Jun 29, 2013 11:26 PM

...I'll just be whistling in the corner pretending I didn't just read that :P

Does "squabbling" also include making repeated references to your failed relationships, the size of your genitals, being offended that your grammar and spelling are so bad as to be nonsensical, or steadfastly ignoring any and all relevant information in your quest to make a net-date?

FUCK'YA- i second THAT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_O62ntunBY4

Absolutely! Anything NOT CONTENT-RELEVANT!

Pay attention, listen more than you speak. If you do speak, stick to things you have first-hand knowledge of, and asking the right questions.

People answering questions, stick to things you have FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE OF.

Stating opinions doesn't work. There are no opinions in law, there's truth or lies.

Kate Butler, the fact that I now have this from you in WRITTEN form pleases me....

Muahahahahahah!

If I had a problem with that, I wouldn't have said it.

FUN FACT: In 100% of cases where a party does not feel a cold chill go down their spine, when I maniacally laugh, said party did not understand the situation.

This will be no different :P

I read your last comment and am tempted to stop speaking. Perhaps just a few more sentences for Pierre.

If I'm hearing you correctly, you would, by extrapolation, like to experience death to determine how to more fully understand how not to die. You might like to stick your hand in an oven to learn about how to avoid getting burned.

The goal is to live a meaningful life unencumbered by the requirement to be kidnapped, incarcerated, beaten, inconvenienced, financially burdened...by any person or institution.

You can do that most effectively by following the advice in this post.

All I have stated, are the personal guidelines I try to stick to.

Shush (preemptively) Pierre. Don't spoil the moment.

*whistling in the corner*

Ok...sorry...I'm out looking for a corner...

Be the corner.

Ok, I'm done. As you were.

*Pees in corner*

I always feel like a Chillaen Engineer when when I read stuff like this. I think about the 80+ miners trapped and the awesome engineering they threw together to save them.... and they all thank "God" and say it was "a miracle".

We'll just use this as a teaching aid, next time... and we all know there will be a next time. :D

HALLELUJAH!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbG8p7smrOM

"if I had spent the last seven months arguing, instead of listening, learning, and asking the right questions..." - This is correct.

She spent the first four months doing that. :P

But NOT the last three, and that was the point :D

AND, the arguing was NOT done on here...

...NOTICE for PARTICULARS? :/

If all non-relevant comments got squashed, we would see 99% fewer posts.

That imply EVERYBODY I guess ? What you have just wrote Chad imply Everyone in here...you realize that I guess ? Even Scott an Tara's posts.....unless, of course, I have no idea how numbers work :-D

(let me just clarify, that statement in NO way implies that all the STUPID is gone yet)

I guess it would help if Facebook had actually posted the ORIGINAL comment first...

Let's try this again:

It was a looooong four months, with MANY hours spent onboard, verbally beating the STUPID out of my head!

:-D

I reserve the right to post irrelevant comments...

...I have yet to post an irrelevant comment, but I like to keep my options open.

I can not remember seeing Tara post any non-relevant comments or posts. Do you have to instigate shit most of the time Pete Daoust? Or is it a personal affliction you have that you are still looking for a remedy for ? You again miss the point of my comment. You really can't stand it when people stand up to you even if they may be wrong, you just want to create (see that) CREATE controversy.

Uhh, okay, so that would make you The Pot,then? Your responses to Pierre are EVERY bit as controversial...

Do you know what is 99% ?

I have read your comments with all the caring as possible....and it did NOT made sense to me...so I did ask ... That:s it

Your reaction is the same as COPS....

Scott Duncan, this is your group. Anything you post is on topic. Pete Daoust, 99% of what I post could be construed as not relevant. It is better then the 100% when I started.

I've been dealing with guys like you since I'm very young Chad....I've been ASKING questions when it did not made sense.....and I've been in trouble for doing this countless times...you have no idea man....

Unfortunatly, I KNOW what is 99%, even as a TOKEN, I know what it means...and ANYONE that says 99% of what is in here is irrelevant, is either lying or pulling shit out of his ass. Which one is YOU Chad ?

Pete Daoust, your trolling is getting boring now and very predictive. I would question as to why you have been in trouble countless times but I know the answer so I do not need too. Troll somewhere else please. I can not speak for others but you almost make me want to never comment nor ask questions here. You seem to pop up right after you see my name in the comment section like jack in the box toy. Please go back in your box , if not then at least leave your obnoxious side there. Very tiring.

