Jun 25, 2013 12:32 AM

Thanks to Chief yesterday for this nugget (i know-i know, 'Clubhouse Rules') :P

“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . .” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299.

http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/tag/u-s-v-tweel/

ChiefRock also added yesterday, that when in court once, he told the Justice- "Public jurisdiction doesnt have any authority over private agreements..." The answer the Justice gave to that?. . ."You are right" ;)

'Wise-man' once told me about enforcing an ESTOPPEL and/or private agreement- "...you can post PUBLIC NOTICE on facebook or Google+, or, if you really want to seal-the-deal, better yet- put your PUBLIC NOTICE in the classifieds of the newspaper, what do you think a 'Legal Notice' is for?...its to put something into the PUBLIC RECORD. . .and for 3 days would be sufficient"

DOCTRINE OF LACHES:

a common law doctrine that states that the neglect or failure to institute an action or lawsuit within a reasonable time period, together with prejudice suffered by the other party as a result of the delay, will result in the BARRING of the action

Derek Moran does it matter how they deny. I send affidavit to be rebutted. they don't swear out an affidavit but just send a letter stating that all statements, comments and allegations are specifically denied and no admissions are made or agreed to whatsoever pursuant to this document and its contents. Would that qualify as a denial?

With this statement could that be applied to lawyers that did not say or do anything during a cps court BS for over a year?Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.

Theres a MAXIM that lends itself to affidavits that says basically- "First in time, first in line"...an affidavit says that you are willing to sacrifice being punished for perjury by affirming one out. The fact that the other side didnt, should tell you something about their intentions...

thanks Derek Moran. I like the first in time, that is so very true. And I was just double checking about the letter, cause they seem to think that just because they write it that is so. And I will be one happy bitch when i prove them wrong.

The cps lawyer loves spounting his proper procedure bull shit. But his wont be proper procedure when we get to the supreme court of nova scotia.