The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 27, 2013 12:36 AM

Scott Duncan

Still in a theist-bashing mood, I shall now thin the herd!

OBEY THIS RULE ...lest you feel a sharp tingling sensation.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 940
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 940 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 35

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

Attack on scientific theory? Heh, "theory". Isn't scientific theory an oxymoron like sovereign citizen? As far as I remember theory is just a belief that might possibly conclude in fact. Maybe. I can't wait to see all the posts where science itself proves their own facts wrong.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 942
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 942 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Science is MISNAMED. It should be called "REALITY".

We comprehend reality and document it, and that is Science in a nutshell.

You don't get to Science-bash, while using a computer. :P

The METHOD is what makes science WORK. You are using a processor that has more switches than there are stars in the galaxy. Think about that. THAT is what Science does. When you use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD you ALWAYS arrive at the right answer eventually.

http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/overview_scientific_method2.gif

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 942
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 942 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Since Bildo Schmildo thinks "Theory" is something guys in labcoats scribble on napkins, let's look at the difference between THEORY and HYPOTHESIS.

BTW, if anyone wants to raise "it's just a theory" after I explain this, then I want you to go to the tallest building, step off, and think "Gravity is just a theory" and keep an open mind all the way down.

Here in REALITY, a THEORY is proposed for PEER REVIEW, when you cannot DISPROVE the hypothesis. If you have a HYPOTHESIS, your ONLY thoughts should be to DISPROVE the hypothesis.

When you have exhausted your own capabilities, you INVITE OTHERS TO DISPROVE the hypothesis.

Science is BASED ON DOUBT. That's why there is no such thing as a "Climate Scientist". It's a scam. A TRUE "Climate Scientist" WANTS to be challenged. Especially if they are seeing bad things ahead.

Look at the name we are often called: Conspiracy THEORIST and our Conspiracy THEORIES...meaning they cannot disprove the hypothesis posed...

...it's actually pretty accurate.

But then you want the THEORY Challenged. The idiot with the "open mind" wouldn't mind the THEORY of Gravity challenged as they fall to their deaths from the tall building I told them to step off.

Anyone with a THEORY must ALSO have a condition that they would concede the theory is DIS-PROVED.

If, one of those idiots who step off the building with an "open mind" suddenly flies like tinkerbell, then THEY WIN. Gravity is WRONG, and back to the drawing board...

That is Science in its most basic form. LEARN IT. it will TEACH YOU TO THINK!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 943
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 943 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

As far as I remember theory is just a belief that might possibly conclude in fact. Yes, that is what I said. THEORY is proposed for PEER REVIEW, when you cannot DISPROVE the hypothesis. Peer review invites others who might doubt the theory, and/or the hypothesis to experiment and find positive or negative results. I don't see the problem here. Napkins? Yes, they do use those if there is nothing else handy to write on at the moment. I've watched it done.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 944
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 944 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I think it would be prudent to assume that "christians are too stupid to see the irony of science-bashing on a computer" is a PRESUMED Fact, unless very compelling evidence contradicts this theory.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 944
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 944 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

i have a theory, the space shuttle exploded in 1986 and i bought a silver ounce commemorative today that says that, for a twenty dollar debt note. my theory is that the guy i got it from probably paid only fifteen for it earlier today (he said it came in thismorning). so he probably made in theory 5bucks and i'm happy because it dillutes the 34 dollar ounce i bought last year by 7. (ofcourse i bought a lot more than that last year, but you guys cant probably do that kind of math... (LOL)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 944
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 944 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

My next hound is going to be called 'snapper' or 'snatch'.

GET OUT OF THAT... insert either of the above. Hounds ALWAYS go straight for the gold with every female in the vicinity. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 945
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 945 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

On another COMPLETELY UNRELATED, but VERY important topic...

ALWAYS Remember your "Safe" word.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/s843x403/1005562_10151454097821927_1040105240_n.jpg

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 945 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 945 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

Received that email this morning :/

Pierre

Why do people commit evil acts?

Sometimes it's simply because they're twisted.

Sometimes it's something else and that something else is pervasive and scary.

An experiment that shows how evil quickly becomes normalized.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/23712.html

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 946
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 946 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top