The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 24, 2013 7:52 PM

Scott Duncan

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT!

...oh wait.

Supreme Court Bombshell: No Right to Remain Silent

thenewamerican.com

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that a suspect's silence can be used to infer guilt. By Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1328
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1328 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_529112897124647
Unique Facebook User ID:
927379467328526
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
link
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 17

Scott Duncan

It's acquiescence. That is NOT an agreement. It's submission. ;)

Agreements have terms.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1329 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1329 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

David Johansen

is not that ruling in controversy with the 1974 privacy act?

does this mean the cops can knock on your door and if you do not answer they can presume you are guilty of whatever they want to make up for a reason for being there in the first place?

AND if your not home (not answering) they can use that as an excuse to bust in to look for you? and any evidence to use against you for anything?

he has a balloon! he might be gonnah try sneaking cocain into a jail! we gotta arrest him...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1330
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1330 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

So the PEOPLE in the government that was CHARTERED "FOR THE PEOPLE, AND BY THE PEOPLE" can't challenge the constitutionality of a law that CLEARLY violates it.

...The United States is doomed.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1330 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1330 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: I love THIS gem: "cannot demonstrate that the future injury they purportedly fear is certainly impending and because they cannot manufacture standing by incurring costs in anticipation for non-imminent harm."

REALLY? They couldn't look at a HISTORY BOOK?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1331
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1331 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top