Even cops that read this group can't say that :-D n'est-ce pas Monsieur l'agent ? :-D

Lol...I pop up every time I see something that makes no sense...and it happens to be YOU often, and it's not my fault...sorry Sir

Should I call you OFFICER ? :-D

Or you should have say: Thinking of it Pierre, maybe you're right, 99% is a bit exagerate....maybe I should have say 58%, or 45%, or NOTHING, because it's just very complicated to count ALL these posts, figure out which one is irrelevant, and take ALL divided by Ireelevant, which will give you the right number, but wait, considering that YOU decide which one is irrelevant or not, that could be a problem...and a false number could occur...mmmhhhhh ?????

Also it is 'would' "That would imply" What is 'it'? You said you know what 'it' means. What is it? "Which one is YOU Chad?"....what the fuck? Sorry, what the fuck are you talking about? Go back on your Medication. I asked you if you were a cop the other day. Stands until rebutted, but even then your attitude is cop like so carry on Pete Daoust, been nice talking with you. Bored now.

Chad, EVERYONE knows I'm not a cop in here....EVERYONE....ask if you think I'm wrong ?....just ask...as asking.. :D

Pierre. When you make a relevant post, I always mention it, because it's rare...like albino Pygmies.

So, ask yourself, How many times have I mentioned your post is relevant?

I don't remember...oh wait, once it happens :D

I felt sooooo...gggooooddddd... :D

I haven't did it on intent though.. :/, I had NO IDEA it was

So "less than 1% (I'm VERY generous here, if you do the actual math) of your posts are relevant, leaving 99% irrelevant, and the content of this forum would not suffer if everything you ever wrote here was purged; correct?

Let that sink in...

We were NOT talking about MY posts...we were talking about ALL posts...correct ?

No, Pierre. We are talking about YOURS.

Chad on the other hand RARELY speaks unless he has a question, or needs a point clarified.

Chad is my gauge as to how annoyed/frustrated the cops reading your writing has caused. :D

If it annoys Chad Brodgesell, it must be driving cops, batshit. :D

I rounded the numbers in favor of the stupid.

That's awesome Chad Brodgesell. Just like our educational system.

So I'm usefull in here ?

Or not ?

What do YOU think, Pierre?

Here, use this as a reference. Don't come back until you have read them all. Know my pain.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/search/?query=Pete%20Daoust

ay ay ay!!! what were you talking about Kate? i forgot already. we need a TTFL Shadow Group where people can go and blow off steam and sort out personal stuff (if thats even possible) mixed in with a few legal terms and trivial facts and EVERYONE doesnt have to read it and read it again later as they search through posts AND maybe never even know it happened!!! i would love to not know what going on ;)

Ah, the irony of it all....my post on "Pointless bickering" has turned into...POINTLESS BICKERING. It takes TWO people to argue. What exactly do you expect, when you choose to make antagonistic responses?

ok...see you in jail and/or in hell....and again, I am sorry if I have cause ANY pain to ANY one, but here, right now, I am right, and the ONLY thing I see, is this Chad guy have a SPECIAL PROTECTION of some type, he must be a family member, or someone you like a lot......so I'm gone...bye and thanks for everything....if I can help for anything in the futur....call me.

Pete Daoust, just another tip here on how to learn from reading posts. When I print out a great topic that has over 500 posts I redact all the posts by certain members. It shortens the useless reading which takes time otherwise. Sometimes I redact mine too, as they make no sense to the OP and why re-read shit I posted myself. Only problem is the black ink cartridge just does not last like it used too.

I'm going to post a section of a private conversation that took place, oh, about the same time Kate made her original post - apologies for making the private public, but I don't want to retype the same basic thing.

Not paraphrased, it goes exactly like this:

"On another note, welcome to the world of posting interesting and relevant commentary. If history has shown me anything, you will now need to post-sit for a while and drive the point home.

A large number of people will "like" the comment and think it is meaningful and relevant. Some of those same people will heed your advice for 10-15 minutes, and eventually it will devolve into conversations with [edit: people] posting bad videos, talking about their throbbing erections, and squabbling about the direction of the post.

Enjoy!"

Okay, just to be clear, Chad Brodgesell ,this: "Pete Daoust, your trolling is getting boring now and very predictive. I would question as to why you have been in trouble countless times but I know the answer so I do not need too. Troll somewhere else please. I can not speak for others but you almost make me want to never comment nor ask questions here. You seem to pop up right after you see my name in the comment section like jack in the box toy. Please go back in your box , if not then at least leave your obnoxious side there. Very tiring." is pretty antagonistic. This was NOT just a post directed at Pierre....

