the living being.

I posted this on Trent's page, if you don't think it's accurate Scott Duncan, you can remove from the TFL. I'm grateful to Scott for various reasons...he may be alot of things but one thing I trust in him is that he is not a liar....if you reread the convo...you will notice that the suggestion was made that he lied. That is an ad hominen attack.. Ad hominem attacks during discussions = loss of credibility + no increased awareness/learning An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an argument made personally against an opponent instead of against their argument.[2] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as an informal fallacy,[3][4][5] more precisely an irrelevance The piece of information he was explaining is a KEY to freedom. I always against our programming which is what makes the group so valuable. The other thing is, none of it is personal, even the law is not personal, it's our own ignorance that gives us that impression. We all comprehend that our person is different then us the living being. In the group, think as a living being (critically), but recognize that the 'person' is our programming. When Scott responds, it's the 'person' thinking/programming that he is responding to, not the living being.
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 104 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_532427420126528
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 36

Scott Duncan

This is VERY accurate. Nice work Gail.

You are correct, I never target the Living Being, as I need them for labour in the death camps I'm building...

...did I say DEATH camps? I meant HAPPY Camps. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 105
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 105 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Also backed by me too Gail Blackman......but when dumb people aren't qualified to even ASK the question because they never went to the University of Shut The Fuck Up & actually ATTACK THE MESSENGER THEN WE MUST AS ONE BACK EACH & EVERYONE THAT DOES THE ATTACK AGAINST THE CAPTAIN. ....Or just piss yourself laughing because of their programming of BELIEF IS ALL WRONG=2+2=10

Gail Marie

programming is a powerful thing...most don't realize they even are programmed. The way one feels about themselves has alot to do with it ;)

Much of our programming results from our being forced to submit to others way of thinking and perspective. I think most that have been banned from this group or take issue with Scott, have trouble seeing that we aren't being forced to submit to Scott, but to ourselves. It's quite amazing how we've been manipulated, so many layers, I'm happy to be aware of it, to recognize it and begin to unravel it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 105
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 105 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I HAVE to do it. I promised to.

I don't have to abide ignorance and belief. The notion that I must "respect" the idiocy of the programming people embrace (and they DO embrace it) is one of the main reasons that I have such harsh responses when such idiocy is presented as "truth" that I must "disprove".

People fare MUCH better here when they accept that they ARE programmed. This is why they think wrong, and value the wrong things.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 105
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 105 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

When Trent asked the question "where do you spend your Scottie-bucks?", he revealed that he was targeting ME and ignoring what I was saying...

...and Derek Moran, even stepped in and pointed it out. You buy MY currency, and you PAY me with it. How fucking hard is that to grasp? It happens on EVERY midway, on a fairground. Where do you spend the tickets you buy at a midway?

That is why he got removed, and why I intend to kill his revenue stream. You don't get to be intentionally stupid, and claim you have information that has value.

...and that one IS offensive to me. The concept of SELLING information is the lowest form of fraud.

Look at EVERY project I have a hand in. There is a FREE and a buy-to-help-support option. You can sell your own Linux distribution for as much as people will pay for it, but you MUST have a free/community version... It's the law ;)

I have a SERIOUS problem with those who CHARGE MONEY for information. I used to do lectures. Packed venues! I did it because I was asked to. Nothing else. I was never paid (though every time, I was offered). To accept would go against everything I know to be true.

Loving Christians brought an end to that. I learned that adults with imaginary friends will try to harm you, when they hear things they don't like. Even worse, Government workers will use the "offended Christian" act to inflict violence. When they pretended to offended MUSLIMS and actually hurt people I cared about, then I stopped.

Plus, as I said, I am keeping a promise. No amount of money is worth breaking that promise.

...and I WILL NOT "respect" the "beliefs" of others, no matter how "arrogant" you think that makes me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 106
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 106 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

"People fare MUCH better here when they accept that they ARE programmed. This is why they think wrong, and value the wrong things."

Signed, M. Night Shyamalan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4NFdLBnD0g

Play video
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 107
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 107 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top