The Tender For Law

Apr 29, 2013

Romley StewartRom Stover

Apr 29, 2013

Meeting today with the CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL asking for the sovereitn or royal assent documents. The council was issued notice in relation to a request for a meeting today. The meeting was not granted and we were ordered to leave the council by the security. We were not shown any royal assents or any other document of authority from the CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL. Letter below. http://romstover.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/asc-meeting-with-the-cairns- council-29-4-2013-jpg/ asc-meeting-with-the-cairns-council-29-4-2013.jpg Imageasc-meeting-with-the-cairns-council-29-4-2013.jpg29MondayApr 2013 Posted by capitisdiminutiokey in Uncategorized≈ Leave a CommentAbout these adsShare this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeLoading... ROMSTOVER — Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 1016 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

http://romstover.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/asc-meeting-with-the-cairns-council-29-4-2013-jpg/

Read Comments 4

Pete Daoust

Apr 29, 2013 2:52 PM

Pete Daoust What is your goal with this..???? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 1017 (printed 14 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Apr 29, 2013 2:58 PM

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers It would seem they are trying to showcase an ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT Pierre. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 1017 (printed 14 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Apr 29, 2013 3:19 PM

Pete Daoust Good Luck !!!! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 1017 (printed 14 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Romley StewartRom Stover

Apr 30, 2013 3:33 AM

Rom Stover I don't want to accuse anyone of anything and the best way to find out if the Australian People that work for such foreign corporate entities, in order to take money-energy, from their fellow Australians, is to aske them if they are committing any criminal act first. Even section 514 of the CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1899, Personage, would be violated just by claiming the driver license name appearing as either: SMITH JOHN DOE or SMITH or JOHN DOE? not one of thoes designations appear on any birth record instrument. The Birth Certificate is just: "John Doe" and the so called "Family" name does not appear. If the Council Persons can tell us if they are unlawful, then that is their claim, we don't have to accuse them, the admitt their own crime. If they don't respond to the question, the agree by default, if they say they are not a member of a foreign entity standing under another name, then prove it with the royal assents or whatever they presume to be lawful authority, but the outcome is that they must tell us what they are, who they are and what their intention is, it's not up to me or the Sovereign Council to make that claim that they are anything, we ask them to make that claim. If they lie, I guess they are then in contempt. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 1017 (printed 14 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.