(Meaning MY post, was not meant to single out any ONE person)

I have no special protection Pete Daoust. I also post shit too. Like this thread, except for the first COMMENT I made. Which was JUST a comment.

Yes. I multiply Chad Brodgesell's posts by a factor of 10 and that's what I figure the cops feel right now. :D

Kate Butler, that posted comment WAS directed solely at Pete Daoust. There is being irritating and then there is being downright obnoxious. Add trolling to that.

Now I have wasted (as well as others) my only time I had today for learning on trying to deal with this shit. I was wanting to do some learning. FUCK this pisses me off.

CSIS guys must be SO frustrated and annoyed right now! :D

The Chad-o-meter is really twitchy today! :D

CALM [........./.] ANNOYED

Ok then, reclaim some value. Kate is freshly back from some pretty awesome court work. Scott is here. If you had an interesting question, now would be the time to ask.

Then why do you CHOOSE to argue/respond in antagonistic ways, rather than just ignoring any comments that are NOT relevant?

Just a suggestion there are a million religtard pages to troll on facebook that's what i do :)

Kate Butler, I 'choose' to when it is DIRECTED at ME. This is what this group is about is it not? In learning how to deal with people that come after you? ? Well? Not trying to be 'controversial' but is this not why we are all here? To stand up and say "Hey! Why are are you meddling in my

Affairs" ? Well?

Tara Duncan, you are right. All I had was an observation regarding the OP. All my questions are trivial to the group so I will only ask if it is concise and also what I really want to ask. Most of the time I find that any question I might ask has already been answered in previous posts if I but read them. Bloody hell be to jesus all this over a comment.:)

No, I'm here to LEARN, not quibble over personal opinion. There is no need to turn questions into a personal attack. And it might help to remember that the person asking you the questions that you are so offended by, English is NOT his first language. And if I recall correctly, he's mentioned having to use software to translate messages. So chances are, a great deal of the questions you are taking so personally, are simply Pierre trying to grasp what is being said, on the other side of the language barrier.

Either way, it's all about perception. One person can't argue all by themselves. If you choose to view a comment as a personal attack, and respond in kind, it has just become an argument.

I'm not a big fan of arguments. Discussions maybe, but I never find arguments are productive. My personal life involves people with uber-alpha personalities who rarely, if ever, have arguments.

We're all human (presumably), and it is human nature to take things personally. The problem with doing this is that you tend to be less effective in your interactions.

Observations are good. Questions are great, if they're relevant. It's even fine to have fun - I'm also a big fan of this, otherwise, why do anything?

Kate is right in that people whose retarded comments are ignored will either think of something more productive to say, or wander off eventually.

Don't worry too much about making a comment or asking for clarification just because you think it may have been covered elsewhere. If you ask the same question 15 times, however, it may be time to think about finding a hobby that doesn't involve deep thought.

In other news, I finally found "this note is legal tender" on one of the new see-through $20 bills. It took 5 minutes, a pair of reading glasses and a magifying glass. Holy "fine print" batman!

I should also mention that I declared it to NOT be there and was told by you-know-who to keep looking because it MUST be there. Bloody know-it-alls.

This is the "Will Preach Leeman" argument; "You're too mean to be right, and you're right all the time, but you're mean so it doesn't count".

Plus nobody else has a chance to be right, because I FUCKING RESERVED THEM ALL! :D

...and Jesus will get me too, apparently.

LaNi Black is reading and like-raping my posts in this thread. :D

Your obsession with being stalked by some Mexican guy is mildly distrubing :D

I disagree with you. Maybe I should emulate his method of 'language barrier' and see what happens. I do not think that you nor anyone else would be okay with that. Yet when someone trolls you , you are suggesting that it simple be "Oh well, let it go. It is not worth it to respond"? Is this not what people all around the world are doing right now? Is this not what the Government wants you to do? Just cave in? Is this not the CORE problem of the world today? People ALLOWING others to run over them? MY perception is, if you come after me I will respond. If you disagree with someone choosing to respond to ANY FORM of attack upon themselves is that not what your local government and above want of you? To tell someone else that it is not right for them to respond to an attack against them? So Kate Butler, Who do YOU want me to go to or what form do you want me to fill out to 'Complain'? . I disagree with you. Some one comes after me I WILL RESPOND. . THIS IS WHY WE ARE HERE. To learn HOW TO RESPOND WHEN SOMEONE COMES AFTER YOU. If I am wrong on this.... Someone with admin authority on this group BAN me NOW as I can recall upon joining this group "NON topic discussion will get you banned." Do you not ***SEE*** the lower layers here? This argue/controversy IS the reason why we are here. Sht I hope I said all that right. FUCKING BAN me IF I am WRONG in the intent.

