Jun 24, 2013 8:11 PM

i think your correct scott ,

OF COURSE I'm correct. (DuuuH!) :P

scott is cool ,

i am greatfull for his info / insight , he is correct , he knows it , thats cool ,

the best 1 was the cluster fuck to victory a few months back , I dont want to give you a big head (well a bigger 1) but that was cool , Scott was cool ,

Ashley Hamaluk: I can say with absolute certainty that this forum is the ONLY place where you have received VALUE of any sort, regarding the Law and "Legal" matters.

Now, now much did you pay for it?

Now ask yourself how much you got out of it?

See if you can work out proportionately, exactly how little right you have to criticise. :P

In the end, I am the one who has paid, and WILL pay the price. Disagree all you want, reality doesn't care, and I have NO tolerance for non-reality.

...and I defy you to substantiate any position you may "disagree" with. It's educational to the reader, and gives me a chance to look REALLY stupid. EVERYONE WINS!

...so do tell, Ashley Hamaluk, what has this mean old Scottish Noble said, that you "disagree" with? :D

*jeopardy music*

...hmmm. If a guy with a prorogued title and a crappy little forum on Facebook can silence you, why do you think you even stand a chance in the real world? :P

"...a prorogued title..." - My John Hall 'admiralty-book' mentioned, "...a court of admiralty NEVER interferes where a TITLE is in controversy"....hmmmmmmmmm :/

If kick a cop in the face day was only to come around once a year i propose so we can break up the year another "kick those who don't think cops should be kicked in the face in the face day"

Prorogued = "Technical Difficulties, please stand by"...

Well, Carl Dunne, you just endorsed violence against somebody who "THINKS" something...

...and you're OK with that?

They support those that would commit violence on me and should be treated the same and would walk by as i'm being assaulted because the perpatraitors wear a uniform should i not see them as equally the problem i find it hard not to.

Title-in-controversy = court-of-admiralty wouldnt touch you then presently even IF you had done something wrong? :/

Would not the punishment have to fit the TITLE as well as the crime?

I will add i would rather no one got kicked in the face at all just as i'd rather not being a slave but the reality of the situation doesn't allow that.

Can I have a "prorogued" Title ???.....please... :(

Fuck I'm begging again....this begging shit is planted in me :/

Carl Dunne, you are advocating the very "thought crime" concept, that those who are in "authority" think is THEIR right to "police". Perhaps you are looking for a government job! :D

Don't become what you behold.

"They support those that would commit violence on me " means every Muslim on the planet falls under that category... Should violence be inflicted on them?

If being a stupid moron who believes stupid shit is suddenly a justification for violence, should I start killing off the Christians?

No?

Can you see the slippery slope "thought crime" sends you down?

I never thought of killing christians or muslim, but since it's forbiden to lie here, I will admit seeing me, in my fucked-up MIND, beat the shit out of a few of those....PLEASE FORGIVE ME... :( (especially those child molesters....I can't stand those)

Those who actually harm others are FAR different than those who "think" about harming others. The fact that you think there is no difference, is the same mentality the government has. Perhaps YOU want a government job, Pierre?

No, I don't want a government job, but, indeed, I was trained good for it....

I do see your point Scott Duncan but is them supporting what cops do when presented with evidence to the contrary no better than a blind belief that they are infallible. I have been assaulted numerous times by these people and the response i get from people is well you must of annoyed them somehow by asking the wrong questions or being "cheeky". To me those people are no better than those sympathetic to religious beliefs as even clear cut evidence does not change their position. I think the government would rather pack it all in than have me around i make a terrible servant. I am applying the logic of you can either be the problem or the solution and things cannot change while people view these people as infallible and are "only doing their job". This is obviously something i think wrong about but i find it hard not to as people walk by and watch and do nothing perhaps when it happens to them their mindset will be different.

Good thing I've quit school at a young age, and never get this high school diploma, and had to work to eat, who knows, I would maby be a crazy government agent ..???

...and there are at least ten ass-wipes in the Free-dumb movement who think I should be harmed because I call them adults with imaginary friends!

Reality SHOWS that they are delusional, and there is a LOT of evidence supporting this position... but they ignore it, and wish me harm.

Same thing? :P

How many humans were killed in these past 300 years ???...because of ATHEISTS....

None. I know of NO killing "in the name of atheism".

So it's surely NOT the same thing ?....

yes but the rest of the movement would not stand back and watch (hopefully) and those that did would be as guilty as the perpatrator no ? Some people think these guys have a right to do whatever they want because they wear a uniform and that is as wrong as the one doing it as they will always do it because of the support they have from believers. I would not stand by and watch them assault anyone i do not fear them if there were more like me it would not be a problem. I don't think anyone deserves violence brought upon them in an ideal world but passive only gets you being the one kicked by these power hungry animals. I do see what you're saying i can accept i am thinking wrong here and your comments have shown me a flaw but my position has come from years of abuse so it's hard to dismiss based on what you have said up till now how else can we stop them?

Kill the people who give the orders, comes to mind, but that just opens the door for the next, even worse douchebag to replace him, so it's not practical.

The fact that you notice there is a problem is a good sign, but I have no solution for you. I'm just the messenger.

Every day, I ponder slitting the throats of those who have harmed me, and those I care about, in the past year> I think I would enjoy it...

...but I will enjoy it more when I pull the whole thing down. That's the thing; despite the fact that every government official will label ANYONE who questions authority as "crazy", I know I'm not.

I also know that because I am a thinking, rational man, I can say with certainty that if I think someone should be dead 5 years after the fact, then they probably should be... and it's a foregone conclusion that OTHERS feel the same way.

I call this 5 year waiting period, "Padding the suspect list".

...and police only "solve" 40% of homicides, and the ones they DO get are mostly confessions. If they don't have their suspect in the first 2 days, they probably never will. I like to have at least 5 suspects ahead of me...that will take FAR longer than 48 hours to investigate...and no real result.

Need to kill? Wait 5 years.

Mathematic :D

Especially lawyers, they seems to have more enemies than the average man :/

Exactly. When you harm strangers for a living, it's pretty hard to seek out the "guilty" party.

If Levitt were killed by someone, I'd drop misleading hints directing cops to me, just to give the guy some time to get away! :D

HAHAHA!!!.....wise...lol..lol.. :D

Very true it WILL be much more enjoyable watching these people scramble to safety when their whole world crumbles around them and they finally figure out they were never in the club and are just slaves with extra privileges. Your logic there is flawless as always (Y). I have often told others to step back and just watch their enemies unravel themselves because they always do. I find it hard to take my own advice through impulsiveness and my hatred of these people that is something i need to work on. 5 years eh ;)

If you are going to do something, DO IT RIGHT! :D

Penitentiaries are for the "worst criminal offenders", because the BEST criminal offenders... don't get caught :P

For the public record i have no intention of doing any such things this is a hypothetical conversation :D

Entertainment purpose only.... :D

mine's for "educational and/or re$earch purposes". :D

Yes we're all about the education here at the tender for law :)

Perhaps they would approve of it if it was not in the face but say the crotch? Would you say a face gives higher points than the crotch? Wow, this could be a really sweet reality game-show! We should call Jeff Probst!!!

I'd totally watch that show! :D