David Johansen I really hope that was a failed attempt at a joke.
If that's all it takes for you to think "sky-daddy", then you are far too stupid to be here.
You DON'T have a "guardian angel". The events you describe have nothing to do with "invisible sky daddies" , and your conclusion represent a profound inability to critically think.
...so there's NOTHING "pretty funny" about that. If you think that "proved" that an invisible sky-daddy is watching out for you, then you need to step out of this group and never come back, because the only thing that will possibly happen, is that you leave shit-stains on my forum.
The profound stupidity necessary to reach the conclusion that "sky daddy" is the most reasonable explanation could only come from the brain-damaged processor, that is the infection of the noble lie.
You need to start from scratch. You have NO critical thinking ability. The LEAST likely answer is what YOU think is the default position. Do you see the problem here?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 152Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 152 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.