Who Jesus? Hell yes. The fucker packs rusty garden tools!

The CSIS crowd must be pulling their hair out. :D

With whom do you disagree Chad? We can't squabble without a target.

Every time I see CSIS in print I can't help thinking about NISA.

http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/Shows/More+Shows/InSecurity/Web+Exclusives/ID/2157149171/

To paraphrase Dan, "You're my rock, Scott Duncan"!

http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/Shows/More+Shows/InSecurity/Web+Exclusives/ID/1648330836/?page=3

Chad you are a flamers wet dream. If you block him he will never see your post or you see his again. Problem sorted with minimal effort on your part.

just my two cents worth, Chad your latest responses of questioning is a good way to respond, rather then defending which causes the controversy, where as questioning creates discussion and also provides an opportunity to clarify intents and perceptions? As-King ;)

Very clever Gail Blackman. I hope Scott doesn't see this - he likes this sort of thing. Ask him about "therapist".

ok I'll bite..Scott Duncan would you like to share something about "therapist"?

OOO yes! If I MUST be employed, THAT is the job I want! What OTHER profession allows you to put PSYCHO THE RAPIST on their business card! :D

Hell yes!

Gail Blackman doesn't like-rape my posts like she used to :(

I can only assume it's age catching up...

Ha!

Sorry, I apologize and beg forgiveness for my not naming who I was responding to Tara Duncan. The Long ramble was to Kate Butler.

Make that "IF I had just gone..."

I could be wrong, But I'm PRETTY sure that I had just gone into court, pissed off, and just argued...again, would NOT be sitting here now. Just sayin'....

Learning to competently, and RATIONALLY respond to an attack, that's what I'm here to learn. No one is going to take you seriously if you are just angry and lashing out.

*pees in corner*

Bwahahahahaa!

that is exactly how I see this group....if I can make it here I can make it anywhere lol

Crap - I had just stopped laughing. It's a good think I wasn't drinking something.

Would you like me to pee on you Gail Blackman?

Well Kate, at no time did you mention the words childish or arrested development. You have to use all the words in a good court document. And/or is your friend.

that is a generous offer Scott Duncan, I will order you pay it forward to another deserving member :P

If you say so, Gail.

You can see it in her eyes. Gail Blackman likes some fucked up shit. It's not an unreasonable question.

Did you mean "pee it forward"? I just want to make sure we're clear for the reading public.

hehe

I have decided to dump all this and Join the Free-Dumb movement as a pee-man-on-the-land.

This put me over the edge on my pee-man decision...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewdepaula/2012/11/08/teens-create-a-way-to-use-urine-as-fuel/

Noble cause. To actually paraphrase one of your favorite people, "You've got to chase your dreams, baby!"

Oh wait, that was you. Never mind, the comment stands.

See? Want me to pee on you, now that my urine has VALUE, Gail Blackman? :D

I would accept your offer of the pee along with one of the generators..and counter offer that it not be on me but placed in the generator :)

or is the suggestion of receiving urine generator along with the pee...a counter offer...who would have thought an offer for pee could get so complicated :P

...so, you DO want me to pee on you.

not on me no...and will accept your pee if the generator is also part of the contract....the pee is only valuable with the generator :P

Jesus said I have to pee on you.

he's not the boss of me!

Ask Rob Menard. He talks to Jesus all the time...

Well if you say so... but ...fire...brimstone...rusty garden tools!

I can't believe Scott didn't get in a dig for his favorite troll. So....ask Max Hardcore about the value of unrestrained pee in video masterpieces. I have a title, "Urine Nation"tm

GENIUS! Oh Gail... we MUST make porn!

Starring Sam Francisco and I.P. Nightly - I hope I make millions.

You gotta chase your dreams, baby!

you know the contract offer..accept, counter offer or decline and we'll see where we go from there

...but deep down inside, you KNOW you want to anyway.

contract = law

I suspect it only goes downhill from here Gail take the pee :D

TTFL now accepting applications for Jesus the Gardner, Miss Whistlewhetter, and Prince the Sheepdog. It will also be an endearing Disney-esque story of struggle, best friends, and eco-friendly energy.

No Gail - don't take the pee. We're just getting started. Carl may be working for the MPAA.

