Does the "NOTICE OF MISTAKE" work in child custody situations?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 158Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 158 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.Filter by poster
Read Comments 19
Scott Duncan
Sure!...when there is a mistake!
Sadly your parents REGISTERED the children. You can't UN-Register them.
HOW would you apply it? CUSTODY is a legal term. If you DON'T want custody, notice of mistake is good for that. ALL "Legal responsibility" for the child would be removed...
...I can't think of any other way to apply it.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 158Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 158 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Carl Dunne
As i see it surety is not the matter at hand in a custody as nobody is trying to extract value from you
Scott Duncan
That's the problem here. Nobody takes the time to actually UNDERSTAND the notice. They just think it's a "magic" document, that they can use to "waive" their problems away.
UNDERSTAND the documents you submit.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
Indeed
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Carl Dunne
I see that there is no magic document or sentance an understanding of law as a whole is what is required concentrate on one aspect at your own peril.
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
So the state can remove the child or give CUSTODY over to the other parent and there's no remedy?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Carl Dunne
The state own your child if they didn't you would not have that problem, i don't know what the remedy is i have not looked into family law yet. I'm sure somone here will be of more help
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
Could you resalvage your child's vessel from the government somehow to have claim instead of them?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
you have to be capable of 'backing up' what the document means when questioned. so if you really wanted to be like scott duncan, the only belief you would have is that YOU can litterally do anything your capable of, as long as it is within the common law, and you can explain to them, I KNOW NOTHING (now GFY (he says adressing the court) LOL
I am hankerin for a good telling off of government people infront of their comrads, all while smiling and having a good ole laugh at there expense knowing there is nothing they can do about it.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
"fuck you your a you i'm a me so who are you again?"
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Scott Duncan
Yes Jesse Alexander, you can. I've done it. It's only possible if BOTH parents agree.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159 · cut by a page breakPrinted copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 159 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
district court is roman (what) chancelor enforcing the emporers rule? cops are roman soldiers, sub-sub divisions a thousand years removed, different uniform, same job.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
roman district fantasy island, only were not the ones enjoying it, or are we? how about national kick a cop in the face day, only we make a cop do the kicking so they get to be on both sides and WE get entertained...
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
the more i figure out, the sicker i get.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Derek Hill
both parties agree to what? the mistake or the change in the order or whatever?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Scott Duncan
Why do you care? It will NEVER apply to you.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
it could be a new sporting event Dept. v. Dept
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Stuart Stone
Jesse Alexander, the thread titled: 'Adam Thomas explains how REAL REMEDY lies with the Bills of Exchange Act and AMENDING the ORDERS of Judges/Justices with it- thread. . . . . ' talks about amending orders & there are sections relating to the family court...long read but worth it
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 160 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 19
Scott Duncan
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 158
Carl Dunne
Scott Duncan
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
Carl Dunne
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
Carl Dunne
J.P. Alexander · Jesse Alexander
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159
Scott Duncan
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 159 · cut by a page break
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
Derek Hill
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
Scott Duncan
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160
Stuart Stone
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 160