HEY! Pee-man-on-the-land... remember? Law doesn't apply to me. :P

if we make a private agreement....it does apply to you ;)

Kate Butler, you are not wrong. If you go into ANY court pissed off and arguing n screaming the obvious will happen to you. They will put you some where where hopefully you can not hurt your self or others. But you are making the assumption that AM LIKE THIS to everyone from your above reply. You would be wrong. Go back through ALL ***ALL*** my posts. Funny how it only happens AFTER ***Pete Daoust*** jumps on me. You your self are making assumptions which are false and because those assumptions are directed at me then I MUST RESPOND. This is Law is it not? An assumption stated stands until rebutted? See the layers here? This IS LAW. Right now! No rebuttal then the statement/assumption stands. Do you want me to 2 more layers down into the rabbit hole? Sorry, 1 more layer. I am not sure of the next yet. If I am wrong I am sure Scott will tear me a new one and Tara make it even wider with a broken bottle. I may not know the right words and/or phrase and/or definitions but I DO KNOW that all this LAW stuff in and of it self is only one layer. The LAW stuff does not scare me, the layer under that does. I too have been on court, one I lost next 4 I won. In not one of them did I argue or create controversy. Just angry and lashing out. Interesting. Sorry, are you saying that your response to going to court is not directly related to being 'angry' that someone has gone against you? Are you saying that 'lashing out' is not a direct response of protecting yourself from being attacked?

Yes but a private agreement with a pee-man-on-the-land is sealed with the other party consuming a litere of my semen. It's difficult to do, and takes a while to finish...it's not like signing in commerce. :P

I may already have the next level trademarked Tara :D

oh that is new information i dont remember that offer being on the table, I require time to give consideration to your offer

The litre of semen thing is NOT just me being gross either! It's an ancient tradition that i just made up! :D

Is there not a contractual "cooling off" period?

Does anyone else think of Carl for the role "Prince the Faithful Sheepdog" (unless your picture is not an accurate personal repesentation). :P

A LITRE! That's going to take a while. She'll have PLENTY of time to think about it.

I would think the sheepdog gets it allot easier than the sheep so sold (i know when to quit when i'm ahead) :D

ancient (n.) "standard-bearer," 1550s, a corruption of ensign

ensign (n.) late 14c., via Scottish, from Old French enseigne (12c.) "mark, symbol, signal; flag, standard, pennant,"

I see nothing related to pee in the definition of these words, although I guess it could be your mark lol

No, I dumped all that. I'm a Pee-an-on-the-land now. Think "Spider Pig/Harry Plopper".

I`m reading your mail Kate. After 7 months here I have found it essential to scroll through quickly when there are certain ramblings, arguing, one word sentence posts, and 50 of them in a row... Other than when someone comes on and wants to argue with Scott... those ones you do NOT want to miss!

Note to Kate: "squabbling and/or childish references and/or conversations involving obsenity or bodily fluids and/or retardo-speak and/or anything else that pisses me off" - HA - still on topic.

http://youtu.be/1R828rFd2aI

And we go straight to hell...but we're not squabbling!

Ah, but Chad, YOU were the one to reference this behavior as being what you have come here to learn. I'm saying, "lashing out" may be the programmed reaction, but the process of learning to "think right" includes examining the reasons WHY you have these pre-programmed results, and taking steps to think differently and react in PRODUCTIVE ways.

*pees in corner*

(Just to clarify, again, I am in NO way claiming to have mastered this skill yet, personally!)

Oh, and Fucks The Puppy was ALL-TIME!... and irrelevant to the purpose of the group... There was no arguing just a Tantrum Ending...

We're wasting a valuable fuel (and porn) source here so let me just say this.

The best web site disclaimer I ever saw was, "By entering this web site you agree not to sue me for any reason."

Perhaps another choice in telling people to stop pissing on the threads (see how I worked this in?) is to request that they only make comments that add to the discussion and/or don't piss everyone off.

I have often thought a play area for people who take things personally, or who can't stay on topic, would be a great idea; sort of like the short-bus thread to practice social interaction before going off into the adult area.

Thanks, Kate, for reiterating a good point.

Until that point, the biggest act of vandalism since The Great Library of Alexandria was torched by muslims...having a tantrum.

Fucks-The-Puppy was a tragic loss.

Scott Duncan, you have peed in the corner 3x in 27 hours and I have no evidence of you leaving the corner. Are you sitting in your own piss?

It's fuel baby! That shit gets burnt up as fast as I can pee it!

Sooooo......there is a generator in the corner with you?

Pmsl Chris Schulte

Carl...buy a vowel. What the fuck are you saying?

Yup....I was just looking it up too...ha

Pissing myself laughing

Is there anyone here NOT pissing themselves????

So...wasting fuel, then.

Scott, I also noticed that everytime something goes well, you seem to be happy and instantaneously start pissing. I have a dog who does that when I come home.............hehehe

PEE-MAN-ON-THE-LAND says:

Don't piss your future away!

("pee-man-on-the-land" and "Todd the Sexual Assault Prevention Lemur" are trademarks of Roguesupport Inc.)

I do like PEE-MAN-ON-THE-LAND, but PEE-ON-THE-LAND-MAN seems more accurate. I should prob trademark that....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv6pjoKLPSY

The infidel taunts you for your unfortunate medical condition. Shall I cast him out or smite him or something, sir?

I am sooooo sorry. I didn't realize it was a medical condition

PEE-MAN-ON-THE-LAND says: PEE-MAN-ON-THE-LAND is not a medical condition! :P

"pee-man-on-the-land" and "Todd the Sexual Assault Prevention Lemur" are trademarks of Roguesupport Inc.

Very well then, sir. Let's all take a moment and urinate in triumph!

He was only whistling in the corner until Pierre was told to be the corner poor chap is on the verge of drowning :D

Can we call you PMOTL for short?

See? Carl Dunne READS the thread and doesn't just PRESUME :P

ahhhh....so its Pierre that makes him urinate uncontrollably

Here's why... Know my pain.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/tenderforlaw/search/?query=Pete%20Daoust

*Runs straight to the corner* i'l finish him myself :D

Except for the fact that each time has been in response to a post of mine, and not Pierre's. (Except for the arrangement you and Gail Blackman are hashing out, that one's AAAAAAAAAAAALLLL on you guys! ;)

*pees in the corner*

See?! :)

A question to the members and admins here in this group. So we are only allowed to talk about law and such but not practice what is being explained/discussed? Interesting concept. Considering that IT IS THE INTENT of what is being spoken that holds higher ground rather then the form and/or wording. Is this not law? Some see arguing. Well if that is what you see, cool. Kate Butler, yes. Lashing out in productive ways. Have you not noticed that you RESPOND EVERY TIME I use your name in a post? I am asking you questions as to your posts for clarification. You might see this as lashing out. Now ask yourself how many posts you have made in the last say 2 weeks that I have DIRECTLY attacked you on some thing about those posts. Go back through all your posts and find out. Maybe you should reread my posts here in this thread. You just might find you where taking certain things for granted. I digress. The question again. Worded differently though. So here in this group we are not supposed to respond to DIRECT attacks and trolling? Well I have only one response to that. I will simple shut the fuck up and go back to lurk mode since there some valuable info here that I wish to partake of. I do this not because I do not want to respond and/or comment. I do this because trying to have a discussion here is impossible with people who can not see that this 'arguing' of mine is in reality just practicing law yet at the same time it is a RESPONSE that someone else started. This is just tiring now and a waste of time. Bye.

DUDE! This a FACEBOOK GROUP. A MASSIVELY disposable resource where you get FREE (Not "buy my super-secret DVD") information/knowledge.

In exchange for this MASSIVE VALUE in the CIA Data-mining pool that is Facebook, you follow whatever arbitrary rule an admin pulls out of his or her ass.

I hope that clears up any questions you may have on this issue.

...brought to you by Carl's Junior.

Is this, perhaps, some sort of strange new aversion therapy? Now, every time I open my mouth, a corner receives a golden shower? This seems to be more detrimental to your carpet, than anything else :D

Lurking can be a safe place... just ask Luis Ewing http://www.luisewing.com/

Finished in the corner if the need is there ..

That man did NOT lurk long enough...

Beverly...you should know three security alarms went off on our network, when you posted that link.

I have no doubt about that...

"DUDE! This a FACEBOOK GROUP. A MASSIVELY disposable resource where you get FREE (Not "buy my super-secret DVD") information/knowledge.

In exchange for this MASSIVE VALUE in the CIA Data-mining pool that is Facebook, you follow whatever arbitrary rule an admin pulls out of his or her ass.

I hope that clears up any questions you may have on this issue."

This is HILARIOUS, and 3 people "liked" it?

Are there any people on this forum, or are you a bunch of clever, but badly coded bots?

I fell asleep right after my last comment, which appears to be around the same time, and didn't see it til now. But definitely funny :)

hopefully no people, just male and female studients! oh, and there are 4 like's now! LOL